User talk:XRay/Archive/2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo XRay!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »
Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an info@wikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch Dietmar!

Ich bin ganz begeistert von Deiner (Wieder-)Entdeckung des Quadrats. Es machen sich die wenigsten Gedanken um Gestaltung nur für das Format, hier perfekt umgesetzt. Und die Logik dahinter ist auch uralt. Es wäre ja nicht ich, wenn mein persönlicher XRay-Fave NICHT immer noch die "Bonner Post" in b/w wäre und ironischer weise dachte ich mir, "Warum nicht im Quadrat?";-) Mag für viele eigenartig klingen, aber für mich hast Du mit den Quadraten ein neues Level erreicht. In sich soweit homogen und schlüssig, der einen Technik vergessen lässt. Ein ruhender Pol, darum geht es, und umgekehrt - FLOW Nur das Bild zählt, oder spricht für sich. Wie in einem perfektem Licht und rahmenlosen Rahmen alleine für das Bild gemacht, wie ein Gebäude. Wenn ich jetzt sage, das ist untechnisch, ist es sicher falsch, zumindest formal unkorrekt.Es ist halt schlicht ein anderes Level. (only for u, more Maslow´s Pyramid then OSI-Model). Vielleicht kommen wir auch noch mal dazu, die "schwarzen Pudel auf dem Kohlenhaufen" anzusehen, nicht zu vergleichen.

Rutsch mir gut rüber! Hans-Jürgen

Mehr nur eine Spielerei
Mehr nur eine Spielerei
Danke! Und bevor ich es vergesse: Ebenso einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr! Derzeit spiele ich etwas. Das liegt nicht nur an der winterlichen Saure-Gurken-Zeit, sondern auch an einem Wechsel in das Vollformatlager und dem Wunsch, sich selbst weiterzuentwickeln - da ist es, das andere Level. Formate spielen nur eine Rolle, aber Quadrate und auch 4:5 mochte ich immer schon. Gerade Quadrate finde ich auch in Collagen ganz toll. Sie haben so etwas von Perfektheit, wenn es das Wort überhaupt geben sollte; siehe auch Das perfekte Quadrat und de:Quadratur des Quadrates. Insofern blicke ich mit Spannung auf die nächsten Monate - auch wenn nicht alles für Wikimedia Commons geeignet zu sein scheint. --XRay talk 16:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Das mit den Wasserfällen gefällt mir jetzt weniger (eigentlich gar nicht). Liegt aber an anderen Punkten. 1) Wasserfälle mit langer Belichtungszeit "anzuweichen" wurde thematisch visuell sicher überzogen. 2) Ist ein Quadrat wenn es zu groß wird, schwer darstellbar, da Bilder nun mal an einer Wand (Monitor ist nichts anderes) hängen sollten. Wer hat eine schwarze Wand daheim? 3) Greifen da geometrische Muster, die zu oft religiöse Vorbelastung haben (Kreuz).

Interessant wird es, wenn man in der Fotografie zurückgeht. Quadrat als 56x56mm war praktisch, da ein "teures" Material für Quer-&Hochformat verwendet werden konnte. Und dann muss, vielmehr darf, man sich schon fragen, woher 20x25 - 4x5 Inch (ca.9x12cm), oder eben 24x36mm (2:3) kommt? Ich kenne das als Franke, vermutlich eher von Dürer http://www.albrecht-duerer-apokalypse.de/architektonische-stilblueten-im-marienleben/ und eben von Cover für CD&LP (das Runde muss in´s quadratische). Solltest Du mit "meinem" Tip eine Austellung machen, lasse es mich wissen. Du wirst da ähnliche Probleme finden, große Bilder brauchen Luft dahinter (hängen damit nicht wirklich im Lot), riesige weiße Wänder und mein Favourit ist ja nicht einmal das ruhigste(homogen). Selbst ein Tryptichon wird schwierig, da es lange Wände braucht und das Bild in der Mitte nicht quadratisch sein sollte.

Wenn Du Dürer "stöperst" stolpere auch mal über das magische Quadrat ;-) Habe Dir mal meine RNR geschickt. Gruss, Hans-Jürgen

Vielen Dank für deine Ausführungen! Gerade die Punkte mit den Wasserfällen finde ich sehr interessant, da sie Aspekte enthalten, die mir so noch nicht aufgefallen sind. Ich sehe, dass ich mich noch intensiver mit Themen der Gestaltung auseinandersezten sollte. Dabei lese ich schon immer wieder passende Fachliteratur. Ein Fotograf aus unserem lokalen Fotoclub erzählte auch einmal über ein Seminar zum Aufbau von Ausstellungen. ... im neuen Jahr geht's weiter. (Derzeit lese ich übrigens über die Todsünden der Fotografie - wohl eher allgemein gehalten, aber mit netten Hinweisen - und etwas über Wettervorhersagen und Ausnutzung in der Fotografie. Danach dürfte dann Gestaltung wieder einmal an der Reihe sein.) Deine Mail habe ich bekommen. Vielen Dank. So spontan schaffe ich es allerdings nicht, zum Telefon zu greifen. Ich merke es mir aber mal vor. --XRay talk 11:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Den Dürer-Beitrag habe ich gerade gelesen. Lesenswert. Auch wenn es vielleicht nicht so gemeint ist, fand ich ihn erheiternd. Ich bin nicht so Kunst bewandert, kenne aber ein wenig von Dürer - auch etwas gemogelte Bilder -, aber diese Erläuterungen weisen umfassend auf Unstimmigkeiten hin. Ich sehe es auch als künstlerische Freiheit. Danke für deinen Hinweis. --XRay talk 14:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Die Seite mit Dürer ist nicht nur inhaltlich fundiert, sie ist auch gut geschrieben, Witz bei der Sache gehört dazu. Für Fotografen vorallem lesenswert die Punkte mit Perpektive und Fluchtpunkten. - Dürer ist ja auch mit einem einzigem Kreis bei einem Wettbewerb bekannt geworden. Die Einsicht das jedes Bild ein Kreis sein muss, geht den meisten verloren. Er hat sicher bildliche Interpretationen provoziert, hier bei commons gibt es mehr Unstimmigkeiten, statt Interpretationen. Eigentlich hast mich ja Du zu FP verführt und ich habe die Kritiken im Quadrat gelesen. Stellenweise viel seltsamer aber ein anderer Personenkreis (mit Überlappungen) als bei QI. Ich kämpfe hier oft mit Editierungen oder dem BOT.Seltsamerweise hast Du bei "Graves and Cemeteries" ja gar nicht selber mit abgestimmt. Ist Dir das Thema zu schwer gewesen? Die alten "Meister" zeigen doch eine viel dramatischere Darstellung und vor allem wer sie subventioniert oder schlicht bezahlt hat. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert talk 08:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
FP ist stellenweise so eine Sache für sich, aber angesichts der anderen Bewertung ein ganz anderer Stil. Es ist doch etwas mehr Substanz dabei. Auch wenn ich persönlich mit einigen Bildern sehr hadere, beispielsweise Ablichtungen von Gemälden. Eigentlich kann man hier nur Bewerten, ob es gleichmäßig ausgeleuchtet, richtig beschnitten und farbgerecht abgebildet wurde. Zwei von drei Kriterien sind nicht prüfbar. Aus meiner Sicht reicht das nicht für ein exzellentes Bild. Es sind auf jeden Fall einige wirklich gute Fotografinnen und Fotografen dabei. Ich habe bei deinem Bild wohl nicht mit abgestimmt, weil ich in den letzten Wochen eher wenig aktiv war und es nicht gesehen habe. Schwer gewesen ist es nicht, damit habe ich die geringsten Probleme. (Eher mit der englischen Sprache, in der ich oft nicht sicher genug bin.) Ich bewerte nur prinzipiell keine Gemälde. Und was mein quadratisches Bild an der Nordsee angeht, hatte ich die Kontroverse schon geahnt. Dafür bin ich lang genug dabei. Mich irritieren zwar Hinweise auf einen angeblich ausgebrannten Himmel und das Nichtmögen des quadratischen Formats als Bewertungsmaßstab, aber damit muss man leider leben. Manche bewerten, als ob sie alles kennen und gesehen haben, es im Grunde aber doch nicht wissen. Wenn man's ganz krass haben möchte, dann lässt man seine Bilder hier bewerten: de:Wikipedia:Exzellente Bilder. Mein Tipp: Versuch's nicht. Ich habe manch einen deiner Versuche bei QIC gesehen und sehe dich noch heute rätseln, warum sie nicht QI sein sollen. Die Bilder sind tendenziell immer mit Blickrichtung Wikipedia zu sehen. Ein künstlerischer Anspruch zählt oft nicht. Ich sehe selbst, wie sich meine Vorstellungen nach und nach nicht mehr mit QIC und FPC vereinbaren lassen. VIC habe ich schon eingestellt. --XRay talk 13:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Da bin ich jetzt irgendwie gar nicht bei Dir, oder ich verstehe die zu pauschal formulierten Aussagen nicht einmal in deutscher geschriebener Sprache. Ich hatte niemals ein Gemälde eingestellt, es ging um den Totenkopf St. Johannes, das ist ein Foto, weit weg von einem Gemälde. Gemälde sind zwar ein sicheres Beispiel für die "Unzulänglichkeit" der Bewertungen hier (nicht ohne Grund wird bei Repro geblitzt oder heute mit Neutral-Neon-Röhren/LED zentriert). Da bin ich sicher bei Dir, es ging mir eigentlich mehr um Objektivität. Commons und Wiki-pics haben in der realen Welt kaum eine Bedeutung, was an dem selektierten Personenkreis in commons BRD zu tun haben mag. Es gibt sicher rein charakterliche Vorlieben, die auch in dislike (charmanter als Hass) umschwenken. Sollte einen Mathematiker nicht wundern, nur so macht es Sinn und ist keine Mitternachtsformel, die wirklich elegant, sexy und beauty ist. Es gibt wirklich verdammt gute Fotografen, ich bin keiner davon, nur teuer und muss gottseidank nicht davon leben, ich finanziere nur mein Equipment davon. Was mich viel mehr wundert ist das Herdenverhalten hier, was Wiki und commons schon immer vorgeworfen wurde. Da bist Du irgendwie auch nicht besser. Ich will da nicht hin, ich hoffe doch ich habe versucht Bandbreite zu zeigen. Ich rede nicht von einem user, der endlich mal seinen Sensor geputzt halt, aktuell unter 2MP. Oder einer Frau (Bonus) mit komplett falsch belichteten Auto-Pics, wo der Bison schon auf dem Rasen umkippt. Ich denke mal Du hattest einfach Pech, Dein Bild nach einem perfekten (übrigens runden) Quadrat einzustellen. Peinlich nur für die anderen, da offensichtlicher Herdentrieb. Dabei ist das image zwar super, taugt halt nur nicht als Quadrat. Stichwort Trypichon oder eben großes, sehr große Bild an der Wand. Ich mache halt selten was ohne Absicht ;-) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert talk 18:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Wir haben 2018! Alles Gute! Und wieder zurück. Du schriebst, warum ich wohl dein Bild nicht bewertet hatte. Daraufhin schrieb ich, dass dies wohl geschehen ist, weil ich es nicht gesehen habe. Eine Absicht stand nicht dahinter. Die Gemäldeablichtungen im allgemeinen Sinne sind Bilder, die ich nicht bewerte. Damit sind dies auch die einzigen, die ich mit Absicht nicht bewerte. Deines war keines und ist daher nicht betroffen.
Und Herdenverhalten liegt mir nicht, dafür ecke ich auch zu oft an. Allerdings versuche ich auch keinen Streit vom Zaune zu brechen, sondern alles auf sachlicher Ebene zu halten. So lohnt es sich nicht, Bilder zu nominieren, die keine Chance haben. Das mag wie Herdenverhalten aussehen, ist meiner Meinung nach aber den Zielen von Wikimedia Commons, FP, QI und VI geschuldet. Wikimedia Commons entspringt der Wikipedia-Welt und hat sich dann geöffnet. Das muss man halt immer berücksichtigen. Ich bin mittlerweile schon recht lang dabei und weiß schon, wie manche bewerten und abstimmen. Und ich weiß auch, welche Fotografin und welchen Fotografen ich sehr schätze. Diese fotografieren sehr gut und ihre Bewertung hat auch immer Substanz. Man kennt auch die fotografischen Fähigkeiten und sieht, wer sich wie entwickelt oder entwickeln möchte. Klar gibt es auch den Herdentrieb, aber wo gibt es den nicht? Im täglichen Leben begegnet er mir mit Regelmäßigkeit.
Und nebenbei: Ein besseres Medienarchiv mit Bildern unter freier Lizenz suche ich schon lange - erfolglos. Verwendung finden übrigens zumindest einige meinet Bilder auch außerhalb der Wikimedia-Welt, insofern ist eine gewisse Bedeutung da. Ich sehe aber zwei große Hürden: Die Trennung von Spreu und Weizen bei all den Medien und das Verständnis, was eine freie Lizenz bedeutet.
Bevor ich es vergesse: Du solltest vielleicht meine Diskussionsseite aus deiner Signatur lassen. Sie ist da wohl versehentlich drin gelandet. --XRay talk 08:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year GMT-2018! Ebenfalls nur das Beste und ebenfalls noch kurz zurück. Es ist (nicht war) halt auffällig, da der Tip ja von Dir kam und chronologisch genug Zeit NACH dem Hinweis war. Das textlich zu beschreiben ist alles viel zu umständlich hier. Die Wettbewerbe scheinen ja kein zeitliches Ende zu haben? - finden ein ganz anderes Bewertungslevel und worüber ich stolpere der html-code ist wieder anders. Ist seit Wochen ja auch bei QI ein Problem (bug) und bei FP ist wieder alles etwas anderes. Das mit dem Gruppenverhalten ist wichitg, da einiges wie Farbdarstellung oft nur ein Trend ist, gefährlich wird es wenn dies einer gewissen Marke zugeschrieben wird. Daher sind selbst die QI´s gefährlich, viele der Bilder sind falsch oder überbelichtet (sieht halt freundlicher aus). Und heute kostet ein brauchbarer Monitor fast nichts mehr, dazu 99% Farbraum. In Deinem Fall wäre das die Kritik mit "ausgebrannten Himmel" oder "Ozean ist krumm" was in einem Fall totaler Nonsense ist, im anderen Fall ist es definitiv ein Thema (horizontale Linien im Quadrat und optische Täuschungen). Letzteres ist sogar ein Geschlechter-Problem. Drei Männer hängen ein Whiteboard auf, das wird Diskussionen geben, an dem sich eine Frau lange nicht beteiligt...(10mal gemessen und immer noch krumm??) Ich sehe hier halt zwei Dinge, Themen werden total überstrapaziert und es werden die Sternchen untereinander weitergereicht, bei zweien denke ich sogar sie sind ein Paar. Gibt man der Meute ein neues Thema, verzweifeln sie erst mal. Die Sportfotos von Julia sind so ein Fall. Wenn man die freien Lizenzen mal vergisst, gibt es genug Portale (zB shutterstock) oder einfach Katalog-Fotos. (Das wäre DAS Wiki-Thema) nur die wenigsten QI´s werden dafür genommen, das hat andere Gründe. Wiki will da aber sicher hin. Das ist halt nicht mein Interesse, solange die Bilder im freien Markt keinen Dollar verdienen würden und sich selbst der Fotograf das Bild nicht an die Wand hängen würde.Bei Artikeln scheitert Wiki ja immer noch an der Zitierfähigkeit für wissenschaftlcihe Arbeiten, ich mag und mache es trotzdem. Sicher viel zu wenig, bei "ACR" in Wiki macht das "Gruppen-Auge" einfach konstruktiven Sinn und man darf sich fragen, warum es das vorher noch nicht gab, daher konnte ich in Wiki nicht anders. Ähnliches ist bei b/w zu sehen, mir war das mit der letzten Kritik neu und ich bin mir sicher ich habe es auch bei Dir schon gesehen (gleiches raw), ähnlich QI´s kleiner als 2MP NACH dem Hinweis auf die Regeln. Ein photographisches Thema wie die Mäusescheune ist übrigens damit nicht gemeint. Wird das nicht als Argument sondern als Emotion ausgewertet wird es mehr als unsachlich. Ein Freund von mir ist Restaurator, Brillenträger mit einem verdammt gutem Auge. Er wird bezahlt und seine Bilder stehen in Massen in Denkmalkatalogen zur Verfügung, er tut sich das hier gar nicht an (zu kompliziert) interessant war es aber was er zu den Kommentaren und Bildern meinte. Er war da viel schneller als ich, es richtig einzuschätzen. Dabei hat er sich um so Spitzfindigkeiten wie CA´s gar nicht gekümmert. Er ist auch der einzige der rein in jpeg fotografieren darf, denn er ist farbenblind. Ein erfolgreiches 2018 - Hans-Jürgen

