User talk:Pfctdayelise/Archive03

This is an archive of inactive discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

• User talk:Pfctdayelise/Archive01
• User talk:Pfctdayelise/Archive02

Image:Myriophyllum spicatum.jpeg

Sorry for answering so late, but over the last 3 weeks I was really busy. Please delete that picture. The aquatic plant can't be determined correctly and in the german wikipedia it is said that this picture is also obsolete. Fabelfroh 10:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Images to be deleted

Thank you very much for the suggestion!

Yesterday I went through most of the help pages and documentation on commons and I was not able to find any specific information about this problem. Even the topic how to request a page deletion is a well kept secret. I'm not blaming anybody, I'm just rying to explain why I downloaded a new version of the pictures. I'm sure many other users are experiencing the same problems. --Folini 15:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I tried very hard, but the result is that I created a different picture without replacing the original one. For example I was trying to replace the Casa di Riposo per Musicisti a Milano.png with teh equivalent jpg version. I selected Upload a new version of this image from the page of the image to replace and as first result I recived an error message like corrupted file (infact, the destination file name was still .png, while the downloaded file was .jpg). Then I changed the destination file name name to match the souce file name as .jpg) and the download succeded, but as a result now I have two different pictures:

• PNG version
• JPG version

Please, can you explain how I can just replace a picture switching file format?

One more question, how long it take for a picture to be deleted after i added the picture to the category Candidates for speedy deletion?

Thank you, --Folini 06:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:LT-Army-Student Officer.jpg speedy deletion

Er, why exactly is "LT-Army-OF1d.jpg" a better name? It seems more cryptic, and thus less useful, IMO. Is the original name inaccurate? pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh no there is a reason for that. Rank insignias comes in series. If is very easy to use them when file is named like this. The original name of the rank exists on the article description page.

1. LT is Latvias code (I dont mind its rename to LAT and I am kicking myself for not doing this)
2. Army is the branch, I also intend to do Navy, Air force etc.
3. OF-1d is the NATO equavalent code. OF-5 would be colonel, OF-1d is cadet/student officer.

See the usage of such images in Ranks and insignia of NATO armies officers.

Hope this explains the matter. I can explain in greater detail if you'd like that. :)

--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 15:28, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Image-Mexico template.png deletion

Raison: Uploaded twice, better image at Image:Mexico template.png Pseudomoi 15:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Brat Albert.JPG deletion

OK. Never mind. It is a clear deletion case and I thought I was helping. But perhaps it's none of my business. Wlos 18:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

w:Trademark dilution

What are you trying to say here? And what does Commons:Licensing mean by "generally"? Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 20:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I removed the GFDL's

Hi,

A little bit late, but that is because I was away. The GFDL's are removed from the images like you asked, I think i've had them all now. If not feel free to change those which still need to be changed. Thanks SportsPhotographer 07:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:France with Corsica (demis).png

Hi, I noticed your message about the Subject. I did as you suggested, I added the COM:DEL tag in place of the one you removed. Anyway, it's quite hard to understand what needs to be discussed about the blatant falsification of that map, as anyone can easily verify by taking a look at any ACCURATE map or, better, satellite image of the interested area. Thanks. --Piero Montesacro 13:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. Meanwhile - and before being able to read your latest message sent to me - I had added a numer of new COM:DEL tags to other maps very similar to the one in subject, all of them featuring the same blatant geographic falsification:

1. Image:Saumur dot.jpg
2. Image:Nantes dot.png
3. Image:Les Sables dot.JPG
4. Image:Fontenay-le-Comte dot.png
5. Image:Cholet dot.JPG
6. Image:Bordeaux dot2.png

