User talk:Spurzem/Archive 19

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First Formula Vee: Crash at first Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, Frame 2: Car turned over into ditch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Scope must be for car. Not “scene” Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Ridicolous! In dealing with you, it is difficult not to be abusive. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

 Question Spurzem, my question would be whether there are a number of different recognizable features on the route that are known as "Scene 1", "Scene 2", etc., or are those just your names for the different photos of the race? In other words, what makes these two scopes descriptive? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: It is the numbering of the pictures that belong together. First the car turned sideways, a few meters further it got into the so-called trench and overturned, then helpers came over. I think there are three of the few photos of an accident from that time at the Nürburgring that we have in the Commons. Thank goodness the driver was not injured. But if charlesjsharp thinks the photos are uninteresting or unusable, I have to accept it. Regards -- Spurzem (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

They're surely interesting, but I think the description could be made clearer, and in fact, you just did that. Do you think you could include the whole description in each photo in this series and then for the scope, indicate what the car is doing in each shot? That way, we can have a clear and really useful narrative. I'd be happy to help with phrasing as needed and useful, now that I understand what's being depicted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

So based on your description, I think this shot is "First Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, car runs into ditch", but do you know the model of the car or the name of the driver? Either or both of those could be added to the scope. The other picture would be "car turns over". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: This race was a demonstration event for the still young Formula Vee in Germany. In the program booklet it was announced as the "AvD Nürburgring Cup for Formula-V (Vau)-Fahrzeuge". Time 12:00 p.m. to 12:25 p.m., 10 laps on the so-called concrete loop. There was no list of drivers and vehicles in the program booklet. The vehicles were "beachcar" and "formcar". I don't know which car is in the ditch and I don't know the driver either. However, the pictures show what was understood as safety at the Nürburgring 55 years ago. -- Spurzem (talk) 11:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I think we can work with this. "First Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, car runs into ditch" is sufficient for me to support, as this is definitely a valuable bit of history, as you mention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

The accident begins with "Scene 1". Have we to change the scope too? -- Spurzem (talk) 07:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

I doubt "Scene [number]" is a useful scope, but perhaps I'm wrong. Is this a very well-known accident that is well-known to have occurred in the numbered scenes you're specifying, or would it be clearer to describe what's actually happening in each scene, as I'm suggesting? I feel like "Scene 1", "Scene 2" tells the user nothing except that they most likely happened in chronological order. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Again: The three pictures belong together. They show the process of an accident in three steps. Maybe it would be better to say "Step 1" etc. instead of "Scene 1" etc. The first photo shows how the car is oversteering and with the rear is pushing outwards, starting to turn. You can't see how it gets into the ditch and overturns. Picture two shows how the car is lying in the ditch with the wheels upwards and the driver is freeing himself from the car. The helpers can be seen in picture three. With their help, the car was erected. The so-called security ditches of former times were dangerous. Today, such a driving error as in this Formula Vee race would be unproblematic. The car would remain on the wheels and could continue to drive. -- Spurzem (talk) 16:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

I think I get how to do this. You could describe it as "Crash at first Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, Frame 2: Car runs into ditch" and do the analogous thing with the other photos. That makes the scope a little long, but it makes the point you want to make about the photos being a series, and it's informative. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay. -- Spurzem (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Now please change the scopes marked as "Scene 1" and "Scene 3" in an appropriate way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support per Kekek --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First Formula Vee race in Germany on the Nürburgring, Frame 3, helpers after accident.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Scope must be for car. Not “scene” Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Ridicolous! What I'm showing here indeed are not bears, lions or beetles; that's history of motorsport.-- Spurzem (talk) 21:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

This shows an accident by the look of it. As you are descibing the history of motorsport, then tell us what has happened and to who (racing driver Karl-Heinz Trettau?). Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Take a look at the three pictures and see what happened: The car turned, got into the so-called protective ditch and overturned. 55 years ago, this race was a demonstration event for the introduction of Formula Vee in Germany; it took about 25 minutes, 10 laps on the so-called concrete loop of the Nürburgring. The drivers are not mentioned in the program booklet that I still have on my desk at the moment. Therefore I can not give the name, but I am sure that it is not Lewis Hamilton. ;-) -- Spurzem (talk) 12:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support now with new scope, like frame 2. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support, thank you. Now, please change the scope of Frame 1. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

