User talk:Wieralee/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2013  •  2014
2015  •  2016
2017  •  2018
2019  •  2020
2021  •  2022
2023


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wieralee!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:Kirgiz grafika 2.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Re:nowe wersje plików

Z tego, co widzę, to były dzisiaj problemy z odświeżaniem się cache na niektórych serwerach, ale wszystko powinno być już w porządku. Ja na swojej przeglądarce (Google Chrome) widzę wersję czarno-białą, więc to raczej kwestia cache po stronie Twojej przeglądarki – rozumiem, że próbowałaś wyczyścić pamięć podręczną, usunąć ciastka itp.? odder (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 18:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham page005b.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham page005b.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham page005a.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham page005a.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Marcus Cyron (talk) 18:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

What's the reason of removing this illustration?
It's taken from the book published in Poland in 1932 (the author died in 1910), no one of illustrators or editors mentioned in the book, so 70 years passed - is ok. I was working on this photo for nearly 20 minutes to make it more clean. I was changing many parametres - and I had been correcting it pixel by pixel to remove from this illustration some objects of aging.
I've chosen the licence {{self|Cc-pd-mark-footer|PD-old}} - more than 50 000 files on Commons uses this licence for derivatived graphics'.
I put a link to original photo in the book

 This is a retouched picture, which means that it has been digitally altered from its original version. Modifications: cropped, adjusted contrast, highlighted, sharpened and cleaned. The original can be viewed here: PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham.djvu: . Modifications made by Wieralee.



What's wrong?
It's removed without any explanation. Whos copyright had been violated? Author - no, editor - no, publisher - no... So? Thanks for your work, but give me an answer, please... It would help me in the future. Wieralee (talk) 19:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. There's always an authot. And only because he's not known means not, there's no Copyright. On the contrary - not to know the author mostly is very problematic because you don't know when he or she dies. So it's possible, that the photographer of the image was at the time 20 yeas old. maybe he was getting 70 years old. So 2053 the picture would be free. I know, this is hard to understand and I don't like it too. But everything what have to do with copyright we really have to look for, because it could getting very expensive, so we can't accept those critical images - and I say it with a big sorry! I really would be happy if we could. Sometimes there are national rules, but I don't know it for Poland. Maybe you can find it out. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
It seems so. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
  1. ↑ Can you explain, please, why did you remove this PD book cover?
    Its author is anonymous so Template:Anonymous-EU applies.
    It is also published before 1994, so the Template:PD-Polish applies to the photograph used there.
    And because of the above it is not covered by URAA. Ankry (talk) 19:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
    • Can you provide clear and valid evidence that the author is unknown? I'm sorry but your speculation is not enough. In addition, get in contact with User:Marcus Cyron. He nominated it for deletion. Ask him. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
    • It is not necessary, as PD-Polish applies also in this specific case. Author is irrelevant in case of this license as there is no copyright notice of the photographer in the book.
    What kind clear and valid evidence is expected when using the Anonymous-EU template? Or is it assumed that Anonymous-EU template is void and useless in commons at all and pictures marked using this template will never become PD (as we will never know the date of death of unknown author)? Do you suggest this should be considered list of deletion requests? Could you please point me to the commons rules applied in this case?
    Thanks, I will contact User:Marcus Cyron, but I suggest that the deletion request page should be better for this discussion. Could you, please, point me to that page? I cannot find it. Ankry (talk) 20:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
    • I have restored this image and opened a deletion discussion. Please get in contact with Marcus Cyron and discuss at the DR. I am out. Thanks for your support. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham page005b.png

File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa-Cham page005b.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Zetetic astronomy. Earth not a globe.pdf

Mam wątpliwości, czy okładka książki w zamieszczonym przez ciebie pliku pochodzi rzeczywiście z roku 1865. A jeśli nie, może być (C) Google Inc. Ankry (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Nowele obce

Zrobione.

