User talk:Ptyx
.JPG){kind=link}
,_about_420-400_BC,_British_Museum_(14237128366).jpg){kind=link}
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. abf /talk to me/ 20:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 8a4b7403e687571e8a4689d5998f8288[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
S'il te plait, upload la refaite photo de nouveau sous un autre nom. Ne change pas de maniere si drastique la photo, car elle me plait comme ca. Setreset (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:Vespasian's Camp.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Africa 2020[edit]
| Contribute to Wiki Loves Africa and to how the world sees Africa! | Contribuez à Wiki Loves Africa et impactez la façon dont le monde voit l’Afrique! |
|---|---|
| Dear Ptyx In the past, you contributed to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. This February, you have another opportunity to create beautiful photographs on the theme of "transportation" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa. As with previous years, there are also many exciting cash prizes. Wiki Loves Africa is an annual public contest where people across Africa can contribute media (photographs, video and audio) about their environment to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation. Images from the competition have helped millions learn more about Africa and see Africa more clearly from an African perspective. Overall, nearly 5000 people like you have contributed to this photo contest, and contributed 18,000 images about Africa. When does it take place? The 2020 competition will start on the 15th of February 2020 and close on 31st March 2020. What should we contribute? Pictures ! audios ! videos ! The theme for the 2020 contest is... Africa on the Move ! This theme encompasses a host of approaches and is intentionally open to interpretation. It encourages the submission of visual representations of movement or transportation, whether by path, road, sea air, by self-propelled, animal or mechanical means, or the historical or contemporary structures that have been created to facilitate movement or the transportation of people, goods, or animals. In addition to the value your photos contribute to understanding and African visibility, there are several prizes on offer. The international prizes are:
Additional categories are:
For rules and information about how to participate, or to join the contest, click on Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest. Warmest, Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team |
Cher ou chère Ptyx, Au cours des années passées, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Ce mois de février vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème du "transport", qui pourraient profondément modifier la façon dont le reste du monde voit l’Afrique et comprend ses habitants et ses coutumes. Bonus, comme lors des années précédentes, il y a plusieurs prix à la clé. Wiki Loves Africa un concours public annuel où chacun est invité à partager des illustrations via Wikimedia Commons, en rapport avec le thème de l’année, illustrations qui pourront être utilisées sur Wikipédia ou les autres sites de la Wikimedia Foundation. Les photos collectées par le passé dans le cadre du concours ont aidé des millions de personne à mieux connaitre et comprendre l’Afrique et à la voir selon une perspective africaine. Au cours des dernières années, près de 5000 personnes comme vous ont contribué au concours, un total de 18,000 photos sur l’Afrique. Quand le concours se déroule t-il? Le concours 2020 démarre le 15 février 2020 et cloture le 31 mars 2020. Quelles sont les contenus attendus? Des photos ! Des enregistrements audio ! Des vidéos ! Le thème du concours 2020 est ... Le transport. Ce thème englobe de nombreuses approches, il est aussi intentionnellement ouvert à l’interprétation. Le thème Transport ! encourage à proposer des représentations liées au mouvement ou au transport, que ce soit par la route, ou l’air, ou l’eau, de façon auto-propulsée ou avec l’aide de la force animale ou mécanique, ou bien également les structures architecturales historiques ou contemporaines qui sont à l’origine ou ont facilité le mouvement et le transport des êtres humains, des animaux ou des biens. En plus de la valeur intrinsèque que vos photos apportent pour une meilleure visibilité et compréhension de l’Afrique à travers le monde, il y a de nombreux prix à gagner. Les prix internationaux sont les suivants:
Catégories additionnelles:
Chaque gagnant recevra également des cadeaux supplémentaires tels qu'une casquette "I edit Wikipedia from Africa", une batterie portable, des stickers... Des prix supplémentaires seront offerts dans certains pays. Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation et pour participer au concours, cliquez sur Participer au concours Wiki Loves Africa. Bien à vous, Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa |
|
File:Vieux tours, escalier-galeries, 60 rue Colbert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Desprez37 (talk) 09:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Vieux tours, 23 rue Albert Thomas, maison XIIIe siècle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Desprez37 (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Vieux Tours, Quartier Saint-Gatien, 124,126 rue Colbert XVe,XVIe et XVIIIe siècle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Desprez37 (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Vieux tours, n° 49 rue Georges Courteline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Desprez37 (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Yufka yapımı.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Yufka yapımı.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Yufka yapımı.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I found you claim ".... soit des rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage d'images d'autres contributeurs." I just wanted to edit pictures about Bosra and found you had decided to change my pictures. I want you to stop that, I do not think you are "rectifying" them, but just ruining my originals. I am good with Photoshop and do my own correcting if I find it necessary. I confess I sometimes rectify pictures by others, but only if they are, for instance, deeply underexposed, have the wrong colour, or are obviously lopsided. By the way: I will overwrite your edits, as I will put in their stead full size pictures. Don't touch them.
