User talk:Spurzem/Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurner RS (2014-09-13 6990 Sp) Heck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU 201 OSL, Bj. 1936 (2014-09-13 7078).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford V8 (2014-09-13 7137).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kadett A, Bj. 1964 (2014-09-13 6999) Heck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfa Romeo Spider, 2. Gen (2014-09-13 7140).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 35 (2014-09-13 7121).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU 251 OSL, Bj. 1941, Gespann (hinten).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Karl-May-Spiele

Hi,

I could not find the image you were talking about, but there are more here: Category:Karl-May-Spiele Bad Segeberg. I think it may be an error. I am pretty certain there can't be a copyright on picture of a show like this (only may be on the decoration). Regards, Yann (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

As you can read at the top of this side my photos were deleted. Obviously as photographer I am not allowed to publish images of theatre under CC-license. From the director in Elspe I got a license only for Wikipedia but this was not enough. Kind regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't find which of your photos of theater were deleted. Could you please give me a link? Also you could archive your talk page. See mine as an example. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I can not show you the photos or give you a link because they were deleted and not in the commons any longer. It was a scene with Pierre Brice as Winnetou and another with running horses an a coach. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Was there a deletion request? There should be anyway, because this is not a case of speedy deletion, even if the content is copyrighted. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I found File:1986-08-02 Pierre Brice in Elspe.jpg and File:1986-08-02 Elspe Karl-May-Festspiele.jpg. If you took these pictures, you can choose the license you want. These are scenes on horses, and there is nothing to copyright in that. In File:1986-08-02 Elspe mit Pierre Brice-2.jpg, these are costumes. Again these cannot get a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Probably the director of the Karl-May-Spiele at Elspe would not think so. As I said I asked him and he gave me only a limited license which was not enough for Wikipedia or Commons. Regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I think that any claim of copyright on these pictures by the director of the Karl-May-Spiele is copyfraud. I asked further opinions (and undeletion) at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Pictures of stage performance. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Two other admins agree with me, and the images have been restored. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

I am astonished, thank you. But now I hope that the director of the Karl-May-Festspiele will not protest. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Grabkreuz 1620.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Where's the engine? I'm joke. Good. --Livioandronico2013 08:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC) I can not only cars and bikes. -- Spurzem 09:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Kreuz Im Pfaffenacker (2014 7575).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2009-08-07 1047 Oldtimer-GP - Porsche 904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Tiguan TDI 2.0, Bj. 2008-06 (Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --JLPC 16:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausziege in Alken (2011-10-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 904 (2009-08-07 1039).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Barockgarten - Umfass'mauer (2014-10-01 796).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horex Regina 400 (2014-09-13 7005 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche - Norbert v. X (2014-10-01 857b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kbh3rd 04:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehr, Kirche St. Potentinus (2014-10-01 804).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Borgw Isabella, Bj. 1959, Bad Neuenahr (2014-08-29 6701).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Borgw Isabella, Bj. 1959, Bad Neuenahr (2014-08-29 6701).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Falsches Datum im Beschreibungsfeld?

Hallo,

du hast kürzlich meine Heimalstadt besucht und dort fotografiert ;-) (Ohne meine Erlaubnis ;-). Anscheinend hast du ein falsches Datum im Beschreibungsfeld angegeben siehe zum Beispiel hier: File:Trier, Dom - Kreuzgang (3 2014).JPG. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Lieber Berthold, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Diese Sorte Fehler übersieht man selber leicht, weil man gar nicht damit rechnet, sich verschrieben haben zu können. Ich hatte die Bildbeschreibung leicht abgewandelt sogar schon zu anderen Bildern kopiert. Und was die „Erlaubnis“ betrifft: So lange es meine Gesundheit und mein rasant vorrückendes Alter erlauben, werde ich noch öfter nach Trier kommen; es ist immer wieder schön und immer lohnt es sich, den Fotoapparat dabei zu haben. In diesem Zusammenhang alle Anerkennung für Dein Titelbild im Artikel „Trierer Dom“. Mir ist es bisher noch nicht gelungen, den Dom aus dieser Perspektive einigermaßen ohne Verzerrungen aufzunehmen und die Bäume nur wenig störend erscheinen zu lassen. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für das Lob, dafür waren auch mehrere Versuche nötig. Ich bin da im Vorteil, weil ich mit dem Fahrrad oder sogar zu Fuß dorthin kommen kann. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

