User talk:Seancasey00

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Seancasey00!
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CarsonCistulliReading.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CarsonCistulliReading.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 13:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This one's trickier. Part of project Ourmedia but not clear that it has a CC like with last two. I'll leave this open to the administrators who have more experience here.--Seancasey00 (talk) 15:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder because I doubt that it was not you who talked about this with me only a few days ago. User_talk:Martin_H.#File:Carson_cistulli02.jpg, obvious Seancasey00=Molly81. I cant help myself but this look like some very biiig conflict of interests to me, including edits like this trying to hide the COI. --Martin H. (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Martin, I'm not Sean Casey the writer if that's what you mean. This account name is in hommage to the baseball player with the same name. I do like good sports writing, support writers like Rob Neyer, Joe Posnanski Carson Cistulli. If you want to know more biographically about me I'd be glad to share but maybe in a space more private than this?--Seancasey00 (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Im not interested in your biography, Im only interested in the incidence about this file, the quick call for deletion and the reupload under a different account. I wonder if this is some kind of lottery based on the idea that of many attempts one will finaly succeed, and if the uploader behinds this is more interested in Wikipedia and in its mission to build a free content repository or if the uploader is more interested in bringing the subject into a good light. A conflict of interest can also arises if only one person with a special point of view writes an article, given the revision history of the Cistulli article I think there are some COI problems, a COI bringing personal opinions and promotion in the article and a COI between the promotional intention and the policies of Wikipedia. --Martin H. (talk) 15:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work here Martin. You're probably right than that I have a conflict of interest in that I've read Cistulli's poetic oeuvre, a good chunk of his sports writing. At this point I've made my mark/given a starting point. I'll let other people continue the project (here at wikimedia commons.) Best of luck going forward --Seancasey00 (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin,
Sean and I talked and we both want this situation clarified. Listen:
1) There is a connection between me and Sean but it's not what you seem to think.
2) With this image we both made the same mistake. I've made contact with the owner, received permission, and sent the permission to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org
3) Neither of us has a COI problem with Carson Cistulli, Kenneth Koch, Peter Orlovsky or any of the other authors we've edited or created wiki pages for. As you may or may not know the original COI concern was with the links to FanGraphs (see this), Sean's work here, here and here was certainly not trying to "hide" anything but rather was addressing the concern of external links. As he said "[p]age cleaned up, unnecessary references to FanGraphs removed."
4) If I continue working in Wikipedia after this it will be on the French page and you are welcome to follow me there
5) We both recognize that we are new members here and thank you for your work.
Cordialement, --Molly81 (talk) 10:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TheNewEnthusiastPilotIssue.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See previous.--Seancasey00 (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TNE-Issue_03.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See file, see link, see source: 1) file: "allow us to present ourselves the shuttlecoque sporting hour sportinghour.blogspot.com 2)link: sportinghour.blogspot.com From there in the archives we find http://sportinghour.blogspot.com/2007/12/tne-for-13dec07.html which links to archive.org, our oringial document TneWir3.pdf 3) now looking at our source http://www.archive.org/details/TneWir3 we see the description: "Creative Commons license: Attribution 3.0 United States" a link to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ for the licence--Seancasey00 (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Seancasey00!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]