User talk:Thuresson/Archive6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

varfor radera du vår profilsida

varfor radera du vår profilsida

Varfor Radera vår profil side ?  med text verbetim Dr. childress page ???

Dr. Childress er del av vär verksamhet, och er en av vär psykologist reference ?

mvh Peter Knudsen Bpm Juristfirma (talk) 01:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC) |}

Please see Commons:Deletion policy: Copyright violations can be deleted by administrators without further ado. None of the Wikimedia Foundation projects will allow you to upload copyright violations. Thuresson (talk) 01:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

UDR

An attempt do decide what other users should work on is highly non-cooperetive IMO. We are all volunteers and work in the fields we wish to. Rules concerning OTRS tickets processing are not established by Wikimedia Commons community and, in particular, not by Wikimedia Commons administrators. As well as it is not OTRS members role to decide whether a particular image is in Wikimedia Commons scope or which one shold be used in a Wikipedia article.

I hope I misunderstood your intentions in this comment. If you wish to help shortenning the OTRS queues, you are welcome to volunteer to OTRS. Ankry (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I regret I was unaware that the request was made by an OTRS member. Thuresson (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for using it, but please ensure there is a timestamp.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanislav Kosior.jpg

You deleted my file. Could you explain the reason? --Armenius vambery (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello dear friend! What would you like to know? Thuresson (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Why did you deleted my file? Explanation. --Armenius vambery (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I (uploader) have never agreed that "Rapaport is the photographer". Please restore it back. --Armenius vambery (talk) 19:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi bestie, I am so happy you writing to me. очень дерево as we say in Cherkassy! It was yourself who named the photographer on March 17, 2018. You wrote "Photo by Rappoport". Thuresson (talk) 08:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
I indicated that it is not possible to estimate pma. Please restore it back. --Armenius vambery (talk) 13:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello best friend. Contact me again when you have credible and verifiable information that the photographer's date of death is something else than 1975. Thuresson (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Alarm bell

Hi. An alarm bell rings. Beyond the following link are 40k files you may have an interest in per your user page. You have been warned. Category:Copyrighted free use.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Excel 2.2 for Macintosh Advertisement 1989.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Excel 2.2 for Macintosh Advertisement 1989.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 03:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Excel 3.0 for Macintosh Ad.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Excel 3.0 for Macintosh Ad.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 03:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Philip II crossing the Loire.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Philip II crossing the Loire.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Reverted you

Hi.. I removed your note while removing the impersonator's undel request, since I didn't think it would make sense to leave just your reply. Let me know if you think I should have acted differently. Storkk (talk) 21:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm quite happy with that. Thuresson (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Undelete photo File:TheIndependent.jpg

You mention that there is a photo taken by Dubai photographer, but can you explain which photo you are talking about. I am only trying to include a photo of the Independent newspaper. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeddyFang (talk • contribs) 21:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

The photo on the page in the newspaper. Thuresson (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi again, can you clarify a little bit more, you are saying that the picture of the Independent front page was taken by the Dubai photographer? or are you saying that a picture in the newspaper was taken by the Dubai photographer? thank you for clarifying. TeddyFang (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)TeddyFang

hello Mr. Thuresson, I am writing to ask you if it was possible to restore this painting by Frank O. Salisbury (1874-1962), in 6th May 1935, the following license was PD-UKGov, respecting the actual copyright, it would be possible to ask for it to be restored ? please?--87.15.94.41 00:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

commond undeletion request

Bonjour M. Thuresson, je vous écris pour vous dire que ma demande suivante concernant un fichier précédemment supprimé n’a rien à voir avec le vandalisme, je demande si ma demande peut être acceptée et analysée (et si sa réponse est négative) , Je suis obligé de renoncer définitivement à demander la révocation du comons, si le délai minimum était de 6 mois), si elle voulait que je me lève au moins, je serais désolé d’analyser ma dernière demande faite par moi; Donc, si au moins ce portrait était publié, je me sentirais plus serein en 'attendant 6 mois en direct. I await your response, greetings--95.248.92.139 22:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

17:20, 22 nov 2018 Thuresson (discussione | contributi) ha cancellato la pagina File:Luigi Rollino con il figlio Marco Michele a Napoli a bordo dell'incrociatore Duca degli Abruzzi 1957.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MarcoMichele2018) (ringrazia) (global usage; delinker log)

Mr. Thuresson, vorrei sapere perchè è stato cancellato un file di una immagine di cui io sono proprietario in originale. Chiedo che venga ripristinata, è una immagine della mia famiglia alla quale non voglio rinunciare ed è di mia proprietà, e il copyright è di mia proprietà. Grazie Marco M. Rollino — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoMichele2018 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

