User talk:Taxiarchos228/Archive2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive:
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Schwenningen - Alte Post1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Schwenningen - Kaufhaus Merkur1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Schwenningen - Kaufhaus Merkur3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Schwenningen - In der Muslen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Gemeindezentrum Münster 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkirnach - Katholische Kirche St. Jakobus3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkirnach - Katholische Kirche St. Jakobus5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Burg Rötteln von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Brombacher Schlösschen3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Am Mühlrain6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach - St.-Peter-Kirche-Turmrestauration2012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weil am Rhein - DR-Baureihe ET 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Münster Unser Lieben Frau4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Lörracher Straße37 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Karl-Wenk-Straße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Germanuskirche - Hauptportal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Johanniterkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Firmengebäude Wiese Textil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
_2.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Brunnen Hüsinger Straße (161-1) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Brombacher Schlösschen2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach - Regio S-Bahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach - St.-Peter-Kirche-Turmrestauration2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Television Tower St. Chrischona
I wish you a happy 2003. Your appointment "Television Tower St. Chrischona" in VI is a problem. You're right, the second image is better, but you can not vote because you misrepresented appointments. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- A happy 2003? Bit late for that. ;-) For you too a happy new year 2013. The misinterpretation was by someone else who guessed me to do so Commons_talk:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list#Replacing_an_existing_VI_by_a_better_picture. How to solve this problem otherwise? Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oops, yes 2013 is better. I do not know how to solve this problem I finished my work and I tried I never do that.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- How to do this in a formal correct way is circumstantial for me. But there should be a general possibility to replace actual VI if there a better ons. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- There is an error but I do not find it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, If you allow me to interfere: 1) opening a MVR is the right way to do that : "If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR." Commons:Valued_image_candidates#How_to_open_a_Most_Valued_Review; 2) Closure after votes: Commons:Valued_image_closure#Closing_most_valued_reviews; 3) The VI label has to be removed by hand after closure if I remember well.
In the present case, the re-nomination has not been done in the simpliest way but I don't think it matters; I will follow the closure and cleanup after votes. Greetings, --Myrabella (talk) 08:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, If you allow me to interfere: 1) opening a MVR is the right way to do that : "If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR." Commons:Valued_image_candidates#How_to_open_a_Most_Valued_Review; 2) Closure after votes: Commons:Valued_image_closure#Closing_most_valued_reviews; 3) The VI label has to be removed by hand after closure if I remember well.
- There is an error but I do not find it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- How to do this in a formal correct way is circumstantial for me. But there should be a general possibility to replace actual VI if there a better ons. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oops, yes 2013 is better. I do not know how to solve this problem I finished my work and I tried I never do that.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Friedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Feerstraße12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Bahnhof1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Wasserreservoir1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Schopfheimer Straße27a 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Schwenningen - Volkshochschule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Münster Unser Lieben Frau5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Altes Rathaus2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden-Minseln - Peter und Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden-Adelhausen - Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden AG - Reformierte Kirche1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Wohnhochhäuser am Fecampring1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Schopfheimer Straße27a 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden-Minseln - Peter und Paul2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden - Wohnhochhäuser am Fecampring3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Wasserreservoir2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Schopfheimer Straße25 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Brombacher Schlösschen1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Haagen - Bahnhof2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Schopfheimer Straße26 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Feerstraße6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Alte Basler Straße Nord38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Bahnhof1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Bahnhof2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Basler Straße 24a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Hirschbergweg9 und 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Hauingen - Wiesenbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten-Fridolinkirche2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Schopfheimer Straße25 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rheinfelden AG - Reformierte Kirche2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Zeppelinstraße44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Historisches Wasserreservoir Buckweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Bahnhof3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Stetten - Hauptstraße54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach-Brombach - Brombacher Schlösschen4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lindau - Hafen7.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lindau - Hafen7.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Steinen-Hofen - Evangelische Kirche13b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Stadtwappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Münster Unser Lieben Frau2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Television Tower St. Chrischona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VS - Villingen - Oberes Tor1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Solothurn
Hallo Wlady; ich habe mir gedacht, dass dich unser nächster Stammtisch auch aufgrund des Vorprogramms interessieren könnte und mache daher hiermit mal darauf aufmerksam :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 19:34, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Obgenanntes Bild von dir wird hier nicht lizenzkonform genutzt. JFYI. --Umschattiger (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lörrach - Burg Rötteln - Oberburg11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Black Lines on Nathan Phillips Square Photo
I was just curious what the faint lines going through the sky in your photo of Nathan Phillips Square are. Was the image stitched together from multiple shots or something?
