User talk:Quahadi/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File source is not properly indicated: File:Drniška tvrđava.1.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Drniška tvrđava.1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Drniška tvrđava.1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 01:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

MP4 Videos

originally uploaded in the mp4 format

Thank you for providing the useful video footage. You uploaded the video files in the unfree mp4 format. It would be nice if you converted them to OGV or WebM in the future. Please just ask me any further questions. --McZusatz (talk) 22:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Quahadi. You have new messages at McZusatz's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

McZusatz (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Panorama-Viteza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Šumadija

A ova mapa ne odgovara? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Serbia022.png PANONIAN (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Pa dobro, zato sam nacrtao dve mape, jednu koja pokazuje položaj Šumadije u Srbiji i drugu koja pokazuje veće gradove i naselja: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_Šumadija Na onoj mapi koja pokazuje celu Srbiju jednostavno nema prostora da se prikažu i sva ta naselja. Što se same mape Srbije tiče, u pitanju su geografski regioni bez administrativnog statusa. U primarnom izvoru koji sam koristio stoji opis "predeone i antropogeografske celine Srbije". PANONIAN (talk) 10:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Calm down, stop yelling at me with exclamation marks about the map

Alright, I made a mistake with the map of Swabia, you could tell me that but you didn't have to yell at me about it.--R-41 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

NASA

Samo mi napiši ako nešto ne možeš da prepoznaš pa da ti pomognem. --Smooth_O (talk) 13:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Request: Croatian for Template:Closed cap

Hi! Are you interested in adding Croatian to Template:Closed cap? There are not yet any Croatian translations for that template Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Neretva, kod Carinskeg mosta 4711.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Neretva, kod Carinskeg mosta 4710.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Panorama Mostara 4724.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

OpenStreetMap licensing

Hi there! I see you've uploaded some OSM images under a wrong license. (cc-by instead of cc-by-sa) [1] Try to avoid doing so in the future. Palosirkka (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Čajdraš-11.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Čajdraš-11.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Čajdraš-1.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Čajdraš-1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


File:Spomenik kraljici Katarini, Dom HSK , Mostar04596.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 10:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


File:Spomenik kraljici Katarini, dom HSK, Mostar.7850.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 10:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


File:Spomenik poginulom HVO-ovcu u Mostaru04573.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik-braniteljima00672.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik-braniteljima00676.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik-braniteljima00681.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik-braniteljima00677.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik-braniteljima00671.JPG.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kameni križ u središtu Širokog Brijega 04664.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kameni križ, Široki Brig04663.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Fra-grga martić.monument08845.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Iznad Crkvica, Pelišac.05330.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jelačić 1377.ogv

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jelačić 1377.ogv. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jelačić 1380.ogv

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jelačić 1380.ogv. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jelačić 1378.ogv

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jelačić 1378.ogv. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Krajolik , Kupres.84.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: FOP

Ne kužim ti se baš u propise, ali po svemu sudeći, nema slikama spasa.--MaGa 09:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Divković-naslovnica-Nauk krstjanski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 21:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mursko Središće city location.GIF. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Quahadi. Please remove your uploads from this maintenance category. Thank you. --Leyo 13:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Plaža kod k.Domagoja 20130911 061417.ogv is now in this maintenance category. --Leyo 07:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Mala i Vela Sestrica7100228.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Lumbarda iz Orebića5140119.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Karmen i Orebić265.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Gubavac i Knežić337.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, darkweasel94 19:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Za mnoge kilometre koje si prošao i rijetkih beštijica ulovio ;) Roberta F. (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Spomen-križ, Tihaljina27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:18, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik u Bristovici, Drinovci..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Monument near church, Gorica.08351.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Antun-B. Šimić,spomenik u Drinovcima.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik poginulom HVO-ovcu u Mostaru04573.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik u Mostaru040847.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik u Mostaru04620.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik u Mostaru04592.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Grb HB, Dom HSK , Mostar04595.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Herceg-Stjepan- Kosača-home-entrance plaque07879.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Grb Kosača, Dom HSK , Mostar04593.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:33, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Herceg-stjepan-kosača-home07852.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Herceg-stjepan-kosača-home07884.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Spomenik u Mostaru04622.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:West Mostar.05223.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:36, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Eleassar (t/p) 13:37, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 13:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Leyo 17:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Template:Autotranslate And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jcb (talk) 02:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Leyo 18:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 ([[User talk:Stefan4|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 21:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Dear Qahadi,

