User talk:ViseMoD
Welcome to commons ViseMoD. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Male mallard standing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QI[edit]
Для File:Searchlight_in_Mikhailovsky_Garden.jpg добавьте геокод и уточните описание. Без этого я сниму свой голос.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Не вижу смысла в геокоде для данного снимка. Считаю, что нахождение прожектора в Михайловском парке в данном случае совершенно неважно (не знаю даже, зачем я это упомянул). Да и координат у меня всё равно нет. А под описанием вы что имеете в виду? —ViseMoD (talk) 04:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Геокод необходим всегда, он сильно помогает, от геокода ничего не становится хуже. В Михайловском парке много прожекторов. Координаты легко найти в google map, там довольно крупный масштаб, а что они будут неточные — невелика беда! С описанием я имею в виду, что сейчас непонятно, зачем эта фотография. Почему вы решили снять прожектор? Что он подсвечивает? Есть ли какие-то справочные сведения о нём типа года установки? Или товарного названия? Или название его производителя? В общем, чем больше, тем лучше. Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Уточнил, как смог. —ViseMoD (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Превосходно! Теперь это более чем QI. Может быть, попробуете выставить на VI?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Спасибо! Думаю, для VI это не слишком ценный кадр. —ViseMoD (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Есть более детальные прожектора этого типа, да?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- Спасибо! Думаю, для VI это не слишком ценный кадр. —ViseMoD (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Превосходно! Теперь это более чем QI. Может быть, попробуете выставить на VI?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Уточнил, как смог. —ViseMoD (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Геокод необходим всегда, он сильно помогает, от геокода ничего не становится хуже. В Михайловском парке много прожекторов. Координаты легко найти в google map, там довольно крупный масштаб, а что они будут неточные — невелика беда! С описанием я имею в виду, что сейчас непонятно, зачем эта фотография. Почему вы решили снять прожектор? Что он подсвечивает? Есть ли какие-то справочные сведения о нём типа года установки? Или товарного названия? Или название его производителя? В общем, чем больше, тем лучше. Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Searchlight in Mikhailovsky Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
О времени[edit]
"можно потратить 5 мин, можно полчаса". Я только потому спросил, что у меня на снимок меньше сорока минут, к сожалению, не уходит. Я стараюсь, но всё равно не получается быстрее, потому что слишком уж много есть вариантов и потому что нелегко выбрать правильный :-))).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- На мой взгляд, слова про 15% серый — это религия. В жизни бывает и светло, и темно. Вот тут белый собор, на снимке он совсем не белый. Или, скажем, фотоширота у глаза гораздо больше, чем у камеры, поэтому приходится мытьём и катаньем загонять яркое небо и тусклые стены в более тусклое небо и более яркие стены, чтобы собрать их поближе к той самой середине диапазона. Вы сами заметили, что кабы сделать собор светлее, небо бы пропало; а в реальной жизни глаза делают собор светлее, и небо не пропадает. На мой взгляд, HDR это такое мошенничество, которое позволяет нам обманывать матрицу фотоаппарата.
- Пример белого неба и белой стены, когда нужная яркость стены убивала небо.
- Пример чёрного неба и белой стены, когда при нужной яркости стен выгорает свет фонарей, то есть типичный образец кадра, который не умещается в фотошироту.
- Пример белой стены в яркий летний день, когда притемнение белой стены приводит к тому, что зелёные деревья становятся чёрными, да и тень вся гибнет.
- Мне хочется оправдать эту технологию, чтобы вы не так горько думали о полезном HDR. Он реально помогает. Подробнее о технологии вот тут.
- И ещё пару слов. Пример вечернего кадра, который по мере сил очищен от оранжевого света, и исходный вечерний ужас, который многим нравится, а я считаю его враньём. Башня не оранжевая. Башня белая.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Спасибо за примеры!
Дело в том, что обработка фотографии - это всегда компромисс. Да, при съёмке необходимо уместить тональный диапазон сцены в диапазон фотокамеры. Однако такие приёмы, как HDR не для меня. Мне эти снимки кажутся неестественными. Вообще-то говоря, глаз не настолько лучше фотокамеры в плане тонального диапазона. Да, динамический диапазон глаза выше, но когда он фокусируется на одном объекте и не двигается, диапазон сужается. И исходя из этого, нет смысла пытаться уместить в кадр, скажем и белые облака, и траву в тени. Если нельзя снять сцену из-за большого контраста, то можно прийти в другое время, дождаться облачной погоды, либо воспользоваться градиентными фильтрами, если сцена позволяет. Однако в конечном счёте, когда приходит время обрабатывать кадр нужно не наврать с цветами и добиться максимальной контрастности у сюжетно-важного объекта.