17:23, 22 nov 2018 Thuresson (discussione | contributi) ha cancellato la pagina File:Tesserino Partigiano CNL.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MarcoMichele2018) (ringrazia) (global usage; delinker log)

17:23, 22 nov 2018 Thuresson (discussione | contributi) ha cancellato la pagina File:Tesserino Partigiano CNL.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MarcoMichele2018) (ringrazia) (global usage; delinker log) Mr. Thuresson, vorrei sapere perchè è stato cancellato un file di una immagine di cui io sono proprietario in originale. E' il tesserino da Partigiano di mio padre, è di mia proprietà e l'immagine è stata prodotta da me. Chiedo che venga ripristinata, è una immagine di mia proprietà, e il copyright è di mia proprietà. Grazie Marco M. Rollino — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoMichele2018 (talk • contribs) 11:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

17:23, 22 nov 2018 Thuresson (discussione | contributi) ha cancellato la pagina File:Salvataggio dell'equipaggio dell'aereo I. Bais in oceano Atlantico il 6 gennaio 1931.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MarcoMichele2018) (ringrazia) (global usage; delinker log)

17:23, 22 nov 2018 Thuresson (discussione | contributi) ha cancellato la pagina File:Salvataggio dell'equipaggio dell'aereo I. Bais in oceano Atlantico il 6 gennaio 1931.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MarcoMichele2018) (ringrazia) (global usage; delinker log). Mr. Thuresson, vorrei sapere perchè è stato cancellato un file di una immagine di cui io sono proprietario in originale. Chiedo che venga ripristinata, è una immagine di mia proprietà, e il copyright è di mia proprietà. Grazie Marco M. Rollino — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoMichele2018 (talk • contribs) 11:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Richiesta di ripristino di file cancellati

Mr. Thuresson, vorrei sapere perchè sono stati cancellati file di immagini di cui io sono proprietario in originale. Chiedo che vengano tutti ripristinati, sono immagini appartenenti alla mia famiglia, sono di mia proprietà, e il copyright è di mia proprietà. Grazie MarcoMichele 2018

  • Encomio Solenne [[1]]
  • Attestato Croce d'Oro [[2]]
  • Attestato Croce d'Argento [[3]]
  • Attestato della Campagna d'Albania [[4]]
  • Attestato Guerra di Liberazione Patrioti volontari della Libertà [[5]]
  • Attestato Lunga Navigazione [[6]]
  • Attestato Medaglia d'Argento per Lunga Navigazione [[7]]
  • Attestato della Prima Croce al Merito di Guerra [[8]]
  • Attestato della Seconda Croce al Merito di Guerra [[9]]
  • Attestato della Terza Croce al Merito di Guerra [[10]]
  • Attestato di Volontario della Seconda Guerra Mondiale [[11]]
  • Attestato della Guerra di Liberazione[[12]]
  • Attestato della Guerra di Liberazione [[13]]
  • Attestato del Periodo Bellico [[14]]
  • Certificato di Abilitazione a Torpediniere [[15]]
  • Diploma di Cavaliere della Repubblica [[16]]
  • Certificato di Patriota da Generale Alexander [[17]]
  • Luigi Rollino 1941 [[18]]
  • Luigi e Giuliana Rollino a Taranto 1941 [[19]]
  • Italo Balbo con il governatore di Rio de Janeiro gennaio 1931 [[20]]
  • Lo Stormo 1 di Italo Balbo e la divisione Esploratori davanti alla baia di Rio de Janeiro il 15 gennaio 1931 [[21]]

[[22]]