… und für mich sind es 125 km mit dem Auto. ;-) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Petrusbrunnen (2014 7) Fortitudo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Petrusbrunnen (2014 4) Justitia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Petrusbrunnen (2014).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Petrusbrunnen (2014 6) Temperantia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Petrusbrunnen (2014 5) Sapientia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seifenkiste Bad Wörishofen (5377) Doppelsitzer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 80-7 (2008-06-28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hauptmarkt - Steipe, Petrus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail --Daniel Case 04:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for posting your photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ClarkJim-Lotus19620805.jpg . I have used it on my Roadtrip-'62 website under the CC License you gave, to provide information to my readers. DonDMilne (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC) I am glad that you find my old photo good. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seifenkiste Bad Wörishofen 2012 (5392).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Kurpark (2012-07-12 Sp 03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porsche 911 Carrera RSR, Bj. 1974 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porsche 911 Carrera RSR, Bj. 1974 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Kurtheater (2012-07-10 a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some CA that needs to be removed. I left a note. --Halavar 22:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)  Done. Thank you. Please look now. -- Spurzem 23:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 00:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Kraniche am Kurhaus 2013-08-29 (1693).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Featured

Hello Spurzem Wie geht? How about a look at my photos on Featured? I think they deserve danke --LivioAndronico talk 12:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Can you check also the other too? Danke --LivioAndronico talk 21:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

The image of the church is not so good as it perhaps could be. At the left it is distorted, especially the statue at the pillar. Regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:24, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Kurpark (2012-07-15 Sp 01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong CA on the stones to the right--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 01:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)  Done. Thank you. -- Spurzem 13:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)  Not done Better. But still some big spots there. Last time I had same problem, I just killed of all purple and magenta as there wasn't anything else of this color. 18-55mm kit lens I take it?--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC) But now it should be good. -- Spurzem 10:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)  Done but not perfect--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Kneippbrunnen Kurpark 2013-08-28 (1666).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Featured

Hello Spurzem. Can you check this photos on Featured? [1] If you want and if you have time danke --LivioAndronico talk 12:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfa Romeo Montreal (2012-07-04 4791 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Gauge-Bronne am Kurhaus (2012-07-08).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2006-05-05 Schloss Sayn 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 2007 (2012-07-14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks for answering my question! --Hubertl 17:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU TT, Bj. 1969, 1277 ccm 2007-06-15 11 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU TT, Bj. 1971, 1277 ccm (2007-06-15 52 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpine A110 - Heck (2007-06-16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:01, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williams FW08-3 (2007-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few dark but Ok --Livioandronico2013 21:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Featured

Hello Spurzem Wie geht? HCan give a look at this [2] photo on Featured? I think they deserve danke --LivioAndronico talk 13:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus 87B-3 in der Boxengasse (2007-06-17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

HI

Excuse me, what does it mean that my photo is lop-sided. I don't understand it. Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 23:26, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

It tilts to the left side. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!! Ezarateesteban 23:47, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi TT 1. Gen. (2007-05-06 03b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Lindt-Goldhasen (2008-04-12 a).JPG

File:Lindt-Goldhasen (2008-04-12 a).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smial (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Lindt-Goldhasen (2008-04-12 b).JPG

File:Lindt-Goldhasen (2008-04-12 b).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smial (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Xmas and happy new year

Merry Xmas and happy new year --LivioAndronico talk 11:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear LivioAndronico, thank you very much for your good wishes. On Christmas I was in the hospital because of heavy circulatory disturbance. But since today I am back at home and I you send my best whishes for 2015 to you. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh very sorry for this situation , I hope that the new year will bring a iron health to you my friend .

