User talk:Ymaup

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ymaup!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Ymaup!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Gypaète barbu.jpg is uncategorized since 13 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:New Holland Honeyeater 2.JPG is uncategorized since 14 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Red Tailed Black cockatoo.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Yellow bellied Sunbird.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flambe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Only scientific name is missing, good picture, better categories would be nice Mbdortmund 23:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)  Info Categories added, thanks for advice Ymaup 09:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC) good work --Mbdortmund 19:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flambe2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 19:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flambe3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good documentation --Mbdortmund 19:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Vous aussi...

... vous appréciez les insectes !!!! Sympa, n'est-il pas ? --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoover Dam2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bonne qualité --Ianare 07:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Valley4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable quality, but why f/4 only? Taken in 'automatic' mode, perhaps? -- MJJR 21:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)  Info You're right. --Ymaup 12:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bryce Canyon (lever de soleil).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors.--Two+two=4 14:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massif du Mont Blanc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise, some CA, but good composition, good lighting, and an impressive view. -- Smial 00:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA, but good, though -- QICbot (talk)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refuge dent d'oche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Two+two=4 14:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Double Arch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Bien, mais je voudrais défricher le buisson.... -- Smial 00:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)  Comment C'est au dessus de mes capacités techniques ! -- Ymaup 07:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Obtenir une scie ! Conduis là ! Faites l'image encore une fois ! ;-) -- H005 22:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)  Comment J'y penserai ;-) Je suis un peu loin maintenant... -- Ymaup 08:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC) * Support La récolte ou destruction de plantes est strictement interdite dans les parcs nationals. De toutes façons, ici c'est QI, pas FP ... et bien que l'image serait meilleure sans le buisson, la qualité est loin d'être mauvaise. --Ianare 19:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delicate Arch sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Carcasse d'âne.JPG

Hi Ymaup, it's an interesting image, could you please add to the description where the photo was taken, and ideally also its geolocation? -- H005 (talk) 22:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit bouquetin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot. -Jcart1534 02:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

.

File:Jeune bouquetin.png

Bonjour,

Je pense que tu pourrais proposer ta photo comme image de qualité, mais il vaudrait mieux qu'elle soit au format JPEG. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC) de Haute-Savoie aussi. ;oD

Si le nom n'est pas absolument identique, il faut l'importer séparément. À mon avis, si tu la proposes en format PNG, tu auras des critiques négatives. Yann (talk) 09:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Voilà la photo au format JPEG : File:Jeune bouquetin.jpg. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeune bouquetin.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great! Might be FP. Yann 20:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouquetin jeune 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent shot --Cayambe 10:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carcasse d'âne.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouquetin lac annecy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Copyright status: File:Yellow bellied Sunbird.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Yellow bellied Sunbird.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)