Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades

Nominación

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.

Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

{{Support}} ( Support),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info),
{{Question}} ( Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas

Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)

Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas

Featured picture candidates

File:Cartina della Toscana alla fine del tredicesimo secolo.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 08:41:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The historical events in 13th century Florence reflect the evolution of the municipal institutions present everywhere and demonstrate how, in reality, the facts were intertwined in the broader struggle between the Empire and the Papacy. Florence was established as a municipality during the 11th century and since then began to expand into the surrounding region. At the beginning, the government was of an aristocratic-consular type but evolved towards a podestarial government, also because the merchant class was developing. In the second half of the 13th century, popular governments alternated. The company had strong divisions. The "fat people", made up of nobles of feudal origin and rich merchants and bankers, were contrasted by the "small people", which included small artisans and shop workers. Even from a political point of view, there were divisions due to the presence of two opposing factions: the Guelphs and the Ghibellines, whose name was officially assumed in 1215. The Guelphs were pro-papal, while the Ghibellines were pro-imperial. Over time this distinction began to mask the rivalry between the noble families. Initially, the Ghibellines led by the Uberti family prevailed in Florence. However, their supremacy was ephemeral because in 1250 after the death of Frederick II, the Guelphs expelled the Ghibellines from the city. Ten years later, in 1260, in the battle of Montaperti, the Ghibellines achieved victory over the Guelphs, whose leaders were sent into exile, thus being able to resume government of the city. After various events, in 1289, the battle of Campaldino in which Florence, mostly Guelph, and Arezzo, mostly Ghibelline, faced each other saw the final defeat of the latter. The victory of the Guelphs did not put an end to the internal conflicts since, subsequently, the Guelphs divided into white Guelphs and black Guelphs. The former were more favorable to the Empire, supporting the idea that the Pope should not interfere in civil affairs, while the latter relied directly on the papal court, also encouraging its extension into Tuscany. In the following century, as happened in other parts of Italy, Florence began to incorporate the smaller municipalities (Pistoia, Cortona, Arezzo)
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courvite Isabelle Jbil NP 002.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 21:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae (Pratincoles and Coursers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing camouflage. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ammomane élégante Jbil.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 21:44:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billie Eilish at Pukkelpop Festival - 18 AUGUST 2019 (01) (cropped).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:11:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info Billie Eilish at 2019 Pukkelpop Music Festival which take place in Kiewit, Hasselt, Belgium. Created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Thomson200 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 16:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aix galericulata (Female), Richmond Park, UK - May 2013.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Too tight crop and overall not better than existing FPs of this species. Poco a poco (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes eudamippus Doubleday, 1843 - Great Nawab 8.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 11:03:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larus occidentalis (Western Gull), Point Lobos, CA, US - May 2013.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 19:19:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow 👌 Wolverine XI 21:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support focus and sharpness are incredible if you consider that the photo is from 2013. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think we should be providing a platform for images from someone that engages in copyleft trolling, would hate to see more small-time users extorted for €400+. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grey-headed Honeyeater 0A2A3929.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 18:54:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oxelaëre le porche en2018 l'église Saint-Martin.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 15:06:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info Oxelaëre (départment du Nord, France), portal of the St Martin's church decorated with medallions carved with effigies of King David represented with his harp on the left, and Saint Cecilia with a zither on the right
all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful symmetry.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed on the cornice. It seems there are stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs: Done correction of overprocessing on the cornice. Note that the church is a building of medieval origin built on an inclined plane File:Oxelaere Eglise Saint Martin (3).jpg. Best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 14:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I don't see any difference. The very first version had no problem with this. Here we can eaasely see the stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious and appealing composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:California State Capitol (top), NW view up.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info Northwest view upwards to the pediment, rotunda, and dome of the California State Capitol in Sacramento. I wanted to make the bright dome stand out well against a dark blue sky. The camera location was about 30 meters away from the building. Perspective distortion correction has been applied, more would look unnatural. What do you think, is the chosen gallery Architectural elements#Others appropriate or should Architecture/Exteriors#United States be chosen instead? I was a bit unsure, thanks in advance for your feedback. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The view upwards to the pediment and the dome with the flags in front of it was particularly impressive to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect symmetry, interrupted only by the banners proudly fluttering in the breeze, beautiful lateral light which emphasizes the three-dimensionality of the sculptures, great blue/white contrast which is, again, broken only by the banners. As the photo shows big parts of the building, I would favour Architecture/Exteriors#United States. – Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, Aristeas. I have updated the gallery accordingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great shot, well done. I'm just wondering, how many photos will you have tried? And..., if I may ask: with a slower exposure, would you have had flags motion and/or a brighter blue sky? I don't want to criticize your work, it's just curiosity. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Terragio67. My aim was to capture all the details of the white facade's structures in the bright light and contrast them well against a dark blue sky. A narrower aperture and longer exposure resulted in blown highlights and less detail on the white facade. In addition, I didn't have a tripod with me at the time. I took quite a few shots of this detail also at other ISO settings. But there are only three left because I deleted the most useless ones. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TY very much for your prompt reply. Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun fact, I had a similar idea in File:California State Capitol (top), NW view up dllu 2018.jpg but much worse lighting and I accidentally cut off the left corner. dllu (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The light has its charm: nice coloration by the evening light of the summer sun, too bad about the cut off left corner, dllu. I was just wondering why I hadn't seen this pretty shot in the category before, until I realized that you had just uploaded it yesterday :) -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Radomianin! I only uploaded it after seeing your nomination. Actually, that reminded me to go through my Sacramento pictures and I just uploaded File:Blue hour front view of California State Capitol dllu 2018.jpg as well! dllu (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good opportunity, very nice :) This shot is charming. Too bad there are people sitting in front of it, but that's hard to avoid on location. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Strong oppose~~ Strong support What a ~~dreadful~~ splendid photo of a ~~horrible~~ magnificent building! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwerin Castle (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the weather wasn't great, but I think the water reflection is a plus.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Water reflexion still works well. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Lovely photo. - Jmabel ! talk 00:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flock of gulls in Cape May (20662).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:56:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Leucophaeus