}}

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Postal vehicle of Germany: Hercules Lastboy with trailer, view from front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Bodendorf Kirchentür, Weinert - Anbetung der Könige (2015-11-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wiking Modellbau: VW 1303, scale 1 : 87, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Steipe 6 - Jakobus, Helena (2012-10-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief by Egino Weinert: Adoration of the Magi at the portal of St. Sebastianus church in Bad Bodendorf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Gangolf in Trier, nave and choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful, best in scope Ezarateesteban 01:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jesuitenkirche (Trier), southern side choir with oculus to the Spee crypt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfa Romeo 33/3, driven by Rolf Stommelen in 1971 on the start and finish straight of the Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Belaja sowa blis kordona somnitelnaja

Belaja sowa kordona "Somnitelnaja"

Bubo bubo im Zoo in Nyíregyháza

Hallo Lothar,

in der Bewertung des Bildes der Eule moniertest du gestern – kurz, nachdem ich dort das Bild wegen des Rauschens abgelehnt hatte – dass man, sofern man das Bild als unbrauchbar kritisere, ein vergleichbares Bild machen solle. Ist zwar kein de:Bubo scandiacus, aber ein de:Bubo bubo. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 09:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Johannes, Dein Foto ist auch ganz nett, kommt aber hinsichtlich Bildgestaltung und Licht bei Weitem nicht an das unter anderem von Dir kritisierte Bild nicht heran. Es ist oben rechts sehr dunkel und es scheint ein bisschen nach rechts zu hängen. Viele Grüße und schönen Sonntag -- Spurzem (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Oben rechts in der Ecke darf es meines Erachtens dunkel sein, da ist ja auch kein Kopf zu sehen. Die Bildgestaltung bei mir ist vielleicht nicht so gut, die Möglichkeiten hatte ich aber nicht (großer Zaun und Abhang waren hinderlich). Mir geht es ja nur darum, dass mein Bild erheblich weniger rauscht. Du wirst das Muster der Federn und die Augen sehr schön erkennen können, ohne, dass das Rauschen störend wäre. Beim oberen Bild hingegen ist das Gesicht der Eule des Rauschens wegen nicht mehr auszumachen. Die Verschlusszeit hätte länger und die Lichtempfindlichkeit geringer eingestellt werden müssen. Dir ebenso einen schönen Sonntag, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 09:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Johannes, auch das Gesicht Deines Vogels ist ziemlich dunkel. Aber abgesehen davon: Mich stört bei den QI-Bewertungen allgemein, dass für die meisten Juroren die Bildgestaltung eine untergeordnete Rolle spielt. Wenn es scharf ist und nicht „rauscht“, darf es sonst ziemlicher Murks sein. Siehe unter anderem manche Bilder von Automobilausstellungen. Auch wenn man das Auto vor lauter Lichtreflexen – übertrieben gesagt – kaum erkennen kann, es vorn zu dunkel und hinten zu hell und im Übrigen verzerrt ist, wird es „promoted“, nach dem Motto: „Es ist aber scharf.“ Doch noch mal zu der weißen Eule: Ich kann ihr Gesicht erkennen. ;-) -- Spurzem (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Lothar, bei QIs geht es mehr um die Technik, als das Motiv. Du hast völlig recht, dass die Komposition nicht immer besonders gut ist; darum geht es aber beim QI aber nicht zwingend. Scharf, nicht rauschend, gut ausgeleuchtet, nicht schief. Eine gute Komposition ist für Featured Pictures erforderlich, so meine ich zu glauben. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Schönen Dank, dass Du mir das erklärst. ;-) FP war meines Erachtens bislang die „Königsklasse“, in der ich genau wie in Wikipedia KEB nicht mehr mitmache, nachdem mir ein Foto vom Radwechsel bei einem Oldtimerrennen am Nürburgring abgeschmettert wurde, weil einer der Umstehenden eine rote Jacke trug, die nach Meinung eines der Wortführer nicht in die trübe Stimmung passte. Ein Kontra-Argument bei KEB lautete vor paar Jahren: „Auto fährt durch die Sonne.“ Das war für mich das Zeichen, mich an diesem Zirkus ebenfalls nicht mehr zu beteiligen. Aber noch mal zu QI: Vor einiger Zeit wurde mir das Foto eines alten Opel Rekord für unbrauchbar erklärt, weil das daneben stehende Auto das vordere Seitenteil vor dem Rad geringfügig verdeckte, also wegen völlig misslungener Bildgestaltung. Manchmal habe ich nach den vielen Jahren mit QI das Gefühl (das aber täuschen kann), als spiele es auch eine Rolle, wer ein Bild präsentiert. -- Spurzem (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Ich will dich nicht belehren, aber ich teile deine letztgenannte Beobachtung und glaube nicht unbedingt an eine Täuschung. Ich schlage aus ebenjenem Grunde nur mehr Bilder vor, die ich mit Unterstützung WMATs gemacht habe. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View from Seilbahn Koblenz to Deutsches Eck and passenger ship „Wappen von Köln“.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer W 25 K, Bj. 1938, Cockpit (2013-09-03 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer W 25 K, Bj. 1938 (2013-09-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 3 PS (2013-09-03 museum mobile Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer W 25 K, Bj. 1938, Front (2013-09-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 125 W, Bj. 1950 (2013-09-03 Sp 4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochem, Alte Thorschenke, Brückenstraße 3 (2019-04-26 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Hat man beim "Hotel" Schriftzug das "t" mit einem "f" verwechselt? --Berthold Werner 14:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Berthold Werner: Wieso, ich sehe nur beim „sch“ das sogenannte „lange s“, das tatsächlich einem f ähnelt. – Ach ja, rechts beim „Hotel“, das ist wohl doch ein verziertes t, ein f müsste eine Unterlänge haben. Aber Verwechs­lungen von Buch­staben gibt es; ich kenne es von der Kärlicher Kirche. -- Spurzem 18:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, steering wheel and dashboard, view from right.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful, but I'd normally call this the dashboard and restrict "cockpit" to planes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I would have been surprised if you didn't have something to complain about. In my opinion, the photo shows not only a dashboard, but also a steering wheel and - though quite dark - the gear lever, the pedals and part of the seat. But if you think the scope needs to be limited to the dashboard, please be free and change it. Best wishes -- Spurzem (talk) 07:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Perhaps we should write: steering wheel and dashboard (?). -- Spurzem (talk) 07:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Sure, that's a good scope. But please understand, I'm not complaining. Why do you think it's annoying to work to arrive at the most useful scope? You provide wonderful photos. That's the most important thing, but we need to help people find them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