MarcoMichele2018 (talk) 15:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Det går bra att kontakta mig på västgötska, småländska eller annat nordiskt språk. Tyvärr förstår jag inte italienska. Thuresson (talk) 21:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Herr Thuresson, jag skulle vilja veta varför bildfiler har tagits bort, varav jag är den ursprungliga ägaren. Jag ber att alla är återställda, bilder som tillhör min familj, är min egendom, och upphovsrätten är min egendom. Tack MarcoMichele 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoMichele2018 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Det var en märklig fråga eftersom du meddelades i maj 2018 att dina filer hade nominerats att bli raderade. Du gavs också tillfälle att delta i diskussionen samt att lägga fram skäl till varför filerna inte skulle raderas. Efter nomineringen var du aktiv på italienska wikipedia men valde själv att inte komma med några argument. Generellt sett skulle jag som en tumregel påstå att ingen användare på Wikicommons är ursprunglig upphovsrättsinnehavare av verk från 1940-talet. Thuresson (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Tack, herr Thuresson för din förtydligande, det här är en militär dekoration som min far kom från den italienska flottan för en hjältisk handling under andra världskriget. Dekorationen tillhör min familj sedan min far har varit död i många år. Men för den här bilden som alla andra som är relaterade till min fars militära karriär tillhör min familj. Jag lägger bilderna till förfogande för Wikipedia, eftersom de är en del av mänsklighetens historia. Om jag måste avstå från upphovsrätten, är det okej med mig. Vad måste jag göra för att göra bilderna tillgängliga, även de andra raderas? Och vidare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoMichele2018 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Militära dekorationer brukar i allmänhet formges av en konstnär och i så fall behöver man veta vem konstnären är och om den personen har varit avliden i 70 år. Om konstnären är okänd behöver man åtminstone veta när verket publicerades första gången och i vilket sammanhang. Thuresson (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Dear Mr Thuresson, dekoration som du hänvisar är en enkel bit papper som utfärdats av kommittén för National Liberation, säkert utarbetats av en obskyr kontorist några typografi av några av norra italienska staden, efter befrielsen från ockupationen tyska. Formuläret är inte viktigt, men innehållet i det dokument som kunde ha skrivits på ett pappersark. Glöm inte att i slutet av kriget hade problem att överleva och ingen var intresserad av att titta efter en artist att skriva en dekoration för en hjälte av motståndet. Det är synd att du inte vet italienska, läs att det är ett enkelt erkännande av militärt värde, inget annat, av vilket minst 266 637 exemplar har skrivits ut. Försök att föreställa dig hur världen var som 1946. Våra fäder var lite mer konkreta än vi är idag, och de sökte verkligen ingen konstnär för en bit papperspapper, de hade några överlevnadsproblem vid den tiden. Tack ändå för din uppmärksamhet, om du inte vill publicera dekorationen spelar ingen roll, ingen kan idag ta bort den från min far. Marco M. Rollino MarcoMichele2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoMichele2018 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Maxim Atayants

Dear sir, could you comment your sentence "Not done. OTRS tickets are processed in due order by OTRS volunteers. Thuresson (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)" In https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2018-11#Maxim_Atayants Does it mean that my tickets 2018102210005857 and 2018102210005795 are processed and my appeal to remove my graphics works to proper Category declined? Or I should wait? If first - how to understand the reason why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxim atayants (talk • contribs) 17:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Maxim atayants (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Swedish Wikipedia

Hello, can you make a little notification in an appropriate place in this wikipedia for me? by tidying up Commons categories and Wikidata I found sv:Brokormstjärnor and sv:Ophiothrichidae both articles are the same topic, but the speeling of sv:Ophiothrichidae is wrong and the source that was used is now also fixed [26], I ask because some BOTs created corresponding item Ophiothrichidae (Q3543123) and that finally is potentially disturbing for us via {{Wikidata Infobox}}. Can they delete or merge the wrong article? Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

I'm not missing anything I hope?

"Sometimes the jokes write themselves"

I can't actually see the image, I'm just going by the filename, so I hope I didn't miss anything? (I'm not sure what you're referring to) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


Oh, I was not making fun of you. My point was that KAT during its time showed a blatant distegard for copyright and that they are unlikely to file a DMCA complaint. Thuresson (talk) 12:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

A license review

Hello! In this edit you reviewed a license for an image, but the site-parameter in the template LicenseReview links to a page that does not contain the image in question. (There is an image of the same subject at mynewsdesk here which is said to be "Creative Commons erkännande" but it does not state which verison of CC-BY it is.) --Bensin (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

It's regrettable that I mixed up the license review with this photo: File:Sebastian Eriksson & Andréas Eriksson 2012-07-03 001.jpg. In 2016 I reviewed hundreds of photos uploaded from Mynewsdesk but the web site has apparently made a few changes regarding its licensing since then. One recent example is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Magnus Uggla 2013-06-14.jpg.
On the web page here, you can see that the license for this particular photo of Sarah Dawn Finer is CC-BY-SA-3.0 (you will have to scroll down past a lot of photos, then hover the mouse pointer over the license). Thuresson (talk) 20:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes, the image is here and the licence can be seen here by first hovering the image and then hovering the license link. Could you please update your license review on the image page here on Commons to reflect that? --Bensin (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! --Bensin (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

  1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
  2. Go to your preferences
  3. Scroll down to Email Options
  4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
  5. Click Save

File:The Ramblers wiki.jpg

Hello Thuresson. Sorry for bothering you. I'm having trouble uploading images that I own. They are mine and I own the website where they are published (a Wix.com website). On former comments I meant that I have authorization because I am the owner. How can I proceed and proove this? Can you help me out? I'm a bit lost here. Thank you for your time.LuisNunes2019 (talk) 13:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Godspower Oparaugo in 2017.jpg

Dear Thuresson, kindle restore the file above, the description was accurate and it serves as a step taken to unite skilled youths during my youth service year. I am sure that such gathering is still maintained b my successors at youth service in Eket.

