User talk:Ysangkok

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Orbit graph[edit]

Hi, thank you for redrawing one of my graphs! Could you tell me how you did it? Have you used the original file or have you re-created it from scratch? My orbit svg are (a poor) by-product of my program and I never got around to improve the svg generated. Given the number of existing (and to be) graphs I would like, with your permission, to include this transformation in future graphs if feasible. Eurocommuter 17:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COA of polish-lithuanian union (reply from pl-wiki)[edit]

Hi! Thanks for opinion about my picture - I'm doing my best, however last time I have many other things to do :(

I don't think that your version of COA looks worse, but please note that picture of White Eagle in your version comes from present-day coat of arms of Poland - used (without crown, and with some little changes) since World War II, so people of Polish-Lithuanian Union couldn't use that form of picture :)

Regards, Orem 10:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent photograph[edit]

File:Transparent film reel and film.png
Photograph with transparency

Image:Transparent film reel and film.png is cool. Did you do the transparency thing? How? —Bromskloss 17:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that for some of these images John Leach does not own the rights for the of the depicted characters. For an example I doubt he has the right to use the Dilbert cartoon or release it under a free license.

Also I see some ads in one of his comic strips. These are copyrighted too and probably used without proper permission.

I am checking these comic strips now and starts deleting those who contain other's copyrighted works. --|EPO| 18:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have uploaded this image and tried to use a cc-by-nd-3.0 license. We do not allow nd (non-derivative) licenses on Commons. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 16:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalized[edit]

I don't know why I have vandalized Commons. I've just uploaded some pictures. Can you tell me more, please? --Lisbeth 09:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: What's wrong with my pictures[edit]

You recently asked what's wrong with all my pictures included in Category:Pictures showing a librsvg bug. If you look carefully you'll notice that the subscripts are not working correctly, i.e. it reads H3C instead of H3C. This is because librsvg ignores the baseline-shift property, bug #5792. Mysid 20:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can of course, if you wish. Mysid 02:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the modifications! I'm not very optimistic about the bug fix. Mysid 04:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request for undeleting this image. I create this talk page if you want. ~ bayo or talk 08:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Płaty mózgu.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Wyglif 17:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this image a derivative work of this? Looks similar to me. Wyglif 22:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is it seems he's inactive from 2006. This description is better than nothing. Regards Wyglif 10:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I recently uploaded a version of your file Image:Userpage_barnstar.svg. It features a transparent background, which you commented on in the image page. --DTR 20:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Beastie.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

From http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html:

"BSD Daemon Copyright 1988 by Marshall Kirk McKusick. All Rights Reserved."

LX (talk, contribs) 20:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LX. The image I uploaded was not the original, so the text on the FreeBSD website does not apply. It is merely a reproduction of the BSD deamon. If you really want to delete the original BSD deamon (which is covered by the license on the website), take a look at BSD Daemon, the original is right there. --Ysangkok 20:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.
Copyright applies not to a specific rendition of a creative idea, but to the idea itself. An interpretation of the copyrighted Beastie character is just as much a copyright infringement as a drawing of a Disney character or any other fan-art based on non-free characters. Please read Commons:Derivative works. Thanks for bringing BSD Daemon to my attention, though. Those will unfortunately have to be deleted as well. LX (talk, contribs) 20:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the quick response. I now understand your reasons for deleting the image. But I don't really know what you mean by "keeping the discussion where it started". This is the only page I know of, which is concerning this subject. This image page and its discussion page are all deleted now. --Ysangkok 20:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By "where it started", I mean on your user talk page, rather than mine. See how this is easier to follow than if the posts were spread out over both of them? :) LX (talk, contribs) 20:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I got it mixed up in my head. You're right about that it makes it the discussion easier to track. --Ysangkok 20:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and I disagree with the deletion, why did you not allow a discussion to appear before you deleted it? --Ysangkok 20:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was deleted per Commons:Deletion guidelines#Speedy_deletion as an obvious copyright. If you still believe it was not appropriate after reading Commons:Derivative works, you may file an undeletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests. LX (talk, contribs) 20:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'll surrender. :P --Ysangkok 20:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Coat of Arms of Lithuania.svg[edit]

Hello,

I use this to create this . Merci pour ton original. Jmh2o 21:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 15194a87cd781f59844ae0c671ac3955[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Coat of Arms of Denmark[edit]

Hello! Could you please upload again the previous version of the CoA of Denmark? The new one is damaged and doesn't display at all in small size, which has destroyed my Denmark Portal in the Spanish Wikipedia. Thank you --Té y kriptonita (talk) 21:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why adapt the free version of the coat of arms to the unfree version on vector-images.com? Rewmember that Vector-images.com also only do free interpretations of the coat of arms and their colour choices are as arbitrary as ours. /Lokal_Profil 17:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ysangkok. There are better possibilities to improve structural formulas than what you did here (even your third try is not better than my version, IMHO worse). There are plenty of images with SVG bugs in these galleries. --Leyo 22:02, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are the better possibilities? And why was my version worse? --Ysangkok (talk) 16:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I meant images with SVG bugs. Your version was not much worse (the alignment of some bonds was not ideal), but not better and hence there was no reason to replace my version. --Leyo 16:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ysangkok!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Easy-Star-All-Stars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mattsullivan89 (talk) 21:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An age old question[edit]

It appears your question here finally has an answer. Fry1989 eh? 05:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GUAcoat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schoenberg_op11_no1_excerpt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Longbyte1 (talk) 05:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows logo - 2006.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Albertojuanse (talk) 23:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Ysangkok. You have new messages at Apteva's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

I wanted to upload a current version of but for some unknown reasons, commons tell me "You cannot overwrite this file.". Would be nice if you, or somebody else, who can execute "upload a new version" for that file, would bring it up-to-date: en:Silvermont is going to be relased soon, and it requires a new box... ScotXW (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ysangkok. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 13:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gliederung der Beskiden.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 01:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Higher resolution[edit]

Yes,I have a higher resolution of File:2016 Yilan Graupel.144p.ogv.--James970028 (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

could you upload it instead of the current file? --Ysangkok (talk) 01:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK,I will upload a higher resolution one to instead it soon.--James970028 (talk) 09:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

coats of arms[edit]

Hello, I am interested in hiring an artist who knows heraldry. If you are interested, please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

File:US Beef cuts.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

72.173.184.167 14:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

about the porcelain tower[edit]

If I pass by, I'll take a picture. May not be very fast.--Berthe (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARGOS Launch, 23 Feb 1999.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ 13:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows logo - 2006.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paralithodes rathbuni has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 08:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello you are the uploader of this image[edit]

Can I use this image on a physical print for personal use? thnks - ed


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_support_equipment#/media/File:Connecting_waste_suction_hose_to_the_lavatory_service_outlet.jpg

File:Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground support equipment

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Denmark Bornholm.svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Denmark Bornholm.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Loongson logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 02:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:911Commissioners HIGHRES.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Region Sønderjylland-Schleswig has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vallensbæk Kommune coa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A466:F20E:1:3DBA:64DE:D84:187A 06:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Politkovskaya01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]