User talk:Twisp

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dislocations[edit]

Nice (dislocation) photo's Twisp. Would it be more correct to say that the photo' shows etch pits in silicon, resulting from the preferential attack of the highly strained lattice regions around the dislocation core? A magnification of 500x seems extremely low to be showing the dislocations themselves. 200.141.112.78 20:40, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more correct, but I didn't think that it was necessary to repeat this description for every image. I'm leaving this job to someone, who will write an article using these images. I've already put them to wikipedia article on dislocations with a comment similar to yours and I think, that whoever will use these images to illustrate an article, will put a similar comment.

Category:Graphic Tool[edit]

Hi. PLease don't add the drinkware sillouettes to the Graphic Tool category. That category is for images which are really usefull to use again and again such as the wikiman/wiki couple and worldmaps. /Lokal_Profil 12:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also I created Category:Silhouettes of drinkware for these images. /Lokal_Profil 12:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP[edit]

See here: [1] – it was blocked by LX for being anopen proxy; please contact him. giggy (:O) 01:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou[edit]

Thank you for uploading svg format images [2], [3] and [4]. I have tried uploading svg format images before, but wasn't as successful. Here are some other images that I have uploaded, but could not get them to display properly in svg format. If you feel it's worth your time and effort please do convert them to svg format.

Thanks again. -- [Myth] ([Talk]) .

Czochralski growth image[edit]

Hello Twisp, in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Czochralski_Process.svg is "residu" a type error? --213.156.49.141 19:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing, error corrected. Twisp (talk) 11:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Amplifier Circuit Small.svg[edit]

Hi Twisp

Thanks for you contribution of the illustration Image:Amplifier Circuit Small.svg. I have looked at it, and it seems that a capacitor is missing in series with R7. Only if a GND was held at (+Vsupply)/2 could it be DC-connected to GND. Please also correct Image:Amplifier_Circuit_Small.png (or mark for deletion?). kind regards, --Glenn (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

A mistake from developer Tim Starling resulted in the accidental deletion of 496 full-resolution images. A list of the affected images at Wikimedia Commons was made by PatrícaR and can be found here. As one of your images was found on the list, I'm asking you if you could re-upload the image Enneagram as an octave.svg from your hard disk, with the comment Restoring image, see [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2008-September/004148.html].

Kind regards,
Kameraad Pjotr 14:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Streamlines etc.[edit]

Dear Twisp, I am sorry to say that I removed your images from the streamlines article. I am afraid that the level of detail was too high to nicely convey with just a static image: a dynamical concept benefits I find from an animation. I hope you are not offended. Fi1Kaiv8 (talk) 00:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou[edit]

From your svg:

--Jmarchn (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Twisp!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Permission[edit]

Hello,

Would you please provide me with a copyright permission. I would like to use your figure (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fracture_modes_v2.svg) in my dissertation.

Thanks.

Konstantin Dolgan

Your account will be renamed[edit]

23:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)