Jetzt habe ich die FPCs aber doch nach langer Zeit noch einmal komplett durchgesehen und war definitiv für dein Bild zu spät. Sorry. Ich vermute, du hast schon bemerkt, dass ich auf bildtechnisch hier bei Wikimedia Commons auf dem Rückzug bin. Aber ich habe viele Jahre der Erfahrung hinter mir. Da sind die vielen Strömungen in der Bewertung der QIs wie auch ein Zoo ungeschriebener oder in allen Winkeln der Seiten verborgenen Regeln, da sind teils krass unterschiedliche Ansichten, unnötige Kleinkrämerei und eine unnötige Komplexität. Es ist allen Freiwilligen hoch anzurechnen, sich hier zu engagieren. Aber die Folge sind total unterschiedliche und auch komplizierte Verfahren nicht nur bei QI, FP und VI. Änderungen dauern sehr lange, oft mit müßigen Diskussionen. (BTW: Das ist in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia noch deutlich heftiger, dort aber auch gepaart mit einem oft unmöglichen Umgangston. Mich wundert der Autorenmangel so gesehen keineswegs.) Bei den Bewertungen bei den QIC mag ich übrigens keine engen Kontakte feststellen, wohl aber immer wiederkehrende Zeiten, zu denen Leute aktiv sind. Und man lernt recht schnell, wer in der Regel gute Bilder liefert und wer Bilder mit mehr Diskussionsbedarf nominiert. Daraus könnte man so etwas ableiten. Sei's drum, ich werde weiter an mir arbeiten, lernen, aber auch meinen Weg weiter gehen. Mir fehlt nur sehnlichst eine Plattform, auf der man gute Bilder mit freier Lizenz zur Verfügung stellen kann und sich mit anderen auf ähnlichem Niveau austauschen kann.--XRay talk 17:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2016 -- 5285 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments More as QI!! Ich finde zwar das Themen hier immer extrem überstrapaziert werden, aber es ist Dein bestes, der Quadrat-Serie. Als Fineprint muss es groß an der Wand hängen, sehr groß, dann würden mich auch der etwas zu dunkel geratene erste Pfal nicht stören... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Danke! Deine Anregung mit dem Abzug werde ich mir mal überlegen. Die Idee ist gut. Vielleicht für die nächste Fotoausstellung. --XRay 10:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Quarzsandförderung -- 2017 -- 0251-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 09:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santorin (GR), Exomytis, Vlychada Beach -- 2017 -- 2999 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Solid and genuine. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Quarzsandförderung -- 2017 -- 0245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Quarzsandförderung -- 2017 -- 0259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ilsenburg, Ilsetal, Ilsefälle -- 2017 -- 0143 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0268 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III, Quarzsandförderung -- 2017 -- 0256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Promenade, Wasserfall -- 2017 -- 1923 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not a beautiful as your other longer exposure shots of flowing water, but well done. --Granada 09:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 07:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Röhren aus ABS

Haben Sie schon so was photographiert? Unter Category:Plastic pipes gibt es einige mögliche Bilder, leider kann ich den Material nicht von den Röhren lesen, sonst haette ich das genauer kategoriziert. HLHJ (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Habe ich. Auf den ersten Blick sind mindestens zwei Bilder von mir. Genauer identifizieren kann ich den Kunststoff leider auch nicht. Danke auf jeden Fall für die Bemühungen der Kategorisierung. Es wird zwar immer mal gewünscht, aber mir geht es in erster Linie um das Motiv. Pflanzengattungen, Architekturstile, Baujahre, Materialarten, etc. festzustellen, wäre ein unverhältnismäßiger Aufwand. Und Wikimedia Commons ist ein Medienarchiv, nicht Wikipedia. Soweit ich kann, unterstütze ich allerdings genauere Kategorisierungen - auch mit Hilfe von nicht veröffentlichten Fotos. Wegen der beiden Bilder kann ich gerne noch einmal nachsehen. --XRay talk 06:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Auf den anderen Bildern ist leider auch keine Bezeichnung zu finden. --XRay talk 16:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Tut mir erstmal leid...

Ich hatte heute minimal dreimal was zu dem Gerüst "Ketteler/Specht" geschrieben. Dann kam wieder der kleine Chinese in der Mitte mit seinem bot (buggy script). Jedscheddd mog I nimmer! :-/ Andere Bewertungen waren auch verschwunden, daher verordne ich mir eine commons Pause. - Ich habe mir Dein Bild runtergeladen und mit ACR 6.7 angesehen, sieht bei mir anders aus, aber Du magst ja keine fremde Korrekturen. (dabei ist es ein lens-profile). Ich habe dann gestern leider an der 13er PS-Version rumgespielt (ACR 9 und höher) da ich mir kaum vorstellen konnte das die f4 Gläser so seltsam sind (ist mir vor allem bei jemand anderem aufgefallen). Fazit ich bin am neuinstallieren, der letzten PS-Version. Komme mir jetzt bitte nicht mit LR- ACR ist das selbe und "perpective correction" geht mit LR für mich nicht. Übrigens (auch klar) die alte Version, wo das komplette Gebäude noch stand ist besser. Zwar APS (wie heißt DX bei Canon?) aber weniger Weitwinkel-Look und dabei dürfte das fast ein 30er mm, nicht wie in Vollformat ein 35mm sein. Du stellst Dich aber manchmal auch "unsauber" - Na egal, gehabe Dich wohl! - Hans-Jürgen

Ich muss zugeben, dass ich manchmal Schwierigkeiten habe, dir zu folgen. Fremde Korrekturen mag ich ganz und gar nicht, stimmt. Die Änderung mache ich selbst am RAW. Wenn ich dann noch etwas zu korrigieren habe, wird diese Änderung auch berücksichtigt. Wenn du so nett wärst, würde ich mir deine Änderungen gern einmal ansehen. Du könntest mir das Bild per Mail schicken. Die alte Version mit dem vollständigen Gebäude mag besser gewesen zu sein. Leider muss man seinen Standort schon mal nach parkenden oder fahrenden Autos ausrichten. Direkt gegenüber standen zu viele Autos. Die für das Bild gewählte Position zeigt gerade keine parkenden Autos, war aber mitten auf der Straße - mit Stativ. Da hat man Augen für das Motiv und auch für den Verkehr. Auch wenn die Geometrie schon etwas arg zum Tragen kommt, es war immerhin kein Ultraweitwinkel. Die zuerst erwogenen 20 mm hatte ich dann doch verworfen. --XRay talk 18:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Sunset photo

Someone else said they like it so I've sent this to CR. PumpkinSky talk 21:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. --XRay talk 06:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Fassade der ehem. Firma Ketteler-Specht -- 2018 -- 0328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and correct exposed! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Fassade der ehem. Firma Ketteler-Specht -- 2018 -- 0332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 10:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2018 -- 0352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality-- PumpkinSky 14:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2018 -- 0345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality-- PumpkinSky 14:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2017 -- 0262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Nice composition but the sky is overexposed, can you fix it? --Cvmontuy 06:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Sorry, it's not fixable. It the sun (behind the clouds). Feel free to decline the nomination if you think it is not QI. Thank you. --XRay 14:40, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
* Weak support --Basotxerri 08:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Extra categorie: Dama dama.--Famberhorst 18:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Forgotten, sorry. --XRay 18:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2018 -- 0347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. It's a pity that you don't know which species of trees it is... Tournasol7 04:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

POTD proposal

Hi XRay:

I have a POTD request. You have at church related photo slated for Template:Potd/2018-10-31. I have this FP: File:Farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 13.jpg that I think would be better for that day since it's Halloween. Would you consider moving your photo to a different day? Nov 21 and a couple days in December are available. If not, that's okay, no worries. Peace, PumpkinSky talk 03:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

It is Halloween, but it Reformation Day too. The photograph was choosen because of Reformation Day. It should stay on October 31st. Sorry. --XRay talk 05:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
That's ok. No worries. PumpkinSky talk 11:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Hot pixel

Hallo XRay,

bevor Du die Kamera zum Service gibst: Wenn ich das richtig verstehe, ist das Auftreten von Hot Pixels bei Langzeitbelichtungen normal, weil sich hier der Sensor aufheizt.