Info Thousands of gulls come to this beach just after high tide this time of year, just after all the horseshoe crabs have come ashore to lay their eggs. It's a feeding frenzy spectacle. At one point, something spooked them and they took to the air. We were standing out on a mud flat at the time and it sort of felt like they were circling us -- very loud and kind of surreal (and somehow we escaped without getting anything falling on us). This is my effort at capturing the chaotic moment, quickly snapping five frames for a panorama. The vast majority of these birds are laughing gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla), but there are several herring gulls, too, as well as Canada geese and mallards. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An impressive scene. Reminds me of a famous movie quote: “Have you ever seen so many seagulls? What do you suppose it is?” -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there are some stitching errors on birds (imo nothing serious). I would be happy to support, if they are addressed. -- Ivar (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for taking the time to annotate -- I'll look at this and fix tonight. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Iifar for spotting the flaws that I also missed, and thanks to Rhododendrites for the fixes that have improved the image. Unfortunately there are blue edge repetitions below the wings in many places. They resemble chromatic aberration, but apparently are not. Maybe you can do something about that. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment two birds left with half of the wing, one of them is small (and far away). -- Ivar (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Stitching photos is difficult and sometimes (as in this case) painful. So that everyone can appreciate your work, it would be nice to see the 5 individual photos. However, I'm curious to see the corrections you're making. --Terragio67 (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gray catbird watching hawk (42953).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Mimidae (Mockingbirds and Thrashers)
Info I was watching this gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) when a red-tailed hawk flew overhead. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arenal (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 120.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Trachiniformes
Info Sandperch (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Philippines. We have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wait, is it that a frog fish I see on the sea floor? Wolverine XI 18:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is so distracting. I can hardly see the subject. wait... Henrysz (talk) 03:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm impressed by the camouflaged creature. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Кронштадт, морской собор сверху зимой.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A successful aerial shot for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Jmabel ! talk 00:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and moody aerial shot! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit monotonous in colors, but quite good. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collection of historical CPUs.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 14:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info Focus-stacked image of a bunch of historical CPUs created by Martijn Boer - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What can I say...except that the crop is a little shaky. Wolverine XI 18:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 23:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support very cool Henrysz (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:14 de julio día de despedidas (29969735828).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 10:05:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created by San Fermin Pamplona Navarra - uploaded by Theklan - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (regretfully). Awkward crop and composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calidris Alba on one foot at Caspersen Beach.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 06:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Calidris
Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are 4 pictures already featured for this species, which show greater details of the plumage. Anyhow, this photo shows an interesting pose of the bird. The eye could have been sharper. Very nice picture. Maybe, my support will result just a moral one, but nice done! --Harlock81 (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloem van een Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea'. 30-05-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 05:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Onagraceae
Info Closed flower of a Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea' (Night bloomer) Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Казанский собор, колоннада 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 21:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Екатерина Борисова - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un pecheur rentre au port au lever du jour à kerkennah - vue large - tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 09:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info A fisherman returns to the port at daybreak in Kerkennah The photo was taken from a fishing tool used to catch octopus; created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What an innovative composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: would support if horizon is straightened; very impressive otherwise. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Skander zarrad: Please correct tilt as noticed above Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest people vote on the basis that the tilt will be sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning composition. --August Geyler (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different and nice. ★ 12:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! for an untilted version -- Radomianin (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Creative composition but the blurry foreground ruins it, sorry. Because it makes the whole image too busy and cluttered. Imagine the picture without these distracting elements, it would be much better. Although the contrejour is average, with lack of detail, poor contrasts, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive story-telling composition, linking natural objects, playing with the themes of sea, sun and fishing, rationally, consistently, at the same time transcending on several axes, effectively making it three-dimensional. Pleasant light and good technical quality. --Argenberg (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very much :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition --XRay 💬 18:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Charles, Argenberg, XRay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin, sorry. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 27.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 07:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info Coat of arms and portrait of Cardinal Augustin Bea, ceiling painting, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 20:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The yellow portions of the wing seem a bit too bright for me. (example). --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caldeira Grande 2023-02-25.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Cosmonaut in Portugal! World traveler! ★ 12:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portale della Chiesa di San Michele.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While I see this photo as a superior to full scale chapel (if you can't step further from the object — shoot the details), this picture is lacking wow and is blurred on the top. Maybe a QI but not a FP IMO, sorry. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like this composition with the oculus a lot better than the cropped alternative below, but unfortunately the sharpness is lacking as Красный mentioned. dllu (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info: square crop without the oculus. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbitistes constrictus BW 2023-09-11 16-20-45 FR.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or Bush Crickets)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 90 % of the picture is blurred because only the head is in focus. And the animal is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop doesn't sit right with me. Wolverine XI 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support In macro photography Sebring12Hrs if you don't stack images with different depths of field you can't have all the animal in focus especially if it is not parallel to the lens. The photo was taken at f13, he couldn't do better--El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You don't have as big a depth of field as you do with focus-stacking though this was not taken with a macro lens. The depth of field is worse if you get in too close. Naturally, an animal in profile will have more of its body in focus than this sort of threequarter view, but Orthoptera legs and Tettigoniidae antennae are very tricky. There is seldom a reason to crop off part of an animal unless the objective is a close up. In this case a tighter crop just to show the head would make it look better, but the head isn't especially sharp so it might not be worth it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was taken with a macro lens of this kind: https://www.grainlab.com/images/product_images/original_images/pen_f_28-50_1a.jpg and is done without focus stacking because it's a living animal in nature. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, yes it is. I've only done test photos using 50mm macro. I had to get too close, so not much good for the insect macros I take. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The animal was cut (leg and antenna), additionally the problem of depth of field, here you can see an image of a similar subject in focus and not cut --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the photo you mentioned the subject is parallel to the lens so that's normal. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this makes it easier to solve the depth of field problem but I was referring to the problem of not cutting the animal. Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (regretfully) – makes for a good QI and VI, but not FP with that specific crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment With this crop it would fail at VI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:004 Sunrise at Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tanzania
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good light and colors but nothing seems to be really in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas; very impressive when viewed in full size. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Wonderful composition, but low DoF. Why only f/5.6? --XRay 💬 18:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Tanzania