Interestingly, at least in the one case (Image:Bordeaux dot2.png), checking the history you can see that the first image posted - which was accurate - was later intentionally replaced with the bogus one. It seems that some French users are a bit clueless not to say careless much about map accuracy: very recently, as you can check here, one of them agreed with my remarks and fixed more than 100 images on Commons which were inaccurate in the same way of the ones I pointed out above. This is IMHO not an unimportant matter, because we, as Wikipedia, are servicing literally hundreds of bogus maps of France to the whole world. I believe that it could be the case to sensibilize the French Wikipedia about the problem, since in France there are even governamental institutions which do distribute similar maps, in spite of the HARD FACT that they are obviosly and blatantly INACCURATE and MISLEADING: for example, take the following image: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:France_departements.png As you can see, the latest version FEATURES a separation line indicating that the island of Corsica was displaced from its real position (actually, it would have been entirely outside in such map, if it was accurate) but if you check the previous versions, there was NO indication of the displacement performed. Furthermore, if you check the source of the map ([http://www.ign.fr/affiche_rubrique.asp?rbr_id=445&lng_id=FR) you discover that its distributor is the National Geographical Institute of France!!! Now, please, be so kind to check this ACTUAL satellite image of the region and see by yourself what they dared to do: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Frankrijk_satelliet.jpg and this other image as well: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Satellite_image_of_France_in_August_2002.jpg

here are more ACCURATE maps of France which do prove my point. Please don't esitate in contacting me again if you need any further information. More thanks, --Piero Montesacro 19:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, just a reminder: more than one week has passed and nothing seems to have happened. Please advice. Thanks, --Piero Montesacro 17:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, and thank you so much for your prompt removal of the first one of the images that I had candidated for their deletion. Is there any reason that prevents removing the other ones that I mentioned here? More Thanks --Piero Montesacro 14:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for bothering you again: just discovered another in this series: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:La_Roche_sur_Yon_dot2.png Could you be so kind to consider adding it to the others I listed earlier? THANKS!!! --Piero Montesacro 23:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Foo_1.jpg alive and kickin'

1. Sic! (I hope you like it - could be (from my part, is intended to be, if acceptable, as a Don't-demo picture as well on JPEGitis as on Not-to-be-used templates).
2. As I (hopefully) created "Category:W.'sTests" as a sub-category of yours, is it reasonable to put both categories into the discription, or rather not? TX, WolfgangW. 13:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Respuesta

Sorry, but I'm not speak English. I'm speak Spanish. Gabri-co 16:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Quality

Hi, you're right about the quality. I don't like to change the old pictures again though, but as you might have already seen I've uploaded higher quality images now and I will be adding more. SportsPhotographer 00:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Have a look, please

here.--WolfgangW. 09:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Immagine 011.jpg deletion

Sorry, I uploaded the image twice in error, but the real name of the image is Image:Torino 2006 casa Italia.jpg. I've added this link also to the Image:Immagine 011.jpg page. Thank you :-) --Trek00 10:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:Map of Streams in Lycoming and Sullivan Counties Pennsylvania.png deletion

Thanks for deleting it - I changed the name because I realized I would have to eventually make a separate map for Sullivan County (there are two major streams/watersheds in it that are not clear in the deleted map). Since the new map showed strams and watersheds for Lycoming County, PA I changed the name to Image:Major Watersheds in Lycoming County Pennsylvania.PNG. I appreciate the help and am sorry for the extra work for you. Thanks again, Ruhrfisch 17:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Rather don't have a look, please

Hi, I try hard to merge existing talks with you and Arnomane on more-or-less same themes, which will take me at least 24 hrs from now on, I suppose. Beeing somewhat overwhelmed, I'd beg for silence until I can give silence fini for my talk page. As I watch your page, please leave messages here, in case there would be any need. tx, 103%+ wikistressed w. ;) WolfgangW. 20:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

A.Perfect.Beginner's Lots of Questions

Whilst being in troubles on my own talk page, I would like to collect answers there which I meanwhile might get e.g. here. Please "push" my questions to places like VP, HD or wherever by just marking then vp, he or whatever, mark by ?? what is not understandable or by "---" what you are not willing or able to answer. In such cases, I'd remove the question from here and put it there. Of course I'm glad about all I get, in case you have the time and like to answer here, but I'm somewhat afraid I might askt too many questions - in such case, please just tell me to STOP.