Grüsse, --Basotxerri (talk) 18:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Das stimmt. Es gibt auch keine Sensoren, die fehlerfrei sind. Aber die Kamera ist neu und ich finde es schon als störend. Meines Wissens nach werden die defekten Pixel registriert und dann per Interpolation herausgerechnet. Und das Registrieren kann leider nur der Service durchführen. Danke auf jeden Fall für deinen Tipp. --XRay talk 18:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough fore a Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 0402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 0362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2018 -- 0446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 0417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 0413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Fassade der ehem. Firma Ketteler-Specht -- 2018 -- 0333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

18:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2018 -- 0496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2018 -- 0448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp and clean from edge to edge! I desperately need to throw away my old Tokina 28-70 f/2.8 and exchange it for a Tamron 15-30 - btw: your Sigma 20mm looks way sharper than the example I had for testing with my D850 and which led me back a bit disappointed. --Granada 08:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 Comment :-) --XRay 08:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2018 -- 0479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2018 -- 0456-60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2018 -- 0463-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2018 -- 0450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2018 -- 0474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2018 -- 0470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2018 -- 0485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Aasee -- 2018 -- 0432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and categorization. --Trougnouf 21:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Aasee -- 2018 -- 0440.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and categorization. --Trougnouf 21:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Fassade der ehem. Firma Ketteler-Specht -- 2018 -- 0337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 0417.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 0417.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knöpfe -- 2018 -- 0501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knöpfe -- 2018 -- 0502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

23:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt, Korkmännchen -- 2018 -- 0542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2018 -- 0521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadtweinhaus, Korkmännchen -- 2018 -- 0543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Clemenskirche, -Goldene Fuge- -- 2018 -- 0545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Krippe -- 2018 -- 0612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0596-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Eingangsbereich -- 2018 -- 0573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0584 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0587-91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Opferkerzen -- 2018 -- 0619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems to be slightly vertical. but good image quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Krippe -- 2018 -- 0614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr schön! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0581 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Eingangsbereich -- 2018 -- 0567-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0592.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Eingangsbereich -- 2018 -- 0557-61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Krippe -- 2018 -- 0606-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Fragen eines Nichtrauchers

Hallo, XRay, ich hab' die Tage die Category:Ashtrays aufgeräumt, da war ziemlich Kraut und Rüben. Jetzt ist da eine leere Kategorie (Cigarette-stub bins‎), wie geht man da vor? Und Category:Ashtrays in Restaurants habe ich aus Versehen ein großes R geschrieben. Seit gestern ist das kleine Cat-a-lot-Feld weg, was man so gut benutzen kann; wo könnte das sein? Viele Grüße, --Coyote III (talk) 17:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Bei der einen habe ich der Einfachheit halber den Löschantrag direkt eingetragen, die andere habe ich umbenannt. Das Recht zum Umbenennen habe ich glücklicherweise. Damit sollte alles erledigt sein, oder? Es gab im Forum übrigens auch dieselbe Frage nach Cat-a-lot. Vielleicht schaust du da mal. Vielleicht liegt es am Cache. Bei dem Mitstreiter war es einfach wieder da. --XRay talk 19:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hallo, XRay, danke für die Aktionen und Hinweise. Grüße, --Coyote III (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
cat-a-lot ist nach Neustart des PCs wieder da. Grüße, --Coyote III (talk) 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0596-8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0596-8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Opferkerzen -- 2018 -- 0616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Eingangsbereich -- 2018 -- 0572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I assume that the WB is correct. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I think WB is OK. There was a mix of three different kind of lights - from cold to warm. I check WB at a white paper at the right and it was OK. --XRay 08:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)--  Comment Für mich ist das schon hefitg weich(Shadows), zu warm (bei 80% Kunstlicht) auch falsch. Es dürften am Boden Solnhofener Platten sein, wäre ja auch eigentlich "Weißwurst" könnte man die Gestaltung sehen, hier dreht aber Dietmar an Alpinweiss, ohne (G)"K"raukarte (nicht so sicher in der Gestaltung. Vieles hier ist entweder überbelichtet (da freundlich) oder eben überkorrigiert. Es fehlen mir dazu die bewusste Gestaltung, was aber nur meine Sicht der Dinge ist...--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 21:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Ich schicke dir gerne mal das Bild mit absolut korrektem Weißabgleich. ;-) Das Kreuz erhält dann dank des Fensters einen wunderbaren Blaustich. ;-) --XRay 06:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Glaube ich Dir sofort! :) Ralf hatte mal so ein Bild aus einem Krankenhaus, ist wirklich nicht einfach. Warum blitzt ihr da nicht? Afraid of Flash-Light? ;-) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Die Szenerie mit Blitz steht auf der Todo-Liste ... Wenn meine Kamera vom Service wieder da ist. --XRay 10:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2018 -- 3404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Opferkerzen -- 2018 -- 0626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2018 -- 3408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Opferkerzen -- 2018 -- 0684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2018 -- 3405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2018 -- 3402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2014 -- 6769-71 (retouched).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2018 -- 3409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0580.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0580.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC) CommentAgnes was faster:) From my side a really weak pro. Normally (not a QI Rule) such shadows area is pity, but the counting point are the colours (The wall is really such chamois?) I was liking the older version more, (here i can imagine 500K to much) only the front side of the stones looks right.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Please see Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#User:PumpkinSky and User:HalfGig. Your FPC is one of six that will be demoted after HalfGig's vote is removed. You may wish to join the discussion there. Once the image is removed from Feature Pictures, you are welcome to renominate it if you want. -- Colin (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I'm fixing the demotion of these double-voted pictures, and I must also ask you to remove this from the POTD {{Picture of the day|year=2019|month=12|day=01}} or pick another photo for that day. Thanks! --cart-Talk 15:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
I'll fix it. --XRay talk 15:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur Skulptur -- 2018 -- 0759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC) Comment Gefällt mir ja von Dir ausnahmsweise überhaupt nicht (jaja, german language, but this comment is for the author:-). Für mich übertreiben es viele hier, Du hattest eine Bildserie mit Quadraten und kannst b/w. Dann eine Raute, schwierig zu fotografiern, gerade mit weichem, da monotem Licht, gekippt und dann sowas?! Ich habe mir das Bild lange angesehen. Ich komme mit der Umsetzung nicht klar. Als BW im Quadrat hätte ich es verstanden, aber so krass an den Seiten beschnitten und dann noch mit Linien die nach fehlender Objektiv-Korrektur aussehen, tsss :)? It´s ok to come back to the roots, but in this way?--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Was soll ich dazu sagen? Du hast schon recht, die Umsetzung ist nicht eine der besten. --XRay 14:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Katholisch-Thelogische Fakultät -- 2018 -- 0769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2018 -- 0761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Krippe -- 2018 -- 0614.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Krippe -- 2018 -- 0614.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Altar -- 2018 -- 0782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0773.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0773.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0822-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht, Eingangsbereich -- 2018 -- 0791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The perspective of the candle box seems somewhat distorted. But good image quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 0829 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

User category

Could you please explain me how to create a USER category ? Danke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PJDespa (talk • contribs) 11:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@PJDespa: Did you tried to search for user categories? Did you tried to have a look to the source of user categories? Yes? Otherwise please have a look to {{User category}}. --XRay talk 13:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Konzertmuschel -- 2018 -- 0909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Ortsansicht -- 2018 -- 0901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Hätte mir als Quadrat wesentlich besser gefallen Focus liegt auf "nasse Füße" ;-) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Postamt -- 2018 -- 0904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Konzertmuschel -- 2018 -- 0910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Verreyt- -- 2018 -- 0837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Cumberland-Denkmal -- 2018 -- 0948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.
Category:Betula in February--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 08:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Promenade -- 2018 -- 0902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Wittich- -- 2018 -- 0840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Evangelisch-reformierte Kirche -- 2018 -- 1134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bahnhof Stelldichein -- 2018 -- 0952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bahnhof Stelldichein -- 2018 -- 0954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Cumberland-Denkmal -- 2018 -- 0951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Kur-Apotheke -- 2018 -- 0908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Weak support The sign seems slightly unsharp and the sky looks very bright, almost burnt out. --Basotxerri 18:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Lützenkirchen- -- 2018 -- 0832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Actually, the green Lensflares were supposed to be removed, but here I find them rather artistic. --Ermell 08:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bahnhof Stelldichein -- 2018 -- 0955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Schöpfwerk Greetsiel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bahnhof Stelldichein -- 2018 -- 0957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Friedrichstraße, Haus Nordsee -- 2018 -- 0964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Sielstraße -- 2018 -- 1130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Evangelisch-reformierte Kirche -- 2018 -- 1132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PJDespa 09:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Skulptur -- 2018 -- 0907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bahnhof Stelldichein -- 2018 -- 0960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. One view, clear it´s a Xray --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Sielstraße -- 2018 -- 1117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:49, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bahnhof Stelldichein -- 2018 -- 0963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Nordstrand -- 2018 -- 0946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Bunsen- -- 2018 -- 0836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Jansen- -- 2018 -- 0850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Still a nice object to play with 3 Lines Viewing --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bülowallee -- 2018 -- 1027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Keller- -- 2018 -- 0859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Clear enough for QI and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 09:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Krawinkel- -- 2018 -- 0843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krummhörn, Greetsiel, Schöpfwerk Greetsiel -- 2018 -- 1139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Haus Bismarck -- 2018 -- 1029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Watt-Welten -- 2018 -- 1038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Dachboden -- 2018 -- 1382 (Instaheiligkreuz).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Macke- -- 2018 -- 0853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Inselmühle -- 2018 -- 1032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strange, that the double green door is crooked. But otherwise everything is right. It will therefore be correct. Good image quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -von der Lippe- -- 2018 -- 0846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Kur-Apotheke -- 2018 -- 1011-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Watt-Welten -- 2018 -- 1039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Kurplatz, Fahrradständer -- 2018 -- 1023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Skulptur -Friesische Sonne- -- 2018 -- 1035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Watt-Welten -- 2018 -- 1040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - The small area that's blown on a wave is no big deal in such a big photo. Nice scene. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Fahrradschmuck -- 2018 -- 1080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Clasen- -- 2018 -- 0861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Haus Schiffahrt -- 2018 -- 0985-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Watt-Welten -- 2018 -- 1042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 21:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Georgskapelle -- 2018 -- 0871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus -- 2018 -- 1175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 19:40, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Boeselager- -- 2018 -- 0864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Watt-Welten -- 2018 -- 1043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 Comment For me the shadow is too dominating and disturbing. -- Spurzem 14:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 Comment The rear side of the gravestone is empty, the shadow is part of the composition. It's the reason why I've taken the photograph of an empty rear side. --XRay 16:29, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -Boeselager- -- 2018 -- 0865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus -- 2018 -- 1177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Universitätsklinikum -- 2018 -- 1180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality.Sanu N 11:43, 7 March 2018

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus -- 2018 -- 1185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus -- 2018 -- 1178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Universitätsklinikum -- 2018 -- 1191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2018 -- 1305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, Universitätsklinikum -- 2018 -- 1199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The weak dust spot in the sky should be removed and the sky could do with some denoising.--Ermell 07:16, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I've found the dust spot! Everything fixed. Thank you. --XRay 16:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Good quality. --Ermell 17:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Watt-Welten -- 2018 -- 1041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and QI to me --Cvmontuy 14:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