Mam jednak wątpliwości, czy teksty oryginalne wszystkich nowel są PD w USA (jeśli nie, wtedy tłumaczenia też nie będą PD). Na pewno PD są te, które opublikowano po raz pierwszy przed 1.1.1923; ewentualne pozostałe trzeba dokładnie sprawdzić. Ankry (talk) 15:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:PL Eliza Orzeszkowa - Przygody Jasia.djvu jest PD-US-1923, więc chyba nie ma potrzeby blokować. Chyba, że ktoś wykaże, że książka nie jest PD w PL. Ankry (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Szkolne przygody Pimpusia Sadełko page 0005.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Szkolne przygody Pimpusia Sadełko page 0005.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

3 podpisy

@Jarekt: Dzięki. Nie wiem, co się dzieje... Wrzucam pliki za pomocą Upload Wizarda, który po prostu nie pójdzie dalej i nie załaduje plików, jeżeli się mu nie poda licencji. Więc licencje na pewno były, ale gdzieś wyparowały... Widzę też, że kategoria, którą wtedy założyłam, figurowała jako nie utworzona... Dopisałam licencje, mam nadzieję że teraz już wszystko będzie dobrze. Pozdrawiam :-) Wieralee (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Dziękuje za poprawki, ale powinieneś poczekać jeszcze rok przesłanie tych plików. Wedle Google ilustratorem tej książki był Bogdan Bartłomiej Nowakowski który zmarł w 1945 roku. Trudno twierdzić ze autor jest anonimowy jeśli jego (czasami czytelny) podpis jest na wielu ilustracjach. --Jarekt (talk) 13:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

@Jarekt: Jest wiele plików, w których wycinam ilustracje i ukrywam do odblokowania w odpowiednim roku. W tym przypadku długo szukałam ilustratora. Moje "podejrzenia" też padły na Bogdana Bartłomieja Nowakowskiego, bo czasami podpis jest, że tak powiem, możliwy do takiej interpretacji. Zobacz jednak tutaj: File:Szkolne przygody Pimpusia Sadełko page 0015.jpg. Ewidentnie litera w drugim członie to G, przy czym nie pasuje to ani do Bartłomieja, ani do Nowakowskiego... :( Kreska i styl także nie są charakterystyczne w porównaniu z pracami, które są dostępne w Google. Dlatego zdecydowałam się oznaczyć te pliki jako anonimowe, niezidentyfikowane. Ale jeśli masz tę pewność, której ja nie mam, możemy ukryć te pliki na rok, nie ma sprawy. Wieralee (talk) 13:45, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Ja to imię znalazłem szukając "Szkolne przygody Pimpusia Sadełko" Bogdan ale teraz myślę ze był on ilustratorem z wydania z 1925 roku pokolorowanego i przedrukowanego tutaj. Skopiowałem 3 podpisy do jednego pliku: Podpis #2 (i może #3) wygląda na "BOGDANOWAK..WS.." ale zgadzam się ze #1 wyglada bardziej na "Bogdan Gri..kows..". Wiec zostawmy tak jak jest. --Jarekt (talk) 14:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Hegebeintum

Hi Wieralee, FYI: Hogebeintum is certainly not a bad name, it's just the Dutch name for the village that's officially called Hegebeintum (which is the Frisian name) and nl:wiki still links to Category:Hogebeintum in many articles. Also, I was not very pleased to discover you had been recatting some of those images just while was already in the midst of doing exactly that: this generates unnecessary edit conflicts, all the more because you did not bother to change the place name in the address field, nor to fix other mistakes (e.g. some of these images were also categorized in Cemeteries in Opsterland, which should be Cemeteries in Ferwerderadiel. If you're not familiair with basic Dutch topography, it may be wise to refrain from "helping" in this way. Regards, Wutsje 18:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi,

Please inform the uploader. See Commons:Guidelines for tagging copyright violations‎. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Moving from Category:Ladies-in-waiting of Russian Empire to Category:Ladies-in-waiting from the Russian Empire

I think you're not right. Ladies-in-waiting of Russian Empire means "ladies on the service of Empire", like "Military of Russian Empire". Ladies-in-waiting from the Russian Empire means ANY lady-in-waiting born in Russian Empire. The oath of allegiance is lost in such renaming. So now it is suitable for any Russian lady at the service at the court of French queen, German empress, etc. You should return it back. --Shakko (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Wellcome Images Barnstar