Would it be wise

to establish another User-Subpage of mine for that intended Collection, or shall I use the Talk page for that?

Definition of "Third Party"?

What I wanted to express by "Third party" is: anbody but the uploader and some obvious.owner.of.rights. I ask you as a native English speaker whether this term might be understood in such broad sense, thereby including eg. also some person photographed by me, who has to agree before uploading? I think "Duesis" understanding ot the term might be too »narrow«. So, I ask : Can third party mean what I tried to explain - yes-or-no, and in case of no, can you please possibly give me better or the correct words for it? —WolfgangW. 08:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

May we erase my questions from here,

as you answer them on my page anyways? I (imho) would just leave the heading, and I would just sign in to inform you that I have new attacks, on my page, which you are politely asked to look after? Or is there some reason that such would not be perfect? _T.P.B 13:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Annie IP's serious jokes Nr1.png

Annie IP 10:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC) One more question: would it be some hint for the public on not to mistake my name as a Woman's name, if I spelled it Anni IP or Anny IP?

On editing "First Steps"

Hello, I start a dummie- or demoversion of "Beginners First Steps" on Commons:Erste Schritte which I discuss on Commons talk:First steps. Would you please have a look at it? I might need some protection for my idea, which seriously differs from acual First Steps by using several more little pages. As beeing in a flame war with (at least) one of the German admins, I'm afraid I might not be able to show my thing running before it would possibly be killed. TX, Wolfgang Annie IP 19:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Raw translations, as done by now (should be sufficient for evaluating):

1. "Main" First Steps-Page: User:Huitzlipochtli III./Annie IP's 1st
2. Commons:Account anlegen (DE) (=Create Account) almost self-explaining, I think
3. Commons:Upload file (English version)

See also:

• Image:Example.png ——Annie IP 07:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Bug found

This is just to let you know - has no imortance to my work. I will not present this to Bugzilla, feeling too uncertain about the How-to. Compare to

Which is: "x" directly before the double closing brackets prevent this picture from scaling properly - took me some time to find out ;) Best, w. —Annie IP 05:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Cool Cat

Hello! Thank you for taking the time to vote for me in my recent request for adminship. It ended with a final score of (8/10) and hece failed to reach concensus. I value all of the contributions made during the process and I will take a special note of the constructive criticism regarding interacting with users in the user talk space. If you have questions, or requests, please leave a message. --Cool CatTalk|@ 12:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Request about Chinese user

Hi. Could you do my a little favour? The User:Melop has uploaded Image:SH-2-196 Bauhinia championi.jpg. It would be really nice if someone could check zh:User:Melop just to see if he appears to be a trustworthy user and if there is a way to contact him about image licenses.

I've heard China has had some Wikipedia connectivity problem since October 2005 (government censorship). But maybe inactive users still respond to emails, perhaps?

Cheers, Fred Chess 00:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:thelimit.jpg

If on en: an image is uploaded and it's inmediately used to vandalize several pages by the uploader I will speedy it (common sense, since it's obvious the uploader doesn't plan to use it on articles). I don't know how things are done in common, so I went ahead and tagged it, maybe I did wrong. The commons admin that saw it could either delete the image or just remove the tag and follow whatever proper procedure is. Drini 00:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

oh and about if he was blocked, and I don't recall top of my head the username to check, can you help me with that? Drini 00:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh I finally found it (had t owade through a hundred of contribs of blocked users ;) Here's the link: [1] and he was indeed blocked. Drini 02:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree he needs not to be blocked hre, I was just giving you feedback on why I proposed the image to be deleted since it was uloaded just for such actions. Drini 23:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Costarican money

I will research about it, but I'm pretty sure there is no such copyright law in our country. We have a very light copyright law and it will hardly include coins images. But I will find out for sure and if they are not considered my work just because I scanned them, then I guess we can change the license, right? Or do I have to delete them? Thanks for your comments! --Murven 06:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

The following links take you to the documents of our copyright laws. They do not seem to mention the coins or anything alike. But I will send them to a lawyer for consulting. I guess for the moment I'll change the license to PD.

