User talk:Spurzem/Archive 12

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Toine Hezemans in 1972, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:41, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auburn Speedster Boattail 851 Replica, Bj. 1977 (Sp 1r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfa Romeo Montreal, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 695 (2014-06-15 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 1800, li. Seite (2018-06-03 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 19:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 1800, Front (2018-06-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 19:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magirus Deutz 110 D 7 (Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Lambretta, 149 cm³, 6 PS, Bj. 1955 (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 300 SL Replica, Bj. 2002 (2018-06-03 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 Giardiniera, Bj. 1969 (2018-06-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 14:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zündapp DB 205, rear and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support per nom - best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassenheim, Karmelenberg - 7 Fußfälle (2018-06-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porch of Maria Laach, detail "little devil" (Teufelchen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sachs 98 cc 1952 Einbaumotor (2018-06-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 4 (Bauzeit 1967-1974 r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat X1-9, Bj. 1977 (2018-06-03 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sachs 98 cc 1952 Einbaumotor, links (2018-06-03 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 4, Heck (Bauzeit 1967-1974 r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 914, Modell 1975-76 (2018-06-03 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-15 5922 Kernkraftwerk MüK, Kühlturm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-15 5935 Kernkraftwerk MüK.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz-Taktor F2L514-4-U, Bj. 1958 (2012-06-10 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz-Taktor F2L514-4-U, Bj. 1958 (2012-06-10 r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 550, Bj. 1956, Heck (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adler M 100, Bj. 1951, re (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goebel, Lutz-Motor, Typ 58-58 (Detail) re..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goebel, Lutz-Motor, Typ 58-50, Bj. 1952.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St.-Castor-Str. 7 (2018-07-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 550 A, Bj. 1956, vorn (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 22:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WAS-2103 oder Lada 1500 (2018-06-30 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adler M 100, Bj. 1951, vorn (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moto Morini Corsaro, Motor 125 cm³, Bj. 1961, li. (2016-06-30 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The rear wheel has some problems with the sun. But the main subject of the engine is in the focus for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford 17 M - P2 (2018-06-30 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 04:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of St. Castor (Karden).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 550, Bj. 1956, vorn Seite (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera (964), Bauzeit 1989-94 (2018-06-30 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 19:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 90 S, Motor li. (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice engine and nice picture. :-) --GT1976 12:13, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW RT 200-3, Bj. 1956 (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW RT 200/3, left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, Used and Only in Scope. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adler M 100, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rear of Opel Manta A with Vinyl roof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Manta 02b Foto MSp 2006-10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducati 998 (2018-06-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autobianchi Panoramica, Heck (2017-06-11 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Autobianchi Bianchina Panoramica, rear and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Hebmüller, Heck (2015-09-12 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Europa (2017-06-11 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2006-07-16 BMW R 12 - Motor.JPG

File:2006-07-16 BMW R 12 - Motor.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 22:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Europa, in Fahrt (2017-06-11 Foto Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW R12, engine, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2006-07-16 BMW R 12 - Motor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a bit of green CA and some chroma noise but that should be fixable for such daytime shot.--Peulle 23:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC) @Peulle: I withdraw. -- Spurzem 09:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)  Done Nomination once more -- Spurzem 11:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Fine! --Palauenc05 06:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katrin Apel, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annika Mehlhorn, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellen Wessinghage as entrant of charity performance Vortour der Hoffnung in 2012.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:27, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 365 GTB 4 Daytona, Bj. 1970 (2007-07-22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A small file. But good quality for me ..--Famberhorst 04:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel GT 1900 (2008-06-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --DeFacto 20:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Konsul I 03 (Foto Sp 2011-06-19) Hinterradfederung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor, Lindenplatz (2018-08-27).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scammell Scarab, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Small technical problem with the scope that I modified. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goggomobil Coupé (2014-09-03 7049 b) Heck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Audi TT 8J Roadster (2018-09-26 Sp r).jpg

Copyright status: File:Audi TT 8J Roadster (2018-09-26 Sp r).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Audi TT 8J Roadster (2018-09-26 Sp r).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 14:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: Danke für den überaus umfangreichen Hinweis. Ich hatte nicht bemerkt, dass in der Vorlage etwas falsch war. Freundliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Bianchina

Thanks, in italy is famous [1] --Architas (talk) 18:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your "Ferrari 250 TR" images

You uploaded two pictures of a white Ferrari Testa Rossa, which is actually a replica. So, I would not have used the "Most Valued". I put them in this category, where you can read the story: category:Schouwenburg replica of 1958 Ferrari 250 TR Ketil3 (talk) 19:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Who told you that it is a replica? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi TT 8J Roadster (2018-09-26 Sp r).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Müden, St. Stephanus, Südosten (2018-09-26 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Müden, St. Stephanus, Turm und Chor (2018-09-26 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Treis-Karden: Chapel of Windhausen, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Hofkapelle zu Windhausen (2018-10-03 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Treis-Karden, St.-Castor-Straße 3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor, Potentinusstatue (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object but top crop (left part) might have been better --Michielverbeek 23:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Müden, St. Stephanus - Friedhofskreuz (2018-09-26 Sp A).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Spurzem! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

@George Chernilevsky: Many thanks and all the best for you. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, Spurzem! *

Joyeux Noël et tous mes vœux de bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 10:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

@Pierre André Leclercq: Tank you very much and best wishes for you too. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Downscaled...

