User talk:NosLida

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NosLida!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dicas[edit]

Olá! Ao carregar um ficheiro de uma fonte externa com licenciamento compatível ao do Commons, peço que use...

A verificação do status do licenciamento será feita por Bot (Flickr) ou por revisores especiais para confirmar o licenciamento. Peço também que transporta a licença correta --> exemplo. Tenha em mente que serviços para hospedar imagens atraem também usuários que hospedam imagens sob um licenciamento livre que - na verdade - foram roubadas de outros sites. No caso do Flickr, este comportamento é conhecido aqui por Flick Washing --> ver Commons:License laundering para obter mais informações e instruções. Obrigado e boas contribuições. Gunnex (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NosLida. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Bem vindo[edit]

Olá NosLida, parabéns pelos carregamentos, eu estava mesmo precisando de alguém que carregasse fotos de escolas de samba de outros estados aqui no Commons tb, pois as do Rio, da Intendente Magalhães, todo ano eu fotografo, mas as de SP não tem ninguém daqui. Eu comecei a pegar fotos livres do Léo Pinheiro postadas no Flickr, mas dá um pouco de trabalho, é bom que você esteja me ajudando.

Note, no entanto, que algumas fotos que você carregou já haviam sido carregadas por mim antes. Veja File:Angelina Basílio (Rosas de Ouro).JPG que você carregou eu já tinha carregado antes como File:2010 - Rosas - Angelina MG 1016.JPG. File:Seu Leandro (2010).JPG eu também já tinha carregado: File:2010 - LeandrodeItaquera MG 1011.JPG. File:Serginho da Vila Maria (2010).JPG também: File:2010 - VilaMaria MG 1233.JPG. File:Vai-Vai (2010).JPG também em File:2010 - Vai-Vai - casal.JPG.

Eu separei as fotos nas categorias mais específicas, veja que dentro da categoria das escolas de São Paulo cada escola tem uma subcategoria. Só não criei praquelas que tem poucas fotos e é difícil achar novas, como por exemplo Dragões de São Miguel que tem uma foto só e se não me engano ta fora dos desfiles oficiais. É importante separar em categorias para por nos artigos da Wikipédia assim: {{commonscat|NOME DA CATEGORIA}}, por exemplo, no artigos pt:Sociedade Rosas de Ouro você pode por {{commonscat|Sociedade Rosas de Ouro}} e vai criar um link para a Category:Sociedade Rosas de Ouro. Veja no artigo da minha escola pt:GRES Império da Praça Seca como funciona. Leandro Rocha (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beleza amigo, eu deveria ter consultado, mas porque você carregou e não colocou nas páginas?? Nunca que iria passar na minha cabeça que existia fotos carregadas sem serem utilizadas nas respectivas páginas. É difícil achar fotos de profissional dessa qualidade disponível para carregamento, mas as fotos do Léo Pinheiro é de 2010; espero que ele continue fotografando e deixando disponível para enriquecer a enciclopédia. Abraços.--NosLida (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quanto às fotos duplicadas, o ideal é que a primeira postada seja mantida e as demais eliminadas, mas tudo bem, elimina as duplicadas que não estiverem nos artigos, porém daqui pra frente, por favor toma mais cuidado e não posta as duplicadas. Qual o seu e-mail? Preciso te mostrar uma imagem que tenho aqui, não sei qual escola é, você deve conhecer melhor, tem como me dar essa ajuda? Leandro Rocha (talk) 10:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removi categorias desse arquivo. Ele não deve conter as categorias "samba schools os São Paulo" e "Samba schools of Brazil" pq a Categoria da Vila Maria jé é subcat de ambas. Abraço! Leandro Rocha (talk) 21:38, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Abraços.--NosLida (talk) 02:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda OTRS[edit]

Olá,

De momento não tenho acesso ao sistema OTRS, pelo que não poderei ajudar. Deverá tentar contactar outro editor que possa aceder ao sistema:

Obg, 81.193.156.82 13:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oscar Casares (pintor).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 05:14, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oscar Casares (pintor).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMF (logo).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valdir Peres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Troféu Mundial Feminino de Futebol de Salão AMF (2013).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 18:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Outono brasileiro.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Outono brasileiro.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:CST (PSOL) logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: A imagem contém mesmo formas geométricas simples? Um Sol estilizado? Uma bandeira flamulando?
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Luan (talk) 14:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hughie Gallacher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marchjuly (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Woodcock (1942).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 04:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mundial feminino futebol de salão (logo) 2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 07:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]