User talk:Spurzem/Archive 14

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Bäckerjungenbrunnen, Detail 2 (2019-08-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Bäckerjungenbrunnen, Detail (2019-08-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture on the Bäckerjungenbrunnen (in English: Baker boys' fountain) from 1984 by Guta von Freydorf-Stephanow on the Markt (market place) in Andernach, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bäckerjungenbrunnen in Andernach, wide view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Given multiple images of the same topic, the scope becomes a determining factor. For a statue, I think two views probably matter the most: its context, and its detail. This to me is the best in relation to context because it shows the statue in an urban square, from the front, and without unnecessary background people, although the verticals could benefit from correction. Fix the scope, and I'll support. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: Please feel not offenced, but I think that what you say is criticism at a very high level. What is wrong at the scope? And which lines should be corrected? I do not see anything that could be wrong. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Re scope: You have nominated another "view from southwest", but a close-up; so we have different images sharing a scope (barring minor wording differences). As for the verticals, the upper part of the building appears to me to lean outwards. Perhaps it does. ShiftN tells me it could do with minor angle and perspective correction, but so small as to make no appreciable difference, so that is no longer a major consideration, and I withdraw it. But I'd still like you to consider the scope. "wide/context view from the southwest", perhaps? Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: O. K. Please change the scope so as you think that it is right. But in the lines I see no mistake. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

 Support Fine now. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tympanum at south portal of the Church of Our Lady in Andernach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is better to stay in the consensus and not listen to the extremists: puts in place a normal scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: A few days ago, Charlesjsharp taught me that the scopes need to be as detailed as possible. Now it's suddenly different again. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
PS: I have the scope changed now and wait for the criticism of Charlesjsharp. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Countersteering with a Maserati 250F from 1957 at Nürburgring, Südkehre, in 1977.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I have checked this image against all the VI criteria and am happy to support its nomination. In particular, I checked it against an image taken in 2009 (photographically superior) but I voted for this image on grounds that it showed the typical driver's protection of the 1950's. Martinvl (talk) 21:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of the Bäckerjungenbrunnen in Andernach, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I think we need title and/or sculptor for VI, Lothar Spurzem. And do we need this cropped image as well as the more distant view from the same POV? Charles (talk) 10:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I don't understand the almost regular criticism of my photos. Sometimes the scopes are too short, sometimes they are too long. The name of the sculptor is in the description of the picture, and the year of the creation of the work of art is mentioned too. The title of the work is "Bäckerjungenbrunnen" (refering to a local tale of two young bakers who defended their town against aggressors). And why should we not have a detailed picture and additionally a picture of the entire fountain? Regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: @Archaeodontosaurus: I will bow to the experience of Didier, but all works of art I've seen promoted to VI have the name of the artist in the scope. Why not here? Also, I see now there may be an error of English, but your scope says on the Bäckerjungenbrunnen which implies a street name, I think you meant to type of the Bäckerjungenbrunnen I do not know which 'regular criticisms' you are referring to. Charles (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: For explanation: Baker boys are young men who want to become bakers and are trained by a master. The legend tells that they saw attackers approaching the city early in the morning. Then they took beehives, hurled them into the group of soldiers who were stabbed and fled. Should I write all this into the scope? I can also name the sculpter's name in Scope, maybe date of birth, place of birth, date of death and place of death. Perhaps the name of her husband is also important, so that you can recognize the image as a VI. In this context, I remember one of my first presentations here, a portrait of the racing driver Hannelore Werner. At that time the scope was criticized as too extensive, in such a way that I almost lost the desire to show a picture here at all. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your sarcasm is not needed here. You could show some respect to a polite and reasonable request. You are a very experienced Wikipedian so I am surprised. Perhaps you are having a bad day. I have not opposed your nomination; I just want it improved. Charles (talk) 12:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

It takes a single scope unambiguously possible. For the charts the titles are very redundant and it is imperative to give the name of the author and the title. There is currently a nomination which gives the name of the place of the version because the same author may have painted several versions of the same subject. In the specific case that concerns us it is possible to give the name of the author but the scope as it was labeled is unique it is impossible to be wrong.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I have corrected the English in the scope so that it makes sense. Charles (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: In what way was the preposition that I had chosen wrong? The sculpture is on (the top of) the fountain. What did you not understand? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