- I had made some pics of Nathan Phillips Square. Which one do you mean exactly? This one File:Toronto - ON - Rathaus und Nathan Phillips Square.jpg was a stitching, this one e.g. File:Toronto - ON - New City Hall3.jpg not. The lines are fixed steel cables above the ground and is not a picture mistake or bad processing. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Appropriately Licensed
You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Messe Berlin1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Messe Berlin2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Berliner Fernsehturm - Fensterreinigung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Berliner Fernsehturm - Aerial view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Alexanderhaus1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin - Funkturm1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Berlin - Messe Berlin2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin - Messe Berlin2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Category:Rosengarten_im_Grüttpark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Dietrich (talk) 22:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Berlin - Berliner Fernsehturm - Fensterreinigung.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin - Berliner Fernsehturm - Fensterreinigung.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 16:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi
Hi, I have nominated your File:Toronto - ON - Toronto Harbourfront7.jpg for Feature Picture Candidates in English Wikipedia.. Benison (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for nomination and information about this. --Wladyslaw (talk) 23:26, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again, the pic nominated by me would be closing its nomination on 4th. It would be good if you or any of your acquaintance may support it rather than see it lose the nomination. It's indeed a superb picture. So, best of luck and hence please support the picture at {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Toronto - ON - Toronto Harbourfront7.jpg}} Benison (talk) 12:46, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Weissenstein
Deine und Michas Fotos sind jetzt historische Dokumente. Von der Talstation ist nur noch dieser Schutthaufen übrig: File:Station oberdorf so nov 09 2013 b.jpg - der Rest wird auch gerade abgerissen... Gestumblindi (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Preis beim Schreibwettbewerb
Hallo de:Benutzer:Ventus55, User:Taxiarchos228, de:Benutzer:SEM, de:Benutzer:Peal1903, de:Benutzer:Sir Gawain, ihr seid jetzt mit der Auswahl eines Preises dran. Der letzte benachrichtigt bitte de:Benutzer:Toter Alter Mann, de:Benutzer:Andreas Werle, de:Benutzer:Voyager und de:Benutzer:Kopilot. Gruß--Emergency doc (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Vitra_Design_Museum_nachts3.jpg
Deine Nachtbilder finde ich sehr charmant und erfreulicherweise ist der Rauschlevel sehr niedrig. Was mich von der Promotion einiger Bilder abhält, ist, dass die Entzerrung nicht konsequent duchgezogen ist. Ich weiss wohl, dass manchmal die senkrechten nicht senkrecht sind, aber wenn mehrere Vertikalen geneigt sind, dann muss mit digitaler Entzerrung noch was zu machen sein. Schau Dir mal bei obigem Bild z.B. den Zaun links an. Du wirst feststellen, dass alle Zaunpfähle sowie die darüber liegenden Fenster nach rechts geneigt sind. Gerade bei modernen Gebäuden müssen diese Linien aber echte Senkrechte sein. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Danke für deine Erklärung, aber teile Deine Ansicht aus mehreren Gründen nicht. Erstens finde ich nicht, dass die Zaunpfähle markant von der Senkrechten abweichen und zweitens finde ich diese Abweichung weder störend noch signifikant für QI. Darüber hinaus: ich entstütze Bauwerksbilder konsequent und korrigiere die Perspektive insoweit auch. Wenn Du dir meine Arbeiten ansiehst wirst du sogar feststellen, dass ich einen starken Schwerpunkt auf Bauwerksbilder gesetzt habe und damit auch eine gewisse Erfahrung in diesem Bereich habe. Perspektivisches Korrigieren geht bei mir aber nie so weit, dass eine weitwinkliche Aufnahme, die in dem von dir verlinkten Beispiel nun mal eine ist, derart "plattgewalzt" wird damit jeder "Grashalm" kerzengerade steht. Solche Bilder wirken oft nicht gut. Man muss nicht alles begradigen, was man begradigen kann. Hier gilt wie für fast alles: Augenmaß wahren. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ich gebe Dir recht; Entzerrung sollte nicht um der Entzerrung willen eingesetzt werden. Manchmal gehts halt nicht oder es sprechen andere Gründe dagegen. Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Überbelichtete Fassade
Hallo Taxiarchos228! Du hattest gefragt, warum File:Berlin - Französischer Dom3.jpg überbelichtet ist. Die Antwort ist hier. Insbesondere der Rotkanal ist ausgebrannt und Details am oberen Teil der Fassade sind nicht mehr erkennbar. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ich finde es übrigens schade, dass du auf Kritik nicht reagierst bzw. noch nicht einmal antwortest, wenn ich mir sogar die Mühe mache und die überbelichteten Bereiche aufzeige, damit du sie ggf. korrigieren kannst. Meine Bewertungen auf QIC/FPC (gerade negative Bewertungen) begründe ich immer sehr ausführlich. Du musst ja nicht mit mir einer Meinung sein, aber baharrliches schweigen, zeigt zumindest geringes Interesse an meiner Meinung. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Lieber Tuxyso, es hat nichts mit beharrlichem Schweigen zu tun sondern schlicht mit der Tatsache, dass ich nicht immer Zeit für alles habe. Deine Antwort habe ich gelesen, nur hatte ich keine Zeit, das Bild erneut "in die Hand" zu nehmen. Kein Grund für dich, beleigt zu sein. Und kein Grund für mich, mir vorschreiben zu lassen wann ich meine Bilder eventuell neu entwickeln werde. Danke für dein Verständnis. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ich möchte dir gar nichts vorschreiben. Bisher hatte ich allerdings auf QIC die Erfahrung gemacht, dass die Nominierer ein Interesse daran haben, das Bild noch während des Prozesses zu verbessern. Das funktioniert in der Regel recht effizient und hält die Anzahl der QI-(Re-)Nominierungen gering. Da es nicht der erste Kommentar von mir war, auf den du nicht reagiert hast, wollte ich hier einfach nachfragen. Du musst ja nicht gleich eine neue Version hochladen, aber über ein Danke für den Hinweis, ich schaue mir das die Tage mal an freut man sich mehr als gar nichts zu hören. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Deine Antwort ist gerade mal etwas über 24 Stunden her. Wir haben definitiv andere Rhythmen und ich lasse mir weder aufdrängen wann noch ob ich mich für ein Statement zu bedanken habe. Ich habe nachgefragt, Du hast geantwortet; fertig ist der Lack. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ich möchte dir gar nichts vorschreiben. Bisher hatte ich allerdings auf QIC die Erfahrung gemacht, dass die Nominierer ein Interesse daran haben, das Bild noch während des Prozesses zu verbessern. Das funktioniert in der Regel recht effizient und hält die Anzahl der QI-(Re-)Nominierungen gering. Da es nicht der erste Kommentar von mir war, auf den du nicht reagiert hast, wollte ich hier einfach nachfragen. Du musst ja nicht gleich eine neue Version hochladen, aber über ein Danke für den Hinweis, ich schaue mir das die Tage mal an freut man sich mehr als gar nichts zu hören. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Lieber Tuxyso, es hat nichts mit beharrlichem Schweigen zu tun sondern schlicht mit der Tatsache, dass ich nicht immer Zeit für alles habe. Deine Antwort habe ich gelesen, nur hatte ich keine Zeit, das Bild erneut "in die Hand" zu nehmen. Kein Grund für dich, beleigt zu sein. Und kein Grund für mich, mir vorschreiben zu lassen wann ich meine Bilder eventuell neu entwickeln werde. Danke für dein Verständnis. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Berlin - Siegessäule Spitze.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin - Siegessäule Spitze.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 |
File:Vitra Design Museum nachts1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Danke !
Hi Taxiarchos228.
Thanks to your comment in QIC page, the Roman helmet is now a new FP in our collection.
Without your advice, I never have had the idea to nominate it in the FPC page, and it was a great success, unexpected to me.
So, thank you again, and good luck.--Jebulon (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Jebulon,
- you´re welcome. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
And also:
Hi Taxiarchos228. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 13:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo Leyo,
- ich habe keine Ahnung, welche Parameter da falsch sein sollen. Das scheint mir auch eher ein Softwareproblem von Commons zu sein als eines, was ich als Fotograf verursacht habe, zumal die Bilder teilweise auch nicht mal von mir auf Commons hochgeladen wurden sondern durch einen Übertragungsvorgang, den ich nicht mal initiiert habe. Ich bin da also genauso ratlos wie du. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Es handelte sich um den undefinierten Parameter Notes. --Leyo 22:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- ...den ich aber auch nie wissentlich gesetzt habe. Was habe ich als Fotograf dieses Bildes damit zu tun? Kann damit leider nichts anfangen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Naja… --Leyo 09:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ich habe eine von Commons vorgeschlagene Vorlage genutzt. Was da ins "Notes" gehört weiss ich nicht. Von mir aus kann die Zeile auch raus, wenn das syntaktisch zulässig ist. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ist bereits geschehen. --Leyo 09:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Danke! --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ist bereits geschehen. --Leyo 09:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ich habe eine von Commons vorgeschlagene Vorlage genutzt. Was da ins "Notes" gehört weiss ich nicht. Von mir aus kann die Zeile auch raus, wenn das syntaktisch zulässig ist. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Naja… --Leyo 09:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- ...den ich aber auch nie wissentlich gesetzt habe. Was habe ich als Fotograf dieses Bildes damit zu tun? Kann damit leider nichts anfangen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Es handelte sich um den undefinierten Parameter Notes. --Leyo 22:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Editor @ ar.wiki
Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
FP promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Toronto - ON - Toronto Harbourfront7.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Toronto - ON - Toronto Harbourfront7.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/JKadavoor Jee 08:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
2014 !
|
* * * 2014! * * * |
| Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
Commons Picture of the Day
Hi Wladyslaw,
My name is Jawad Qadir and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Foundation blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/
Given that your photo is scheduled for 23 January 2013, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. If you're interested, please email me at jqadir@wikimedia.org.
Thanks, Jqadir (WMF) (talk)
Request
Hello, my name is Tomek. I'd like to use your photo in my article (science, non- commercial journal). Would you give me the permission to do it and the name of photographer? I'd add this information to the article. Thank you all the best Tomek Kruszewski
I'm sorry. My question is connected with Library from Ottawa (my mail: tomkrus@wsb.torun.pl) Tomek Kruszewski
Merry Christmas