Kindly restore it for reference purposes. (MrGodspower (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC))

File:Blue 0072C6.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:4898:80E8:F:2698:AF7B:9EAB:84A5 09:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

File:ICE_CUBES_facility_MOCKUP.jpg_File:ICE_Cubes_onboard_the_ISS.jpg

Hello, You have denied the undeletion for these pictures. The license I had chosen might be wrong, but these pictures are not from Space Applications Services nor from their website. They are from the ESA website http://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2017/06/Experiment_cube - https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2018/07/ICE_Cubes_facility and the and the copyright rules are here https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Copyright_Notice_Images.

Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by FKE94 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, but the ESA license does not allow me to use the photos for monetary gain. Thuresson (talk) 15:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

I am not sure what this file was but, if it is a photograph of the ship, it is most certainly in the public domain everywhere since the ship was destroyed in 1918. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 21:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Well, who can say without information about publication history and/or name of the photographer? Thuresson (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

hi Mr. Thuresson, I would have this file to restore, regarding this PD license picture,, it is a portrait executed in the mid-nineteenth century by an unknown artist, however copyright status is valid with the PD license--2.44.63.169 23:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Thuresson,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Thuresson,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

The file in question is a logo that was created, trademarked and owned by us (Culcha Society) and therefore no laws are being broken so we would like to request the file be undeleted.

--Culcha Society (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Please clarify why this file is useful for any Wikimedia project. Thuresson (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

--Culcha Society (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

This file is useful because its the logo that represent the project being described. It is also an established practice created by @Culcha Society that is growing with over 10K practitioners/supporters. We hope this explanation is sufficient and clear enough.

Hi! Out of curiosity, did you nominate File:L'homme qui pousse le mur, se libère.jpg for deletion per COM:SCOPE? If it is, it's not totally clear as the uploader/artist believes that the nom was due to permission reasons. It may be good to clarify in the DR Regards, Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 16:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please remove

I hold the copyright for these images and they have been uploaded from Mynewsdesk even though there is a disclaimer that says that it will not be available for everyone after a certain date. Please email me and explain why you are not removing these images even though I the copyright holder asked you to. daniel.holking@gmail.com


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Eliasson_2010-06-17_001.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Eliasson_2011-05-09_001.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Eliasson_2010-06-17_003.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Eliasson_2010-06-17_002.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.104.5.107 (talk) 09:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, you hold the copyright. You have licensed these images under a Creative Commons CC-BY-3.0 license which is irrevocable. The Wikimedia foundation is using your photos under the terms of the license you picked. Thuresson (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Explanation requested

Hello,

Please explain why the Coat of arms of New York State was reverted back, when I provided references detailing the dramatic change to the file? Thanks! - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 01:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

There must not be any dramatic changes to a file, as is further explained in the official guideline Commons:Overwriting existing files. Thuresson (talk) 06:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Even if those changes are in line with recent legislative action? --TheLionHasSeen (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The New York State legislature has no influence over Commons guidelines. Thuresson (talk) 07:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Have you read the discussion page? Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 09:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:PD-NorwayGov

Can you (or another admin or template editor) edit this template. The law referred to, is "Lov om opphavsrett til åndsverk m.v." (åndsverkloven) of 1961 https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLO/lov/1961-05-12-2/ which has been repealed and replaced by LOV-2018-06-15-40 Lov om opphavsrett til åndsverk mv. (åndsverkloven) https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2018-06-15-40.

The content in the § referred to in the template (§9) in the old law of 1961 is now found in §14 of the new law from 2018. The text is almost identical but appears to be updated to contemporary Norwegian.

The content referred to from §1 seems to have been moved to §2 in the new law.

See also Template talk:PD-NorwayGov#Law revision and Template talk:PD-NorwayGov/doc

Category discussion warning

Famous Vikings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 08:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

I posted the explanation about my changes in the project page discussion, Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru, as I wrote to another user:

The text cited in works of the government, comes from Law 13714 from 1961, this law was repealed by Legislative Decree No. 822, (published on 24 April 1996), implies that what is written in works of the government is not valid, there is some exception but nothing about whats is written in works of the government. In the current legislative decree nothing is mentioned regarding Works of "legal entities", like Government, municipalities, and organizations.

