User talk:AVRS/Archive 4

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-sq.png

Hello AVRS! Please upload a new version for this file. See the discussion at sq.wikipedia. Thanks! --Olsi (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done. --AVRS (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! --Olsi (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Needing assistance / advice

Hello AVRS,

recently I found that lots of images uploaded by Shawnee (talk · contribs) are published on other sites using google image search. Therefore I requested permission or at least clarification on the talk-page but I am not sure whether he/she will understand it. So if the user - who probably only speeks ru - has questions, would you help me answering them please? Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 00:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

So, now I have the predicted problem. Can you help? Translator: "I tried to create one as it was written but I did not succeed but I say these photos from my computer"

Could you ask the user, what "my computer means"? Thank you very much. -- RE rillke questions? 15:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your efforts. -- RE rillke questions? 11:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, too. --AVRS (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

thanks for File:Carnavalitoo.ogv

Hallo AVRS, just wanted to say thank you for your help at File:Carnavalitoo.ogv (and the dupe). Do you really think we need both file versions? ~10% bitrate is not really significant. I would upload the bigger version on top of the smaller one. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:17, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Mozilla-thunderbird-2.0-fr.png

Hi. I think I got the license tags right for this one, as I'm going over the files subcategorizing at Category:Screenshots of Mozilla Thunderbird. I don't necessarily modify licensing for every file that I subcategorize, just that this time the topmost template caught my attention. -Mardus (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I think it wasn’t about trademark, but about copyright. Firefox logo is MTL since version 3.5, but it was also modified then. I don’t remember about Thunderbird. --AVRS (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, Thunderbird has been trademarked, too, and Firefox logo requirements are very likely to apply in a very similar fashion; otherwise Icedove (for Thunderbird) and IceApe (SeaMonkey) wouldn't have happened. -Mardus (talk) 04:07, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

In the past (before Firefox 3.5), the logos were not just trademarked (as they still are), but also not released under any free copyright license. --AVRS (talk) 12:42, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:Triskelion

Consult User_talk:AVRS/Archive_3#Category:Invisible Pink Unicorn... AnonMoos (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Why do you think it does not replace interwikis? It provides links to the same Wikipedia articles, but at the same time it helps those who search images using words in their languages; the only other way for that to work is through links from other projects, which search engines may consider different sites, and thus give the links different priorities.

Maybe you think the links in my template should be to the Commons gallery?

--AVRS (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Interwikis are somewhat separate from ordinary links, and have their own rules, and are often automatically patrolled and maintained by interwiki-bots etc. Your template may be a lot more convenient for user to click on to go to a Wikipedia article in the language of their choice, but it does not replace interwikis (no bot is going to automatically add new languages to your template, for one thing...) AnonMoos (talk) 19:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Ah, OK, thanks. Do the bots add interwikis pointing to categories, too? --AVRS (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Originally they would only update and add to interwikis on Commons categories if these pointed to categories (not to article pages) on the Wikipedias, but this has changed in the past year. See [1] etc. AnonMoos (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Re:Orientation of File:Wien Schatzkammer Deutscher Orden - Kris.jpg

The orientation of this image is correct now. -- Xenophon (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо за скрытие

Спасибо. Я попробовал искать какой-то способ скрывать, да не нашёл.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Russian FOP cases

When you add a category to a DR, please use the following form.

<noinclude>[[Category:Russian FOP cases]]</noinclude>

If you do not use the noinclude pair, the category is transcluded into every appearance of the DR, which means that both the daily log and the archives will be put into the category as well as the DR. This triples the size of the category and makes it both harder and slightly slower to use.

This is true for all DR categories, both "... FOP cases" and "Undelete in 20XX".