- After writing till here I checked some other edits that you made. I find you too brighten pictures that seem underexposed. I find that rather acceptable, but .... The point is: I visited Bosra on an overcast day and wanted to preserve the atmosphere, both inside buildings (such as in Al-Omari Mosque (Bosra)) and outside. Your edits bring out some more detail, but ruin that atmosphere. And on one of the pictures where you straightened the Bâb al-Quandil there is, in the right bottom corner, the kind of white space that appears if you use the straighten option and forget to check if you stayed within the cadre. I always fill such a white space somehow, and do think you added an error to my picture. Also: when editing the pictures I sometimes have to choose between tilting the picture and get more details of the sides in the frame, or correct that tilt. Doing so, I lose details at the edge, which is what you did. I had made my choice, and don't like you correcting. A last reason: my pictures are often used in publications (120 and counting). I get requests for them, and usually send the originals and edits through the web. But as I am now putting edits on Commons as full sized originals, I may invite such authors and photo-editors to just download them from the Commons. This may be more important once I’m dead. And I do not like the thought they might be downloading your “rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage” instead. There are plenty of pictures that need improving in Commons, but please leave mine alone. Dosseman (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Bonjour Ptyx,
Je découvre la nouvelle version de ce fichier que j'ai importé et que tu as modifié. Pour ce qui concerne le cadrage, j'avais volontairement importé une image de la maison dans son environnement (j'en ai d'ailleurs importé d'autres où la maison est mieux cadrée, voir la catégorie). Donc je préférerais que la nouvelle version soit importée sous un autre nom, d'ici là je me permets de remettre la version originale. Cordialement, Floflo (talk) 09:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Pas de problème, fais comme tu l'entends... Pour rappel tout de même, nous sommes dans le domaine de la photographie documentaire, pas de la photo d'art. Les images dans Wikipedia étant destinées à montrer les choses tout d'abord sous forme de vignette, il y a tout intérêt à réduire les marges vides. D'autre part, il n'est guère conseillé de sous-exposer à ce point les photos, même si cela a été la mode à une certaine période. Ptyx (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Temple of Apollo Epikourios at Bassae (Greece), about 420-400 BC, British Museum (14237128366).jpg[edit]
,_about_420-400_BC,_British_Museum_(14237128366).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:Temple of Apollo Epikourios at Bassae (Greece), about 420-400 BC, British Museum (14237128366).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
,_about_420-400_BC,_British_Museum_(14237128366).jpg){kind=link}
C messier (talk) 10:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
You are persistent in editing works that I requested not to be touched (two today). In July I wrote, regarding other work by me:
I found you claim ".... soit des rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage d'images d'autres contributeurs." I just wanted to edit pictures about Bosra and found you had decided to change my pictures. I want you to stop that, I do not think you are "rectifying" them, but just ruining my originals. I am good with Photoshop and do my own correcting if I find it necessary. I confess I sometimes rectify pictures by others, but only if they are, for instance, deeply underexposed, have the wrong colour, or are obviously lopsided. By the way: I will overwrite your edits, as I will put in their stead full size pictures. Don't touch them. - After writing till here I checked some other edits that you made. I find you too brighten pictures that seem underexposed. I find that rather acceptable, but .... The point is: I visited Bosra on an overcast day and wanted to preserve the atmosphere, both inside buildings (such as in Al-Omari Mosque (Bosra)) and outside. Your edits bring out some more detail, but ruin that atmosphere. And on one of the pictures where you straightened the Bâb al-Quandil there is, in the right bottom corner, the kind of white space that appears if you use the straighten option and forget to check if you stayed within the cadre. I always fill such a white space somehow, and do think you added an error to my picture. Also: when editing the pictures I sometimes have to choose between tilting the picture and get more details of the sides in the frame, or correct that tilt. Doing so, I lose details at the edge, which is what you did. I had made my choice, and don't like you correcting. A last reason: my pictures are often used in publications (120 and counting). I get requests for them, and usually send the originals and edits through the web. But as I am now putting edits on Commons as full sized originals, I may invite such authors and photo-editors to just download them from the Commons. This may be more important once I’m dead. And I do not like the thought they might be downloading your “rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage” instead. There are plenty of pictures that need improving in Commons, but please leave mine alone.
Yet you did it again, ruining the atmosphere of approaching rain on pictures that I found true to the situatioon as I found it, not as what you think it should have been. Other "improvers" used my pictures as a copy, that would be alright with me. But do not claim to "improve" my own. You seem to be a "levels" maniac, but I can decide levels myself.Also I read your statement in answer to someone else "Pour rappel tout de même, nous sommes dans le domaine de la photographie documentaire, pas de la photo d'art." I find that pretty arrogant. Dosseman (talk) 14:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour, vous avez mille fois raison : les photos sous-exposées 4 fois font de bien meilleurs documents pour notre projet encyclopédique. Merci pour vos précieux téléversements et votre gentillesse infinie. Ptyx (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Je sens une certaine ironie, mais c'est un prix que je paierai volontiers pour être débarrassé de vos interventions. Comme j'utilise un équipement professionnel et me souviens très bien des conditions météorologiques lors de la prise de vue, je laisserai la "sous-exposition quatre fois" à votre perspicacité supérieure. Dosseman (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:The Acropolis Museum as seen from the top of the Acropolis hill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