Wellcome Images volunteer barnstar
Thank you for helping to categorise the Wellcome Image library uploads. You are in our project hall of fame for your work! :-) --Fæ (talk) 00:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Gray vs Grey

I will be reverting all your "grey" to "gray" moves, on the grounds that the categories are about British things and thus use British spelling. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:49, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I endorse Mattbuck's reversions. "Grey" is not a "typo" or misspelling, it is "gray" that is incorrect in British English. Thryduulf (talk) 16:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • @Thryduulf: It's incorrect in all dictionaries I have. But that's why I made redirections, to make both of versions working. If you don't want to have it fixed, it can stay incorrect, I don't want to waste my time for discussions. Do it better, if you can.
If you revert or move category, check it. You can't leave redirections which are not empty, because it causes other problems. Look here 1 2. Wieralee (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • See wikt:grey. Did it not occur that consistent long-standing use of "grey" accross dozens of categories might be worth checking for accuracy before unilateral movement? I have not moved or reverted anything myself (I'm not an admin so I can't). Thryduulf (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

{{Unresolved}} on Category:Sollya linearis

Hello my friend,
I created {{Unresolved}} for cases where there is a naming issue for which help is needed.
But your modification here does not help much.
What did you have in mind ?
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 09:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Excellent.
Thanks for the explaination.
As I am faulty, I will try to solve the issue ;-)
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 11:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

categorising

Hi, adding files to Category:Pictures and images (a redirect, BTW) is absolutely pointless and makes CAT:UNCAT dispensable. Therefore, please don't do it.    FDMS  4    01:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Also, please give categories more meaningful names than Category:Klimafreundliche Lauf- und Sportevents - Klimaschutz bewegt!.    FDMS  4    01:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Eine kleine Bitte

Diese ständige Umkategorisierung geht mir schon auf den Wecker. Könntest Du Dich mal mit Gugerell absprechen. Ehrlich gesagt ist es mir egal, wo die Bilder abgelegt werden, obwohl ich eher Deine Form bevorzuge, falls "weltweit" es keinen gleichnamigen Platz bzw. gleichnamige Straße gibt. Bwag (talk) 10:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Vienna categories

Hi Wieralee, Thank you but I am familiar with requesting categories to be moved. This procedure was however not done by the user who moved the categories that I have created and maintained. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 16:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Category

Hi, i just want to say thanks for helping moving categories in my user page. 27christian11 (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Renaming categories

Hello Wieralee,

thank you for your tireless contributions in moving categories. However, I noticed some of the categories I requested moving have not been renamed correctly. For instance, the move request of Category:Mount Eboshi (Aso, Kumamoto) to Category:Mount Eboshi (Minamiaso, Kumamoto) ended up as Category:Mount Eboshi, Minamiaso, Kumamoto, which is not the way I requested. The same goes to other examples, such as Category:Mount Kannon, Rokko Mountains, Category:Mount Mi, Kyoto and Osaka and Category:Aino Station, Hyogo among others.

Please understand that the majority of Japan-related categories use parentheses in such cases (cf Category:Mount Eboshi), and switching to comma-separated disambiguation could make an unharmonised situation.

But anyway, I am also highly doubtful whether it is adequate to choose category names different from the original requests. I will appreciate if you use relevant talk page first when the suggested category name seems unfit. Thank you in advance for understanding. Yasu (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