Thanks,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Ouch. Thanks. --AVRS (talk) 12:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for all the cleanup -- are you using AWB? If not, perhaps you should be.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I am not (it is for the wrong platform; I probably should try a bookmarklet for the simple parts); but I am checking the years for Undelete categories. What do you think of making a template that would be used like {{Russian FOP case|2019|2024|2050}}? And possibly “Undelete” subcategories by country. --AVRS (talk) 16:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmm. I like to keep things simple -- I'm all in favor of the "Undelete in 20xx" categories -- it certainly makes it easy each January 1. I'm not sure why you would want them by countries. I'd keep the dates separate from the country. Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

A country’s copyright term lengths can change separately from others, and are calculated separately, so that you can check the files of a particular country to be undeleted, keeping its laws in mind (e.g. if the year can be wrong, like the 50 vs 70 vs 74 years for Russia). --AVRS (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I understand your reasoning -- I'd balance the small likelihood of a national change in copyright term against having to determine the applicable country (usually easy, but not always) and type out the more complex category. I might do it for selected countries, particularly ones that don't use the now general 70 years.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't think I understand what you mean by "{{Russian FOP case|2019|2024|2050}}". Why use a template?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

So that a bunch of code with noinclude is not needed (multiple categories; also, the category has been added in the middle of the discussion), and if there country-specific subcategories are added/removed, the template can automate that. --AVRS (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Can you do that? What you're proposing is that Template:A, including Category:B, is going to be transcluded into DR:C, which will be included in Category:B, but that Category:B will not be active when C is transcluded into the log.

Yes, maybe if you used subst: on the template, it would work. I'd have to try it to be sure. If it works, it's a good idea -- I've left messages like the one that started this thread maybe ten times and I know that's only some of them. Also, of course, you understand transclusion -- many of our colleagues don't. A template would make it a lot easier -- and, as you suggest, pick up the country and the year at the same time. If you had the country, then I think I would use the death year, not the undelete year, so that on January 1, the person doing undeletions in the country would have only to delete the oldest remaining year -- that eliminates possible mistakes by the person adding the template.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

CFD on cat:Pictures_and_images and similar

As someone who has edited Category:Pictures and images and some of its subcats, please see the (non-) discussion (not) going on at Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/02#Category:Pictures and images (and the 9 nominations following it), if you haven't already, and comment there if you wish. Thanks. - dcljr (talk) 01:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

File:AT-12 Guardsman.jpg

Здравствуйте. Я поторопился с лицензией на изображение. Задал вопрос на форуме в вики и последовал первому ответу... а там, оказывается не всё так просто. В данный момент мной отослан запрос на уточнение лицензии. А пока можно ли как-то, не удаляя изображение, "прикрыть" его или поставить предупреждение что бы временно файл не использовали? На неделю примерно, а там или придёт ответ или... придётся удалять картинку. --Ze-dan (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --AVRS (talk) 08:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mediagoblin 0.2.1 ascii art.png

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2

over good correction, check me now again please

Thank you very much for your advise.I was seeing help topics again.I get a massive attack long time ago over the importance of images in Wiki Commons even though it could be that also it has been received by anonymous identity.It seems that although English is not a communication barrier, if it's not my native language, not comes to be the one used for writing, but understandable in my case seems to be the same or perhaps well seemed. Anyway I hope you understand that the incursion is alienating and massive, and finally remove the block but here will be to ask another, I'm not even angry with anyone for any posible impression.Please a new

check in Skapheandros (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC) A bit best Thanks for everything again.Skapheandros  ^{talk to me}

Description on Category:FidoNet

Hi. I don't know why the description was removed from Category:FidoNet. FidoNet is almost all BBSes, isn't it? File:Fidonodes.PNG is number of nodes (mostly BBSes?); File:Ftn.png is how messages go from FidoNet to the BBS; File:Ron Dwight self-portrait.gif, File:Sysopka2009.JPG, and File:Tom Jennings.jpg are all sysops. (I copied Esperanto from FidoNet and BBS, so it might be wrong and I wouldn't know. But the English description I wrote myself.) --Closeapple (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi.

As you can see from File:Ftn.png, for an FTN, BBS software is only an interface to read/write messages or download files from file echoes.

Most FidoNet nodes left were and probably are in Russia, and most didn’t have BBSes anymore. I doubt the nodes of many of the sysops at File:Sysopka2009.JPG have BBSes, or even “Web BBSes” (not sure Google Groups can be counted as an example of one).