It is not acceptable that foreigners make inferences, conclusions, and write about Peruvian laws, thus generating confusion. If it has to be discussed, it will be among Peruvians, if necessary we will ask the government institution to pronounce on the issue, meanwhile, that text must be deleted. Peruvians are independent since 1821.

I declined my request undeletion of File:Carlos Garcia y Garcia.jpg so that I am not misunderstood, the topic about foreign take the authority to interpret our laws are more important. Jjrt (talk) 03:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

I'm not sure with whom I need to speak, but I work for www.clal.org, and I've uploaded the picture of our President numerous times, and it keeps getting flagged. It's OUR picture - so I'm REALLY confused. Please help me understand why we can't link to our OWN PAGE and photos?

Many thanks, Shelli Aderman

saderman@clal.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shellipsm (talk • contribs) 19:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your first step must be to speak with whoever is in charge of the website clal.org and ask him or her to change the license of the photo from "All rights reserved" to a license that is acceptable at Wikicommons, see Commons:Licensing. Thuresson (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

stefan ruscan cu cimpoiul

I have scane it... The picture have been gave it to me to, I have been allowed to use it without restriction by artist family. In the same way they give it to Petru Taranu to publish it in 2000. And no problem apeaers... I'm not specialist in copyright but I consider it to be Fairy use. Wrong? Stefan Ruscan died in 1937 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ana Ruscanu (talk • contribs) 14:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Proper licensing Issue

Hello Wikimedia friend,

I hope this finds you and yours well. I was wondering if I could possibly ask for your kind attention to a request. I am a new contributor to Wiki commons. Would you please clarify for me what kind of licensing code and/or attribution is/are needed to apply to the Legal Information | The Bahá’í Faith (bahai.org) specified by the Media Bank on bahai.org?

On 20 January, 2021 as soon as I noticed the 'notification for deletion', I rushed to check and correct the licensing issues on every photo below. I thought by changing the code from {{cc-by-sa-4-0}} to {{cc-by-4.0}} and adding the name of the rights holder "Copyright © Bahá'í International Community" there would be no issues. I am not sure why it did not work, and the photos were all deleted the next day, thus I am requesting your help. Please advise how I can correct this situation. Thank you.

I.) These photos were from bahai.org media bank.

· File:Hermann Grossmann (1899-1968).webp

· File:William Sutherland Maxwell (1874-1952).webp

· File:William Sears (1911-1992).webp

· File:Valíyu’lláh Varqá (1884-1955).webp

· File:Ugo Giachery (1896-1989).webp

· File:Taráz’u’lláh Samandarí (1874-1968).webp

· File:Siyyid Mustafá Rúmí (d. 1942).webp

· File:Siegfried Schopflocher (1877-1953).webp

· File:Shu’á’u’lláh `Alá’í (1889-1984).webp

· File:Roy C. Wilhelm (1875-1951).webp

· File:Rahmatu’lláh Muhájir (1923-1979).webp

· File:Paul Edmond Haney (1909-1982).webp

· File:Músá Banání (1886-1971).webp

· File:Mullá Muḥammad-Riḍáy-i-Muḥammad Ábádí, known as Jináb-i-Shaykh Muḥammad-Riḍáy-i-Yazdí.webp