See the bright side, for your lucky you're not in Italy. Here probably gave you an aspirin and you sent home

Anyway if you can give a look at this [3] photo on Featured? I think they deserve ? Thanks and Happy new year --LivioAndronico talk 10:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Mönsch Lothar, mach' kein' Scheiß. Du hast doch Benzin im Blut. Nimm Super+! Alles Gute! -- Smial (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo LivioaAndronico, hallo Smial, many thanks and best whishes for you -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Golf VI 1.4 (2010-05-08).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU-Lux,Bj.1955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Lothar,

Du hast heute ein Bild ausgezeichnet, welches inhaltlich völlig falsch bezeichnet ist. diese Marmormaske ist keine Theatermaske - schon allein vom Gewicht, der Größe und des Materials (was man ja sehr gut erkennen kann), sondern die Verkleidung als Wasserspeier, wie man es auf englisch sagt eine Gargoyle. Was auch ziemlich gut nachvollziehbar ist, denn die Einläufe in die Becken wurden damals mit solchen Kopfmasken überdeckt und sie haben meistens auch diese ganz typischen Mundformen. Im Übrigen etwas, was nichts speziell Italienisches ist, man findet so etwas auch bei uns fast überall auf historischen Brunnen, in ganz Europa. Ich habe die positive Nominierung von dir bis zum Zeitpunkt der Änderung auf Diskussion gestellt. Es ist Teil des Nominierungsprozesses, dass die Objekte korrekt benannt, kategorisiert und beschrieben werden. Sonst kann es kein Quality-Image sein. --Hubertl (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Hubertl, das ist meines Erachtens eine zweischneidige Sache, wenn ich Dir auch Recht gebe, dass die Beschreibung eines Bildes stimmen sollte. Andererseits: Warum sollte zum Beispiel mein Foto von der NSU Lux schlecht sein, wenn ich versehentlich NSU Max geschrieben hätte? Den meisten Betrachtern wäre es wahrscheinlich gar nicht aufgefallen, was den Fehler doppelt schwer gemacht hätte. Aber das Bild? Meines Erachtens wäre es trotzdem gut. Doch zurück zum Wasserspeier. Warum änderst Du nicht einfach die Beschreibung und machst den Bildautor auf seinen Irrtum aufmerksam? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Habe ich geändert (mit Begründung!) und es wurde drei Mal zurückgestellt. Ebenso die geänderte Kategorie. Ein Qualitätsbild zeichnet sich durch die Gesamtheit seiner Information aus, das betrifft die inhaltliche Einordnung in das System, die Beschreibung, eine örtliche Zuordnung (Geokoordinaten, wenn von Belang) und dann das Bild selbst, welches grundsätzliche Anforderungen erfüllen soll. Was es auch tut. Wenn ich dein Bild NSU-Max gesehen hätte und dir gesagt, dass es sich nicht um einen NSU Max sondern um einen NSU-Lux handelt, hättest du mir gesagt, ich soll meine dummen Statements gefälligst lassen? --Hubertl (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

etwas anderes..

Ich habe auf der Vorderseite von Dir gelesen, dass du darüber informiert werden möchtest, wenn jemand an einem Bild von dir eine Veränderung macht. Dafür gibt es einen eigenen Baustein, den man auch individuell ändern kann. Siehe hier dieser wird jeweils mit {{User:Hubertl/No-new-version}} (in meinem speziellen Fall, anstatt Hubertl kann auch Spurzem stehen) schon beim Hochladen der Bilder eingefügt, es geht aber nachträglich auch! Schau mal, wie das bei einem meiner Bilder aussieht. Grundsätzlich ist es so, dass sich die Leute daran halten. --Hubertl (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Danke, das schau ich mir mal an. Es ist nämlich ärgerlich, wenn man irgendwann sieht, dass irgendwer mit einem nicht nachvollziehbaren Geschmack für Farben ein Bild verhunzt hat. Und wenn jemand wirklich ein Foto verbessern kann, sollte er es nicht eigenmächtig machen. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Golf V, Bj. 2007, 2-türig, vorn re.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Golf V, Bj. 2007, 2-türig, vorn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ursus in der Bergprüfung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like a steam locomotive. Considering the age of the photo, good quality. --Steindy 21:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Die Hasen