It's very important to keep the same system for all the categories. All geografical names are in renaming now: they are being changed from names with brackets to names without brackets. So if you had asked for a new name with brackets, I'd choosen a new form to avoid the next step: renaming from name with brackets to names without brackets. You should also remember, that if there are no two things with the same name, the category shouldn't have more specified name.
Your requests are not consistent:
you ask for moving:
[[Category:Shoheibashi Bridge]] => [[Category:Shohei Bridge]]
but [[Category:Mukaishima Island]] => [[Category:Mukaishima]]
It's not consistent at all! If you change Shoheibashi Bridge to Shohei Bridge, the same you should do with the islands names, so you should ask for moving from Mukaishima Island to Mukai Island, isn't it?
I had hesitated to start a discussion about your all geographical requests, whether they are compatible with the geographical atlas in English. The names should be in English, so the names should be the same as in Google Earth, for example.
If you don't like any of my renaming, you can change it, of course. I would not fight ;-)
Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC) Moved from User talk:Yasu Yasu (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Your explanation has no proof that the categories for geographical names should use comma-separated disambiguation instead of parentheses. There are numerous examples of categories that use parentheses, such as Category:A' Chailleach (Fannaichs)‎/Category:A' Chailleach (Monadh Liath)‎ (mountains in Scotland), Category:Fallbach (Baumkirchen)/Category:Fallbach (Innsbruck)‎ (rivers in Austria), Category:Hammersmith tube station (District and Piccadilly Lines)/Category:Hammersmith tube station (Hammersmith & City Line) (Tube stations in London), Category:New River (Broward County, Florida)/Category:New River (Santa Fe River) (rivers in the US) and many more. And none of these categories doesn't seem to have been discussed for renaming.
You have a good point that my requests are not consistent. Yes, basically "Mukaishima Island" should have been renamed to "Mukai Island". Even though I chose "Mukaishima" simply because the form "Category:Xxx-shima" takes up the majority in the group of Japanese islands categories, whilst "Category:Xxx Island" is not.
But talking of consistency, I think your renaming is not consistent either. For instance, you moved Category:Atsuta-ku, Nagoya to Category:Atsuta-ku, Nagoya, Aichi but this is redundant because the location called "Atsuta-ku" only exists in the City of Nagoya in Aichi Prefecture, not in any other Nagoyas in the world. And, although you marked this as "Requested move", no one in fact has requested this rename.
Still, I am grateful for your contributions in renaming many categories that have no disambiguation terms (that is, categories we don't have to fight over). Keep on the good work.
P.S. I moved your reply from my talk page in order to comply with the Talk page guidelines. Regards Yasu (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


Fur skin-categories

Please, don't change the English categories of fur skins into Latin names. Fur skins are trade items, articles of commerce. Only the categories should be sorted into the Latin animal names. Thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 08:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

  • @Kürschner: I don't manage moving categories. Somebody is moving them and sb makes a category redirection inside. Each redirected category should be empty (if it's not, the files are hidden) - so I empty redirected categories. I'm serving requested moves, too. It's 14 days for a discussion about requested category moving. If nobody oppose, it has been moved. Technically it's my job - but the decision isn't mine. Somebody else is managing a request & somebody else is making category redirections. Look into the history. Wieralee (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, thank you for your answer. Have a nice Christmas! -- Kürschner (talk) 11:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Renaming categories

Hello Wieralee! Why did you move the Category:Buildings in São Paulo (city) to the (incorrect named) Category:Buildings in São Paulo City? Regards, Sturm (talk) 14:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Category:Earth closets just interested but why have you changed a specific technical term to a wider category using words I have never heard? I would never think of doing a search there. I have built one and have further photos to upload. Can you give me the link to the discussion? I suspect that it was done because it looked tidy without discussing the issue with the sustainable building people. Greetings from Strood. --ClemRutter (talk) 21:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • @ClemRutter: it wasn't my decision. Look into the history. I'm only cleaning redirected categories, because they should be empty. Whey they are not, some files are hidden, sometimes for many, many years... Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks- but slow down. There is no history- there is no discussion. You must look more carefully. In 2008, a user created an empty category- six months later another user tagged it as empty wrongly using the redirect tag instead of the delete tag. Six years later we now have files that correctly should go into the formerly empty category- the correct action is to remove the redirect tag, post a message in talk explaining your actions and link the the category to the en:wiki article Earth closet#Other closets- then using Cat-a-lot move any identifiable Moule earth closets into the reopened section. More work, true but a far better result. How amusing that this is all caused by a primitive loo. --ClemRutter (talk) 01:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • @ClemRutter: excuse me, I have no time and no enough knowledge to give each badly redirected category its correct place. The wrong redirects existed for many many years and everybody was pleased -- now I'm cleaning it, maybe not perfectly, but you all get a message that something has happened -- and you can correct it. Yesterday I'd worked into almost one thousand such categories. It's better fot them to have been cleaned up, than lay next few years. Wieralee (talk) 10:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Album