· File:Mulla Muhammad-i-Qa’ini, known as Nabíl-i-Akbar (1829-1892).webp

· File:Muhammed Taqiy-i-Isfahani (d. 1946).webp

· File:Mirza ‘Alí-Muhammad Varqá, the father of Rúhu’lláh (d. 1896).webp

· File:Mírzá `Ali-Muhammad, known as Ibn-i-Asdaq, (d. 1928).webp

· File:Martha Root (1872-1939).webp

· File:Louis George Gregory (1874-1951).webp

· File:Leroy C. Ioas (1896-1965).webp

· File:Keith Ransom-Kehler (1876-1933).webp

· File:John Henry Hyde-Dunn (1855-1941).webp

· File:John Graham Ferraby (1914-1973).webp

· File:John Ebenezer Esslemont (1874-1925).webp

· File:John Aldham Robarts (1901-1991).webp

· File:Jalál Kházeh, also transliterated as Jalál Kháḍih (1897-1990).webp

· File:Horace Hotchkiss Holley (1887-1960).webp

· File:Hasan Muvaqqar Balyúzí (1908-1980).webp

· File:Harold Collis Featherstone (1913-1990).webp

· File:Hají Mullá `Alí-Akbar, known as Hají Ákhúnd,(1842-1910).webp

· File:Hájí Mírzá Muhammad-Taqí, known as Ibn-i-Abhar (d. 1917).webp

· File:Hají Mírzá Hasan-i-Adíb (1848-1919).webp

· File:Hájí Abu’l-Hasan-i-Ardikání, known as Hájí Amín (1831-1928).webp

· File:George Townshend (1876-1957).webp

· File:Enoch Olinga (1926-1979).webp

· File:Dorothy Beecher Baker (1898-1954).webp

· File:Dhikru’lláh Khádim (1904-1986).webp

· File:Corinne Knight True (1861-1961).webp

· File:Clara Dunn (1869-1960).webp

· File:Amelia Engelder Collins (1873-1962).webp

· File:Amatu’l-Bahá Rúhíyyih Khánum (1910-2000).webp

· File:Agnes Baldwin Alexander (1875-1971).webp

· File:Adelbert Mühlschlegel (1897-1980).webp

· File:‘Abdu’l-Jalíl Bey Sa‘ad (d. 1942).webp

· File:Abu’l-Qásim Faizi (1906-1980).webp

· File:`Alí-Muhammad Varqá (1911-2007).webp

·  File:`Alí-Akbar Furútan (1905-2003).webp

II. The photo below this line is one and the same from Baha'i Media Bank also.

·  File:Hands and First House 1963.jpg

·  File:ایادیان امرالله و اولین هیئت انتخابی بیت العدل اعظم در نزدیکی مرقد بهاءالله.jpg

III. The group below this line are pictures I photographed from existing books with credits to the authors.

· File:Phoebe-Apperson-Hearst.jpg

· File:رابرت ترنر - یکی از حواریون عبدالبهاء.jpg

· File:آقا بزرگ خراسانی ملقب به بدیع.jpg

·  File:نبیل زرندی.jpg


<nowiki>Looking forward to your helpful response. With appreciation for your time, Bineshgardi (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Thuresson

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Thuresson,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


File:Ufuk BAYRAM.jpg

Flickr washing from flickr.com. Thuresson (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello there. I wish everyone good work. I tried to add this photo to the article called "Ufuk Bayram" on tr.wikipedia.org. I added it before, but it was deleted. This time I asked the photo's owner to open a Flickr account. I added the photo from his Flickr account. What should I do to upload this photo?Bilimeinanan (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Please ask the photographer to follow the instructions at COM:OTRS instead. Thuresson (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

File:9- Vilnius-Maison verte-DSC05325-Massacre de Paneriai.JPG

Why have you deleted this photo? Unknown author and: According to the Green House in Vilnius, this photo was part of a package of photos sent to the US for the trials of Nazis after the war; -So it was published between 1926 and 1977 in the states without copyright notice. This kind of deletion is a blessing for the authors of such crimes.--FLLL (talk) 08:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome to state your case that sending a photo from one country to another without permission from the copyright owner equals publishing without infringing 17 USC 501(a). Undeletion requests are made at COM:UNDEL. Thuresson (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

DR backlog

Hi, Admin. I saw that you just made a good clean up at Commons:Deletion requests/2021/03/11; thanks. Commons:Deletion requests/2020/09/30 is also loaded with several simple cases waiting for closure since a long time. Best. --E4024 (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@Thuresson

Yes I believe so the man responsible for the movie poster is the one who directed the movie David charhon him and Jean claude Van Damme has been posting it all over social media Jamesjenks53 (talk) 23:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

@jamesjenks53

Yes the movie poster has been posted all on social media by jean Claude van Damme and movie director David charhon so it makes sense for the movie poster to be on there LOL Jamesjenks53 (talk) 23:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Found it!

I finally have some free time thanks to summer vacations and I decided that I would find the source from the seagull picture you rightly deleted, and I did! Here is the link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seagull_in_capitol_hill.jpg I do believe that I can remix the file and share it but maybe I had to link the work or the license or something, idk you tell me man, Best Regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scuraball (talk • contribs) 07:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2021 – stort grattis till Måns Hagberg och hans fotografi av reveln vid Vivesholms naturreservat! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2021 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Bilderna på Jan Eliasson

Jag som är fotografen som tagit dessa bilder på Jan Eliasson vill att du tar bort dessa från Wikimedia Commoms. Om du vet hur pressbilder funkar så läggs de upp för att användas i sammanhang som har med företaget att göra, i detta fallet WaterAid. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Eliasson_2010-06-17_002.jpg

Om du tittar på sidan som ligger under SOURCE https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/wateraidsverige/images/jan-eliasson-ordfoerande-i-wateraid-sveriges-styrelse-45954 ser du att det finns ett OBS! där. "OBS! Bilderna upphör som pressbilder den sista augusti 2012 och får då inte längre användas fritt." Hade vi köpt bilderna av en fotograf kunde detta ha drabbat oss hårt då den kunde kräva mycket betalt av oss för att de sprids så här nu.