sind wieder da. Ich hoffe, das funktioniert als Beispiel bei ähnlichen zukünftigen Löschanträgen. -- Smial (talk) 13:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Wie denn das? Inzwischen stehe ich mit Lindt im Schriftwechsel, die vor einer eventuellen Zustimmung meine Fotos sehen und von mir wissen wollen, warum ich die Hasen veröffentlichen will. Ich habe es erläutert und warte jetzt auf Antwort. Die Frage ist, ob ich vorsorglich schon bei Volkswagen, Opel, Daimler, BMW, Ferrari, Porsche, Fiat usw. die nachträgliche Genehmigung für meine in den Commons hochgeladenen Bilder einzuholen versuchen soll. Schwierig wird es bei nicht mehr existierenden Unternehmen wie Borgward, Horex, Veritas usw. Beste Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer W 23, Baujahr 1939 (2014-08-02 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unimog 406, 5600 cm³, 84 PS, Bj. 1986 (2b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Halo

Halo Lothar,I just wanted to say hello and I hope you are better now,a hug. --LivioAndronico talk 15:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo LivioAndronico, thank you. I feel rather good now und I hope that it will continue. Best regards and all good wishes to you -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holder A 15, Bauzeit 1969 - 1973 (2008-06-14 b Foto Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 12:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelly & Lewis, 1949–1953 (2006-07-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt Favorit 3, Bauzeit 1964 - 1967 (2008-06-14) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:05, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelly & Lewis, 1949–1953 (2008-06-14) mit Säge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW 1600 by minichamps (Seite).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt Dieselross F17 WG, 18 PS, Bj. 1959 (2012-07-18).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda S 800 Heck (2011-06-19) b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments May be overexposure on the back of the car but Good quality. --Ezarate 01:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Cambodge.- la cité lacustre de Saray, (3).jpg

Regarding your support at QI discussion for File:Cambodge.- la cité lacustre de Saray, (3).jpg, I have to ask, how do you feel this is sharp enough for QI? There is no fine detail in it. QIs should be pixel sharp, this doesn't come close. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

In my opinion it is sharp – at least sharp enough for QI. I see the profile in the tires for example. If I remember right some of your promoted images were not so sharp as this file of Cambodge. Regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda S 800 Front (2011-06-19) b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlüsselblume (2008-04-26 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 250 H, Bj. 1952 (2013-09-03 museum mobile).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusual but interesting perspective. --Palauenc05 21:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC) But why not? ;-) -- Spurzem 22:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC) I like it (even from behind!) --Palauenc05 18:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward B 1500 (2014-08-31 6831).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isab Coupé Cabrio, Bj. 1961 (2014-08-29 6591).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (The woman in the background is a little bit disturbing, but IMO still OK.) --XRay 16:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Sport-Prinz (2014-09-13 7031) Heck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW RS 54 Gespann (2011-08-13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fittipaldi F5, Bj. 1977 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diesellok V 212 309-9 (2009-05-31).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirschblüte mit Biene (2007-04-06).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wie man wegen dieser Kirschenblüte einen derartigen Stellvertreterkrieg führen kann, ist eines der Geheimnisse von QI. Gratulation! --Hubertl (talk) 07:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen Meister Eckhart (Skulptur) 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen - Dicke Sockelfigur von Lang (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borsig Nr. 12250 (2007-06-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice picture, but it needs some noise reduction. --Code 05:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you. I will try to get it better. -- Spurzem 10:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Support QI in my eyes. --Ralf Roletschek 12:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Tank you, Ralf. I asked Wikipedia:Fotowerkstatt for a revision but they saw no lack. -- Spurzem 13:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Now it is slight improved by Martin K. Thanks to him. -- Spurzem 16:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Support now. --Code 20:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grüner Leguan im Zoo Neuwied (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 10:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erdmännchen Zoo Neuwied (2013-04-16 a).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward B 611 Wohnmobil (2005-08-26).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward P100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Iltis (2) 2008-09-15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (No EXIF data. :-( ) --XRay 12:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type Light Weight (left side) built in 1963-64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 850 Coupé Front (2013-09-15 Spu).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph TR3 (2013-09-15 2258).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peugeot 1007, Bj. 2005 (4) 14.12.2005 (ret).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Vilnius University Great Courtyard 1, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