I'm sorry, but it's very difficult to determine afterwards, what you have photographed. Without a description and coordinates your pictures are unusable.--Kopiersperre ([[User talk:Kopiersperre|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ies ([[User talk:Ies|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 16:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Quahadi! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Ogulin

Hello. I had written the Hebrew article about Ogulin. I noticed you uploaded many photos from there. Is there any Monument related the Jewish community?. There was a jewish cemetery in Ogulin. Can a photo of be taken?. thanks. Assayas ([[User talk:Assayas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Scoopfinder(d) 23:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Translating the interface in your language, we need your help

Hello Quahadi, thanks for working on this wiki in your language. We updated the list of priority translations and I write you to let you know. The language used by this wiki (or by you in your preferences) needs about 100 translations or less in the priority list. You're almost done!
int:translateinterface

Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 16:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 16:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Cyrillic pages of Reims Gospel books

Hello Quahadi, you uploaded the glagolica pages of the Reims gospel book. Do you think you could do the same for the Cyrillic pages? They are of valuable importance, since they represent, according to some sources, the most ancient Slavonic written document? --Diligent ([[User talk:Diligent|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Surtsicna ([[User talk:Surtsicna|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Quahadi - are you aware of this page, and did you create it on purpose? It's in the wrong namespace and seems to be a candidate for Template:Tlx to me. Best regards, Storkk ([[User talk:Storkk|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

please add yourself as author again

I have cleaned File:Kupreško polje01833.JPG, there was just a date in the author field. Would you be so kind to add you as the author (if it were so), formally the author is missing now. The michelin link was dangling, if you have a location for the image, it is preferred to add Template:Template for the camera position. regards --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Videos of 2015 from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Koji je smisao postavljanja tolikih bezveznih video fileova na wikipediju?? --37.203.90.64 04:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Another version of New Orleans sat photo

Hi, there is your file File:New_Orleans_from_space.LO.jpeg and I think there should be better version on http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/Collections/EarthFromSpace/ for example with http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/Collections/EarthFromSpace/city.htm - http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/Collections/EarthFromSpace/query.pl?CITYVIEW=NEW%20ORLEANS&RESULTS=GRAPHICAL&BOOLCV=OR (only 5 photos). And there are more images in http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/ "Search by Map Area" - type "New Orleans" and select the city, then click Search images in Drawn Box. They have larger versions of many photos, for example http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?mission=ISS042&roll=E&frame=254692 http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?mission=ISS038&roll=E&frame=6966 http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/DatabaseImages/ESC/large/ISS038/ISS038-E-6966.JPG . `A5b ([[User talk:A5b|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate JarektBot ([[User talk:JarektBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies ([[User talk:Ies|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:02, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Sreejith K ([[User talk:Sreejithk2000|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate GregorB ([[User talk:GregorB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reventtalk 20:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate - Reventtalk 01:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate - Reventtalk 02:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Renaming videos

Please see Commons:Village_pump#Renaming_videos. Thanks. - Reventtalk 10:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Joschi71 ([[User talk:Joschi71|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


Template:Autotranslate

--Gampe ([[User talk:Gampe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jon Kolbert ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Meetup

Hey, I see you've uploaded quite a few videos about the east of the Netherlands. Would you be interested in going to a meetup of Wikipedians in the Netherlands? There's a meetup every other week on Saturday in Utrecht. See the schedule at the WMNL wiki. --Vera (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Zenwort ([[User talk:Zenwort|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Valerialucatello ([[User talk:Valerialucatello|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Fl.schmitt ([[User talk:Fl.schmitt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Fl.schmitt ([[User talk:Fl.schmitt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 2A02:8108:9FC0:1F80:13:C321:1F75:D083 21:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Lint error in signature

Hello as there is a lint error (usage of obsolete font tags), kindly change your signature in Special:Preferences from [[User:Quahadi|<font color="Red">'''Quahadi'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Quahadi|'''<font color="Orange">Añtó</font>''']] to [[User:Quahadi|<span style="color:Red;">'''Quahadi'''</span>]] [[User talk:Quahadi|'''<span style="color:Orange;">Añtó</span>''']]. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 06:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 06:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Lint error in signature

Hi, just wondering if you would be willing to update your sig to change the font tags to span tags? The reason is that font tags are deprecated and show up at Lint errors, so it's best not to use them for new content. Thanks. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Sig HTML
Current: Quahadi Añtó [[User:Quahadi|<font color="Red">'''Quahadi'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Quahadi|'''<font color="Orange">Añtó</font>''']]
Proposed: Quahadi Añtó [[User:Quahadi|<span style="color:Red;">'''Quahadi'''</span>]] [[User talk:Quahadi|'''<span style="color:Orange;">Añtó</span>''']]