• http://www.cfia.or.cr/leyes/LE-043%20Propiedad%20Intelectual.doc
• http://www.cfia.or.cr/leyes/LE-114%20Ley%20de%20derechos%20de%20autor%20y%20derechos%20conexos%206683.doc

--Murven 06:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Ready, I changed them all to {{PD-ineligible}}. If the lawyer tells me I cannot use the images I will delete them. Thanks! --Murven 07:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Redundant

Hi. I deleted only images orphaned in all wiki projects (cheched with check usage) and onl images with image:cross.jpg. I think that it isn't a problem for local projects, because the images wasn't usable because was only image:cross.jpg and no project uses the image that I delete. If I delete some not orphaned images, is a mistake, and I didn't want do it. --RED DEVIL 666 07:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I know. Sorry, I don't know it. But I thought that orphan images of cross.jpg are candidate to speed deletion. Now I don't do it more. Thank for information. --RED DEVIL 666 16:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Yarl

Thank you for information, I have written request to user Yarl at Polish Wiki user page -PioM 11:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

thanx for your remarks [2]. We have time, It doesn't great problem whether the deletion is speedy or not so speedy, I think :-) Gubbubu 13:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Licensing

Hello, I'm writing to explain situation about images like Image:Primus93.jpg. This and other images were from enWiki, so I copy them into Commons. Sorry for troubles, it will be better if you delete them. Regards. Yarl.pl ^talk 15:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Latvian copyright

Hello Pfctdayelise,

I don't know whether you found my answer on my own talk page, regarding the deletion of a picture I uploaded in good faith but bad knowledge today.

I'm not familiar with this plethoria of rules and did so in good faith, assuming that these tags were equivalent. I reject your accusation of "bending the rule just because ..." but am sorry for wrongful doing. --—Gf1961 15:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

After that I checked a few pages and actually found the text of the Latvian copyright law in English [[3]]. I'm really a complete novice to such regulations. Could you please give me a hand and check Section 6,1, whether you would consider the use of that photo and others of similar sources as acceptable for commons and tell me, which license template would be the correct one to use. Thank you in advance, --—Gf1961 19:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Paris-TGV-Icon.JPG

Hi. Of course, I can provide You info on files i used to make this icon:

• Image:Eiffel Tower, full-view looking toward the Trocadero, Exposition Universal, 1900, Paris, France.jpg - PD picture, I used some image processing filters in order to obtain only an Eiffel Tower Silhouette on white background,
• Image:Tgv-icon.png - double sized (compared to original icon), originally a photo made by David Monniaux, modified to a icon by Schutz, released under under CC-BY-SA license.

I added this info on a picture description page and I changed the license type.

Removed redundancytag

... from Image:North Brabant-Flag.png. Please have a look at what I wrote here. I also posted this with Quistnix, as he is more familiar with use of templates within templates, which is what this will cause in a number of articles. Noorse 12:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Roomba

Hey there. Do you think we should allow User:Roomba to continue its tagging campaign? It's tagging about 2 images per minute. It's done about 300 so far, and no telling when it will stop. User:dbenbenn 01:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

At the current rate it will take a bit over 10 hours to complete. If you block it I'll just have danny unblock it.--Gmaxwell 01:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

My post in the Village Pump here

Hiya, you've now been officially appointed as my Commons-helper ;-). Did you see my post in the VP: Commons:Village_pump#Sound_files_with_the_pronunciation_of_Dutch_municipalities? Do you think it's possible to do it the way I suggested? My post here's 'cause I'm a bit, hmm can't find the word, let's say eager to get an answer. Cheers, NielsF 02:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I answered on my commons talkpage, for the next half hour or so I'll be checking that, otherwise, please follow my "instructions" on the top of that page. Thanks for the help sofar. NielsF 05:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Ping! See my commons talkpage. NielsF 16:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Did you see my response here?. (No need to spam my Dutch page anymore by the way, I'll check my commons one regularly) NielsF 02:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