Lepszej jakości skany I tomu albumu so w jpg w PBI. Ankry (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

autograf

Szanowna Pani! Dnia 31 grudnia 2014 r., zamieściła Pani ten oto autograf skopiowany z biblioteki cyfrowej, dlatego, chciałem prosić, aby go Pani skasowała (schowała) na okres kilku miesięcy, ponieważ, od 15 miesięcy zwracam się w oficjalnych pismach do dyrekcji rozmaitych instytucji kulturalnych w kraju, a w tym, do znanych muzeów, z prośbą o wykonanie i przekazanie do zamieszczenia na Wikipedii, fotografii, lub repordukcji, pokazujących rozmaite muzealia związane z księciem Józefem Poniatowskim, ponieważ, zamierzam, za kilka miesięcy, stworzyć z nich na commons.wikimedia wielką galerię fotograficzną, upamiętniająca Księcia Józefa. Ale, ponieważ, sprawa wciąż jest w toku i wciąż zwracam sie do nowych instytucji o przekazanie fotografii, dlatego, nie zamieszczam jeszcze żadnych na commons.wikimedia, które już otrzymałem, aby dyrektorzy, nie mieli pretekstu, że na Wikipedii, już znajdują się fotografie, lub reprodukcje tego, o co ich proszę i dlatego "z wiekim żalem..." bla bla bla... ale, muszą mi odmówić. W związku z tym, jest bardzo potrzebne, aby na okres ok. pół roku, gdy będę prowadzić pertraktacje, m.in. z kilkoma archiwami i muzeami w sprawie udostępnienia dokumentów napisanych, lub podpisanych przez Księcia Józefa, żaden autograf, ani dokument podpisany przez Księcia Józefa, nie pojawił się na commons.wikimedia. Jeśli, zaś, ma Pani wątpliwości co do mojej prośby, proszę o mnie zapytać pod tym oto adresem (permissions-pl@wikimedia.org) ponieważ, tam, gromadzenie przeze mnie wspomnianych fotografii i reprodukcji do zamieszczenia na commons.wikimedia, już zgłosiłem, dlatego, będą mogli potwierdzić, że taki fakt ma miejsce i że, nie jest to, jakaś, wymyślona bajka. Z poważaniem A.W.G.


Tak, rozumiem całą sytuację. Tyle, że... prosi mnie Pan o zrobienie ruchów, co do których nie mam po prostu odpowiednich uprawnień. Jestem administratorką Wikiźródeł, na Commons jestem zwykłym użytkownikiem. Nie mam uprawnień do usuwania/ukrywania plików. To mogą robić tylko administratorzy Commons.
Niezależnie od tego, nawet administratorzy muszą stosować się do określonych zasad, nie mogą tego robić wg własnego uznania. Z grubsza rzecz ujmując, nie widzę podstaw, by można było o to skutecznie wystąpić do któregoś z administratorów:
  • kasowanie "na wniosek zamieszczającego" bez uzasadnienia jest możliwe przez pierwsze 7 dni po zamieszczeniu i TYLKO gdy plik nie jest używany (a ten plik jest już używany)
  • wspomniana rycina nie narusza praw autorskich, jest opublikowana zgodnie z przepisami
  • jej zamieszczenie nie narusza niczyich dóbr osobistych.
Zgodnie z zasadami Polityki usuwania plików na Commons w grę może wchodzić tylko "courtesy deletion", ale mało prawdopodobne, by któryś z adminów skasował plik na tej podstawie, gdyż naraża się na spowodowanie konfliktu interesów pomiędzy użytkownikami.
Jeżeli o mnie chodzi --- zgadzam się na usunięcie tego pliku. Może Pan poprosić o to któregoś z administratorów (Lista administratorów), może któryś z nich zgodzi się wziąć to na siebie...
Przykro mi, że tak wyszło. Wieralee (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Stop moving categories!