Ach, Lothar, du rennst gegen Ideologen an. Es gibt Situationen, da kann man volle Auflösung erwarten, es gibt reichlich Situationen, bei denen die volle Sensorauflösung kontraproduktiv ist. Mach bitte weiter viele Bilder auf diesen Oldtimer-Ralleys, bitte von fahrenden Autos, und wenn die nicht ganz 10000%ig scharf eingefroren sind, dann lade sie trotzdem hoch. Man sieht deinen Autobildern einfach an, daß du mit Liebe bei der Sache bist und du ein Auge hast für die wesentlichen Aspekte des Designs und der Technik. QI rutscht immer mehr in die Sektiererei ab. Ich schlage schon lange kaum noch eigene Bilder vor und senfe eigentlich nur noch da herum, wenn mir besonders krasse Fehlurteile auffallen. Diese ganzen Autosalon-"Qualitätsbilder" der letzten Zeit gehen mir furchtbar auf den Senkel, fast ausschließlich hochglanzpolierte Showexemplare mit unmotiviertem Drumherum in fürchterlichster Effektbeleuchtung und regelmäßig ohne jegliche fotografische Gestaltung. Aber sie sind mit teuren Kameras und Objektiven knackscharf und vor allem: Mit "voller Auflösung" hochgeladen - zack - QI.
Ich teile zwar nicht jede deiner Bildbewertungen, hin und wieder liegst du im fototechnischen Sinne falsch, aber ich stimme durchaus auch öfters überein. Trotzdem fände ich gut, wenn du etwas mehr Zurückhaltung im Ton bzw. in der Ansprache zeigen würdest, wenn du anderen Bewertern auf QI widersprichst, ob berechtigt, oder unberechtigt, egal. Nicht immer gleich die persönliche Keule rausholen. --Smial (talk) 00:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC) Ps: Wenn ich dir mal widerspreche, dann kannst du ganz sicher sein, daß da keine persönlichen Animositäten dahinter stecken ;-)

Hallo Smial, danke für Deine Worte und für die Einschätzung der oft verzerrten, über- und unterbelichteten Bilder aus Autosalons, zum Teil mit vielen störenden Lichtreflexen, die massenweise als QI hochgejubelt werden. Das Foto des 2 CV ist übrigens nicht „downscaled“, um Schärfe herauszuholen, sondern es ist ein Ausschnitt, weil ich mit 85 mm Brennweite nicht dicht genug an dem fahrenden Auto war. Aber was Schärfe betrifft: ADAC- und die Lichtplakette von 2011 in der Windschutzscheibe sind lesbar und nicht schlechter als das Porschewappen auf einigen der „preisgekrönten“ fotografischen Werke der letzten Zeit. Aber egal. Wenn Dir „mein“ 2 CV auch gefällt, wie aben anzuklingen scheint, wäre ein Pro von Dir nett. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Ro 80, Bj. 1976, Front (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 23:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 90 S, Motor re., Dell'Orto-Vergaser, 38 mm (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice boxer. --GT1976 17:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weber Doppelvergaser 48 DCOE 99 (2014-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 17:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citroen 2 CV Dolly, Bj. 1987 (2012-06-10 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach, Prophet, Hildegard Bienen 1971 (2017-06-06 Sp 2115b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Maria Laach, Pietà.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:57, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Burg, Nordost (2019-02-06 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Georgskapelle (2019-03-28 Sp 4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 19:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Moselstraße 32 (2019-03-31 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Kommentare

