Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cocacola-5cents-1900 edit1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Cocacola-5cents-1900 edit1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2009 at 18:05:22
Info created by Hilda Clark - uploaded by Victorrocha - nominated by --190.31.24.146 18:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC) -- 190.31.24.146 18:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Support I'll agree with the Spaniards here. This is great. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)- Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 07:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Econt (talk) 11:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXXtalk 11:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Tiago Fioreze (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Sophus Bie (talk) 05:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Question Does anyone know what are those little crosses - under the girls chest, on the top of her hat, and on Coca-Cola amblem? --Lošmi (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- I believe they're something to do with aligning the layers during the reproduction process. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I taught that too, but they are usually (always?) printed outside of the picture, and cut out. Maybe it was different 100 years ago... --Lošmi (talk) 23:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Usually, but, well, if NASA can do it on Moon photos, I guess Coca-Cola can do it here. It has extremely good colouring for 1900 - most colour printing from that era is a lot more garish, or, at least, a lot less subtle. Maybe this made it more difficult, and so more crosses were needed? Who knows! Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, now that you mentioned, I remember that I saw them on Moon exploration pictures. I assumed that it has something with taking pictures in outer space. Assuming, of course, that it actually happened :) --Lošmi (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Usually, but, well, if NASA can do it on Moon photos, I guess Coca-Cola can do it here. It has extremely good colouring for 1900 - most colour printing from that era is a lot more garish, or, at least, a lot less subtle. Maybe this made it more difficult, and so more crosses were needed? Who knows! Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I taught that too, but they are usually (always?) printed outside of the picture, and cut out. Maybe it was different 100 years ago... --Lošmi (talk) 23:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I believe they're something to do with aligning the layers during the reproduction process. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Forgot to do this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --S. Martín (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose The crosses bother me. Lycaon (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Neutral I like it, but the crosses aren't that great. —kallerna™ 18:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. --Karel (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