You are creating useless categories and removing a well structured tree of categories with no sense. You are including in categories named "Populated places in..." even small villages with just a few hundreds of inhabitants, like Category:Nacimiento, Almería. First learn the demography of the places and then create categories, stop. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Ok, @Cookie: . As you wish. I didn't start this direction of moving: it lasts all the week. All categories called "Cities and villages" are being moved to a "Populated places" --- so inside the Spain provinces categories there were many categories called "Populated places" and many categories called "Cities and villages". I'd unified this, that's all. "Populated places" means "places, where people live" --- I dont know why do you think that name isn't suitable for small villages? What do you mean writing "with no sense"? Wieralee (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
I hope you can accept my apologies. I had not noticed the move of those categories (which it seems to have started in 2012) and your sudden massive moves scared me to death. Sorry for my coment a bit abrupt, if I can help you with the moves just tell me. Regards. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Wieralee.
I see that you did the same for some French municipalities. Do you know if there is a discussion or a decision for that ? Thx. Regards. --Poudou99 (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

The action of moving those categories was initiated by User:Verdy p (look into his edits history) => f.e. look here. He had redirected categories, but he had left the files inside. I take care of redirected categories: they should be empty. If they are not --- I'm moving their content into the correct place. When I started emptying redirected categories, I saw that there's no unification inside them, so I started to unify the naming. There was also a draft here. Cookie had ask me to stop it - so it's not finished yet.
All Commons Categories should be unified, instead of countries. Maybe one day it will come true ;-)
Have a nice day, Wieralee (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Even if it was not your idea to move french municipalities from "cities and villages" to "populated places" it's still wrong! There was no change in French law and a municipality stays a municipality with major, council and all, wheras a "populated place" is part of a municipality. Traumrune (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Wayside vs. Column shrines

Hi Wieralee, may I know why you moved File:Nové Roudné, kaplička 01.jpg and ...02.jpg from Wayside shrines to Column shrines when the photos do not show a column shrine? (EN: Column shrines) Thanks, --cheva (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @Cheva: I'd moved the files, because User:ŠJů has moved the Category:Wayside shrines in České Budějovice to Category:Chapels in České Budějovice (look here) and he'd left those files in redirected categories. The files shouldn't be in redirected categories, because nobody can see them. So I'd moved the files following the movement of their categories. Wieralee (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Fossil categories

Hi, please revert, see: [2] FunkMonk (talk) 19:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @FunkMonk: done. I'd emptied redirected categories, because NeverDoING had moved the categories and left the files inside. It would be nice to help you in this task, but my English and my knowledge about Paleontology is too poor, I'm afraid. Sorry for the confusion. Wieralee (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks, yeah, it will take some time! But it is not so complicated language wise, it is only moving categories so they end with "fossils" instead of begin with "fossil". FunkMonk (talk) 23:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Heh, I was just about to thank you again when you wrote this. Amazing work! And yes, we'll fix potential issues as we find them, but looks good at first glance. FunkMonk (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Panda Washington Zoo 2014.jpg

No 'gripe' about the move, specifically, but I was actually writing a talk page message at the same time, check File talk:Panda Ling Ling Washington Zoo (14012295648).jpg. Thanks. Revent (talk) 10:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, no complaint, just an FYI since you had touched it (since it might end up moved again). Revent (talk) 13:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Renaming

It didn't occur to me that search engines wouldn't be able to find them with the names together. Actually, I think they would, but if you're concerned about it, I'd be happy to put in dashes/spaces instead. It makes no difference to me. - Themightyquill (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

С праздником Весныǃ С тобой можно общаться по-русски?

Matsievsky (talk) 11:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Matsievsky: Немножко ;-) Я понимаю, но у меня нет русской клавиатурой.
Большое спасибо :-) Wieralee (talk) 12:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Category redirects

Hi, thanks for your work on Non-empty category redirects. Do you think RussBot or JarektBot should expand or accelerate their intervention? It's not clear to me in what cases they replace categories automatically. --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Federico Leva (BEIC): Russbot is useful - it adds category redirections, but only once a day, I think. I don't know if JarekBot is working and what is its work. When I started lookong after Non-empty category, it had over several months of arrears, so I think any bot is working there. And maybe it's good - I'm more experienced now - and I don't accept each move. Wieralee (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
    • Sure, that's great. Now that you gathered this experience, it would be nice to see if part of it can be coded somewhere. :) If you have suggestions for Russbot or other bot owners, I think they would be very valuable. --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File moves