5DIV

Hallo Dietmar, ich bin am überlegen, mir eine 5DIV zu kaufen. Genaugenommen bin ich eigentlich schon ziemlich entschlossen, habe mir aber vorgenommen, vor dem Kauf mal bei ein paar Besitzern dieser Kamera nachzufragen, wie die Erfahrungen so sind. Wie kommst Du mit der Kamera zurecht? Bist Du zufrieden? Irgendwelche speziellen Vorzüge oder Nachteile? --Code (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Code: Hallo Ansgar, wenn du doch schon ziemlich entschlossen bist, kann ich dich doch auch kaum noch davon abhalten, oder? Möchte ich auch gar nicht. Ich habe meine Entscheidung nicht bereut, vielmehr bedauert, dass ich nicht schon früher auf den großen Sensor gewechselt habe. Die EOS 5DMIV ist ein Arbeitstier und sie arbeitet richtig gut. Feature, die mir fehlten, sind endlich an Bord. Die Auflösung ist mehr als ausreichend, die Dynamik nicht herausragend, aber schon gut. Vorteile könnte ich noch einige auszählen. Du merkst schon, ich bin zufrieden. Aber ein paar Bedenken kann ich dir nicht nehmen, die ich doch erwähnen möchte. Erst einmal ist sie größer und schwerer. Ich habe zum Beispiel auch einen neuen Fotorucksack gekauft. Sie hat keinen integrierten Blitz, aber den nutze ich bei all meinen anderen Kameras auch nicht. Sie hat kein Klappdisplay. Das ist echt so ein Punkt, denn meine Aufnahmen dicht über dem Boden oder mit in die Höhe gehaltener Kamera sind schwieriger geworden. Meine Objektive durfte ich - bis auf eines - komplett tauschen. Das 20-mm-Sigma ist Spitze. Selten ein so gutes Objektiv gehabt. Das neue Immerdrauf 24-105-mm-Canon war trotz der L-Serie schlechter. Die ersten Bilder bei QIC wurden wegen Unschärfe bemängelt. Gut, es ist Pixelpeeping, denn bei einer 12-MPx- und bei einer 30-MPx-Kamera auf Pixelebene die Schärfe zu beurteilen, ist Quark. Aber das lässt sich einigen Bewerterinnen und Bewertern wohl kaum noch in überschaubarer Zeit erklären. Es war mir trotzdem zuviel. Ergo: Kamera und Objektiv gingen erst einmal zum Service. (Anmerkung am Rande: Dank kostenlosem CPS mit Priority eine Servicezeit von 5 Tagen plus Versand statt vorher erfahrungsgemäß 5 Tage plus Versand. Aber im ersten Fall werden die 5 Tage zugesichert, also doch ein kleiner Unterschied.) Nach dem Service hat die Schärfe deutlich zugenommen und heute ich nichts mehr zu bemängeln. Das Objektivthema ist aber immens. Viele Objektive schaffen die Auflösung des 30-MPx-Sensors gar nicht. Canon hat etliche im Angebot, die seit über 10 Jahren produziert werden. Vor 10 Jahren dachte man auch gar nicht an heutige Auflösungen. Da muss man beim Kauf schon aufpassen. Gute Objektive, die richtig gut zur Kamera passen, sind schon heftig teuer. Man zumindest in Bezug auf das Equipment den Hobbybereich verlassen. Ich bin also zufrieden. Dank eines Vorgängers aus demselben Hause war die Umstellung auch einfach. Man fand sich sofort zurecht. Aber für die Spezialitäten muss man schon Anleitung studieren, lesen und ausprobieren. Ich habe die Kamera seit November und kam grundlegend sofort klar. Heute würde ich meinen Kenntnisstand als gut bezeichnen, muss aber noch einmal die Anleitung durchgehen, um einem "sehr gut" nahezukommen. Ach ja, Handbuch. Gibt's nur als Download. Da spart Canon an der falschen Stelle. --XRay talk 15:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. Klingt so, als gebe es jedenfalls keine Umstände, die mich noch davon abbringen könnten. Meine Objektive sind ja durchweg schon ziemlich gut. Ich würde mir ja sehr gerne noch das 16-35mm F4L kaufen, aber ob das auch noch ins Budget passt, muss ich mir nochmal gut überlegen. Jedenfalls nochmal Danke für Deine Einschätzung. Und ja - von Vollformat möchte ich auch nicht mehr weg. Ich war kurz am überlegen, ob ich auf was spiegelloses umsteige oder gar auf MFT, aber ich bin mittlerweile ein derartige Qualitätsfetischist geworden, dass ich mit was anderem gar nicht mehr klarkäme. Ich hatte dann noch über einen Systemwechsel zu Nikon nachgedacht, weil Canon doch ziemlich hinterherhinkt (die D850 ist schon ein anderes Kaliber, als die 5DIV), aber letztlich haben mich vor allem die Objektive davon abgehalten. Auch das Objektivsortiment, das ich noch nicht habe, aber von dem ich träume. Sowas wie das 85mm f/1.2L hat Nikon einfach nicht. Und bei Tilt-Shift siehts auch schlecht aus. Aber das ist natürlich alles sowieso noch Zukunftsmusik. Viele Grüße! --Code (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Sowohl die Nikon als auch eine Sony waren bei mir auch in der Auswahl. Die Nikon ist zuerst ausgeschieden, die Sony erst auf der Zielgeraden. Die Unterschiede sind eher marginal, die Canon ist es geworden, weil ich die Bedienung kannte. Allerdings habe ich auch eine Sony-Systemkamera und kenne ein wenig von Sonys Weg. Gefällt mir persönlich nicht ganz so. --XRay talk 19:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Woran lag's bei der Nikon? --Code (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Mehrere Gespräche mit dem Fotohändlers meines Vertrauens auch über Nikons Produktpolitik und verschiedene Berichte über fehlerhafte Kameraserien in den vergangenen zwei Jahren. Die technischen Daten fand ich gut, allerdings kein nennenswertes Alleinstellungsmerkmal. --XRay talk 19:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -- 2018 -- 0839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Historisches Rathaus -- 2018 -- 1211-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche -- 2018 -- 1230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche -- 2018 -- 1231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Historisches Rathaus, Skulptur -- 2018 -- 1208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Bademuseum, Liebesschlösser -- 2018 -- 1078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche -- 2018 -- 1232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentI suggest a stronger crop (cutting out the right curved sandstone) and a flahs to reduce the shadows. Mir ist ja klar das ich da eine kleinkarierte Nervensäge bin, aber das eigentliche Objekt hat ja nur geschätzte max. drei Tonwerte, dafür ist es mir zu hell zu weich und auch nicht kontrastreich. Ölen oder anfeuchten geht ja kaum, blitzen schon, das härteste im Kontrast sind die zeichnungslosen Schatten die detailwichtig sind. Den normalen großen Schatten von rechts finde ich unten sehr bildstörend. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)}
* Good quality. --Smial 11:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Platz des Westfälischen Friedens -- 2018 -- 1209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Überwasserkirche -- 2018 -- 1233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:09, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2018 -- 1308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2018 -- 1309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2018 -- 1313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and a good idea. -- Ikan Kekek 05:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Take a look at this

Just a heads up, I actually found this funny when I was categorizing recent QIC's. I believe this, File:Norderney, Hafen -- 2018 -- 1047.jpg may have the wrong description. It's a very nice dock but it's not a mammal. Have a good day! -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

You're right, but there are two meanings of dolphin. It's this: Category:Dolphins (structure). The german word isn't really better. --XRay talk 18:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark -- 2018 -- 1314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -von Schick- -- 2018 -- 0881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very nice motive. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Krypta -- 2018 -- 1398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

f/16

I took this in f/11, f/13 and f/16, as with most of the other images from that particular campsite because the scenery was so gorgeous and the skies so clear. Most of them worked best at f/11, but this one worked at f/16, for me, because I got the best exposure on the clouds, with no blown highlights, and the deepest blue. Daniel Case (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -von Schick- -- 2018 -- 0882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1346.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Krypta -- 2018 -- 1399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1353.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Krypta -- 2018 -- 1407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof, Grabstätte -von Schiller- -- 2018 -- 0875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Krypta -- 2018 -- 1396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Melancholic, too --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pro, but like the cropped more. Heilig Kreuz is one of modern christ styles. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Anna-Katharina-Emmerick-Gedenkstätte -- 2018 -- 1413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Dernekamp, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1519-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Peoplefotografie und Portraits

Ich wunder mich über den geringen Anteil an Personenfotografie. Ist vielleicht auch nicht Dein Ding? Ich hätte mal eine grundsätzliche Frage zu Personenbildern. Eigentlich macht es seitens Commons doch nur Sinn, wenn es eine Verwendung für Wikipedia gibt. Das kann ich nachvollziehen, damit die ganzen Serien von Politikern oder Sportlern bei einem event. Seltsamerweise findet das mehr in einer Form der Reportage statt. Das sachliche darf damit das fotografische überwiegen. Seltsamerweise gibt es sehr wenige Bilder von "Schaustellern" (gemeint ist sich zur Schau stellen), Musiker, Philosophen gerade Mode und models gehen irgendwie total unter. Mir ist oft die Arbeit zu viel (ich bin nicht der Edit-Guy) und wenn ich mich mal wieder vertippe, ist es sehr umständlich, die reinen Tippies richtig zu stellen. Bis auf Musiker und Künstler sehe ich auch keine sinnvolle Verwendung für wikipedia, was eventuell die fehlende gestalterische Umsetzung erklärt. Mögen viele anders sehen, aber Commons ist unter der CAT People - da für mich keine Fotografenseite. Ich nehme Persönlichkeitsrechte sehr ernst, Kinder in Armutsländern veröffentliche ich daher nur noch selten (das ist oft zur Fotosafari verkommen). Ich habe mal eine eigenen Kategorie aufgemacht. Kannst Du das mal scanen? Photographs by Hans-Jürgen Neubert/Peoble and Portraits Ich finde das so bei keinem Commoner, was sich (bis auf die Arbeit und die fehlende Verwendung) mir nicht komplett erklärt. Wo setzte ich eigentlich richtig den "public rights stamp"? Schöne Woche, Hans-Jürgen Neubert Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Da muss ich etwas ausholen, es ist nicht mir drei Wörtern erklärbar. Zuerst einmal zur Verwendung. Wikimedia Commons ist unabhängig von Wikipedia. Dank der Entstehungsgeschichte hat sich das noch nicht bei jedem herumgesprochen, es ist aber so im Projektziel definiert. Es gibt aber eine leichte Verwendbarkeit in den Wikipedias dieser Welt. Die vielen Personenbilder, die du siehst, sind nahezu immer ereignisorientiert - wenn man das mal so ausdrücken darf. Es ist oft als Projekt bei Wikimedia eingestielt und wird von Wikimedia gefördert. Die Förderung fällt unterschiedlich aus. Besonders gerne werden Festivals, Politikerinnen und Politiker oder Sportereignisse gefördert. Schau mal hier: Category:Wikimedia Foundation projects oder Category:Supported by Wikimedia Deutschland. Das stellt vielleicht erst einmal ein etwa schräges Bild dar. Wenn man allerdings mal bei Category:People by subject schaut, findet man auch andere Bilder, teilweise für sich gesehen schon recht schräg und absurd. Deine Bilder passen letztendlich ganz gut ins Konzept. Persönlichkeitsrechte der Abgebildeten gelten eigentlich sowieso, erst recht bei freien Lizenzen wie Creative Commons. Das muss rein rechtlich gesehen gar nicht sonderlich bemerkt werden. Es ist meiner Meinung nach aber trotzdem einen Hinweis wert, vor allem wegen der besonderen Bedeutung der Identifizierbarkeit von Personen. Und dieses Template mit dem Hinweis auf die Persönlichkeitsrechte. Es gibt diverse passende Orte, bei Information unter Permission oder bei der Lizenz oder direkt nach Information. Wenn's spezielle Orte geben sollte, steht's im Beschreibungstext, schau einfach mal hier: {{Personality rights}}. Das wird aber alles mal ein Ende finden, wenn sich die strukturierten Daten mal durchgesetzt haben werden. Das Projekt läuft auf Hochtouren.
Darf ich noch etwas anmerken? Deine Kategorie Category:Photographs by Hans-Jürgen Neubert/Peoble and Portraits, soll ich sie umbenennen? "People". ;-)
Und ja, du hast recht, ich mache keinen Personenaufnahmen. Das ist nicht ganz mein Ding. --XRay talk 15:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

ː:@XRay: Ja bitte umbenennen, einen für die Mittelfranken, doppeldes D und hartes B auch Legasteniker genannt ;-) Die gesponserten events sind nicht mein Ding. Ich hatte mich schon bei Granada gewundert, das die sich so eine Arbeit antut. Ich kenne das nur von Modeevents, da geht es mir mehr um monetäre Zuwendung, die Arbeit die ganzen Modelle auch noch zu benamen wäre mir zu viel. Es gibt hier ja nicht einmal gute Bilder von David Bowie, der ist tot und ich bin kein Rentner. Ich könnte so nur mal den "Schwarzen Pudel" einstellen, die Edit-Story und CAT´s macht irgendwie weniger Sinn. Mir ist auch fotografisch etwas aufgefallen, bei Personen arbeitet man als Fotograf ja ganz anders (WA, offene Blende, Focus auf das Objekt und das oft in einer feinen, eng abgestecken, Grenze, Weichzeichnung durch Licht und Softer (brush) bei Frauen, Härte bei Männern usw) zudem ist einem meist das Zielformat bekannt, die wenigsten sind daher direkt anzuwenden. Die jpeg´s haben Taschenformat, die Plakate sind fast zu hart. Dürfte viel Prügel bei QI geben ː-D Als persönlichen share kann man damit commons nicht nutzen, lässt sich ja schwer verstecken. Schräg und absurd wäre bei vielen Künstlern und Musikern ein Stilmittel. Im Umkehrschluß sieht man doch auch, das die wenigsten QI´s Werbetauglich sind, außer bei Urlaubsbildern und Architektur. Merci und Dankeǃ Hans-Jürgen Neubert 17:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Die Zielgruppe hier bei Wikimedia Commons ist hier schon anders als bei manch anderen Angeboten. Eine Alternative habe ich aber bis heute nicht gefunden. Das mag auch daran liegen, dass ich einerseits die freien Lizenzen favorisiere und mich andererseits auch gerne für Denkmäler engagiere. Für JPEGs gibt es sicherlich ein für und wider. Ich frage mich schon seit Jahren, warum Kameras von heute so ein in die Jahre gekommenes Format überhaupt noch schreiben. - Und ein Wikimedia-Projekt habe ich mal gemacht, Fotoflüge im Münsterland. Etliche Wochen Arbeit war das. Das brauche ich erst einmal nicht mehr. Kleinere Projekte durchaus, aber nicht in dem Stil mit etlichen Fotografinnen und Fotografen im Schnelldurchlauf mal eben eine Schloss oder Museum ablichten. Das ist mir von der Qualität her nicht akzeptabel und mehr Knipsen als Fotografieren. - Deine Kategorie habe ich übrigens umbenannt. --XRay talk 16:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Merci, auch offiziell. Komme aktuell weniger zu commons. Bin daher oft zu spät oder langsam. Was mir aufgefallen ist https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b6/Nottuln%2C_Wassermühle_Schulze-Westerath%2C_BMW_Mini_--_2018_--_1485-9.jpg

Du arbeitest doch mit LT, kann das Ebenen? Auch ein jpeg-bug, die doppelten Bilder stört gerade am Baum, sieht wie eine verschobene Hochpass-Ebene aus, passiert halt leider auch, das sich die SW verrechnet... Schönes WE, Hans-Jürgen