The scope said on the ... and I changed to of the ... "on the" does not make sense unless the sculpture was "on" the baker boys. Which it isn't. It's a sculpture "of" the baker boys. Charles (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Sorry, as a detail, which it is, it suffers from a cluttered background (which could have been defocussed), and the other closeup (with leafy background) better expresses the detail for me, although taken from slightly more to the left would have been even better. It also has a very similar scope to another nomination for the same statue ("from the southwest"). Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: Are we here at "Featured pictures plus" and what other photo from this angle is better? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 08:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Funken-Narrenbrunnen (2019-08-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks tilted slightly to the left. --C messier 12:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC) @C messier:  Done. Probably you were right. Thanks. -- Spurzem 19:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
True Vine, painting in St. Castor (Karden) interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph 1800 Roadster, Bj. 1948, innen (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adler M 100, Bj. 1951, Tacho (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vespa 150 Sprint V, Radaufhängung (Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vespa 150 Sprint V (2019-09-08 Sp 1777 d).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 Topolino, Bj. 1955 (2016-05-01 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Guzzi V 7, Armaturen (2017-07-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Z8 - Armaturenbrett (2009-05-20).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veglia Borletti speedometer on a Vespa 150 Sprint V..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment scope change to "on a" Charles (talk) 21:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Thank you very much for your help and the correction. But why is a tachometer on and not at a scooter? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

That's English prepositions for you. "I saw the scooter AT the fair. We arrived ON time. ON Friday. AT 10 o'clock. The scooter was ON the stand. It was AT the back so we couldn't see it very well. The tacho was mounted ON the scooter and the indicator was AT zero. Have fun. Charles (talk) 10:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front suspension of Vespa 150 Sprint V..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
VDO speedometer of an Adler M 100.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Actually, it's a speedometer with a odometer (or a milometer if it's miles not km)! A tachometer indicates engine revs not road speed. And VDO made hundreds of different speedos (km/hr as well as mph), so the VDO model no. is more important for VI than the vehicle to which it is attached. Charles (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Oh, I see and understand! The German „tachometer“ is in English a „speedometer“. But to demand the model number of a more than 60-year-old gauge is more than laughable.-- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

 Support there will be an archivist somewhere... Charles (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tachometer and speedometer of Moto Guzzi V7 Sport.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dashboard of BMW Z8.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dashboard and steering wheel of Triumph 1800 Roadster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helmut Kassner driving Yamaha TZ 350 at Nürburgring 1974.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Jesuitenkirche - Orgel (2019-05-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Vespa in VI

She is locked without hope to see promoted. Do you want me to close it manually? Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, I have seen that there is something wrong and I would like you could repair it. Thank you and best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW Hobby, right side, view from rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NSU TTS in motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-16 Austin Mini Cooper (01), 1293 cm³, Bj. 1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-16 Austin Mini Cooper (02), 1293 cm³, Bj. 1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:06, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-16 Austin Mini Cooper (04), 1293 cm³, Bj. 1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:06, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norton Dominator, umgebaut (2007-06-15 2-0).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Alexander-93 19:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herbert Linge driving Porsche 904 at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Heckedotzbrunnen - Skulptur (2019-09-22 Foto Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main object --Michielverbeek 20:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herbert Müller (racecar driver) in Ferrari 512 M at Nürburgring in 1971.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 911 Carrera RSR Turbo of Martini Racing driven by Gijs van Lennep 1974.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maserati Tipo 61 of Camoradi Racing at Nürburgringmuseum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Foto Goliath Goli