File:Fidonodes.PNG is only about listed FidoNet nodes, not point systems, not BBSes (including or not including “Pvt” ones). IIRC, they don’t even have to provide point addresses, the only technical requirement for non-Pvt nodes is that hey can be contacted using FTN software; I think “Pvt” was used for IP-only nodes.

--AVRS (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Прошу согласовать администрирование

Так как "User:PierreSelim" и "User:Jameslwoodward" (и им подобные) не знают историю и специфику жизни в СССР и стран СНГ. Много уходит времени и усилий на объяснение им элементарного (тривиального), что понятно русскоязычным пользователям из бывшего СССР и СНГ. Они мои цифровые файлы (с Кибер-Шот) фото с "Доски почёта" (Tafel der Besten) для статьи о провинциальном Аркадаке Саратовской обл. России трактуют как "Панорама", мои фотографии как "профессиональные" (якобы не моя собственность). А переданные мне лично чёрно-белые фотографии из семейного альбома однофамильцев (для оформления в Википедии биографии их родственника) - опять как профессиональные. Хотя я в юношестве (и многим другим известно) ч/б фото делали в квартире собственными руками (без лицензий): 36 мм плёнка с полифным покрытием, лампа с увеличительным стеклом, проявитель, фиксаж, сушка и т.д. из подробностей получения фотографий с фотоаппарата "Зенит". Они глупо трактуют правила Википедии, доводят до абсурда (не советуют какой шаблон лицензию применить в моей ситуации), а сразу с ригоризмом ставят шаблон "удалить" - они играют с правилами (Википедия:Не доводите до абсурда). В результате "User:Jameslwoodward" злоупотребляя своей виртуальной властью заблокировал мой ай-пи адрес (идентификатор блокировки — 99664). Самое интересное, что на многие мои файлы также ставили шаблон "удалить", хотя сделаны они мною с моего сканера, с ксерокопий старинных книг и карт изд. до 1917 г., которые я брал лично в библиотеках и архивах (о чём имею абонемент, квитанции оплаты и др. юр. свидетельства). Прошу мои файлы и переписку вести со мной тем, кто знает русский язык, имеет опыт жизни в СССР или СНГ. Они не понимают тривиального и элементарного - у нас фотографии делали дома, ретушировали, делали художественное нанесение изображений через трафареты или посредством частичного нанесения проявителя, делали художественную обрезку и т.п. (это и я делал). Это вовсе не означает, что фото из ателье профессиональные и другой автор, а не я. Они не знают элементарного по истории СССР, что воен.форма в СССР была ведена в 1943 г., и на моем фото этот период. Тот кто прислал мне это фото - это его правнук (он мне передал через электронную почту свою родословную подтверждающую его степень родства). У них в голове вообще нет мысли, что это такое. Я заметил - ОНИ НЕ ЗНАЮТ РУССКОГО ЯЗЫКА И НЕ СПОСОБНЫ АНАЛИЗИРОВАТЬ мои файлы с текстами и т.п.. Поэтому прошу, чтобы между собой решили кому и кого администрировать. С уважением --Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Лучше обратитесь на форум, я сейчас столько не прочитаю.

Ваши сообщения на английском не похожи на «en-5», если считать «en-5» больше «en-4», «en-3» и т. п.

В случае с Commons:Deletion requests/File:Family Krupski M. A..jpg Jameslwoodward, может быть, использует кажущуюся ему профессиональность как дополнительную причину для необходимости разрешения.

--AVRS (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Про «панораму» — это из немецкого, относится к производным произведениям, см. Commons:Freedom of panorama и ru:Свобода панорамы. --AVRS (talk) 17:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Renaming file

Please, rename my file "File:This is a logo owned by University of Kragujevac for Faculty of Economics in Kragujevac.jpg" into "File:CoA Technical Faculty Čačak". I have made a mistake and want to rename it but don't know how. As you are administrator, you would probably know how to.. Thanks --AirWolf (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

You’ve uploaded the file to English Wikipedia, not here: en:File:This is a logo owned by University of Kragujevac for Faculty of Economics in Kragujevac.jpg. You can use the template en:Template:Rename media to request rename there, and {{Rename}} at Commons. --AVRS (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Переводы