Please tell me, why you've moved Images like this. I made an administrative descission, that they are not to move. So why you work againt me? There was no valid reason given! Marcus Cyron (talk) 09:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Marcus Cyron: Sorry. I don't look at such problems personally. So I didn't check WHO was working with this file before. I'd considered only the criterion. In my opinion the name "Budapest, Cimetière national de Fiumei út (Fiumei úti Nemzeti Sírkert)ou cimetière Kerepesi (Kerepesi temető) est le plus célèbre cimetière de Budapest (12).JPG" tells nothing, it's better to have a description for each particular tomb, f.e. "Gottermayer-tomb-Kerepesi.jpg". Such a name is easier to find in search engines, it's more likely to use. But maybe I'm wrong, of course.
I can revert my editions, but I'm wondering if it will do even greater confusion. What do you expect from me? I would fulfill your request. Those few files are not so important. The priority is to maintain friendly cooperation. I promise not to rename files you declined, even if I disagree ;-)
Have a nice day, Wieralee (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm confused as to why there is an issue here. I'm also confused as to why Marcus felt a need to leave the message he did at User talk:Themightyquill. It's not apparent to me that Wieralee or Themightyquill have done anything wrong. In response to Marcus' earlier refusal, valid rationales for the proposed moves were subsequently given. Themightyquill is perfectly entitled to revise his move requests to address Marcus' concerns, and Wieralee is perfectly entitled to consider the move requests on their merits. As admins, we do not get a veto over subsequent decisions made by other admins. Marcus, if you disagree, the course of action would be to propose a move to what you believe to be a more appropriate name, not to leave a note on Themightyquill's page ordering him to reverse his actions otherwise you will treat him as a vandal. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Trøgstad Church

Hello! As you can see in this diff it was I who proposed to move Category:Trøgstad Church to Category:Trøgstad kirke 18th of January 2014. On the 2nd of March 2015 you removed the template I had added -move template; Category names should generally be in English Then Steinsplitter with his bot redirected renamed cat Redirected renamed category to Category:Trøgstad kirke (given reason: 'Correct name' and today you undid the revision of the bot with the comment the category names should be in English, both categories are redirect

Well, my point is; this is a Norwegian church and if you look at the main category Churches in Norway you will see that almost 100 % of the categorynames are in Norwegian, hundreds that is. The official name of the church as stated by Statens kartverk - the Norwegian Mapping and Cadastre Authority - is Trøgstad kirke. Not Trøgstad Church or Trøgstad church; Trøgstad kirke at Statens kartverk. Could you please move the files into the correct category Trøgstad kirke? Thank you. --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Instead of that -- if you would like to move a category with such a reason, you should put a {{move}} template inside it and wait at least 14 days for discussion. Look here, for example.
I don't know, which name would be the best, I just can't make a movement against the Commons rules. For other countries the naming policy is "Church in...", Church in Trøgstad", for example.
Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@Anne-Sophie Ofrim: P.S. If somebody is moving a category, he should follow and move the files, too. The files shouldn't stay in redirected categories, because it's very difficult to find them. But do what you want, I would not oppose. You can do this by yourself: fix the templates in both categories and change categories in files. But leave the redirected category empty. Wieralee (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Marc Chagall 1941 cut.jpg

.jpg cut.jpg ← Sorry, it was my overlooking. --WTM (talk) 20:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


Files from Rodez

Je suis désolé de t'avoir donné tant de travail pour renommer tous mes fichiers. Ce n'est pas tous les jours qu'on se trompe d'église !
Avec tous mes remerciements
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Swahili wikipedia workshops

Hi I see you emptied that category. Obviously without trying to communicate with me. So what is the wisdom of taking these images from an identifiable location and lump them together with unrelated pics? There are going to be more Swahili language events. So if you move, move it to a country folder - but then Swahili is to expected to be active at least in 2 countries. Kipala (talk) 16:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @Kipala: you have made a redirected category yourself (look here). => all people are being redirected to an upper category, never seeing these files. All the redirected categories on Commons should be empty (if they are not, we are emptying them). If you would like to have a Suahili category, just make it -- but without a redirection. Wieralee (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks - honestly I have no idea how the "REDIRECT" came into this - misclicked? Just wanted to add the upper category. Ok now? Kipala (talk) 17:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Effects of renaming

Hi!