In response to your last post: allrighty then. I'll contact a bot owner after Quichot has uploaded all the correct files. Thanks again for your help! NielsF 03:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Category scheme playing cards

Seems a shame to delete such work. Why don't we just move it to Suggested category scheme for playing cards or some such, out of the Commons namespace? pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree, it's a shame. A lot of work was spent on that, but it was all wasted. Anyway, feel free to remove the {{D}} if you like. But I think it should stay in the Commons namespace if it's kept at all. User:dbenbenn 08:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Trentreznorcc.jpg

I stated quite explicity in the summary that I messaged the owner and she explicity licensed it under a free creative commons license. Please read the summary next time.--Fallout boy 08:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I messaged her and and got permission specifically to license it under a commercial attribution-sharealike license. As for why it says all rights reserved, either she hasn't updated its licensing information or can't individually license photos. --Fallout boy 08:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• As for the name credit, I didn't think that was a violation of the no derivs licensing since one of the CC licensing terms is to allow the author to select their attribution manner. But if it is, I'll double check w/ the owner to make sure she knows the exact licensing terms. I'm sorry if I sounded moody in my first reply, but based on the initial missing info tag I thought you may have not read the summary.--Fallout boy 08:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• • I posted the permission here, and want to make sure I have adequate documentation.--Fallout boy 21:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bandera de Vila-real.svg deletion

You want to replace an SVG with a PNG??? Normally it's the other way around. Please confirm. pfctdayelise 04:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I confirm. That's because an svg of that same flag already exists, and specially I needed the png for an existing template. It was a mistake to upload the svg, please delete it, thank you. Simkin 10:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Sunset

Yes, I know, thank you. But in this case the SVG - because the color profile - don't was the best quality colors. If you are sysop, please, delete for me. thanks, FML ^hi 12:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm so sorry! Thank you. The SVG version don't be good, look the PNG versions, now it's very good: Image:Dia2.png to Image:Dia17.png. FML ^hi 15:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

OK! Thank you!! hugs, FML ^hi 15:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Angband.png

I'm not sure if you can follow the discussion on my page, please be patient with me.

I have tried answering the copyright question, to the best of my knowledge. Check it out on my discussion.

Mikelima 12:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick answer. I actually already tried asking the current maintainer - let's see how things proceed.

Actually, the problem is simply that Angband was borne in a period predating the open source / free software rationalization, and the original authors are hard to contact, by now. And while Angband has lots of variations, they are all based (at least in part) on the original code. So, bad luck.

If I were to just put a rendition of this (just made up "by hand") would it be ok?

 #########
 #$...## 
 #....## #
 #..@...+
 #########

Not that it makes lots of sense, I realize.

I have browsed the angband sites, and I discovered this:

the opensource situation

So at least the authors are aware of the problem.

Mikelima 14:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Jan Potocki

I know. One of users on pl.wiki found page on witch this guy was named translator of his works. I can ask my girlfriend for sure (she is studying Polish literature :) .--WarX 19:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

welcome back

Thanks for the "welcome back"! I was busy (and I still am in many ways) for the last week and more, so I could not participate as often as I would like to. I'm back for now though, which is good. -- WB 01:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Can you please put a link to the correctly named image when requesting speedy deletion? eg Image:Star Trek Film S1 OF6.png. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Star Trek Film S1 OF6.png was renamed as Image:Star Trek Film OF6.png. Films dont have seasons. OF7 OF8 OF9 and OF10 had a similar rename. I already reuploaded the image and renamed all referances to the old image interwiki. Yes, I did my homework.

If I were an admin I could clean up my mess more effectively and save you time but I am not entrusted with such access. Meanwhile I only ask you to trust me with the images I uploaded myself, especialy with rank insignias. It is very stressful to deal with 1000+ images, it is muc more stressfull if one screws up. It is likely I would forget to mention the exact title of the newer image as my errors often cost me hours of tedious work.

I understand any deletion on comons have interwiki results which is why admins need to be careful but I believe you would appriciate my position perhaps?