Finis Africae. Спасибо. А перевод конференции останется на потом.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Cessna C-78 (N41759 (cn 5807)).jpg

Здравствуйте. Можно ли как-то изменить название файла? А то я только после загрузки заметил ошибку... Правильно будет так: Cessna UC-78 (N41759 (cn 5807)).jpg --ze-dan (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done. {{Rename}}. --AVRS (talk) 13:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:PD-Russia

Уважаемый администратор, помогите, пожалуйста, разобрать данную категорию (практически все файлы вынесены на удаление). См. также User talk:Russavia#Template:PD-Russia. Alex Spade (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Author Víctor Casasola

Извините, не посмотрите запрос на Commons:Deletion requests/Author Víctor Casasola, а то FSII то ли забил, то ли забыл, а хочется какого-то итога в конце концов.--Mexicanec (talk) 21:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Iran RQ-170 photogrammetry.png

Здравствуйте. По-моему едва ли этот файл может иметь свободную лицензию так как исходники для него (два скрина) защищены АП. Хотя может я ошибаюсь. --ze-dan (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Приступ подозрительости :-)

Здравствуйте, это опять я :-) . Можно ли как-то тактично поинтересоваться откуда конкретно берёт фотографии пользователь RuthAS? На этот вопрос меня толкнуло следующее: File:Aero Talleres Boero edited-1.jpg и http://www.airliners.net/photo/Aero-Boero-AB-95/1768635 А если на айрлайнес это он и есть, то почему бы для предупреждения подобных моему недопониманий ему бы не оформить разрешение OTRS? --ze-dan (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Russavia, участник OTRS, просил её загрузить некоторые из файлов. Лучше к нему и обратиться. --AVRS (talk) 19:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I've added the whole discussion in the Administrators' noticeboard. Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

No

I chopped it out of a YouTube clip. Will I just give credit to Google, since I can't remember which one? Ranunculoid (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Required Your Attention

Hi. I recently saw you have posted an image in Wikimedia Commons regarding Mozilla Firefox i.e, File:Mozilla Firefox logo 2013.png, anyways i saw there that you have reverted the image uploaded by an user by the name Nclm tagging as "the first version is assumed free because it is in the source code, like the previous logo was when it was declared free".

Your sentence might be true, but does this apply to the image which was uploaded by another user named TheMostAmazingTechnik replacing my uploaded image ? i.e, File:IOS 7 Logo.png, if yes, you are requested to make changes to it.

Thanks. Himanis Das  talk 10:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi.

I don't know.

The Firefox logo in Firefox is released under a free license. I do not allow uninformed assumptions by myself and by others that a bigger version is free, but I have no non-Mozilla arguments other than the precautionary principle: I have no idea about what amount of additional information is non-free, and what exactly is copyrighted (if anything but author's death date is exact in copyright).

File:IOS 7 Logo.png is different: it is probably not released under a free license, but it is assumed to be below the threshold of originality, and is so simple that it could probably be vectorized almost in your head, so maybe a twice bigger version does not really contain any additional information.

--AVRS (talk) 11:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:GNU screenshots

Hi! My feeling is that we should rename this category: Screenshots by GNU packages which could have categories like Screenshots of GNU GCC, Screenshots of GNU GDB, etc… What do you think? Does this sounds okay? English is not my native language, so I prefer to ask… genium ⟨✉⟩ 14:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Do you mean to avoid confusion with "Windows screenshots", which is for screenshots where Windows' window manager decorations are visible?

"GCC" already has "GNU" in it: Category:GNU Compiler Collection.