Hallo, ich hatte gestern abend noch das Review für das oben angegebene Bild etwas durcheinander gebracht. Ich hatte mir das Bild angeschaut, für Ok befunden und dann übersehen, dass du inzwischen einen Kommentar dazu abgegeben hattest. Durch dieses Missgeschick hatte ich dann einen Syntax error in dem abschnitt produziert. Da ich meine Bearbeitung nicht einfach rückgängig machen wollte, habe ich es dann zur Diskussion verschoben. Ich war mir dann auch nicht mehr sicher nachdem ich den gelesen hatte. Ich wollte dir damit nicht auf die Füße treten! --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Berthold, ich hatte gar nicht mitbekommen, dass da vorübergehend etwas durcheinandergeraten war; es kann also nicht schlimm gewesen sein. Was das Bild betrifft, bin ich der Meinung, dass es wie viele Diliff-Fotos zu sehr verzerrt ist, und ich wundere mich, dass jemand solche Bilder am laufenden Band nominiert. In den Innenräumen von Kirchen sind die Kronleuchter und die seitlichen Bögen oft völlig verzogen. So etwas ist meines Erachtens keine gute Qualität, bei allem Verständnis für die Schwierigkeit, solche Aufnahmen zu machen. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kadett A, Bj. 1964 (2013-09-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera S (991), Bj. 2013 (2013-09-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Rekord A (2012-06-10 Sp1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Nürburgring

Hallo Spurzem, wir mögen zwar nicht immer der gleichen Meinung sein, was Komposition und Kameraeinstellungen betrifft, aber ich wollte trotzdem nicht versäumen, Dir meinen Respekt für Deine Doku-Arbeit am Nürburgring auszudrücken. Ich habe mir die Bilder heute angesehen - über 40 Jahre Bildmaterial, viele unter wesentlich schwierigeren Bedingen entstanden, als das heute möglich ist, das ist eine tolle Leistung. Gratuliere! Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, das freut mich. Was die vierzig Jahre betrifft, kann man nur sagen: Schade, dass es damals noch nicht die Möglichkeiten zu fotografieren wie heute gab. Ich werde es nicht vergessen, wie ich 1962 meine Agfa Isolette vor Beginn des Rennens mit dem Taschentuch austrocknete, dann den 12er-Film einlegte und so gut wie möglich paar Bilder machte. Fotografieren war damals auch recht teuer. Später habe ich eine selbst geschnittene Pappmaske in die Isolette eingelegt, um aus einem Film 24 Kleinbilddias statt der standardmäßigen zwölf herauszuholen. Aber: Es war schön, und es ist auch schön, dass viele meiner Bilder dank Wikipedia und Commons heute noch oder wieder zur Geltung kommen. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Ich hatte ja das Glück, dass mein Vater Photographie an der Berufsschule unterrichtete (damals war die praktische Ausbildung der "Fotolaborantinnen" noch fest in der Berufsschule verankert) und wir zuhause eine Dunkelkammer eingerichtet hatten. Als Kind hatte ich schon fleissig Jobo-Boxen geschüttelt. Einen 36er-Film zu kaufen und zu entwickeln war für mich als Jugendlichen immer noch eine ziemlich teure Angelegenheit. Aber von meinen "Frühwerken" ist eigentlich nichts mehr erhalten geblieben. Das mit der Pappmaske in der Isolette ist ja ganz schön tricky, da muss man auch erst mal draufkommen. Davon hatte ich vorher noch nie gehört. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Die Pappmaske war allerdings nicht meine Erfindung. Ich hatte gelesen, dass es so etwas für die Rolleiflex zu kaufen gab, und gedacht, dass müsse man für die Agfa auch selber machen können. Der Sucher war übrigens ebenfalls abzukleben, mit dem Ergebnis, dass ich die fahrenden Rennwagen viel besser traf als vorher. Denn vorher konnte man schräg durchschauen, mit dem Ergebnis, dass vor den Autos oft noch viel Luft, das Heck aber abgeschnitten war. Hinzu kam, dass ich mit dem Zuschneiden meines Eigenbauformats von etwas 26 x 55 mm auf 24 x 36 mm ein bisschen variieren konnte. Manchmal tat es mir aber auch leid, wenn etwas wegfiel, damit das Dia ins Rähmchen passte. Gruß -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi,how are you? I nominate this [4], Can you give a look? Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 09:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Hansa 1500 Sportcoupé, Bj. 1954.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella TS, Bj. 1959 (2007-09-08 ret).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Famberhorst 19:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Horch 853 innen, Bj. 1936.JPG