Just renaming and then causing things like this is not very good. All changes needs to be checked when renaming if its correcting errors in this way. Also the description at File:David Button Spurs 2010.jpg now gets messed up. I would say that should be a part of the person renaming before removing template and marking it as done. /Hangsna (talk) 12:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Aha, good, sorry for my haste. /Hangsna (talk) 12:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Renaming

Hi Wieralee, the filenames of my pictures include

  • Date of the game in sortable order
  • Exact time of the shot
  • kind of sports
  • and the filename that i need for recognizing the picture

This is NOT what criterion 2 says. If you feel the need of adding information, please do this without destroying the informations that are already in the picture. --Ailura (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Ailura: This is a Commons policy: the photo should have a name which describes a thing/person on it. We are uploading photos not for ourselves, we are working for other people & we want the photos to be easy to find in the searching machines. For the common man the name "20150207 1428 Ice Hockey AUT SVK 8681.jpg" is meaningless, it tells nothing. The new name "Alexander Trivellato - Italy-Slovenia 07.02.2015.jpg" is much better, the photo can be used in many projects on pages of this player.
Look at examples of Criterion 2, at the new names and at the old ones. If you give your photos proper names, nobody would rename them. Each renamed photo has it's redirection -- you can see it in the description. If you put an old name in searching machine, you'll find the file even it was renamed.
Think about it, please. Wieralee (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I am still working on the workflow getting the names, categories and descriptions from lightroom to commons and i am open to suggestions. I put a lot of work into proper categories and descriptions and file usage so i don't think searching machines don't find my pictures. but as i mentioned above: the filenames are neither ambiguous nor meaningless (allowedly hard to read). They tell that this is a scene from an ice hockey game between Austria and Slovakia at a given date and time and with a fairly unique running and sorting number. moving them to a beatiful title with less information and brackets because of the ambiguity is no improvement. --Ailura (talk) 08:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


Why you have renamed these images (Example). I made an administrative descission and said no before. The new names are definetly much more worse. Can you expect, how many "Wohnhäuser Leibnizstraße 52-54" in Germany exist? A lot. Such names are not OK. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Marcus Cyron: Sorry, I haven't seen your ADMINISTRATIVE decision. I don't know how many times a day User:SteinsplitterBot is making the list of Recently declined rename requests. If you decline rename, it goes on a list some time later, not at once. I saw your decline some time after I've already renamed it.
I don't know why you have declined those renames. It was a part of organization of the whole Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Mainz-Neustadt. The uploader clearly mistook the name of the file with their description. I spent some of my time to put the informations into description place in all files I've renamed. It's very fast to decline, but it takes some time to keep these informations inside the file.

:You have to think about the effects of your decline -- look at the File:Colmarstraße 9 und 11 zwei fünfgeschossige Wohnhäuser, 1903, Architekt Reinhold Weisse; Nr. 9 mit sandsteingegliederter Putzfassade.jpg. You have declined, I have declined not renamed. And what was the effect? User uploaded a new renamed File:Wohnhaus Colmarstraße 9-11.jpg and have made a request to delete the old another one... So he gets what he wanted, but other admins have a lot of work... And the mess is bigger.

But if you want, I can rename these files back, no problem. I'm doing my best, but I'm still learning. Wieralee (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nasz Przewodnik Czerwiec 1915 okładka.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nasz Przewodnik Czerwiec 1915 okładka.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @Jarekt: Tak, wpisując licencję wbiłam złe zamknięcia nawiasu. Łatwiej było chyba poprawić te dwa znaki, niż rozpoczynać nowy wątek ;-) Tym niemniej bardzo dziękuję. Yours sincerely, Wieralee (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wieralee/2013&oldid=803713604"