Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 11 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Bergtocht_in_de_omgeving_van_bergdorp_S-charl_17-09-2019._(actm.)_46.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. Wooden door in the church of S-charl. (Detail)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
    I disagree. Slight underexposure, probably 1/2 f-stop. --Smial 10:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support looks better now, thx! -- Smial 12:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 22:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Hummingbird_in_Cotopaxi_National_Park.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ecuadorian hillstar (Oreotrochilus chimborazo) in Cotopaxi National Park, Ecuador --Bgag 00:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support OK to me --Podzemnik 00:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
    Not very sharp --Charlesjsharp 12:32, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Good capture, considering how much they move, but I have to agree with Charles. -- Ikan Kekek 10:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see relevant sharpness issues. The very small bird is very small depicted, but nearly every feather is recognizable. --Smial 12:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 23:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 22:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)