User talk:Nagihuin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nagihuin!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

US Empire ?[edit]

En Français. Vous indiqué des bases militaires américaines en Guyane française et au Vietnam alors qu'il n'y en a aucune. Ainsi que des installations au Pakistan alors que celles ci ont étaient fermé il y a des années. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 18:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa de porcentaje de personas de raza blanca.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Atlasowa (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:European Ancestry.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Atlasowa (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colonial Languages.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Atlasowa (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Proportion of English speakers by country.svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Proportion of English speakers by country.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Atlasowa (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the projection?[edit]

Let’s admit it's your own from some unknown software or idk and you were too lazy to add the Own template

What is the projection of this map? it interests me a lot on short term because some other maps on wikipedia got based on it, and i’d like to calque openstreetmap data on them Galex-713 (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:European Ancestry Map.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Atlasowa (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

European Ancestry Map -> correct Venezuela[edit]

Could you correct Venezuela in the European Ancestry Map? You marked Venezuela as it does it have between 10% to 20% when the ancestry of Europeans there is higher (%) than Colombia. According the the 2011 Census 43% of the people are "white". You can check it on the page Venezuelan of European descent Thanks --Pankoroku (talk) 15:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm detailing Venezuela and Colombia in a further revision of the map. Thank you

Nagihuin (talk) 09:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New-Map-Francophone World.svg - New Brunswick, Canada[edit]

Hi there,
New Brunswick is to be put in dark blue (as Québec) as it is officially bilingual French/English (only Canadian province to do so) due to a third of its population being French speakers. Otherwise good map, thank you. 2.242.116.136 08:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Congreso de Panamá.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim (talk) 15:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas Nagihuin, thank you very much for your explanations on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Congreso de Panamá.png. Don't worry, this request will be closed in a few days. --Achim (talk) 20:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Asking for clarification: There are two different things, the source of the data and the source of the map as we can see it. The source of the data doesn't matter here. If you created the map yourself there is no problem. Initially it looked like the map would have been copied from the cited book of 1982. Therefore this request had been started. Yours, --Achim (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three Linguistic Spaces[edit]

There should be a Spanish-speaking circle over Belize and a Portuguese-speaking circle over the Nagoya/Hamamatsu area of Japan (it's more commonly spoken there than in Timor or Macau), Massachussetts, India (Goa), Sri Lanka, the general Swazi/South African border area with Mozambique, the Namibian border area with Angola and the Surinamese border area with Brazil. I could also mention Uruguay, Paraguay, Andorra, Luxembourg and Casamance, but I suppose overwriting the area of other Romance languages with a circle would be nonsensical. There's also Malacca, but the presence of the Portuguese language there is very weak (but comparable to that of French in plenty of the places where it's marked as such, and Spanish in the Philippines). BTW, Linguísticos in Portuguese gets an acute accent over the second i, could you please fix its misspelling across the wikis? Thanks a lot! 179.211.149.112 16:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hecho ;) Nagihuin (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imperio Español Completo.svg[edit]

I love this map that you made and want to buy or make a large print of it but I can't find it. Help, Nagihuin! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FashionFiend (talk • contribs) 23:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can still find it here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Imperio_Espa%C3%B1ol_Completo.svg

Nagihuin (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emblema Tres Espacios Lingüísticos.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

FromAbove (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre el archivo «Imperio español completo»[edit]

Hola! I think you speak Spanish.... Así que seguiré para hacerle unos comentarios al archivo.

Antes de nada felicitarle por el trabajo pero creo conveniente hacerle unas objeciones con su permiso. -Creo que usted acota el periodo entre el periodo actual y como inicio el reinado de Fernando II de Aragón y Juana I de Castilla, aunque España es más antigua que eso, así que no cuenta otras posesiones de la Corona de Aragón anteriores. Destaca muy bien que el nombre oficial es la Monarquía Hispánica o Católica y que lo de Imperio es más una formalidad historiográfica. Ahora sí, yo creo que sería mejor poner Reino de las Españas y las Indias, Kingdom of the Spains of the Indies, mejor que España en singular. -Le faltaría añadir la Baja Navarra (que es parte innegable del mismo Reino) y que no sólo fue arrancado el Rosellón sino también la Alta Cerdaña. -En Italia los ducados de Parma, Guastalla y Plasencia y el de Lucca eran estados semisoberanos dependientes de la Monarquía Española. Al igual que lo fueron el Reino de las Dos Sicilias cuyos reyes eran miembros de la Familia Real Española. A esto hay que añadir la pretensión a heredar el Gran Ducado de Toscana que se trunca a la muerte del último Médici. -La reclamación del Ducado de Borgoña. -Sobre el Sacro Imperio Romano... ufff, yo personalmente no soy partidario. De acuerdo que se compartió soberano pero el Imperio no dejaba de ser una confederación de numerosísimos estados señoriales, eclesíasticos y ciudades libres. Y añadir, que Hungría no parte del mismo. A pesar de que quien ocupa el trono de Hungría y Bohemia sea por aquel entonces (s. XVI) un Infante de España. Sería el mismo caso del Reino de Inglaterra y de Irlanda con Felipe I y María I.