Sehr schönes Interieur. Allerdings hast Du möglicherweise vergessen, die CA-Korrektur anzuklicken, da sind doch noch einige deutliche magentafarbige Säume zu sehen, die Johann in seiner Begeisterung übersehen hatte :) Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Na ja, „deutliche“ ist vielleicht ein bisschen übertrieben. Aber trotzdem danke; ich habe es zu verbessern versucht. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Arbeitest Du eigentlich mit RAW-Material oder dirkt auf dem jpg? Mit Adobe Lightroom oder einer anderen Software? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Ich arbeite mit JPG und mit Gimp. Das ist freilich sehr laienhaft, aber für die wahrscheinlich nur mehr kurze Zeit, die ich noch vor mir habe, lohnt es sich kaum, mich in ein anderes Programm einzuarbeiten. Aber mal sehen, vielleicht probiere ich es doch noch mal. Gruß -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Man soll sich niemals vorzeitig aufgeben :) Lightroom kannst Du wie alle Adobeprodukte 30 Tage lang testen. Ich finde, es ist einfacher und intuitiver als gimp zu benutzen. So ein magentafarbener Rand ist damit meistens mit einem Mausklick komplett verschwunden. Für mich war vor einigen Jahren die Umstellung auf RAW auch völliges Neuland, aber bereut habe ich es nie. Speicherplatz kostet heute ja fast nichts mehr. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Entschuldigung, bitte!

Hi, Spurzem,

I am terribly sorry, it is my mistake. I've had an edit conflict with Arildv when uploading my last picture, then I just copy/past my previous nomination, and I suppose at that time it "switched" your comment. I did not suppress it on purpose, of course. Can you correct my fault ? Thanks, und Entschuldige noch einmal, bitte.--Jebulon (talk) 22:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

O-kay and best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853 innen, Bj. 1936.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Nigra Trier (2009-05-20 Sp-1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Porta Nigra Trier (2009-05-20 Sp-1).jpg

Guten morgen, Lothar. Auf dem QI ist noch in der unteren linken Ecke ein Beschnittfehler von der Perspektivkorrektion übriggeblieben. Wünsche Dir ein schönes Wochenende. Gruss. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:06, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Tatsächlich; danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab's korrigiert. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 550 Replica, Bj. 1962 (ret a).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austin Healey 3000, Bj. 1967 (2013-05-04 r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Dino Coupé 2400, Bj. 1971 (2013-05-04 9608).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW ADAC Straßenwacht, Bj. 1973, in Fahrt (2014-09-13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW ADAC Straßenwacht, Bj. 1973 (2014-09-13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ximonic 02:21, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type 4.2, Bj. 1969 (2013-05-04 Sp) .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Prinz 1000 C, Bj. 1968 (2014-09-13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 69, Bj. 1955 (2014-09-13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support a few of noise but acceptable. --Livioandronico2013 22:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