I have not yet understood how people can use the scopes to find specific images. But I've changed the scope now. -- Spurzem (talk) 16:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW RT 125 W from 1949/50, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Uncluttered view, not cropped, viewed from same level. Ideal for me. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alte Rheinbrücke Neuwied, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W 25 K from 1938, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dieter Quester in a BMW F269 (Formula 2) at the end of a training session at the GP of Germany on Nürburgring 1969.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 930 V Cabriolet, Bj. 1937-38 (2018-06-03 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari F430 (2017-07-31 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo Spurzem,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Marktkreuz, Südostseite (2010-10-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (see window bars) should be fixed.--Peulle 20:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)  Done -- Spurzem 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 15:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heinkel Kabine 200, version with 4 wheels, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heinkel Kabine 200, version with 4 wheels, with open door, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 175 VS, Bj. 1957 (2013-08-26 Sp 4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch V 12 Cabriolet 670 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Flurkreuz St.-Anna-Straße (2012-07-12 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534 - größer.jpg

You uploaded File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534 - größer.jpg and then tagged it as a duplicate of File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg, but that file doesn't exist on Commons. What are you trying to do? --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: Ich hatte versucht, die Datei ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534.jpg größer zu machen, was aber nicht in der Weise gelungen ist, wie ich es erwartet hatte. Deshalb soll ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534 - größer.jpg gelöscht werden und ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg. erhalten bleiben. Beste Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done. It was File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534.jpg, not File:ArthurPlantagenetBlackBookOfGarter1534p.jpg. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt Dieselross F17 WG, 18 PS, Bj. 1959 mit Anhänger (2012-07-18 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 10:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kurhaus - Eingang (2015-08-25 2931 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brohl, Wegkreuzfragment 1666, Hauptstraße (2020-09-01 Sp 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853 Sport-Cabriolet, Bj. 1937 (innen).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853 Sport-Cabriolet, Bj. 1937 (Seite).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adler MB 200 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Kirche St. Pankratius; Südost (2020-09-07 Sp r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Haus Am Buttermarkt 6, Südost (2020-09-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 3 (2020-09-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Man kann die Ferienwohnung im Wichtelhaus auch gleich buchen, nur das Kleingedruckte ist nicht zu lesen. --Milseburg 10:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Haus Am Buttermarkt 6, Ost (2020-09-12 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche St. Katharina, Am Rathaus 2 (2020-09-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Pfarrkirche St. Johannes - innen (2020-09-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Pfarrkirche St. Johannes - Altarraum (2020-09-05 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Sakramentsnische (2020-09-15 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Engelskonsole Dornenkrone (2020-09-20 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Gemälde Sebastian (2020-09-20 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Depeschenreiterbrunnen, Stadtwappen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Depeschenreiterbrunnen, Gerichtswappen 1554.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 4 - Gasthof Zum Schwan (2020 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Voting

(Google Übersetzung) Hallo Spurzem

Sie haben dieses Bild [1] von mir auf Quality Images-Kandidaten hochgestuft. Zu der Zeit hatte es eine grüne Box um sich. Heute bin ich zurückgekommen und jetzt hat es eine blaue (nicht gewählte) Box. Anscheinend hat jemand einen nicht markierten Kommentar abgegeben. Ich würde nicht denken, dass Kommentare positive Stimmen außer Kraft setzen. Aber es scheint niemanden zu geben, der für diese Aktivität verantwortlich ist, also frage ich Sie.

Hello Spurzem

You upvoted this picture [2] of mine on Quality Images candidates. At the time it had a green box around it. Today I came back and now it has a blue (unvoted) box. Apparently someone made an unmarked comment. I wouldn't think comments overruled upvotes. But, there seems to be no one in charge of this activity to ask so I'm asking you. Jim Evans (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Jim, ich habe keine Erklärung dafür, wie meine Bewertung verloren gegangen sein kann. Frag doch einmal User:GRDN711. Vielleicht kann er es klären. Freundliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 13:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Jim Evans (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 695, Motor (2012-08-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Karmann Ghia, Typ 34, Armaturenbrett (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, ehem. Pfarrkirche - Fenster Katharina (2020-09-20 Sp d).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Wörishofen: Altarpiece of the high altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Kaffe42 (talk) 17:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Klosterkirche Wörishofen: Altarpiece of the right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Kaffe42 (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): Keystone „Hand of God“.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): Keystone „Star of Bethlehem“.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope - cropping the image a bit would make it more useful, imo. Good image either way. -- Kaffe42 (talk) 20:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): corbel with angel presenting the flagellation pillar of Jesus Christ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, and thank you for this series. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mauritius (Mülheim-Kärlich): chasuble, coat of arms of its founder, Frh. von Ehrenfels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mauritius (Mülheim-Kärlich): Chasuble, donated by Ignatius Franz von Ehrenfels († 1774).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I have taken the liberty of adding an English translation of the description and also of WIkilinking both versions. @Spurzem: Please sort out the "other images" section of the description. Martinvl (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the translation. -- Spurzem (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW R5 at Nürburgring 1979 in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): corbel with angel presenting the crown of thorns of Jesus Christ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): corbel with an unknown Old Testament prophet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): painting of Madonna and Child.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharinenkapelle (Treis): stained glass window "Beheading of Saint Catherine".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barfußläuferbrunnen (Barefoot runner fountain) by Schmidt & Wahl in Sayn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sayn: wooden lintel of house Abteistraße 32.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and really pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)