Siento mucho haberme extendido tanto y agradezco que me haya leído. Sin más molestias por mi parte me gustaría añadir que si pudiera subir el archivo con un tamaño más grande se podría leer mejor.

Gracias. --Parair (talk) 14:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tu intervención. Antes de nada, comentarte que para hacer zoom en el SVG, puedes usar la tecla Control + Rueda del ratón, esa es la forma en la que yo lo veo y chequeo cosas. Independientemente de eso, he subido esta versión en PNG: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/SpanishEmpire.png basta con darle a la lupa encima dos veces para que se despliegue en un tamaño grande y legible. Aún así, puedes usar control + rueda para leerlo mejor, o cambiar elzoom en las propiedades del navegador, esto funciona para todos los archivos.

Efectivamente el período acotado como "imperio español" o los territorios del mismo son algo discutible. España ha sido muchas cosas, un lugar geográfico (=Península) desde el bautizo de Hispania, también un protorreino con los visigodos (Reino de Spania), la base de poder de un Imperio (la Monarquía Católica o Hispánica), y finalmente una Nación desde las revoluciones liberales. Imperio no es igual que nación: un imperio es algo multinacional. Por eso incluyo a los territorios del reino de Portugal, porque eran tan "hispánicos" (léase: de la Monarquía Católica) como los castellanos; y si lo portugués no era español nacional, tampoco lo era lo castellano, o lo aragonés. Se entiende que España sólo fue Imperio tras la política dinástica de los Reyes Católicos, que puso en manos del Rey un enorme conglomerado de señoríos. Esta es la definición de Imperio. Siendo estrictos, a partir de la independencia de la América española, España deja de ser imperio, igual que dejan de ser imperio las naciones hispanoamericanas. A partir de estos años se cambia la noción de imperio a la de imperio colonial (que yo realmente no considero imperio, sino una estructura diferente). España muta desde imperio cristiano con los Austrias (1500-1700) hacia imperio protocolonial borbónico (1700-1800) y finalmente es nación con un pequeño imperio colonial (siglos XIX y XX). Realmente todo esto es una amalgama de definiciones, pero bueno, es lo normal si queremos mostrar un período histórico tan grande en un mapa.

Si por imperio español entendemos también los dominios preaustríacos de los españoles o hispanos, habría que incluir como bien dices a la expansión aragonesa por el Mediterráneo (y por Occitania) previa. Incluso mostrar la Reconquista, o el reino de los visigodos, o el Imperio de las Españas de los soberanos medievales. Es cuestión de definiciones. Para mí hay un período claramente imperial que es el que va desde Carlos V a la independencia de Hispanoamérica; mostrar lo ocurrido por delante y por detrás es cuestión de "añadidos", se podría hacer.

Coincido en lo de Reino de las Españas y las Indias. He visto referencias de ambas (Reino de España y de las Indias, o Reino de las Españas y las Indias) en la bibliografía, me fue difícil decidirme por uno.

Creo que la Baja Navarra fue abandonada en cuanto se toma la Alta Navarra. Desconozco si por un pequeño tiempo fue adscrita o intervenida o controlada por otros reinos hispánicos o el Imperio. Si entendemos que Navarra o la Corona de Aragón preHabsburgo tienen que estar en el mapa, desde luego que debería reflejarse. De hecho, en el mapa hay una referencia a un tratado de 1291 en el norte de África, así que si abrimos el marco, por qué no incluir la Baja Navarra.

Supongo que con todo lo de Italia te refieres al siglo XVIII. No está incluido simplemente porque no sabía cómo meterlo sin ensuciar el dibujo, dado que había también posesiones superpuestas en los siglos XVI y XVII. Pero sí, buenos apuntes. Si tengo tiempo modificaré los mapas para recogerlo, al igual que lo de Borgoña y lo de la Alta Cerdaña.