File:Forester kangaroo (Macropus giganteus tasmaniensis) juvenile hopping Esk Valley.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not a huge fan of the open field, but everything else works. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, kangaroo's mouths are adapted to cut grass really short, which is why their habitat often looks like a mown lawn. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Tasmania, at least. In the mainland, it's fairly normal to see kangaroos in dense bushland. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tanzania and Tasmania! ★ 13:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where is Tanzania coming from? Wolverine XI 18:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination above. ★ 20:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-06-01 09-15-09 FortDuLomont.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh light at right. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor technically with very bad lighting. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-06-01 10-07-04 FortDuLomont.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There're many lens flares on the photo. ★ 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical issues. Blown highlights, blue flares, lack of sharpness in the corners-- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anguila listón azul (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 60.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pie grieche grise.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Light painting round left move.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: Wow factor? ★ 16:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Am I crazy? I don't think this is a photograph at all.. Look at how the lines differs in thickness when they're being stretched VS when being compressed... this is just a bunch of lines with a swirl filters on it and blending layers Henrysz (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel strange bc everyone is supporting this and I can't understand why. This picture seems like a very distorted image from my IR heat camera. I'm with Henrysz here. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:-i---i- (22414622307).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
Info created by Lunna Campos - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Symmetrical impression could be better. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course, but the arrangement of the elements doesn't appear to be symmetrical, so there's not much to do. ★ 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think a more describing file name would be appreciated --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per COM:I: "Images should have a meaningful file name [...] and have an accurate description on the file page" -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Henrysz (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of Gustave Doré by Nadar, between 1856 and 1858.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --August Geyler (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecokathedraal, 29-04-2024 (actm.) 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition! Henrysz (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balzender-Blauer-Pfau-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zebramanguste-Mungos-Mungo-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rainbow (17659375763).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
Info Ruben Andon: Make up, Body art & hair: Barbara Rizzuti
Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Rainbow? No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Perfectly in time for June :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. Wolverine XI 10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: there are a bunch of artifacts along the upper edge of the table that need to be fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True there's a weird rectangle and an unexplainable blurred orange zone close to it. I will support again once it's fixed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement done (3rd editing) (SwissTransfer link) @Jeff G., Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I have removed the above mentioned artifacts and probably unnatural appearing editing marks. If you are satisfied with the improvement after checking, you are welcome to use this version for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I uploaded the version edited by Radomianin. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for your improvements, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escalators at the train station in Helsinki airport.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not exceptional in any way. Wolverine XI 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Nice but tilted at the top. ★ 00:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The roof. ★ 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.