:-) Ich verwalte und bearbeite meine Bilder mit Adobe Lightroom, das ist richtig. Allerdings nicht ausschließlich. In einigen Fällen kommt Photoshop zum Zuge oder auch Photomatix als HDR-Spezialist. Lightroom kann keine Ebenen, Photoshop aber. HDR können beide nicht so toll, daher dafür Photomatix. Der Fehler bei dem Bild entstand trotzdem in Photomatix. Manche Algorithmen arbeiten bei einigen Bildern nicht so toll und ich hatte wohl die Fehler in dem Ergebnis übersehen. Das Bild generiere ich neu. Derzeit bin ich jedoch dabei, einen neuen Rechner einzurichten. Ich bin von MS Windows auf den Mac umgestiegen. Das kostet ein wenig Eingewöhnung. --XRay talk 05:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1421.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A high quality photo, good artistic composition for a detail photo, difficult perspective but well done, some parts are not sharp but IMO this is because of the way the light shines through the windows --Michielverbeek 08:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Dernekamp, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image quality for me. Small perspective correction desired (see houses on the left)--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Parkhaus am Coesfelder Kreuz, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Vivid composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Alter Friedhof -- 2018 -- 0876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Dernekamp, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Parkhaus am Coesfelder Kreuz, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Parkplatz, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1622-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Dernekamp, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1545-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

20:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1425.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 1425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Parkplatz, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1593-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Parkhaus am Coesfelder Kreuz, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottuln, Wassermühle Schulze-Westerath, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1485-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo does have a lot of noise. But still okay for me.--Famberhorst 15:54, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Parkplatz, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1567-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand, Hotel -- 2018 -- 1050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nine tripods on a single image, congratulations :-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:57, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
I quite like this. Possible FP? What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek 08:33, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Kerkstraat -- 2018 -- 1795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 04:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Koppelstraat -- 2018 -- 1789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but like to remove two spots in the sky--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 04:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Het Walletje -- 2018 -- 1806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Antiquariat -- 2018 -- 1807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1783.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Krypta -- 2018 -- 1408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wish it was sharper at top, but nice abstraction --Daniel Case 04:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Sint-Georgius-Kerk -- 2018 -- 1808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  Comment Tower is skewed.--Famberhorst 05:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry. It's fixed now. --XRay 05:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Okay now. Thank you.--Famberhorst 06:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Koppelkerk -- 2018 -- 1812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Bastion Treurniet -- 2018 -- 1863 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Special.--Famberhorst 05:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Neuapostolische Kirche -- 2018 -- 1888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:34, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Werben wir jetzt hier für Autohändler? -- Spurzem 21:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Windmühle Prins van Oranje -- 2018 -- 1813-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Windmühle Prins van Oranje -- 2018 -- 1819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Sint-Georgius-Kerk -- 2018 -- 1792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Spring 2018

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
  • Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
  • Several Commons community members are working on ways to integrate Wikidata in Wikimedia Commons. While this is not full-fledged structured data yet, this work helps to prepare for future conversion of data, and helps to understand how Wikidata and Commons can work better together.
Things to do / input and feedback requests
Discussions held
Events
Partners and allies
  • We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
Research
Development
  • Prototypes will be available for Multilingual Captions soon.
Stay up to date!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Antiquariat -- 2018 -- 1833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Markt, Wasserpumpe -- 2018 -- 1838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Bastion Treurniet -- 2018 -- 1850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Baustelle "Ketteler Gärten" -- 2018 -- 1892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Norderney, Weststrand, Hotel -- 2018 -- 1050.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Norderney, Weststrand, Hotel -- 2018 -- 1050.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Antiquariat -- 2018 -- 1836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Bastion Treurniet -- 2018 -- 1861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Neuapostolische Kirche -- 2018 -- 1898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Antiquariat -- 2018 -- 1835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Markt, Wasserpumpe -- 2018 -- 1839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Bastion Treurniet -- 2018 -- 1859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Neuapostolische Kirche -- 2018 -- 1895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Astonishing!

I love File:Paris, Notre Dame -- 2014 -- 1446.jpg. Fantastic photography. Thanks--Lmbuga (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. :-) --XRay talk 04:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Rembrandt's Hendrikje -- 2018 -- 1847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Markt -- 2018 -- 1845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Vestingpark Sint Bernardus -- 2018 -- 1870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Vestingpark Sint Bernardus -- 2018 -- 1868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2018 -- 1329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL) -- 2018 -- 1877.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Vestingpark Sint Bernardus -- 2018 -- 1884.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Markt -- 2018 -- 1844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Weststrand -- 2018 -- 1106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Scenic. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Bitte an XRayBot

Hallo XRay, bist du bitte so nett und programmierst deinen Bot dahin gehend um, dass er beim Anlegen von Kategorien aus dem Schema Category:month year in Germany by state, z.B. Category:September 2004 in Germany by state statt der Einzelkategorien gleich die Vorlage Template:Germanymonthyearbystate nutzt? Das wäre klasse, m.E. würde das für uns alle die Arbeit noch weiter vereinfachen. Danke! --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Mache ich. Danke für den Hinweis. --XRay talk 21:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Dernekamp, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1545-51.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Dernekamp, BMW Mini -- 2018 -- 1545-51.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Vestingpark Sint Bernardus -- 2018 -- 1872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent composition. Looks like a painting. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Bastion Treurniet -- 2018 -- 1863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Vestingpark Sint Bernardus -- 2018 -- 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredevoort (NL), Vestingpark Sint Bernardus -- 2018 -- 1874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 1991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2018 -- 1962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2018 -- 1978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2018 -- 1994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2018 -- 1983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2018 -- 1970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1925-27-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
*  Comment I think there are some green halos on the left.--Famberhorst 06:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you. You're re right. It's fixed now. --XRay 06:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Fürstbischöfliches Schloss -- 2018 -- 1953-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2018 -- 1982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2018 -- 1988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (Alte Fahrt) -- 2018 -- 2149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Nice mood and soft light. -- Ikan Kekek 04:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (Alte Fahrt) -- 2018 -- 2147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question Is it possible to have more details in the sky and to make the background less grainy ? Nice composition BTW. --PJDespa 11:02, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Yes, thank you. It's fixed now. --XRay 13:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality IMO. --PJDespa 15:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A nice daily sphere, verticals are well done, sharp enough for Q1, but IMO shadows might have been a bit stronger --Michielverbeek 10:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you. Shadows are improved now. --XRay 13:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (Alte Fahrt) -- 2018 -- 2151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2018 -- 2267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Bockwindmühle -- 2018 -- 2161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Schmiede -- 2018 -- 2164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Bockwindmühle -- 2018 -- 2154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Schmiede -- 2018 -- 2168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Backhaus -- 2018 -- 2195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Schmiede -- 2018 -- 2170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Backhaus -- 2018 -- 2197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Mühlenhaus -- 2018 -- 2208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonn, Heerstraße -- 2018 -- 2252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

falsche Bot-Einstellung

Hallo XRay, bitte schau mal in die Category:2017 in Germany, danke! Dein Bot hat dort einige falsche "Jahr in Bundesland"-Kategorien hineingelegt, offenbar jahresunabhängig alles nach 2017. Sachsen-Anhalt hab ich nun schon aufgeräumt; Bayern, Baden-Württemberg, Hamburg, Hessen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern und Saarland noch nicht. Bitte überprüfe mal die Bot-Einstellung, mir scheint das ein Grundsatzproblem zu sein. Evtl. kann der Bot das auch gleich noch aufräumen? Das wäre klasse! Danke vorab! Grüße, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Ups. Kontrolliere ich. Danke für den Hinweis. --XRay talk 16:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Schmiede -- 2018 -- 2173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Backhaus -- 2018 -- 2199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Mühlenhaus -- 2018 -- 2210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Mühlenhaus -- 2018 -- 2219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Bockwindmühle -- 2018 -- 2162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 Question - XRay, are my eyes tricking me, or am I seeing chromatic aberration and halos in the upper part? -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Sorry, you're right. I've found (minor) green CAs and fixed it. Very, very minor halos may be at the top of the mill may be. I've seen it only at pixel level. Thank you. --XRay 07:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Backhaus -- 2018 -- 2202-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Granada Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:21:22 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Mühlenhaus -- 2018 -- 2211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof -- 2018 -- 2212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Mühlenhaus -- 2018 -- 2218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Christian Ferrer Sun, 29 Apr 2018 05:18:46 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof -- 2018 -- 2215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 11:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof -- 2018 -- 2216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Poco a poco Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:52:08 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Landschule -- 2018 -- 2233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Prinzipalmarkt, Hansemahl -- 2018 -- 2288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Bockwindmühle -- 2018 -- 2163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Comment Can you please remove the halo at the top right of the windmill? Perspective for me no problem.--Famberhorst 05:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I'll try it within the next days. And I've seen, there are CAs too. But please have a look to the wing. IMO there are no halos, it's a very small part brightened by the sun. --XRay 05:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Note added.--Famberhorst 06:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks for your hint. It's fixed now. --XRay 16:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Mühlenhaus -- 2018 -- 2221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof, Torhaus Ost -- 2018 -- 2223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.-ArildV 19:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2017 -- 3243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Naturpark -- 2018 -- 0923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2017 -- 3252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2094-99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.  Question Why use only f 7.1 when you have a tripod (I guess) --Moroder 18:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring, Naturdenkmal -- 2017 -- 3273-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2017 -- 3244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Shallow DoF but for me it's OK. Good sharpness on the tree. --Basotxerri 15:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2114-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

16:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Dünenlandschaft -- 2018 -- 0928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2131-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Magical! I'm not sure whether the two rainbow-looking areas are lens flares. Without those, I think this is an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 05:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thank you. I've just removed the lens flare. --XRay 05:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Dünenlandschaft -- 2018 -- 0932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Beresa, Mercedes-Benz C-Klasse Cabrio -- 2018 -- 1763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hmpf

Sieht ja nicht gut aus bei FP :-( War meine Vorstellung nicht enthusiastisch genug? Täte mir echt leid, wenn ich die Chancen dadurch versemmelt hätte. --Smial (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Smial: Mach dir keine Gedanken, du hast nichts versemmelt. Im Gegenteil, vielen Dank für die Nominierung. Ich habe das deutliche Gefühl, dass sich mein Stil verändert und das einiges verursacht. Versierte Fotografinnen und Fotografen - zu denen ich dich zähle - können hier folgen, andere folgen eher einer Art Mainstream. Das sind zwar oft auch gute Bilder, aber fotografische Mittel und Besonderheiten finden sich dort nicht. Und dann ist da noch der Wechsel zum Vollformat und einer Auflösung, die deutlich höher ist. Klar, dass hier in 1:1-Ansicht andere Mängel sichtbar werden, die aber völlig unbedeutend sind. Das Verständnis dafür findet sich auch eher bei versierten Fotografinnen und Fotografen, die die Grenzen eines Objektivs auch einschätzen können. Mal sehen, wie es weiter geht. --XRay talk 18:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2017 -- 3246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Naturschutzgebiet "Teiche in der Heubachniederung" -- 2018 -- 2338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --ArildV 04:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Kettbach -- 2018 -- 2345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norderney, Dünenlandschaft -- 2018 -- 0934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some CA in the upper right corner. Otherwise QI imo.--ArildV 04:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thank you. It's fixed now. --XRay 16:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)  Support--ArildV 17:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2079-83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Did you know which species of trees we can see here? Tournasol7 06:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I think it is Fagus sylvatica. --XRay 07:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2299-303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Naturschutzgebiet "Teiche in der Heubachniederung" -- 2018 -- 2341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2131-7.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2131-7.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Waldgebiet -- 2018 -- 2348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2078-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Feld -- 2018 -- 2355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Note: can you please remove the aura around the haybar on the right?--Famberhorst 04:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now. --XRay 10:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Okay now. Thank you.--Famberhorst 15:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2327-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2332-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2060-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. IMO reasonable use of DoF. --Basotxerri 08:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Feld -- 2018 -- 2352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Kettbach -- 2018 -- 2350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2094-99 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Naturschutzgebiet "Teiche in der Heubachniederung" -- 2018 -- 2342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Wiese -- 2018 -- 2357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2131-7 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 05:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Naturschutzgebiet Ichterloh -- 2018 -- 2307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Suisant7 11:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottuln, Skulptur "Rohrbert" -- 2018 -- 2513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Feld -- 2018 -- 2351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strong CA, otherwise good.--ArildV 05:25, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry. I haven't seen this. It's fixed now. --XRay 10:15, 13 May 2018 (UTC) Thank you, good now. --ArildV 16:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Naturschutzgebiet "Teiche in der Heubachniederung" -- 2018 -- 2343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry but strong CA here also, please see the trees.--ArildV 05:47, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry. I haven't seen this too. It's fixed now. --XRay 10:15, 13 May 2018 (UTC) Better, but still some purple CA (right side). --ArildV 16:46, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks you. It's fixed too. --XRay 16:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Weidezaun -- 2018 -- 2378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Gievenbeck, ehemalige Kaserne -- 2018 -- 2510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 03:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2018 -- 2520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 03:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Schärfentiefe