Если возвращаться к снимку с собором, то этими принципами я и руководствовался, когда обрабатывал кадр. В принципе, можно было бы осветлить стены, но тогда небо выбилось бы напрочь. С одной стороны, оно здесь и не важно; с другой - снимок становится неправдоподобным, что немаловажно.—ViseMoD (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)- Рецензенты на QI думают, что надо умещать и облака и траву. Такая вот объективная реальность. Что же до правдоподобности, то стены в жизни белые, а в снимке они не белые.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 06:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Спасибо за примеры!
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]
|
Dear ViseMoD,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
|
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Though the collection of images for the contest has been completed (as we informed you previously), the organizers of the contest "Wikipedia loves Petersburg" are glad to update you on the current course of events.
Our jury is working hard; on November, 1 it will declare the winners and the recipients of special prizes. We ask those of you who have not yet set up an e-mail address to do it at user preferences page so that the jury could contact the participants of the contest and to hand out the awards. The winners of the European-wide Wiki Loves Monuments competition will be announced later, in mid-November.
Already on November 2 in St. Petersburg, the Art-hotel "Rachmaninov", located on 5, Kazanskaya St., will open an exhibition of works by the participants of the contest. We inform you about the opening time via the website http://wikilovesmonuments.ru/
If you have any questions or need help with Wikimedia Commons, you can contact user kaganer.
You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to info
wikimedia.ru
Thank you again for your participation!.
Размещено автоматически; РобоСтася (talk) 13:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
"Wikipedia loves Petersburg" contest results are summed up[edit]
On November, 1 the winners of the contest "Wiki Loves Monuments" were announced.
It was difficult to select the winners. More than 450 users participated in the contest, having uploaded more than 4400 photographs. The Organizing Committee thanks everybody who took part, tried their hands, and agreed to make their work available to the whole world. There is fascinating work ahead of Wikipedia users: To employ the images to illustrate the articles in Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia which is available in 270 languages.
Do not get upset if you have not won. Look into Wikipedia articles - you may soon find your work there, to help people to visualise the buildings you have taken photographs of. Besides, we will contact you to hand you in a souvenir to recognize your particiation. We hope you will accept this sign of our gratitude.
If you have a chance, you can visit the exhibition of photographs, which has been organized in Saint Petersburg and shows some of the photographs submitted to the contest.
We hope you will participate in the future competitions planned by Wikimedia RU and thank you for your contribution.
You can ask any questions about the contest by sending an e-mail to infowikimedia.ru.
Sincerely,
In the name of the Organizing Committee,
Lvova Anastasia.
Размещено автоматически ботом РобоСтася (talk) 08:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Petrovac's Bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Harbour of Limenas - Large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/ViseMoD⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear ViseMoD,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sestroretsk Marsh - Shore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tower Bridge Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
New Category for you[edit]
I made a new category for you, Category:Quality images by ViseMoD, like most of the others, which participate in the QI-Contest. It will be easier now to organize your own Quality images. Always good light! --Hubertl (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! --ViseMoD (talk) 21:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Озеро Городищенское.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Petrovsky Pond - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! West Kotlin Shore South - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yuntolovsky Reserve - Panoramic West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shhuchie lake - Panoramic North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! North Shore of Neva Gulf - Autumn Path.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lindulovskaja grove - River Bend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Вики любит Землю 2016[edit]
Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваша фотография:
вошла в лонг-лист конкурса. В ближайшие дни жюри составит шорт-лист и определит победителей, обращая особое внимание на качество изображений. Пожалуйста, проверьте, что вошедшие в лонг-лист фотографии загружены в максимально возможном разрешении – это необходимое условие для победы в конкурсе.
Также убедитесь в том, что Вы указали адрес электронной почты и разрешили приём писем от других участников – без этого мы не сможем с Вами связаться.
Кроме того, Вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида.
Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lower Multinskoe - Towards South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Middle Multinskoe - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lake Akchan - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! North Shore of Neva Gulf - Blossom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! North Shore of Neva Gulf - Spring Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baltra Island - Wind Turbines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kemer - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lloret de Mar - Panorama of main beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Овцебыки - самые грозные млекопитающие Таймыра.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Овцебыки - самые грозные млекопитающие Таймыра.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Toledo Infantry Academy - Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama of The Castell de Sant Joan de Lloret de Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open![edit]
Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.
С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.
С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chugush Range - Sochi National Park - 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Volch'ja River - Värämänselkä Ridge - 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ice Hummocks near Listvyanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
_-_winter_2022.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mys Drakon (ostrov Ogoy) - winter 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|