--AVRS (talk) 12:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

No, my English is bad, I meant Screenshots of GNU packages by name with Screenshots of this or that… in it, but I'm not sure now. I don't understand if it's better to say "screenshots of something" or "something screenshots". My thinking was to organize later the "Category:GNU" like this: GNU packages by name, GNU people by name, Screenshots of GNU packages by name, GNU licenses by name, but I'm not sure now, maybe this wording is not the best. We have time anyway, it's probably better for me to watch what others will do… genium ⟨✉⟩ 13:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. --AVRS (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Mozilla_Public_License_2.0_and_templates

Hi, When you marked the section Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Mozilla_Public_License_2.0_and_templates for not archiving, you wrote the time 15:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC). I was just wondering if this was a typo or your intention is in fact for it to be there for 10 years? (I suspect the former, but I guess it's better to be sure :)). In kind regards, Henrik/heb [T C E] 09:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, that’s just the template’s default. --AVRS (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. :D All the best to you, too! --AVRS (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year

So 2013 ended with many ups and downs, starting from the release of blockbuster movies, new OSs, gadgets, cars and bikes, improve in social networking etc to meeting new friends, improving our editing skills, forming new groups.

But it also brought sad movements like the death of Paul Walker, Nelson Mandela to Cyclones like Phailin, Haiyan etc.

Finally, I'd like to conclude that several ups and downs are must in every year but we must be fearless and have faith in divine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2014.

By

Himanis Das (Talk, Facebook me, Tweet me) 17:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Удалений фотографий

Здравствуйте, потому что часто нарушают авторские права моих фотографий я хочу удалить из Википедии или добавлять другие методы защиты фотографии. Как это возможно? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Cetatea_Sorocii.JPG https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Cetatea_Soroca.JPG https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Cetatea_Soroca.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Cetatea_Sorocii.jpg Заранее спасибо! С уважением, Вадим Штербате — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vadim Sterbate (talk • contribs) 12:08, 13 февраля 2014‎ (UTC)

(ссылки выше — на файлы, загруженные участником VadimS:

• File:Cetatea_Soroca.JPG,
• File:Cetatea_Soroca.jpg,
• File:Cetatea_Sorocii.JPG,
• File:Cetatea_Sorocii.jpg.

Участник также писал в румынской Википедии сообщения: ro:Discuție_Utilizator:Andrei_Stroe#Vreau_s.C4.83_.C8.99terg_fotografii_.C3.AEnc.C4.83rcate_anterior, ro:Discuție_Utilizator:Andrei_Stroe#fotografii_de_.C8.99tergere, — из машинного перевода которых может следовать, что он не понял, что разрешил.

)

Здравствуйте. (Я не юрист, так что ниже могут быть ошибки.)

Лицензия Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 позволяет использовать произведение в любых целях при условии, в частности, указания авторов и распространения копий и производных на совместимых условиях — Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0, или (в некоторых случаях) более новой. Отдельного разрешения на соответствующее условиям лицензии использование спрашивать не нужно (это основное свойство свободных лицензий).

Если условия лицензии нарушаются в пределах проекта Викимедиа, можете указать на это нарушителю или вынести производное без указания автора к удалению.

Несоблюдение условий лицензии вне проектов Викимедиа не может являться причиной к удалению файлов из самих проектов.

При несоблюдении условий нарушитель не имеет права использовать файл на условиях лицензии. В случае лицензий версии 4.0, он может получить это право, исправив нарушение в течении 30 дней после того, как узнал. Нарушение условий лицензии может быть нарушением законов об авторских или смежных правах (с учётом исключений в этих законах).

--AVRS (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear AVRS/Archive 4, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship

I'm sorry to see you resign. Thank you for your service as an administrator, and I hope you will continue your involvement with Commons as a regular contributor, if time permits. odder (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Просьба

Здравствуйте. Хотел бы обратится по поводу неадекватного бана моего аккаунта https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:%D0%AD%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%85 , без предупреждения и без весомых оснований. --5.254.243.165 14:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Здравствуйте. Я уже не администратор; со страницы удалили только раздел eo, а в ru осталось. --AVRS (talk) 10:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

File:ME 442 Permission.png

File:ME 442 Permission.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 11:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:ME 336 HitchYourWagon.png

File:ME 336 HitchYourWagon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 11:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:ME 342 Incentivize.png

File:ME 342 Incentivize.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 11:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:ME 398 Books.png

File:ME 398 Books.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 11:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:ME 439 OpenSource.png

File:ME 439 OpenSource.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 11:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Foobar2000 default.png

File:Foobar2000 default.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Codename Lisa (talk) 12:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)