Eine geringe Schärfentiefe dient dazu, bestimmte Aspekte in einem Bild hervorzuheben und andere in den Hintergrund treten zu lassen. Letztendlich ist es eine Sache des Geschmacks, ob man bei der Aufnahme einer Schlange (wie in dem gegebenen Beispiel) den Blick des Betrachters gezielt auf einen Teil des Körpers lenken möchte, oder eben nicht. Mit „Qualität“ hat das rein gar nichts zu tun, sondern damit, wie der Fotograf ein Szene interpretiert. Ich habe die Behauptung, eine geringe Schärfentiefe bei Tieraufnahmen sei ein „Mangel“ hier auf Commons seit Jahren unwidersprochen hingenommen, letztendlich entwickelt sich diese Projekt aber nicht weiter, wenn immer dieselben Dinge als vermeintlicher „Qualitätsmängel“ angemerkt werden. Du weißt, dass ich deine Arbeit hier ansonsten sehr schätze, aber mir liegt nun einmal sehr viel an diesem Projekt und ich habe schon seit geraumer Zeit das Gefühl, dass Commons ein eigenes Qualitätsverständnis entwickelt hat, dass sich von dem Rest der Fotografie-Welt immer weiter entfernt. Die übrigen Mängel (etwa die JPG-Artefakte) erkenne ich an, fand sie aber nicht so gravierend, dass ich das Bild deshalb ablehnen würde. Nocheinmal: ich mag deine Arbeit hier und ich kann mich noch gut an unsere sehr freundliche Begegnung per Email vor ein paar Jahren erinnern. Insofern bitte ich darum, meine Kritik nicht persönlich zu nehmen. Beste Grüße aus der Ferne, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Template:Ping Danke für deine Hinweise. Ich hatte mir das Bild seit deiner positiven Bewertung noch mehrfach angesehen. Mit der Schärfentiefe hast du recht, damit bin ich selbst jetzt mehrfach angeeckt und störe mich mittlerweile auch ein wenig an dem Mainstream in den Bildern. Bei dieser Schlange bin ich mir in der Bewertung eher unsicher und dankbar, dass du eine alternative Bewertung gemacht hast und damit die Diskussion ermöglichst. Es sind noch ein paar andere Faktoren, die mich an diesem Bild irritieren, wenn nicht stören. Es ist sehr eng beschnitten, rechts fehlt mir ein kleiner Teil der Schlange. Irgendwie wirkt das Bild wie mit einer anderen Kamera gemacht und die EXIF-Daten auf "Canon EOS 6D" getrimmt. Ich beobachte auf jeden Fall die Diskussion. --XRay talk 05:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Und noch etwas: Du schreibst "dass Commons ein eigenes Qualitätsverständnis entwickelt hat". Das kann ich nur bestätigen. Es ist derzeit eher Wikipedia-like und nicht tatsächlich fotografisch. Vielleicht haben wir uns auch selber weiter entwickelt. Irgendwie habe ich das Gefühl, dass ich mich mehr und mehr von Wikimedia Commons löse - wie etliche andere Fotografinnen und Fotografen vorher, die ich sehr schätze und deren Arbeiten mich begeistern. --XRay talk 06:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für deine besonnene und freundliche Antwort. Ich weiß das sehr zu schätzen – vor allem, weil ich den allgemeinen Ton hier auf Commons nicht immer ans angenehm erlebe. Ich persönlich benutze die Schärfentiefe regelmäßig bewusst zur Bildgestaltung. Deshalb vielleicht auch mein Drang, dem Vorwurf entgegenzutreten, es handle sich bei geringer Schärfentiefe stets um einen Qualitätsmangel. Bei den Qualitätsbildern kann ich diese Bewertung noch eher verstehen, als bei den Exzellenten Bildern. Denn bei letzteren – und angesichts der Tatsache, dass die meisten Teilnehmer dort auf semi-professionellem Niveau fotografieren – kommt es mir manchmal skurril vor, wenn mit dem Argument „das Bild enthält einen technischen Mangel“ operiert wird. Wenn stattdessen mehr Projektteilnehmer sagen würden „ich hätte die Szene anders interpretiert“ oder „ich verstehe deinen Ansatz zur Bildgestaltung, teile ihn aber nicht“, dann würden wir vermutlich alle besser miteinander auskommen. – Was die Exif-Daten angeht, so war mir das während des Reviews auch aufgefallen, letztendlich gehe ich aber immer von guten Absichten aus. Nochmals beste Grüße nach Deutschland. Wenn ich mal wieder in der alten Heimat bin, würde ich mich über ein persönliches Kennenlernen sehr freuen. Bis dahin, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Manch eine Bewertung würde ich auch gerne etwas anders schreiben, aber oft genug reicht mein Englisch dafür leider nicht. Der Tonfall hier geht meiner Meinung nach noch, zumindest bei den meisten. Da habe ich insbesondere in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia schon anderes erlebt. Letzten Endes hat dies dazu geführt, dass ich dort nur noch selten aktiv. Hier bei Wikimedia Commons fehlt mir so etwas wie wie QI auf fotografischer Ebene, nicht mit der Wikipedia-Brille und auch mal ohne das Wow bei FP. Aber ganz ehrlich: Auf meinem fotografischen Werdegang haben mir hier einige Fotografinnen und Fotografen mit ihrer sachlichen und begründeten Argumentation sehr geholfen. Hier gab es keine flapsige Abwertungen im Stil von "ich mag keine Glasfassaden" wie bei Wikipedia. ... Solltest du mal in Deutschland sein, melde dich gerne. Vielleicht klappt ja mal ein Treffen. Es würde mich freuen. (Vielleicht klappt es auch mal in deiner Region. Meine erste Reise an die Westküste der USA hat mich so sehr begeistert, dass ich dort gerne noch einmal hin möchte.) --XRay talk 07:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Du bist auf jeden Fall herzlich eingeladen. Meine Frau Payton und ich haben sehr gerne Gäste aus Deutschland. Die Natur in Nordkalifornien ist atemberaubend. Sollte das klappen, würde ich mich sehr freuen. --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Danke! :-) --XRay talk 07:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Deidesheim St. Ulrich Epitaph Philip Seelmann (1740-1784).jpg

Hallo Dietmar,
danke für Deine Bewertung. Ich hab aber schon gefühlte tausendmal erklärt, dass mein System keine exif-data hergibt. Woran es liegt weiß ich auch nicht.
Gruß --Palauenc05 ([[User talk:Palauenc05|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Ich kann es mir leider nicht merken, wer damit technische Probleme hat. Was für ein System nutzt du denn? Sind da noch analoge Komponenten dabei? --XRay talk 17:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Heart selection

Hi Dietmar - I followed a link to suggestions you had made in the discussion about focus stacking about improving QI. I came across your little heart logo and the 'selection' idea which I would love to copy. How would I do that please. Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

It's not easy. It is a combination of one of user categories and a feature of my bot. I didn't found an easy function for this. My personal selection are good pictures, sometimes FP, sometimes not. I've created this category since my images with my 30 mpx camera are often treated as unsharp - at 100 percent view. (See Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Resolution_and_100_percent_views) A misunderstandig of a lot of reviewers. I can explain a manual way for the heart: Create a suitable category, add the files to the category. For each file you can add something like {{Top icon|imagename=Nuvola apps package favorite.svg|wikilink=Category:Photographs by Dietmar Rabich/Photographs selection|description=Photographs selection by the author|width=20|height=20|sortkey=zzz}}. That's the icon top right. --XRay talk 17:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll try it. Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about all the fuss at the Village Pump. Following that debate, I've designed a favourites gallery User:Charlesjsharp/favourites based on the FP layout which you might like. Only done my mammals so far. Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Template:Ping I didn't know user categories for favorites are not allowed. I've seen the discussion, too much for my small english vocabulary. A gallery of favorites is only a solution for few images. I'd galleries before, but I can't handle with galleries with hundreds of images. I still add a favorite flag (handled by one of my templates) to my images and I'm looking for an alternative for the categories. The favorite tool isn't a solution because of the galleries and it's only in english. --XRay talk 12:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Hinweis zur Teilnahme an WikiDaheim

Hallo XRay, ich habe gesehen, dass du Bilder hochgeladen hast, die im Scope von WikiDaheim liegen könnten, z.B. Wien,_Zentralfriedhof,_Alter_Jüdischer_Friedhof_--_2018_--_3215.jpg. Damit die Bilder an unserem Fotowettbewerb teilnehmen können, müssen sie mit der Commons-Vorlage WikiDaheim und dem entsprechenden Thema (topic) gekennzeichnet werden. Dies geschieht automatisch, wenn du die Bilder über unsere App https://Wikidaheim.at oder über die diversen Listen (Denkmallisten, Naturdenkmallisten, Public Art Listen, etc. in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia) hochlädst. Bei anderen Upload-Wegen musst du selbst dafür sorgen, dass das Bild mit den richtigen Bausteinen markiert ist um am Wettbewerb teilzunehmen. Technische Hilfe dazu findest du unter de:Wikipedia Diskussion:WikiDaheim. Natürlich steht dir die Teilnahme mit deinen Bildern frei. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich schaue mal, ob ich ein paar Bilder beisteuern kann. Ich musste übrigens schon feststellen, dass es trotz der vielen Touristen selbst in der Inneren Stadt Ecken gibt, die sich in Wikimedia Commons kaum oder gar nicht wiederfinden. Da müsste man mehr Zeit haben. So habe ich nur die paar Bilder der Stadtbesichtigung, teilweise nicht einmal in ausreichender Qualität. Aber dafür bleibt leider keine Zeit und das Equipment ist dank Fluggepäck stark gekürzt. Ein paar Bilder kommen noch, dann sind alle meine Wien-Bilder. Es ist manchmal ganz schön schwer, die passenden Kategorien zu finden. Den russischen Friedhof, den du netterweise zugeordnet hast, habe ich gestern lange ergebnislos gesucht. Die Kategorie des Zentralfriedhofs ist einfach zu unübersichtlich. --XRay talk 09:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Template:Ping Zumindest eine Kategorie fehlt wohl noch: Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2018 in Austria/Cemeteries. Das wäre für meine hochgeladenen Bilder von gestern. Kannst du vielleicht mal schauen? Danke. --XRay talk 09:42, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Kat angelegt.
Zu den fehlenden Ecken, jede Menge, aber die Attraktion der Hauptsehenswürdigkeiten ... Ricardalovesmonuments hat unlängst erst eine ganze Reihe von Bildern von Gründerzeithäusern (das sind die, die gerade flächendeckend abgerissen werden) gemacht, wo noch nix da war. Maclemo macht einen auf Gedenktafeln (z.B. de:Liste_der_Gedenktafeln_und_Gedenksteine_in_Wien/Landstraße), Thomas Ledl in Gemeindebauten, Bwag in Verbesserung von bereits existierenden Abbildungen. und viele andere mehr. Es gibt kein Ziel, es gibt keinen Plan, es gibt keine Organisation, it's a wiki. Aber vielleicht hilft der Wettbewerb, die Augen der FotografInnen zu öffnen und mehr Bilder von noch nicht fotografierten Ecken zu bekommen. Wobei die Dörfer noch wesentlich unterbelichteter sind als die großen Städte.
Zum Zentralfriedhof: stimme dir zu, da ist ein Benutzer wie der Wirbelwind drüber gefahren und hat alles in klein-klein zerlegt. Diskussion war nicht. Macher sind im Vorteil gegenüber Diskutanten. Vorschlag? lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Ihr habt wenigstens Aktive. In meiner Region gibt es zu wenige. Es ist total mühsam, Leute zu motivieren. Was den Zentralfriedhof angeht: Ich würde erstmal die ganzen namentlich bekannten Grabstätte aus der zentralen Kategorie werfen. Die stehen auch bei den alphabetisch geordneten Kategorien. Dann hatte ich versucht, mich an den Gruppen zu orientieren, denn die stehen auf den Plänen. Diese Kategorien gibt es nicht vollständig. Und die besonderen Bereiche habe ich vor lauter Kategorien auch nicht gefunden. Für eine Mausoleum habe ich gestern bestimmt eine Stunde gebraucht, bis ich was passendes fand. Ähnlich ging es mir übrigens auch am Stephansdom, der wiederum zu wenig gegliedert ist. Oft lege ich die Kategorien ja selbst an, aber in einer Stadt mit vielen Aktiven lasse ich das. Da gibt es oft spezielle Kenntnisse und Vorlieben und auf große Diskutiererei habe ich keine Lust. Diese Diskussionen kosten nur Zeit und bringen meist nichts. --XRay talk 10:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Summer 2018

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
  • Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
  • Since our last newsletter, the Structured Data team has moved into designing and building prototypes for various features. The use of multilingual captions in the UploadWizard and on the file page has been researched, designed, discussed, and built out for use. Behind the scenes, back-end work on search is taking place and designs are being drawn up for the front-end. There will soon be specifications published for the use of the first Wikidata property on Commons, "Depicts," and a prototype is to be released to go along with that.
Things to do / input and feedback requests
Discussions held
Wikimania 2018
Partners and allies
Research

Two research projects about Wikimedia Commons are currently ongoing, or in the process of being finished:

  1. Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
  2. Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.
Development
  • Prototypes will be available for Depicts soon.
Stay up to date!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 21:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data Newsletter - Research link fix

Greetings,

The newsletter omitted two interwiki prefixes, breaking the links on non-meta wikis as you might see above. Here are the correct links:

  1. m:Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
  2. m:Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.

