User talk:Tubantia

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello You have priovided this picture and you describe the locomotive as "NS 7853". I can't see this number on the locomotive itself but rather the nameplate "Navizence" which identifies this locomotive as SLM 2079, delivered in 1910 to Aiag Chippis as #4. I know that the similar SLM 1403 and 1404, delivered in 1901 as JS 864-65, then SBB 8438-39 became NS 7851-52 in 1945 but were already withdrawn in 1948. Can you say more about NS 7853? Gürbetaler 23:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got the information from here. It is the annotation used by the Dutch Railways. Tubantia 22:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answer and links! Very helpful--Gürbetaler 21:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token a23926d56dd6d12b84d72d1ba6bc9683[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hi:
I am pretty sure that this building is not the Pieter de la Court building. Which it is I am not sure; it looks like one of the buildings at the Wassenaarseweg, but I am unable to verify that. I found that the file is used on en Wiki, so the problem did propagate in the mean time. JdH (talk) 16:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, you were right, see Routebeschrijving Pieter de la Court-gebouw; that was the building I had in mind. So ii looks like that they renamed the building on the corner of de Rijsburgerweg and Wassenaarseweg. JdH (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, haven't been around for a while; question answered at NL wikipedia. Tubantia (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Musée d'Art Moderne et d'Art Contemporain Nice.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--- Zil (d) 13:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]