--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 03:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I hope you don't feel that I am being petty or singling you out because I wasn't, at all. And I wasn't meaning to criticise you, just seek more information. And this is especially not about your unsuccessful RfA. It's just my speedy deletion procedure. It doesn't matter what the image is or who requested it for deletion, I always check to make sure that the duplicate is in fact the same, because it's so easy to make a mistake and edit the wrong page or c&p the wrong thing or whatever. I leave similar messages on the talk pages of newbies. I leave similar messages on the talk pages of admins. We're all only human. Usually people put a link to the other image, or if they don't I can check in their Gallery and it's usually right next to the one requesting deletion. It's only because you have so many uploads that I couldn't check in this way. It is likely I would forget to mention the exact title of the newer image as my errors often cost me hours of tedious work. I am not sure what you mean by this, since I am trying to avoid errors too.

I do consider you a valuable and reliable member of the community - I wouldn't have asked you for the favour of translating for me if I didn't. Again I'm sorry if you got the wrong impression about the intention of my message here. pfctdayelise (translate?) 06:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

No harm done. I see what you got there, hmm... I'll be more carefull in the future. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 22:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Slaciner

Another message. I think this user speaks Turkish. Could you please leave them a strongly-worded translation of what I wrote. They have uploaded a lot of images now so I am quite suspicious. Please tag any as incomplete source by {{no source since|month=March|day=13|year=2006}} or speedy delete obvious copyvios with {{Delete}}. Thanks for your help, pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I'll process the images soon, I already msged the person in question. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 03:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Admin?

Thanks for your question about the nomination for an admin. I have read COM:A and I think I can "work" this and like to help here on Wikimedia. Don't like self nominations. So when you like to nominate me, it will be fine. -- skINMATE 10:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Deletionrequests

thanks for informing me! .. I knew how to tag images without source: if i put some on deletionrequest it was maybe by mistake! sorry for this, thanks for the information and keep working that hard! excellent! ...Sicherlich ^Post 09:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Gratitude

Thankyou very much Pfctdayelise for sending an email to ask permission for this "image:TJC.jpg". Your help is gratefully appreciated. May God bless you and may you prosper!

Regards -- Joseph, 20:33 Friday 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Carter Pic.jpg

No, I'm not an admin on en, but earlier today the person who uploaded this pic used it under 3 different IPs and user names to replace pictures in articles with it. It was speedily deleted off of en, but when I went to check the picture, it was now linked from Commons.

I'm not sure what goes on here at commons, so thanks for the link to that page. I've put it on my watchlist. I go by the same name on en. tv316 02:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:cc-by-sa-2.5-jp

I know there is a 2.1. After all, I made the Commons:Creative Commons copyright tags page through manually trying every single combination =]
I notified the user who created the template a few days ago, so the deletion can go ahead. Thanks! —UED77 03:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Edit: Looks like I'm a bit late, too :) —UED77 03:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Picture ssire

FR: Je ne parle pas Anglais. toutes mes contributions sont DP-self. Pouvez vous mettre à jour ? Merci

EO: Mi ne parolas la anglan. ĉiu miaj kontribuaĵoj estas DP-self. ĉu eblas al vi xi ĝisdatigi ? Dankon.

--Ssire 09:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Deletion request

I requested deletion of the US-DeptOfHHS-Seal because I became uncertain as to whether it is public domain or not. I haven't found the source, and although it is a symbol of a US government agency, it doesn't, as far as I know, necessarily have to be public domain (unless produced by the US government). ---Marcus- 09:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Your comments on en.wp

Thanks for the update and encouragement on image copyright "discussions", best feydey 01:15, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

image cat - thx

Sorry, and thanks for fixing Gnangarra 02:51, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Logoboy95

Please ban him permanently as soon as possible, he is reverting all deletion request added to his BS and copyvio articles. Maybe take a look at his IP user entry (look at contribution list) --Denniss 02:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

concerns: Image:Large home for McMansionArticle.JPG msg: Hey Pfctdayelise, thanks for your help, I will take care of the right one to be uploaded to write over the picture. Thanks and have a good day.