Thanks!--Quahadi Añtó 20:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Silberštejn ([[User talk:Silberštejn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Silberštejn ([[User talk:Silberštejn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Silberštejn ([[User talk:Silberštejn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

to be clear: the is staying because it needs to be documented that there are people who produce garbage like this, not because it isn't antisemitic. It is still very reprehensible to trivialize the Holocaust like this. You paint yourself as a victim when it's the immunocompromised who need to isolate themselves while this deadly virus is allowed to continue to spread. You can do your part to stop that spread by getting vaccinated or by staying home as well. Vera (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
NOTED!
We agree that we disagree!
FORCING people to take certain medication Was up to recently labelled as "forced medical experiment" and people who participated in that were tried and executed. Quahadi Añtó 06:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
It is needless to say that I have heard on many occasions how unvaccinated people were to be put in "reservations" and their civil rights heavily restricted.
I would rather not quote other insults.
Sounds familiar? Quahadi Añtó 07:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
This is a blatant lie, unvaccinated people are asked to stay home and not pose a threat to others. You know who really liked to lie about being prosecuted? The truth is that it's a privilege to be able to gather in large groups again after a pandemic. If you choose to not get vaccinated than it's your choice to extend the pandemic and either do the responsible thing of self isolating yourself or not do the responsible thing and letting people become permanently disabled or even die. It's a sign of an extremely privileged life that this is a first for you that your choices have a consequence. Vera (talk) 16:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
The nazis were also very far from the only people in history to ever perform unethical medical experiments. The most unethical medical experiment in history was the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which for 40 years witheld cheap adequate medical treatment from African Americans infected with syphilis, long after the introduction of antibiotics. The actual nazis were also very fond of letting what they saw as undeserving groups die by witholding medical care like providing vaccinations.[1] You are currently choosing to experiment with your own health by refusing preventative medicine that has already gone through rigorous trials. This puts you in the group of people who are 15 times more likely to end up in the hospital after they get infected with COVID. There it is far more likely that you will get still experimental medication that are being developed for accute COVID patients that are close to death. You are not the victim here. You are the baddie. --Vera (talk) 11:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

unvaxxed

@Vera Founding fathers of US wrote Constitution of the United States that guarantees basic human rights ( that people like you now interpret as „priviledges“) in despite the fact that period small pox pandemics was in that period. A small pox is a proper „pandemic“, disease was killing (!!!) 30% of infected , compared to covid where most of „infected“ stay at home complaining on facebook. Yes, the vaccine did help to eradicate it. But covid vaccined does not have neither the close effect as advertised. And for people under 50 is necessary as sun block in January in Sweden. What Mengele & co were doing is not appalling because it was disgusting itself. ( btw, I hardly know anybody who enjoys any medical treeatments, vaccines, infusions etc. ) it was shocking because it was done without proper consent. That is what you obviously fail to realize. Lack of consent is something what can turn something perfectly fine into a crime ( for instance lack of consent is what defines something as rape, burglary) That is why mengele fled to South America-he obviously knew he was doing smth wrong.

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_Schilling was hanged because of that. With a reason ! So should be everybody pushing for this experiment. (Yes, Experiment!!) I will tell that you, common people, parliament deputies, cardinals in vatican. Regardless whether people are from Croatia, Germany, The Netherlands, Israel- you name it!

You push for house arrest (yes, that is the proper term for „self-isolation“) of completely innocent people but you find yourself offended with a comparison to the guys in M35 stahlhelm. Freedom is not a reward for compliance- that is how prison system works.

You push for vaccine mandates but you do not thrust them to protect you in Case of contact with 1 single unvaccinated individual. Ineresting!

As far as I am concerned you can vaccinate yourself every month. Perfectly fine! Biontech now claims that their 4th dose protects mininum for 1 month. That is is a significant advance ( LOL) compared to last year when they claimed practically that 2 dosis secure you immortality! The 5th dose will „protect“ us for, I guess, 1 week ( LOL) take it if you want . But, please, let us others live in peace! --Quahadi Añtó 10:13, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Btw, I expect in September ( or even sooner!) new waves and new types of covid-19. and therefore -new restrictions! Unvaxxed refugees from Ukraine will be blamed for, of course!--Quahadi Añtó 10:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ponor ([[User talk:Ponor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Argo Navis ([[User talk:Argo Navis|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

  1. See the right-wing diatribes falsely comparing vaccine mandates to the Nazis