verzerrt

Hi, ich weiß ich bin blind, aber was meinst du mit verzerrtem Hintergrund? --Ailura (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Wo? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Auf qic? --Ailura (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Ach ja; damit meinte ich den Schriftenständer, der vermutlich in Wirklichkeit nicht trapezförmig ist. Außerdem ist der Weihwasserkessel wahrscheinlich nicht oval. Aber unabhängig davon – vielleicht laufen die seitlichen Leisten doch nach oben zusammen - erscheint mir die Komposition nicht gut geglückt. In der Beschreibung war von der Figur die Rede, und die ist sehr ungünstig wiedergegeben. Aber auch einen Eindruck von diesem Bereich der Kirche mit der alten Treppe, dem Schriftenstand und der Statue vermittelt zumindest mir das Foto kaum. Bitte nichts für ungut und freundliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Den Teil hatte ich verstanden, danke, alles kein Problem. ich meine schon dass der Ständer trapezförmig war, aber genau weiß ich es nicht mehr. Die Beschreibung habe ich geändert. --Ailura (talk) 20:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 (2007-06-16 08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 (2007-06-16 07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Dion Bouton, Bj. 1908 (2007-06-16 06) Carbidlampe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853, Bj. 1936, Pedale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-04 (9648b) Horch 853, Bj. 1936, Kühlerfigur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Jetzt ist es perfekt! Denn es ist nämlich ein ganz außerordentlich gelungenes Bild! --Hubertl 21:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Guzzi 750 S3 (2007-06-15 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Baresi franco 21:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-15 34 Moto Guzzi PE, Fg.-Nr. SP7032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, but yet some magenta fringes. I can help out with CA defringing on my LR, if you want. --Cccefalon 11:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC) It would be very nice. Thank you beforehand. -- Spurzem 12:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment I uploaded a new version - QI imo; but for sake of neutrality voting should be done by second reviewer. --Cccefalon 16:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Good quality and teamwork! --Isiwal 20:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-15 33 Moto Guzzi, Fg.-Nr. SP7032 (kl).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hansa 1100, Bj. 1959 (2014-08-31 6785 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Isn't your best work, but acceptable --Livioandronico2013 22:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Modell A, Bj. 1929 (2011-09-03 2c).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford A, Bj. 1929 (2011-09-24 0).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 962C (2007-06-15 37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. I would choose another crop without the half person right (in the background). --XRay 11:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 904; Bj. 1964 (2009-08-07 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 20:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 906, Bj. 1966 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW SS 250 - vorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Tomaso Pantera (Sp 2014-06-15b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I understand the concept of framing --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich St. Mauritius, Glockenturm - Skulptur (2008-10-18).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich St. Mauritius, Glockenturm - Portal (2008-10-19).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 23:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pietà vom Guten Mann 03b (2008-10-19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorus ehem. Grundschule.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2013-08-15 11.31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 22:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2013-08-15 12.18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-17 98 Porsche 550 Replica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. This is in fact part of the seat. Therefore now the third opinion. QI. --Hubertl 04:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa, Bj. 1958, Cockpit (2009-08-07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella Cabrio (2014-08-29 6677).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs (left side of the steering wheel)--Lmbuga 12:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Nice--Lmbuga 12:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph TR 4A (2014-06-15 048 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph TR 4A (2014-06-15 048 Sp) Steering-wheel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar MK V, Bauzeit 1948-51, Front (2008-06-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar MK V, Bauzeit 1948-51, Heck (2008-06-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 20:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroën Traction Avant 11B, Bj. 1938 (2008-06-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgwardtreffen Bad Neuenahr (2014-08-29 6632).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 51 RS, Bj. 1938 (2008-06-28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 2002 Turbo (2008-06-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few dark,but good --Livioandronico2013 14:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bugatti 35 B, Bj. 1925 (2008-06-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2008-06-28 0906 Abarth 1000, Abarth A112, Mini Cooper, NSU TT .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velocette KTT Mk8, 350 cm³, Bj. 1939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AFM 50, 1971 cm³, Bj. 1950 (2008-06-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG F2, Bj. 1932, Heck (2008-06-28) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riley Racing Six, 1500 cm³, Bj. 1935 (2007-06-17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 12:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG F2, Bj. 1932, Front (2008-06-28) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Jüdischer Friedhof (2015-04-12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:26, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Burg-, Heeres-, W'th. Str. (2013-07-02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Burgstr. 27 u. 29 (2013-07-02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)