My apologies, I hope you find the corrected links helpful.

- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

23:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Kamera

Hallo Dietmar, bist Du auf Nikon DX umgestiegen? Viele Grüße! --Code ([[User talk:Code|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Template:Ping Nein, nein. Ich bin da recht günstig dran gekommen. Sie ist meine Drittkamera, ideal zum Radfahren. ;-) Die 5D ist in der Werkstatt, der Sensor ist nach einem Kirmesbesuch durchgebrannt. Ist eine etwas längere Geschichte. --XRay talk 15:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Template:Ping Jetzt habe ich etwas Zeit, da gibt es noch einen Info-Nachschlag. Ende Mai war ich auf einer Kirmes. Am Auto-Scooter habe ich wegen des Lichtspiels Aufnahmen gemacht. Zum Lichtspiel gehörte ein Laser. Die Kamera auf dem Stativ mit Liveview hat das mitbekommen. Erst zwei Wochenenden später hatte ich Zeit, mir die Bilder anzusehen, u. a. Stade, Teufelsmoor und Wien. Ein Fleck in allen Aufnahmen. Den habe ich zurückverfolgt bis zur Kirmes. Dort waren es dann rund 30 ausgefallene Pixel, nach Wien etwa 100 Pixel. Die Kamera ist seitdem in Reparatur. Erst hatte sie Canon gereinigt und aus ihrer Sicht OK zurückgeschickt. Natürlich war sie noch defekt und ging mit weiteren Belegen wieder zum Service. Irgendwann hatten sie den Fehler diagnostiziert und nannten die Kosten. Seitdem hoffe ich quasi jeden Tag, dass die Kamera wieder da ist. Heute halt nicht. Ersatzweise nutze ich solange meine 70D oder die Nikon. --XRay talk 17:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Ohje, das klingt nicht gut. Und es klingt teuer. Meine läuft zum Glück bislang super. Bin sehr zufrieden. Tolle Kamera. War zwar teuer, aber aus meiner Sicht hat sich die Investition absolut gelohnt. Meinst Du, der Defekt kam durch das Live-View? Tauscht Canon jetzt den kompletten Sensor aus? Grüße! --Code ([[User talk:Code|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Ist nicht wirklich toll. Ich vermisse die Kamera auch, denn die Bildqualität ist schon deutlich besser. Aber sie kommt wieder. Live-View war nur ein Teileffekt. Ob der Laser selbst die Ursache ist, weiß ich nicht. Ich klappere derzeit auch die relevanten Versicherungen ab, sowohl meine Fotoversicherung als auch die Haftpflicht des Betreibers. Die Grund ist die zu lange Einwirkung des Lasers auf den Sensor. Die Laser an den Fahrgeschäften müssen so sein, dass sie zum Beispiel die Netzhaut nicht schädigen dürfen. Die Wirkung setzt sich aus der Stärke des Lasers und der Dauer der Einwirkung zusammen. Die Stärke wird vermutlich passen, bei der Dauer dürfte der Grund zu finden sein. Mit Live-View ist das Objektiv offen und das Licht wirkt so relativ lang auf den Sensor ein. Daher die Vermutung, dass Live-View seinen Anteil hatte. Ich kenne das im Grunde schon von Nachtaufnahmen. Bei einer längeren Nachtsitzung mit vielen Life-View-Aktionen wird der Sensor schneller wärmer. Bei meinen vorigen Kameras wie der EOS 600D hat sich das durchaus so bemerkbar gemacht, dass die Anzahl der Hot-Pixel zunahm. --XRay talk 05:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

16:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

09:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Gilly (Charleroi) - rue des Ateliers 16 - 05 - sgraffite.jpg

Hallo,

[sorry for my englis] Thanks to appreciate this picture. Why the categorization should be improved ?
It's : Category:Rue des Ateliers 16 à Gilly - sgraffite -> Category:Art Nouveau sgraffito in Charleroi -> Category:Sgraffito in Charleroi -> Category:Sgraffito in Belgium -> Category:Sgraffito by country -> Category:Sgraffito
How can I improved ?
--H2O(talk) 17:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

I just added some categories as example. --XRay talk 18:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

19:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

17:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

16:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2018

Hi Dietmar user:XRay:, We would love to have you as one of our honoured judges for the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2018. We really hope you would accept this and help us with your expertise. Please do let us know if you have any particular ideas or anything else you think we should know. --Sumit Surai ([[User talk:Sumitsurai|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but I think it is not possible. Thank you for your offer. --XRay talk 18:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

16:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Patrol

Hello XRay. Where should I turn to be a patrol ? CalalC99 (talk) 09:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please have a look to COM:RFR. --XRay talk 09:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Could you explain, please, what "Abtei" means in the German description? Does it mean "home of the abbot/abbess" as de:Abtei says? BTW. I don't think that "abbey" in English also means "home of the abbot". --jdx Re: 15:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

That's a question. Much easier than the answer. I'm a german native speaker, but not a religious terms native speaker. In german a "Abtei" is a monastery with an abbot or abbess as governance. So it's a religious building. The "Dormitorium" (dormitory) are the rooms, where the nuns sleep. The Heiligengrabe monastery is small, so the (former) dormitory are the guest rooms today. I think abbey is a good translation, see en:Abbey. It's not the home of the abbot or abbess, nor in german or english, but it's under the governance of an abbot or abbess. Hopefully a good answer ... --XRay talk 17:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Then shouldn't the description be "Appartement im Dormitorium in dem Kloster…"? BTW. de:Abtei says: Abtei steht auch – wo vorhanden – für das Haus oder den Wohntrakt des Abtes, auch Abtshaus oder Prälatur genannt. Sie besteht aus Wohnräumen für den Abt, meist einer eigenen Kapelle, manchmal einem eigenen Kreuzgang, dem sogenannten Abtshof und einem eigenen Garten.. I'm not fluent in German, but for me it means (more or less) "house of the abbot". --jdx Re: 20:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
You think it's twice, "Abtei" and "Kloster"? IMO difficult, but I (hopefully) understand the problem. The monastery consists of more buildings than the abbey. It is not really the same. There are abbey, cemetery, church, chapel, garden and more buildings in the Heiligengrabe monastery. --XRay talk 05:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Exactly, I think that one of these nouns Abtei/abbey or Kloster/monastery is redundant because IMO usually, in case of Christian monasteries, abbey=monastery. Although, contrary to you, I think that in general an abbey is "bigger" than a monastery. --jdx Re: 06:51, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I'll check this. Thank you. --XRay talk 07:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
IMO the description is OK. It's the abbey within the monastery. Please have a look to the map: [204] --XRay talk 08:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
OK, I get it. Thanks. --jdx Re: 16:51, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Map with cultural heritage monuments in Germany

Hi! you add a lot of cultural heritage monuments from germany. That's that I would like to ask: is there any interactive map with monuments? Something like this page in France: [205] (here for department Aveyron). Thank you in advance for your answer and have a nice day! Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know. IMO it is really difficult to find these cultural heritage monuments. Some district publish the information with map and geo coordinates, some publish nothing. Someting I asked the local government, but very often I'm looking at the german Wikipedia. I would be happy to see good informations like in France or Austria. --XRay talk 15:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Ok, thank you very much for your reply! Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:17, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

16:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo [[:#titleparts:PAGENAME]],

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

22:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili

Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile XRay, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

21:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

15:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are published

19:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Hilfe in Commons benötigt

Hallo Dietmar,

du hattest mir letztes Jahr in meiner Anfangszeit mal deine Hilfe bei Fragen angeboten worauf ich jetzt gerne mal zurückgreifen würde. Ich habe 50 Fotos vom gestrigen Münsterlandgiro hochgeladen und diese auf commons momentan u.a. in der Kategorie "Gescher" einsortiert. Leider bin ich im Neuanlegen von Kategorien noch nicht wirklich fit, wünsche mir aber innerhalb "Gescher" die Unterkategorie "Events in Gescher" und dann am besten bereits eine Unterkategorie zum Giro in Gescher. Kannst du da helfen? Einsortieren würde ich die Bilder da wohl selbstständig, nur beim Anlegen der Kategorie bin ich noch was unsicher...

Dankeschön und beste Grüße aus Gescher Tetzemann ([[User talk:Tetzemann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Kategorien anzulegen ist einfach. Allerdings gibt es keine Unterkategorien, denn alle sind gleichwertig. Das ist zum Beispiel dann relevant, wenn es die Kategorie auch in anderen Fällen geben kann. So ist Category:Hauptstraße nicht eindeutig und muss in den jeweiligen Orten durch den Ortsnamen ergänzt werden. Nun zu deiner Kategorie. Zwei Schritte dazu: Folge einfach dem Link Category:Events in Gescher und trage dort mindestens [[Category:Gescher]] ein. Speichern und fertig. Schau vielleicht noch bei anderen Städten, welche Kategorie man noch eintragen könnte. (Hilfreich ist auch das Helferlein Hotcat. --XRay talk 14:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Unterstützung für Featured Picture

Hallo XRay, ich bin neu bei Commons und benötige Unterstützung. Ich würde gerne dieses Bild als Featured Picture vorschlagen, leider erscheint es nicht in der Übersichtsseite für die Abstimmung. Kannst Du mir dabei helfen? --Dktue ([[User talk:Dktue|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Du musst deine Nominierungsseite manuell in die Liste eintragen. Ich habe es für dich gerade gemacht. --XRay talk 08:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

23:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for Thanking me Qian Nivan ([[User talk:QN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

17:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

19:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo ROOTPAGENAME,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

QI: Sortierfehler

Falls jemand Fragen bezüglich der Sortierungen in "Quality images of cultural heritage monuments in ..." hat: Commons:Forum#Kategorien_für_Quality_images. Ich sehe es als Gefallen für den Mitstreiter. Es ist eine Einmalaktion! Sorry, falls Fehler aufgetreten sein sollten.


Hi, in Niedersachsen waren Bilder aus Japan, Amerika, Frankreich und Bayern. Bitte guck mal nach weiteren Fällen. --Te750iv ([[User talk:Te750iv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Template:Ping Ich dachte gerade noch, es kann nicht lange dauern, bis mir diese Infos mitgeteilt werden. Es ist leider nicht möglich, alle Fälle zu berücksichtigen. Manche Bilder und Kategorien sind über verschlungene Wege Niedersachsen zugeordnet. Ich versuche ja so viel zu vermeiden, wie es möglich ist. Leider geht nicht alles. Der Bot macht das auch nur genau einmal für jedes Bundesland - und heute schaffe ich nicht alles. Ein Teil dieser fehlgeleiteten Bilder nehme ich direkt vorher heraus, manche nach dem Einsortieren und bei dem Rest hoffe ich auf aufmerksame Mitstreiterinnen und Mitstreiter wie dich! Ansonsten: Hier ist der Ursprung. Hoffentlich habe ich nicht zu viele fehlgeleitete Bilder. Danke auf jeden Fall! --XRay talk 12:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Danke für den Diskussionslink. Das ist ja ein umfangreiches Vorhaben. Bei der US-Freileitung sehe ich in den höheren Kategorien keine Querverbindung zu Niedersachsen oder Denkmälern, auch nicht über die versteckten Kategorien. --Te750iv ([[User talk:Te750iv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Irgendwo muss sie sein. Aber es ist ja nicht ganz so tragisch, weil der Bot nicht wieder für Niedersachsen läuft. Die Ursprungsabfrage lief über 12 Ebenen. Kandidaten für solche Kategorien sind beispielsweise Firmen, die ihren Standort in Niedersachsen haben, aber ihre Produkte auch außerhalb von Niedersachsen verkaufen, oder User aus Niedersachen, die ihre User-Kategorien irgendwohin verlinken, oder ... Ich stecke ja auch schon Handarbeit hinein. Als du geschrieben hast, war ich mit Niedersachsen noch beschäftigt. --XRay talk 12:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Dagegen, dass nunmehr irgendwann Hunderte von meinen Fotos (und nicht nur meinen), von Category:Quality images of cultural heritage monuments in North Rhine-Westphalia nach Category:Quality images of cultural heritage monuments in Cologne ohne Rücksicht darauf verschoben werden, dass sie bereits in Category:Quality images of Cologne enthalten sind, protestiere ich schon mal vorsorglich. Wer einen Bot bei Masseneinsätzen an Unmengen von Dateien betreibt, muss schon darauf achten, nicht wie ein Elefant im Porzellanladen zu agieren. --A.Savin 16:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Danke für den Tipp. Das ist wohl nur in NRW so, aber du hast recht, es ist nun überkategorisiert. Das dürfte dann wahrscheinlich auch andere NRW-Städte betreffen. Ich schaue mal, dass ich die Fehler behebe. Kann aber etwas dauern. Ich bitte um Nachsicht. --XRay talk 16:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Ich habe deinen Hinweis direkt bei Commons:Forum#Kategorien_für_Quality_images ergänzt. Hier ist nicht die passende Stelle für die Diskussion darüber. Es ist auch gar keine Diskussion wert, es ist halt unvollständig. Die Überkategorisierung muss noch weg. --XRay talk 16:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Ähm. Ich habe jetzt ganze 7 Bilder gefunden, die so überkategorisiert waren. Für Köln ist der Fehler somit behoben. --XRay talk 17:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Die Fehler bei den anderen Kategorien sind behoben. Ich hoffe, du siehst es mir - ohne Groll - nach, dass man auch mal einen Fehler machen kann. --XRay talk 17:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Xray Bot

Hallo, I notice that the bot is inappropriatly attribuing files of artwork located in Italy to the category "Quality images of cultural heritage monuments in Rhineland-Palatinate)" like this one File:Fresco SAcun.jpg. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder ([[User talk:Moroder|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be right. There is a path from "Cultural heritage monuments in Rhineland-Palatinate" to this file. Sorry. I haven't seen this while checking the images. --XRay talk 18:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

22:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

XRayBot File:IR15 – Lorette-Kapelle.jpg nicht Münster

Hallo XRay, es geht um die Änderung Lorette-Kapelle -> 1914 in Münster.