Hallo User Spurzem,

für ein Buch möchte ich gerne Dein Foto des Goliath Goli verwenden, das unter Creative-Commons 2.0 Deutschland lizenziert ist. Dazu muss ich es in ein Schwarz-Weiß-Bild umwandeln. Du hast ja auf der Beschreibungsseite darum gebeten, vor einer etwaigen Änderung mit dir Rücksprache zu nehmen. Das Kennzeichen würde ich gerne ganz unkenntlich machen. Gruß--77.182.157.208 16:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Hallo, gegen die Umsetzung in Schwarzweiß habe ich nichts, vorausgesetzt, dass es gut gemacht wird. Ganz unkenntlich gemachte Kennzeichen finde ich scheußlich, egal, ob weiße Flächen (die noch einigermaßen ansehnlich sind), verpixelt oder „vermatscht“. Die Meinungen darüber, ob die tatsächlichen Kennzeichen gezeigt werden dürfen, gehen auseinander; deshalb versuche ich meistens, eine Buchstabenkombination herzustellen, die es in Wirklichkeit nicht gibt. Einmal rief mich allerdings die Eigentümerin eines Oldtimers an und gab sich verärgert, weil ich ihr Auto in Wikipedia nicht mit dem wirklichen Kennzeichen zeigte. Freundliche Grüße Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, Lothar Spurzem. Ich wandle das Farbbild in Graustufen um, das wird dann schon ok. Zu den von dir geschilderten Reaktionen auf Kennzeichen auf Fotos: Allen Leuten wohlgetan ist eine Kunst, die niemand kann! ;-) Ich werde es dann weiß machen... Freundliche Grüße--77.180.74.56 11:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Altes Rathaus (2019-09-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Heckedotzbrunnen - Rodbäuerin (2019-09-22 Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz-Fahr 6190 C Shift, Bj. 2015 (2019-10-04 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:07, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schauff-Fahrrad, Prototyp Colani (2019-10-07 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the tyres need some air --Michielverbeek 18:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC) @Michielverbeek: I did not have an air pump with me. ;-) And I hat no courage to ask the owner for more air. I was already pleasantly surprised that he carried the bike out of its relatively dark showroom when I asked if I could take a picture of it. Regards -- Spurzem 20:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schauff-Fahrrad, Prototyp Colani, rear (2019-10-07 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 11:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze sculpture by Fritz Berlin on the Heckedotzbrunnen in Treis, 1989.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prototype of Schauff bicyle designed by Luigi Colani 1982.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW ORE 250, Bj. 1929 (Motor).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW SS 250 - Motor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW E 206, rear and side view right.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW NZ 350, Bj. 1939 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:30, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi R8 LMP, Le Mans 2000, Front (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW SS 250 - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of DKW ORE 250, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW ORE 250, view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Turm Kirche St. Pankratius, Balduinstraße (2019-10-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 22:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Depeschenreiterbrunnen, Detail (2019-10-14 2522 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 15:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wanderer Stromlinie Spezial, Nachbau (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine with charge pump of DKW SS 250 from 1938.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW SS 250 from 1938, side view right.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW ZSW 500, Bj. 1929 (front).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Object is sharp --Michielverbeek 19:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaisersesch, Depeschenreiterbrunnen (2019-10-14 c Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wanderer W240, rear and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Flusspferde by Marlies Poss (2016-10-07 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Kleine Bibliothek by Anne u. Peter Knoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality: focus on name. --Axel Tschentscher 20:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-04-07 29 Achilles-Sport 175, Bj. 1955 (Motor).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:46, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-04-07 38 Achilles-Sport 175, Bj. 1955 (Tachometer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:46, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinkel Tourist, Bj. 1962 (2008-10-11 c) Schaltung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinkel Tourist 103 A0 und Achilles-Sport, 1956 und 1955 (2007-04-09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There you go. This one is good, just fix the white border on the top left.--Peulle 16:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)  Done -- Spurzem 16:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Yep.--Peulle 18:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 37, Bj. 1925-26 (2011-08-13 Sp) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:49, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 37, Bj. 1925-26 (2011-08-13 Sp) 06 rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 37, Bj. 1925-26 (2011-08-13 Sp) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Auferstehung - Mosaik am Friedhof (2019-10-24 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:05, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 31, Haustür (2019-10-26 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 19:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 23 (2019-10-26 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fritz Huschke von Hanstein, driving Porsche 804 in 1981.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Olympia A, Bauzeit 1967-70 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IKKos 19:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Passat GL 1980-85 (2019-10-26 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:08, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Konrad Adenauer in Adenauer-Schuman-Gedenkzeichen Bassenheim by Harald Stieding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:06, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robert Schuman in Adenauer-Schuman-Gedenkzeichen Bassenheim by Harald Stieding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adenauer-Schuman-Gedenkzeichen Bassenheim by Harald Stieding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Symbol of Europe in the Adenauer-Schuman-Gedenkzeichen Bassenheim by Harald Stieding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Triumph (TWN) BDG 250 H, left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz SSKL, Bj. 1931, Cockpit (2008-06-28 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harley-Davidson (01) JDL Racer, 1200 cm³, Bj. 1929 (2007-06-16 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
V16 engine of Auto Union Type C.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)