Support ★ 15:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Cart for the clarification! Yes, the ceiling is crooked, though I think that this is because the roof is crooked ;) --Plozessor (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support after clarification. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clean work on a difficult object. Thanks to Cart for the analysis :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I can see where Remedy Entertainment got inspiration for the Oldest House... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting contemporain architecture with concrete and space, and not easy to capture without any people. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Sebring12Hrs --MB-one (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the disruptive moiré on the escalators and the cut-off entrance are removed, I am also in favour.--Ermell (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermell: Don't want to remove the entrance because it would kill the symmetry of the upper part, but I managed to reduced the moiré at least. --Plozessor (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandnes City Map.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 09:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created and uploaded by Kevinpaulscarrott - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This has got to be one of the best city directory maps created by a Commons user out there. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most maps of larger areas are outdated as soon as they are published. --Cart (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is fine, but nowhere near today's FP standards. Wolverine XI 18:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kue Lapis.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
Info created and uploaded by Shitadevi - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've made an attempt at machine translation but it's up to native speakers to fix it. dllu (t,c) 22:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding. --MB-one (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- J.Stalin S ^Talk 19:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Formalidades

Nominación

Crear una nueva nominación

Para votar

Reglas

Propuestas

Featured picture candidates

Alternative

File:004 Sunrise at Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

File:2024-06-01 09-15-09 FortDuLomont.jpg, not featured

File:2024-06-01 10-07-04 FortDuLomont.jpg, not featured

File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)

File:Sandnes City Map.png, not featured

File:Kue Lapis.jpg, not featured

Navigation menu

Search