User talk:PJDespa

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PJDespa!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albert's bridge crossing the Meuse river in Liege..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted anticlockwise. Mattbuck 21:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)~  Done Right rotation --PJDespa 13:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC) The disembodied head is a bit odd, but ok. Mattbuck 17:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kennedy's tower in Liege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frederic Leonard, Mayor of Ferrières (Belgium).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de l'Ourthe à Poulseur - Ourthe's river at Poulseur (Belgium).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gives a good sense of running water. Fine for me. --Dirtsc 18:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath in Fraiture (Sprimont) - Wallonia - Belgium.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good. But why has the file to be that big? --Dirtsc 15:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tunnel sy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcea rosea L..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF a bit low but ok. --Mattbuck 19:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierge Liege.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top looks a bit unsharp. Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)  Done new version more sharpen --PJDespa 18:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/PJDespa⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear PJDespa,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de justice de Grandhan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

Bonjour PJDespa,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments en Belgique & Luxembourg
• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments (international, autres pays)

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tohogne tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. Filename should be better, CAs, description should be better, geo location, crop at the right, ... And your user category should be hidden (use template for user categories) --XRay 07:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Done Thank you for your advices. I changed the name, placed a geo location and used the template for user categories. --PJDespa Thank you. You should improve sharpness too and remove CAs. Please have a look to the branches of the tree. --XRay 16:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Thank you for your advices. --PJDespa 20:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)  Support IMO acceptable for QI now. Thank you. --XRay 11:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen Wéris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO Nothin´special but good enough for Q1 --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Path between Barvaux and Durbuy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks identical to me but the image is a QI nonetheless --Trougnouf 10:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath GR57 near Barvaux and Tohogne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oak in Tohogne autumn 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK but what kind of oak is it? If you know, put the according category. If not, put it into Unidentified Quercus. --Basotxerri 21:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Suitable category added and category Oak removed. --PJDespa 23:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcea rosea flower (common hollyhock).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  * Comment It is done, I have linked the scope to the suitabble category. Well I hope it is the suitable one because it is the first image I propose for a nomination as VI
•  Comment For botany the scopes must be reduced to the part of the plant that is shown. you have to add flower at the end of the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from 'Alcea rosea (common hollyhock) to 'Alcea rosea flower (common hollyhock) --PJDespa 17:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Barvaux during winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 09:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Saisies (Hauteluce) - Savoie - FRANCE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 05:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paysage automnal SY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The sky is very bright. Please try to improve the sky. --XRay 07:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Hope it is better now. --PJDespa 12:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 12:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree with mistletoe in Durbuy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canal lock in Poulseur (old canal lock).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question Of more than local interest? Charles (talk) 11:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment I answered your question by fullfilling the field reason. I hope you will be convinced by the reason. Tank you.--PJDespa --PJDespa (talk) 11:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - There's a pretty long fr.wp article about this canal, so I don't think there's really a question about the value of this scope, and this is a good depiction of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oak in Durbuy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old cemetery in Comblain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window in Oneux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Early spring Comblain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawthorns in Oneux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les roches noires - Comblain-au-Pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your vote

Hallo PJDespa, do you not have the courage to contradict Peulle and A.Savin. See here. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GR 57 at the base of 'Les Roches Noires'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme du Raideux (Mont).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farm of Raideux in Mont, Comblain-au-Pont.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'Les Roches noires', Comblain-au-Pont.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. It really doesn't look like much to me (we have outcroppings all over the New York Metropolitan Area that are probably more impressive), so I was questioning whether the scope is more than locally notable, but its presence on the WP article you linked probably suffices for notability. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Oak in Mont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 03:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fanson Castle - the whole building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fanson Castle the whole building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's much sharper than I expected, thank you! --Trougnouf 00:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain la Tour The rocks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain la Tour Railway GR57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain Fairon Ourthe River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rocks of Comblain-la-Tour, Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - File:Rocher de la Vierge à Comblain-la-Tour et Xhoris.jpg looks like a more comprehensive picture of the entire group of rocks, and therefore, more useful, but please argue for why this one is more useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Rocher de la Vierge à Comblain-la-Tour et Xhoris.jpg This image has too much chromatic aberration --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - OK, understood, but that image shows the entire group of rocks and this doesn't, so how can this be sufficiently useful? I question that. Maybe neither photo should be a VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose, at least temporarily, per my comment above. I doubt this can really be a VI without being a picture of the entire rock formation, or at least the great majority of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

 Comment If you want to look at satellite photography (here) you see that this geological formation is far in width but far in length. Your demands are disproportionate, and this opposition vote incomprehensible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. The other picture shows much more of the formation, though. So why is it unreasonable to think that a good photo that encompasses a fuller view of the formation is possible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

If you apply your reasoning we will stop everything and wait for better images. The good progress of the project is to reserve the negative votes for flagrant anomalies of our operation. In this case we have two images: one that has a technical problem and one that is very acceptable. It is not perfect but if a better image comes it can pass in MRV because the specificity of our label is not definitive. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

OK, if you think this is a good enough illustration to be worthy of the VI designation, I'll remove my opposing vote, but in cases like this, I appreciate a discussion, at least. And I don't take back any of the substantive criticisms I made. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

