User talk:Schmarrnintelligenz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Schmarrnintelligenz!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Police kevlar helmet, Orlando.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LFaraone 16:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the admins here regard this as copyvio, then pls speedy delete it, but pls explain why you think the official police declaration https://twitter.com/OrlandoPolice/status/742018880256790528 "Media/public: You have permission to use any photos/video/periscope video, etc. posted by OPD on this Twitter feed or any of our channels." is not sufficient. Thx. --SI 16:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@LFaraone, Rama, and Tbhotch: I am really interested in having this question answered; why doesn't Template:PD-FLGov (or similar) apply here? [1] [2] --SI 17:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank for the question. I appreciate your being such a good sport about these deletions.
The crux of the matter is that the statement of the police is vague. It is good enough to establish good faith for somebody who would use the image on a blog or something similar; but it is not a formal statement of licence. They do not mention a licence, nor that the image is public domain, and they do not specify what the permission to use covers. We are not entilted to interpret this statement and put a cc-zero on the images, hence my deletion.
On the other hand, I was not aware of Template:PD-FLGov and the policy that underlines it. This one very much seems to apply in this case, so I am restoring the images and correcting the template.
Cheers! Rama (talk) 18:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Orlando police SWAT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LFaraone 16:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pulse, 1912 South Orange Avenue, Orlando.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 17:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Free Soil Party[edit]

The Free Soil Party certainly had a strong overall anti-slavery tendency, but it wasn't fully abolitionist, or abolitionist in the strict sense. That was part of why it had a stronger political base than the Liberty Party, but also why some abolitionists looked down on it... AnonMoos (talk) 15:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing my mistake, I should've read the article more deeply - a good one. --SI 13:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presidents who were elected despite losing the popular vote[edit]

Hi, I like your bar graph:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electoral_college_win_popular_vote_lost_US_Presidents.png

However, I was wondering if you could please generate an additional graph that also shows the results of the 1824 election. According to the Wikipedia article about that election, Adams won 30.9% and Jackson won 41.4%. "The popular vote figures exclude Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana, New York, South Carolina, and Vermont. In all of these states, the Electors were chosen by the state legislatures rather than by popular vote." The cited source is Leip, David. "1824 Presidential Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved July 26, 2005. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 09:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anythingyouwant: sorry for being a bit late, we discussed this already at: File talk:Electoral college win popular vote lost US Presidents.png. OK? --SI 19:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC) p.s. Please see also File:United States Presidents popular vote losers.png --SI 06:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:STOP Putin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veverve (talk) 11:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop Putin sign.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Veverve (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Umkategorisierung Climate strikes - Fridays for Future[edit]

Du hast da eine ziemlich große Umkategorisierung vorgenommen. FridaysForFuture war jahrelang ein Redirect auf SchoolStrikesforClimate. Jetzt hast Du es praktisch umgedreht. Gibt es dazu eine Diskussion mit einer Entscheidung? C.Suthorn (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ich wollte auch gerade nachfragen, wie die neue Kategorie "Fridays For Future Trier" zu verstehen ist, wo es doch schon die Category:School strikes for climate in Trier gibt. Außerdem fehlen in der neuen zwei Demos. P170 (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Danke fürs Nachfragen. Eigentlich habe ich nur die fehlende Hauptkategorie der Organisation FFF ergänzt, zu der es ja schon gut zweihundert FFF-Unterkategorien gab. Denn die Organisation und die von ihr organisierten Aktionen (Streiks, Demos, Veranstaltungen) und Personen sind ja voneinander unterschiedene Entitäten. --SI 23:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Du willst, dass in Category:School strikes for climate nur noch die Freitagmittagsdemos sind. Alle anderen Veranstaltungen und sonstigen Fotos willst du zu Category:Fridays for Future packen. Es bleibt dann in Deutschland meines Wissens nach nur eine Demo, die nur in Category:School strikes for climate und nicht in Category:Fridays for Future einsortiert werden müsste, da sie vor der Gründung stattfand, wobei die Vorgeschichte einer Organisation natürlich auch Teil der Geschichte einer Organisation ist, man könnte also auch Category:School strikes for climate direkt zur Unterkategorie von Category:Fridays for Future machen. Übrigens sind Links auf externe Seiten wie du sie eingefügt hast nicht erwünscht. GPSLeo (talk) 06:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Und für Organisationen gibt es in großen Städten entsprechende Unterkategorien. Direkt in Category:Berlin sollte fast nie etwas abgelegt werden. GPSLeo (talk) 07:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, GPSLeo, auch das stimmt nicht. Du legst mir Sachen in dem Mund, die ich weder irgendwo geäußert habe, noch denke oder beabsichtige. Ich habe auch keine "Umkategorisierung" vorgenommen und auch nix "umgedreht", wie es C.Suthorn oben falsch behauptet. Lediglich habe ich zu "Category:Fridays for Future" als Kategorie der gleichnamigen Organisation(en) die offensichtlichen und eindeutigen ca. 200 Fridays...-Unterkategorien hinzugefügt, die viele andere User schon vor mir angelegt hatten. Niemandem habe ich vorgeschrieben, wo ihr eure Veranstaltungen, Bilder, Kategorien, etc. einsortieren sollt. Ich habe nichts weggenommen, sondern nur was hinzugefügt! Ihr könnt doch weiterhin alles in "Category:School strikes for climate" einsortieren, was ihr wollt. --SI 09:00, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Im ersten Satz hätte eigentlich ein Fragezeichen stehen sollen. Aus einer Weiterleitung eine redundante Kategoriestruktur zu machen ist etwas, das immer erst einmal diskutiert werden sollte. Insbesondere dann, wenn die bisherige Struktur über viele Jahre von einer Gruppe aktiver User aufgebaut wurde. GPSLeo (talk) 09:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Die Aktion vom 24.2. ist nicht so harmlos, wie hier dargestellt wird. Wann und wo wird denn nun geklärt, ob Category:Fridays for Future oder Category:School strikes for climate Unterkategorie ist, oder beide Parellelkategorien? --ElbHein (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Normalerweise wird auch hier in Commons der Veranstalter/die Organisation als "Mutter" von ihren Veranstaltungen/Aktionen/Produkten/Untergruppen kategorisiert. Genau wie bei Bands und ihren Konzerten/Mitgliedern/Touren/Alben u.ä. Ich setze mal einen Hinweisbaustein dazu rein. SI 22:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Schwimmnudel-Duplikat[edit]

Moin, SI, geschah nicht aus bösem Willen, In der LD schon geschrieben, an sich wollte ich nur die gut aufgelöste Originalversion des Bilds in Commons haben statt dem 600x400-TN. Wenns da eine feine Lösung gibt, da vorhandene Bilder zu ersetzen, stoß mich gern mit der Nase drauf, in Commons-Tech bin ich nicht wirklich weit drin. und wenn wir den Leuten ne LD sparen können, mir wärs recht. Greetz, Korrupt (talk) 19:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, jetz hammer die Diskussion schon an der dritten Stelle (1) + (2) :-) Bei (1) hab ich (in Englisch) die "Lösung" beschrieben: beim hochladen einer neuen Version bekommst du oft mehrere Fehlermeldungen, die können aber fast immer irgendwie weitergeklickt werden, wie ich es auch gemacht hab. Für den alten Dateinamen hab ich Umbenennung beantragt, obwohl das nicht zwingend notwendig ist. -- SI 20:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]