Att bilderna ligger under Creative Commons licens var för att jag var tvungen att välja något och vi ville inte att det skulle står copyrighted här för då skulle ingen våga använda. Testat det förut och det ger bara en massa frågor. Jobbar inte längre på WaterAid så jag kommer inte åt att ändra till copyrighted men jag är ändå fotografen bakom plus att jag nu förklarat för dig samt visat disclaimern som legat på sidan sedan 2013 när jag slutade på WaterAid. "OBS! Bilderna upphör som pressbilder den sista augusti 2012 och får då inte längre användas fritt."

Kan du vara vänlig att ta bort samtliga bilder? Det handlar inte om att jag vill tjäna en massa pengar på detta men jag vill ändå ha en viss kontroll över mina alster PLUS att jag känner Jan Eliasson och han skulle inte vilja ha dessa vind för våg över internet.

Varma hälsningar, /Daniel Holking daniel.holking@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielholking2000 (talk • contribs) 07:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@Danielholking2000: Du kan aldrig återkalla en licens om du har publicerat ditt eget foto med en Creative Commons-licens. Det innebär att Stiftelsen Wikimedia kan fortsätta att använda din bild i enlighet med den CC-licens du själv har valt. Mer information finns här: creativecommons.se. Thuresson (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
@Thuresson:

Absolut det vet jag men nu när ni vet att det inte var syftet har ni valet att inte tillhandahålla bilden till alla i fortsättningen. de som redan har den kan så klart använda den men att ni fortsätter distribuera den trots att ni vet att det inte var min vilja eller avsikten känns inte hänsynsfullt. Vet dessutom att Jan själv inte skulle uppskatta detta så vänligen ta bort den även om du paragrafmässigt har rätt. Jag kommer fortsätta att hitta olika sätt att försöka få bort den och detta är bara första steget, att be om lite medmänsklighet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielholking2000 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Bandersonom.jpg deletion

Please undelete this file and restore it to the Beth Anderson page. This file is entirely my own work and my wikimedia user page clearly identifies my legal name in addition to my wikipedia editing name. This issue has been discussed previously and I have properly identified myself on the wikimedia user page for this reason. My history of edits are always done as a logged in user and my account is clearly under my legal name. I have no history of editing violations so I'm not sure why this was done completely without consultation or scrutiny of my pages.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

File you just deleted

Hi you just deleted . I already updated licensing information. Please reconsider the image. And have a look into it. Talk (reply) JaggaDaaku (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

You should contact the photographer and ask him or her for a written permission to publish this under a free license. More information is available at Commons:VRT. Also, I highly recommed reading Commons:First steps before contributing photos or video to the project. Thuresson (talk) 20:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

reason for deletion : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nawab Najaf ali Khan with sister - Sahebzadi Farhat begum.jpg

May i know the reason for deletion of File:Nawab Najaf ali Khan with sister - Sahebzadi Farhat begum.jpg ? 115.98.100.201 11:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

It was deleted after community discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nawab Najaf ali Khan with sister - Sahebzadi Farhat begum.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Adding or changing copyright/public domain tagg

How do I find the correct copyright/public domain tags for the logos uploaded on Wikimedia/Creative Commons site so that way it won’t get deleted? Let me know if possible. Thanks. FireDragonValo (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

please undelete as it is EXIF, don't see any reason it cannot be included.

hence consider.115.98.79.2 02:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

there's none so blind as those who will not see

All is in the title... Please take a break and consider your actions on Commons. --Desman31 (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Can i get you to help me at with my undeletion request?

I have been waiting without any Admin response for two weeks. --Trade (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Hög tid att ladda upp: Wiki Loves Earth 2022!