Moin Lothar! Du gibst in letzter Zeit auf QIC häufig Kommentare ab statt Bewertungen. Streß mit manchen Benutzern? --Smial (talk) 11:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Smial, ich habe keinen Stress, will aber Stress vermeiden; denn es könnte nach Retourkutsche aussehen oder besonders kritische Aufmerksamkeit wecken, wenn ich ein Decline vergebe, und das vielleicht als Außenseiter. Manchmal kann ich nur staunen, was inzwischen speziell im Bereich von Autos als Qualitätsbild oder "good enough" angesehen wird. Da ist aktuell zum Beispiel ein Audi mit milchig wirkenden Seitenscheiben, aber das Bild ist für einen unserer strengsten Kritiker in Ordnung. Deshalb will ich vorzugsweise nur meinen Kommentar abgeben. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Kann ich verstehen, Kritik kann leicht mißverstanden werden, wenn zwei im selben Themenbereich unterwegs sind. Ich würde liebend gerne den allermeisten von diesen Autosalonbildern ein Contra verpassen wegen besch****ner Ausleuchtung und schrecklichen Hintergründen, ebenso diesen Zufallsschnappschüssen auf irgendwelchen Parkplätzen, aber das könnte wiederum leicht als Stalking ausgelegt werden. Deshalb picke ich mir immer nur vereinzelt besonders gruselige Exemplare raus. Eigentlich sind die meisten dieser Bilder eine Beleidigung für Fotografen wie z.B. Granada, Moroder oder Poco, die mit viel Aufwand und wachsendem Können Bilder erstellen, die dann an einem minimalen Stitchingfehler (Ja, wirklich störende habe ich auch schon bemängelt!) oder angeblich mangelnder Schärfe auf Pixelebene scheitern. --Smial (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi A4 B6 TDI Cabrio (2019-03-27 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Knabenschule, Lassaulx um 1930 (2019-04-06 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:16, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-07 Mauer auf dem zum Kompuskopf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ehemalige Knabenschule (Treis), Southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Beautiful building, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 04:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo Spurzem,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FGS Treis-Karden, Cochem Mosel (2019-05-03 Sp 1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochem, Martinsbrunnen, Bronzestatue 1935, Anton Nagel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach, Genoveva - Relief von Teutenberg (2019-05-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:50, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantinbasilika - Jesus, Gustav Kaupert um 1880.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Im ersten Moment: Schreck, unscharf - war aber nur der Hintergrund. Perfekt belichtet. --Ralf Roletschek 21:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of Heinrich II von Laach, funder of Abbey of Maria Laach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Best in scope, but the scope could be better. First, "Category" shouldn't show in the scope. Second, it would be "donor's grave", as it's the grave of one donor, but why wouldn't it be better to identify the donor by name as Count Heinrich II of Laach? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I modified the scope for the problem of the category, everyone is not familiar with this syntax. I agree with Ikan Kekek 's remark. The scope can be changed without special procedure because there is no vote yet.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thank you so much for pointing out my typo. In German, the apostrophe is not common before a genitive-s. And I'm German. ;-) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - You're welcome, Lothar, and of course I understand that. But what do you think of my proposal to change the scope to "Interior of Maria Laach: Grave of Count Heinrich II of Laach?" Why is "Donor's grave" clearer? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: When I presented my first pictures, the scopes were too long. Suddenly the scope is too short. But apart from that: In this country, this tomb is called "Stiftergrab" oder “Gründergrab”, that’s is in English “Donor’s grave”. But if this question should fail a positive rating of the photo, I'll probably have to accept it. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

We discuss details, but they are interesting and useful. Donor is used rather to designate a sponsor of a work a painting or a statue. But in this case it is the founder of the Abbey of Maria Laach. The scope, which seems to me ideal, could be: Grave of Heinrich II von Laach, funder of {{c|Interior of Maria Laach| Abbey of Maria Laach}} --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I changed it. However, I do not understand the meaning; because some time ago, the scopes had to be as short as possible. Regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support for me is perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - For the record, Lothar, with your explanation above, I would have supported keeping "Donor's grave" as the scope, since that's the name of the grave. When I ask a question ("Why is 'Donor's grave' clearer?"), I am literally asking a question, not dictating an answer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantinbasilika - Matthäus, Gustav Kaupert um 1880.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures at Maria Laach: Genevieve of Brabant (Relief by Reinhold Teutenberg).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 04:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Jesus by Gustav Kaupert in Basilica of Constantine, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope you think it's the best picture, and you're right, but if you're convinced you have to defend it and apply it. Nobody will do it for you ... or rarely. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 23:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Evangelist Matthew by Gustav Kaupert in Basilica of Constantine, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support perhaps using artwork template with more info the value increased a bit Ezarateesteban 19:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 04:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Evangelist Mark by Gustav Kaupert in Basilica of Constantine, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 18:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Evangelist Luke by Gustav Kaupert in Basilica of Constantine, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 18:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steering column of BMW 600 with cardan joints.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 18:14, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach - Abteikirche, Nordwest (2019-05-14 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor - Lukas (2019-05-23 Sp a).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:15, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine of Wartburg 1000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor - Johannes (2019-05-23 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:14, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor - Lukas (2019-05-23 Sp b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor - Chorfenster, Jesus am Kreuz (2019-05-23 Sp) b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Showroom with vehicles of the 1950s in the former Automuseum Busch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Correction of scope--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW RT350 (left side) in the Audi Forum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW RT350 with side car from Binder in the Audi Forum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horch 10-12 PS in the Audi Forum Ingolstadt, sideview.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 03:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Driver’s seat of a Horch 10-12 PS in the Audi Forum Ingolstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 03:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horch 855 Special-Roadster, front, in Audi Forum, Ingolstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Vulphere 08:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horch 855 Special-Roadster, front and left side, in Audi Forum, Ingolstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Problem wit usedin. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. The mistake was due to copy and paste. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Vulphere 08:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horch 855 Special-Roadster, interior, in Audi Forum, Ingolstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Vulphere 08:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW RM 350, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Vulphere 08:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward Hansa 1500 (1954–1956), front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Vulphere 08:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hansa 1700 Sport, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful.--Vulphere 08:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)