I do want to quibble with your argument a bit, though. In no way is my argument to "stop everything and wait for better images". The fundamental question is whether this is a complete enough picture of the scope to be useful enough to merit being called a VI. You surely won't suggest that's not a legitimate criterion, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couple of Bos Taurus in Comblain Fairon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate of the Church of Fairon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:02, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GR 57 through Comblain-la-Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I personally would remove the flying twig on the left. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of the rocks of Comblain la Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 02:02:09 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain Fairon The centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the GR 57 in Comblain la Tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain Fairon centre of the village with a cow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wish the top crop wasn't so tight, but otherwise fine --Daniel Case 17:44, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RAVeL between Comblain la Tour and Comblain Fairon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice early-spring atmosphere --Daniel Case 17:44, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funerary plaque in Comblain-Fairon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Slightly cut out underneath. Above, photo needs a small horizontal correction. For me just enough.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Granada Tue, 01 May 2018 15:51:31 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spring landscape in Comblain-Fairon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image looks tilted, could you check that? --Basotxerri Tue, 01 May 2018 13:53:18 GMT  Done Fixed. 1.5°left. Thank you for your review.  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri Thu, 03 May 2018 16:16:33 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks in Comblain-la-Tour and Xhoris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichius fasciatus on a daisy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 12:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain Fairon Village under a cloudy sky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good. Right side looks leaning in or it seems to be tilted ccw a bit. --Milseburg 18:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)  Done Hope it is better now, thank you for your review.--PJDespa 17:10, 6 June 2018 (UTC) I think, it´s good enoupg for QI now. --Milseburg 12:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comblain Fairon Bloquay creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the 'rue du ruisseau' in Comblain-Fairon, Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabreux bridge GR 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabreux Railway bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabreux GR 57 sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway bridge in Tabreux, Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabreux hydroraphic station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hydrographic station in Tabreux, river Ourthe, Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape of Rahier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape of Rahier with cows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape of Rahier under a cloudy sky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fence in a field near the Boe's valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quite epic, pity that the light wasn't better. Anyway, good quality --Podzemnik 19:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Field near the Boé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cemetries_in_Comblain-au-Pont

Category:Cemetries_in_Comblain-au-Pont has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

·×ald·^es 00:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pond in the sand quarry of Arbois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand quarry Geromont Landscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand quarry Geromont portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coquelicot rouge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heracleum sphondylium fleur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 21:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veau et vaches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fougère gros plan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heracleum sphondylium with flies and a spider.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Forêt (Trooz) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farm in Forêt (Trooz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted and it needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 17:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)  Done tanks for the review, new version uploaded, new category added --PJDespa 21:14, 26 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --SH6188 09:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Forêt (Trooz) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks tilted --Poco a poco 17:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)  CommentIt looks tilted but it is not : the footpath is tilted in the reality but the trees and the fence posts are not tilted in this photograph. --PJDespa 15:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC) All posts in the middle are clearly tilted --Poco a poco 20:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC) New version uploaded, rotation 1.45° right, hope it is better now. --PJDespa 23:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC) Better, but not yet there. Btw, why is the size of your files so big? your files have 4 times less resolution than mine and are bigger. In my case I can confirm that a 10 MB vs a 15 MB or 20 MB file size brings no additional quality to a 40-50 MPx image, it just wastes resources on our server and slows the download time --Poco a poco 10:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)  New version Not tilted now. The weight of the file is lower, only 3.55 Mo instead of more than 14 Mo. I've recorded the file in jpg from a raw at 90% instead of 100 % quality. BTW the original file in raw is about 12Mo for 12MPx camera (Nikon D90 in this case) --PJDespa 17:58, 02 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone nemorosa close up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:User_category

User category has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'Without title' by Lambert ROCOUR.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 00:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stream Blanc-Gravier in Sart-Tilman - downstream.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Work without title by Lambert ROCOUR 1999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Without title by Lambert ROCOUR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum urbanum Close up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labyrinthe by Léon Wuidar (1987).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'm guessing the work was created in 1987? If so, that date can be put in parentheses, without the word "in". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
   Done I changed it in the scope and I asked a renaming of the file --PJDespa (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Work '... Psy' by Pierre Caille (1982-1989) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Work 'Composition monumentale' by Léon WUIDAR (1976-1977).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Photos non-évaluées (unassessed) comme QI (Images de qualité)

De plus en plus souvent, j'ai constaté que des photos que nous proposions comme QI ne font l'objet d'aucubne évaluation (review). C'est pourquoi, au nom de la solidarité francophone, je vous propose d'évaluer (tant positivement que négativement) nos nominations recpectives comme QI afin que ces photos ne tombent dans les oubliettes ! Qu'en pensez-vous ? J'ai proposé 3 QI le 01.08.2020. --P. Branquart (alias PJDespa) talk 17:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, je ne suis pas trop de ton avis. Je trouve que la communauté fait bien son boulot : les images restent 10 jours sans avis avant d'être retirées mais j'ai souvent un avis avant la fin. Pour celles qui ne sont pas acceptées, je le comprends car je propose souvent des images que je trouve un peu limite. Et d'ailleurs je ne suis pas un spécialiste pour évaluer la qualité technique d'une photo, c'est pourquoi je vote rarement. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 06:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'L'enfant boule' by Michel Smolders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'Taureau' by Francis ANDRE (1982).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'La tour kaléidoscopique' by Jean-Paul Laenen (1982).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'Harry' by Xavier Mary (2018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'La cachette' by Michel Smolders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'Gisant' by Michel Smolders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'Idée de porte' by Jean-Marc Navez (1982).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labyrinthe by Léon WUIDAR (1987).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le souvenir by André Welliquet (1979).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd had cropped it tigther to reduce the overexposed are, but just ok --Poco a poco 20:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liaison I - Réflexion au pied levé' by Félix Roulin (1982).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'Colombe - Rêve venu de bientôt' by Groupe TOUT (1982).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liaison V by Alphonse Snoeck (1988).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building B32 - Campus Sart-Tilman - Uliège - Psychology College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Work 'Composition monumentale' by Léon WUIDAR (1976-1977).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 'Grand gisant' by Michel Smolders (1983).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture 'L'enfant boule' by Michel Smolders - Open air museum of Sart-Tilman (Inventory number 141).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)