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Can you please participate here to resolve this? Hekerui (talk) 12:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

As far as I remember I have never deleted anything because of URAA. Thuresson (talk) 13:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Silverlight Logotyp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Артём 13327 (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


Xylitol have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wostr (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikisource statistics for 2022

Dear Thuresson

I'm writing from the Italian Wikisource, where I keep a copy of your precious snapshots of statistics. Will you add the pictures for the 2022 state of tranclusions like you recently did (only for for sv.source in File:Wikisource 20220401 pages sv.png)? It would be a great service for Wikisource. εΔω 14:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I like to save statistical data for Wikisource to show the progress that has been made over the years. With that said, I don't quite understand what I can do for you - the statistical data are freely available for anybody to take part of. Thuresson (talk) 15:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent closure of an undeletion request

You recently closed a deletion request of mine with the reason, "Not done, no consensus to undelete. This matter should probably best be discussed further at Template talk:PD-RU-exempt with references to case law, relevant court cases and links to articles by legal experts in this field."

For one, idk how you could say there wasn't a consensus to undelete considering the only people who commented in that convo before you closed it were the original disputers, nobody else outside the original deletion request said anything. I would've expected the thread to at least allow some level of discussion on the matter by people outside the original deletion request before being closed. Otherwise by that logic, nearly every undeletion request could be closed if the people who originally deleted it decided to comment again and say "no".

And most importantly, even if we accept your reasoning (that there is no consensus to undelete) that would mean there was no consensus delete the file in the first place as the debate on whether the file was covered by PD-RU-exempt should've (and in my opinion did, as they were unable to provide proof that it wasn't covered) gotten clarified in the original deletion request (which in this case was closed prematurely for reasons I explained in the undeletion request). Sxbbetyy (talk) 23:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

So unless I'm mistaken, the only logical conclusion for the undeletion request seems to be to restore the file as there was not enough evidence provided to warrant a deletion, seeing as those supporting its deletion failed to provide any evidence for their position. This can be confirmed via the quick snippets I provided in the undeletion request thread, or by going over the entire original deletion request thread that was linked. Sxbbetyy (talk) 00:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
OK, well, the last entry was made on August 4 and the request was closed on August 8. By long tradition undeletion requests are dealt with quickly and swiftly if the discussion has come to a close. Thuresson (talk) 16:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
OK...no offense but that's a non-answer and doesn't change what I've said above (and for the record the last entry was on August 5th not the 4th). You simply closed the request without making an actual determination based on the provided evidence (or lack thereof in their case). You didn't even allow a basic level of discourse on the matter to occur, so I don't see how you can say the "discussion came to a close" when it didn't even start. Sxbbetyy (talk) 18:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Furthermore, as I made clear from the start the entire point of the undeletion request was not to argue copyright law but rather to get another admin to resolve this issue of the refrenced offending admin (from the original deletion request) choosing to delete the file based off of their personal opinion rather than the uncontroversial conclusion the deletion request (who's purpose WAS to argue this copyright issue) came to. Honestly, my initial message on the undeletion request explains exactly this so it's making me wonder whether or not you even read any of it before making this decision (which would be disturbing because that means you have no interest in actually assisting in this matter and simply closed it to clear out space on the undeletion page). Sxbbetyy (talk) 18:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Do you intend on resolving this matter or no? My guess is no based on the lack of response, if so then a day after this message is posted I will be restoring the file as per: the conclusion of the original deletion request, your logic (that no consensus was reached regarding the file's status, making its deletion invalid as explained above), and the lack of opposition by any other admin on the site.
If you want me to take a different course of action please respond within this timeframe, otherwise I see little reason not to follow through on my decision considering the circumstances behind the image's deletion (as explained several times now, both in the original undeletion thread and the above messages). Sxbbetyy (talk) 20:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Oh, you can do what you like. One word of advice though for your undeletion request: don't attempt filibustering by submitting a Wall of Text. Thuresson (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Of course, doing so serves no purpose other than to waste everyone's time. If you're implying that my responses thus far constituted such "filibustering", idk what to tell you as the content of said messages are self-explanatory, all on topic, and most are not particularly long. If that's not what you intended to imply, then apologies for misinterpreting.
Also, do you have any recommendations on what to do/who to contact should the same offending admin choose to delete the file again for the same reason with no further explanation? I just want to avoid getting into what equates to an edit war over this (and possibly risk a ban by said admin) and simply reposting another undeletion request seems repetitive and unlikely to address the admin abuse. Sxbbetyy (talk) 00:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Tunguska event fallen trees.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2022!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, IMO this should be OK with PD-Italy and PD-1996. From the vehicles, we can evaluate the approximate date of the photograph (1950s). So it was in the public before 1996, so copyright was not restored by URAA. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, This photographer died in 1945, so her works are in the public domain. Could you please restore these files? See Category:Hanna Kunsch. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

No, apparently she was working professionally in 1949, Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Thuresson (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2022 (UTC)