User talk:Tuankiet65

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tuankiet65!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:48, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 14067dd4c7ca5339a661f33dcfb5c9fa[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thank you ![edit]

Hi Tuankiet65 !

I just want to thank you for your kind "WOW", supporting my picture of the Eiffel Tower from below in the FPC page. Your support vote was the last of a long series, but not the least, and I appreciate it very much.
You now what ? I was born a 24 of march too ! (but many many many years before you...)
I wish you a lot of FP to come in your own gallery !
Kind regards from Paris to Da Nang,--Jebulon (talk) 15:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTY[edit]

Chào Tuankiet, tôi đã dịch xong 6 cái thông báo MediaWiki ở dưới, hiện còn 4 cái thông điệp tại Preparation, chia nhau làm nhé, bạn làm 2 cái đầu. À, thống nhất dùng "HACN" cho "POTY" và "Hình ảnh của năm" cho "Picture of The Year" nhé. Prenn · Talk · 10:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Tuankiet65 (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
✓[OK]. Tôi thấy không cần thiết phải dịch FAQ hay thậm chí các quy định vì các trang khác đã nói rất rõ rồi, và bảng tổng hợp dịch thuật cũng không đề cập tới. Tuy nhiên nếu bạn muốn nội dung tiếng Việt đầy đủ thì dịch cũng được. Prenn · Talk · 11:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK
:)
Tuankiet65 (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 21c75421a332ae07860595d48adc07ba[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Hi, I think this is not what you meant to upload at those titles. --Nemo 07:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into this issue. Thanks for your attention. Tuankiet65 (talk) 09:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Red Star Linux (붉은 별) Video (비디오) 1.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

1989 21:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Red Star Linux (붉은 별) Video (비디오) 2-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

1989 21:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariane 5 Mission 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uwe W. (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SQLite Logo 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

+mt 22:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Me at the zoo.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

IagoQnsi (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 22:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 09:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reventtalk 09:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2013 DIFC images[edit]

It is unfortunate that this has not been addressed until now (though I see one was mentioned, long ago) but you obviously messed up uploading these images.... there are exact duplicates, with no way to tell what is correct.

Without some input from you, fixing these (and I suspect there are ones I have not located) there is no way for anyone to figure out what images are of what team, since you uploaded identical images with names and descriptions pointing at different teams. I have not been deleting the duplicates, but instead just 'flagging' them so that you will be notified, but other admins will do so, and the end result will simply be a random mixture of incorrectly described files. Can you, please, look into this? Really, if you can't sort it out then they should quite possibly simply 'all' be deleted as impossible to correctly describe. Thanks. Reventtalk 09:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While I took the photos I did include some "blank" photos as to seperate teams. Unfortunately I didn't know the teams' order nor I could find one on the Internet. And I'm sorry for not leaving any replies, school was quite harsh but it's summer vacation now and I might be able to look into this issue on the next few days.Thanks for the message though. Tuankiet65 (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Another option might simply be to re-describe the ones that were uploaded as being from 'both' teams as 'unknown'... that's rather what I meant by 'delete them all', was delete the duplicate copies and don't claim to know who they were. I did not meant just make them go away completely. Reventtalk 17:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Achim (talk) 19:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me at the zoo.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tuankiet65.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]