Die Kapelle steht in Frankreich, "bei Lens und Arras" (de:Lorettoschlacht), nicht in Münster, da hat der Bot etwa zu pauschal kategorisiert. Daher der Revert. Gute Grüße, --Edfyr ([[User talk:Edfyr|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Den gleichen Fehler machte der Bot bei: File:Detmold - Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz - Kriegerdenkmal (5).jpg und xxx(1-4). Das Category:Infanterie-Regiment „Graf Bülow von Dennewitz“ (6. Westfälisches) Nr. 55 war zwar der Category:13. Division (Deutsches Kaiserreich) in Münster unterstellt, seine Standorte waren aber Detmold, Höxter und Bielefeld (de:Infanterie-Regiment „Graf Bülow von Dennewitz“ (6. Westfälisches) Nr. 55). Das Denkmal steht in Detmold. Mit guten Grüßen,--Edfyr ([[User talk:Edfyr|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Es gibt immer einen Weg von Münster zu den Bildern. Für solche Bilder habe ich eine Ausnahmeliste. Meist finde ich die Ausnahmen, meist, nicht immer. Danke für deinen Hinweis und sorry für die Umstände. --XRay talk 18:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

16:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) ([[User talk:Manfred Werner (WMAT)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Fall 2018 edition

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
Things to do / input and feedback requests

Current:

Since the last newsletter:

Presentations / Press / Events
Partners and allies
  • The info portal on Structured Commons now includes a section on GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).
  • We are currently planning the first GLAM pilot projects that will use structured data on Wikimedia Commons. One project has already started: the Swedish Heritage Board researches and develops a prototype tool to provide improved metadata (translations, data additions...) from Wikimedia Commons back to the source institution. Read the project brief.
  • The documentation for batch uploads of files to Wikimedia Commons will be improved in 2019, as part of preparing for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. To prepare, the GLAM team at the Wikimedia Foundation wants to understand better which types of documentation you already use, and how you like to learn new GLAM-Wiki skills and knowledge. Fill in a short survey to provide input!
Stay up to date!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 17:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Model of the cathedral at Michaelis square

Hallo,

ich bin damit immer noch nicht glücklich, ich hatte es mal mit VP3 (und mit dem Plugin bin ich echt zufrieden) geladen und habe noch andere Dinge gesehen. Dürfte vermutlich am "unvergessen Fleck" liegen, sprich wenn man weis, da war mal was, sieht man genauer hin. Ich habe es nicht hochgeladen, da Du das nicht leiden kannst und er aus dem jpeg die exif-Daten nicht sauber auslesen konnte (warum auch immer). Soll ich es mal als meine Interpretation dennoch schicken? Wohin dann? Gruß, Hans-Jürgen

Danke. Du kannst sie mir per Mail schicken. Es steht eine auf dieser Seite: [263]. Bin mal gespannt. Bei dieser Art Bilder streiten sich in der Regel die Geister. Ich hatte eine wunderbare Umsetzung gesehen, aber bin mit dieser auch nicht ganz glücklich ... wie mit manch anderer Umsetzung. Mal sehen, vielleicht gelingt mir nächste Woche eine bessere. --XRay talk 16:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Nur mal ein Beispiel. Die Fußgänger und Radfahrer sind schon irritierend. Mehr stört mich allerdings, dass der echte Dom im Hintergrund oben abgeschnitten ist. Das muss auch anders gehen. --XRay talk 16:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, BASEPAGENAME! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, BASEPAGENAME! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- Johann Jaritz talk 04:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten

und ein gesundes neues Jahr.--Famberhorst ([[User talk:Famberhorst|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas...

and a Happy New Year And a healthy 2019!
With greetings from the Netherlands.--Agnes Monkelbaan ([[User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten!

Frohe Weihnachten! I wish you a lot og spectacular photos :) Have a great day! Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, BASEPAGENAME! * Joyeux Noël et tous mes vœux de bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Marry Christmas

--Wolfgang Moroder ([[User talk:Moroder|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

* Happy Christmas time and all the best for 2019, XRay! *
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • ... :)

-- Poco2 13:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

* Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, BASEPAGENAME! *
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • ... :)

Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;–)

✴ Happy Holidays 2019, BASEPAGENAME! ✴
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
And all the best for 2019!
--Aristeas ([[User talk:Aristeas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Und nochmals herzlichen Dank für die Nominierung meines Fotos als FP! --Aristeas ([[User talk:Aristeas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Der Countdown für 2019 läuft

Hallo Dietmar, in der ruhigen Zeit, konnte ich mal wieder reinsehen.

Was ich nicht verstanden habe ist eines Deiner Kommentare zu E.3 Warum er massiv versucht QI zu erobern, ist mir zwar auch nicht ganz klar, er geht aber die Sache anders an (positiv) und ist frisches Blut was es hier wirklich braucht. Und Du bist einer der wenigen die auch mal fremde Arbeiten vorschlagen oder Anfängern Unterstützung anbieten. Von mir daher, Daumen hochǃ Mir geht es um "Why png?" Nach meinem Verständnis ist PNG das bessere Dateiformat für Fotos (hat nur den Nachteil der Größe) viele Fehler die sich bei jpeg finden werden umgangen, genauso wie für Druck immer noch sehr viele mit TIF arbeiten. Damit lassen sich mit 20 MB Plakate drucken. Vielleicht liege ich falsch, ich sehe es analog zu Musik-Dateien a la
jpeg = mp3 (lossy format)
PNG = FLAC
DNG = raw (PCM)
Wobei commons oft bei PNG die exif-Daten verliert, was aber mehr ein Commons-Fehler ist, habe ich bei jpg auch sehr oft. Ist wie bei WAV, PCM - Dateien, die werden selten getagged, was aber geht. Nur weil es keiner macht, soll nicht bedeuten, es geht nicht. PCM lauschen sonst nur so audiophile wie ich, jedenfalls ist jpg rechnerisch lange überholt, es lässt sich wie mp3 nur nicht totkriegen. Es setzt sich ja oft das einfachste, meist billigste und damit schlechteste Format durch. Wollte mal wissen, was dahinter steckt.

Ich wünsche Dir eine besinnliche Zeit und einen ruhigen Ablauf 2018, mit einem gesunden Start in´s neue Jahr.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Lass 2019 kommen! Mein Engagement bei Commons wird sich allerdings ein wenig beruhigen, ich möchte mehr Zeit für's Fotografieren verwenden. Auf jeden Fall wünsche ich dir einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr. E.3 habe ich ein paar Hinweise gegeben. Das frische Blut begrüße ich sehr, aber so manches geht eher daneben - beispielsweise die Beschreibungen und die Kategorisierungen. Es wirkt wie ein Engagement ohne auch nur irgendetwas gelesen zu haben. Aber dem kann ja geholfen werden. Und "Why PNG?". Tja. JP(e)G ist schlicht antiquiert und dringend ablösenswert. Das erwähne ich auch als Negativpunkt in meinen Fotokursen immer wieder. Aber selbst JPEG ginge besser, wird aber so gut wie nirgends unterstützt. PNG ist ein freies Format und hat diese Vorteile. Auch die Farbtiefe betreffend ist PNG sicherlich die bessere Wahl. Nur die Dateien sind meiner Erfahrung nach viel größer. Das benachteiligt eindeutig die Leute, die einen schwächeren Zugang zum Internet haben. Und ein unkomprimiertes JPEG mit 8 Bit Farbtiefe ist mit dem PNG und 8 Bit Farbtiefe durchaus ebenbürtig - bis auf die Dateigröße. Aber ob es wirklich ein eindeutiges Pro und Contra gibt, weiß ich nicht. PNG ist klar zu verwenden, wenn man Zeichnungen oder Grafiken erstellt - wenn's nicht SVG ist. Auch bei Transparenzen oder mehr als 8 Bit Farbtiefe ist PNG vorzuziehen. Nur bei den "traditionellen" Digitalfotos sehe ich noch immer JPG, allerdings meiner Meinung nach am besten mit 100% - ohne Komprimierung. Bei E.3 habe ich übrigens den Eindruck, dass er das JPEG-Bild erst in ein PNG konvertiert hat. Da hilft PNG halt gar nicht. Und Rohformate mag ich hier bei Commons auch nicht. Es sind halt Rohdaten. Das kann nicht im Sinne des Erfinders/Fotografen sein. BTW: PNG unterstützt weder EXIF noch IPTC. --XRay talk 10:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Ich werde mich hoffentlich auch in 2019 hüten, mich mit einem Mathematiker anzulegenː-) Solche Leute lesen erst, bevor sie was schreiben. IPTC? ging an mir vorbei. Verstehen werde ich es dennoch nicht.Ich hatte es mit File:Flags of Aşgabat.png und halte es auch heute noch für einen commons-bug, Exif kann png seit Version 1.2 (eigentlich ging das schon früher, es kommt halt auf den Player an, ob er es ausliest). Ich sehe den Vorteil in der Farbe und der Auflösung gerade im monochromen Anteilen (Himmel, da blau) und chamois (oder Haut, sprich elfenbein). Ich kann wirklich nur die Beispiele Photographie versus Musik nennen, heute ist alles jpg oder mp3. F̟ür die Anwender ist es meist Comfort, bzw. das tagging der Datei. Wobei hier Commons total eigen ist, auch Deine Anmerkung "Beschreibungen und Kategorien" ich wurde dafür zigmal gesperrt. (ist sicher reine Rache und persönlich, von einem einzigem admin), trifft aber des Pudels Kern nicht. Moroder hat da ja auch seine Probleme, 12K-HaBla und er bekommt Kritik (teils zu Recht, teils kleinkariert) oder da wird halt mal eine Ende 20 jährige Frau als Girlie eingestuft "File:Setcard Shirin 002.jpg" oder wie soll ich sonst Adolescent girls verstehen?? (ich war´s nichtː-) Keine Ahnung ob Du Eric Clapton magst? Ich könnte Dir da einen SHM-CD rip schicken (google drive) da beißt Du Dir rein mathematisch die dritten Zähne aus (nach den zweiten). Es ist wirklich wie in der Musik-Scene (den Anwender interessiert es dabei nicht, weil es auch zu umständlich ist) wie commons. Ich verstehe nicht mal die letzten drei Anmerkungen vom bot und die Einladung für die italienische Wiki. Ist mein Deutsch schon eigen, dann noch italienisch?? Da kann ich nur fluchen... Sei´s drum, Rutsch mir ruhig rüber, vllt. bekommen wir es doch noch mal real hin --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 16:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Ich gebe ja zu, dass ich dir manchmal nicht ganz folgen kann ... Du hast recht, bei PNG wurde mit der Version 1.2 EXIF ergänzt. Metadaten gab's vorher schon. Es dauert, bis sich so etwas durchsetzt. Bei den Farben verwirrst du mich, meiner Meinung kann ein Dateiformat Farben nicht beeinflussen. Es ist vielmehr die Frage, welches Farbmodell integriert ist und welches genutzt wird. Und was die Kritik bei QIC betrifft: Da ist sie durchaus durchwachsen. Ihr Wert sinkt für mich zunehmend. Einen deutlichen Einbruch gab es mit dem Wechsel auf meine 30-Megapixel-Kamera. Schärfe auf Basis der Pixelebene zu messen ist aus meiner Sicht alles andere als korrekt. Ist die Auflösung hoch genug, schafft so gut wie kein erschwingliches Objektiv diese Auflösung. Im Sinne dieser Kritiker/-innen wäre das Bild dann immer unscharf. Und was so manche Kritiker/-innen angeht: Sie sind alle so gemischt wie wir alle, unterschiedliche Ansätze, unterschiedliches Know-how, unterschiedliche Ansichten. Es hilft oft einen Gang zurückzuschalten und freundlich zu reagieren. Sachlich lässt sich vieles diskutieren. (Ich weiß schon, wen du meinst. ;-) ) Und es hilft nicht, auf dem eigenen Standpunkt zu beharren. Wer recht hat, lässt sich oft nicht schnell entscheiden. Mir hat es geholfen, die Argumente zu gewichten und zu verstehen. Zugegebenermaßen musste ich das eine oder andere mal einsehen, dass ich nicht Recht hatte. Manchmal waren es auch einfach nur andere Ansichten. --XRay talk 16:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:45, 30 December 2018 (UTC)