Los territorios de Carlos V acabé incluyéndolos (si te fijas en el historial del fichero, yo también tengo dudas) porque realmente no se entiende el concepto imperial sin la diarquía Hispánica y Austríaca que dura siglos. Volvemos a la definición de imperio: es un conglomerado multinacional orgánico cohesionado por un mismo sistema de valores imperiales (el cristianismo en este caso) y unas cabezas, o una cabeza o César. Realmente no se entiende la España de 1500 a 1550 sin Alemania. Incluso no se entiende el Imperio español en el siglo XVII sin Alemania (los tercios lucharon como nadie en territorios alemanes). Elvira Roca incluso dice que la Reforma fue una reacción separatista y protonacionalista frente al imperio. Nuevamente, si quieres no lo llamamos imperio español, sino "imperio cristiano en tiempos de influencia española" o "conformado por la política dinástica de hispanos". Realmente el imperio cristiano multicontinental que nos ocupa fue haciéndose cada vez más y más "español" en el sentido nacional con el tiempo, pero es un proceso que tiene muchos escalones. ¿En qué escalón cortamos? Podríamos decir que 1550-1700 tampoco es imperio español en sentido estricto. Realmente de 1550 a 1700 el dominio Habsburgo se entiende como un proyecto imperial con dos cabezas, España y Austria. Llámalo imperio Habsburgo si quieres. En ese caso quizás habría que incluir a la Austria 1550-1700. Simplemente, cortar o prescindir de una esas dos cabezas en el mapa se me acababa antojando menos veraz que incluir lo alemán-austríaco de alguna manera... Pero nuevamente, es discutible.

La Hungría no imperial la incluí porque entendí que Carlos era también soberano de la misma, además de Emperador. Yo entiendo que no es exactamente igual que Felipe en Inglaterra porque en este caso fue rey consorte.

Corrijo: veo en https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hungarian_monarchs#House_of_Habsburg_.281526.E2.80.931780.29 que Carlos nunca fue rey de Hungría. Aún así, era Habsburgo. Depende de cómo entendamos imperio, siguiendo los razonamientos anteriores, puede entenderse vinculado o no...


Nagihuin (talk) 12:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
File:IberianMareClausum.svg is amazing! I adore maps like that. Thank you SO VERY MUCH!!!

🐰💬❤🆒🌐👏🌟✨❗

Geekdiva (talk) 02:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you so much!! Nagihuin (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imperio Español Completo[edit]

Hello! I`m great fan of your maps. They`re very detailed. I edit the newest version of "Imperio Español Completo", but I don`t know how I can post it at your page, so here`s link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Imperio_Espa%C3%B1ol_Completo.png I just add some text corrections, and spanish Santa Catarina (in Brazil). I hope you approve it, and post at your page in Wikimedia.

Hey, thank you! I've added your suggestion about Santa Catarina. Check it out. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Imperio_Espa%C3%B1ol_Completo.svg You said you added some text corrections, please tell me where and I'll check them as well. ¡Me alegro de que te gusten mis mapas! Nagihuin (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answear) About text corrections, I`m checked them, and it was just glitches of png, it`s doesn`t matter). But I have couple of questions:

1) will you add explorations of F. de Soto as spanish ambitions in North America?

2) will you plan to dо such detailed map of South America, as you do at this masterpiece: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spanish_North_America.png

And it`s very sad that you`re answering so rarely(

Hey! 1) They're added with the brown shade with the rest of the Hemisphere! Maybe it should be nice to draw the limits of explored areas. I'll think about it. 2) I'd like to do one giant map per continent, but I'm having troubles to find time. I hope someday I could. Nagihuin (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Tell me please, where I can find all of your works, with all updates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maksim Deep (talk • contribs) 11:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=50&user=Nagihuin Nagihuin (talk) 11:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Me gustaría contactar contigo[edit]

Hola, soy M. José del Camino Español y de La Tienda de los Tercios. Nos encantan tus mapas y lo que representan. ¿Podrías contactar con nosotros? nos gustaría hablar contigo de forma privada. Mi correo es elcaminoespanol@gmail.com Un saludo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M. José Salvatierra (talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa Imperio Español[edit]

Antes de nada, es una magnífico mapa. No obstante, quiero remarcar que en el mapa se deberían marcar algunas ubicaciones más:

-Los territorios ampliados en el Golfo de Guinea también fueron reivindicados antes de la firma del Tratado de París de 1900 con Francia, no solo durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

-El territorio de Sabah en el norte de Borneo fue reclamado por España hasta la firma del Protocolo de Madrid en 1885.

-Aunque entiendo tu razonamiento, personalmente marcaría Patagonia y el sur de Chile como territorio reclamado y no controlado efectivamente teniendo en cuenta las constante incursiones (malones) de los mapuches contra los asentamientos españoles. Tal vez la solución sería marcar también otros territorios como no controlado de forma efectiva, como era el caso de la mayoría de Luisiana y California.

-La provincia de Misiones al norte del moderno Uruguay era un territorio español y no portugués.

-Tánger, ya como la Zona Internacional de Tánger, fue ocupado por el ejército español durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

-Tal vez se podrían diferenciar el conjunto del Sacro Imperio de las posesiones directas de Carlos I dentro del propio Sacro Imperio, es decir, el Archiducado de Austria.

-Santa Elena fue reclamada pero no ocupada por Portugal.

En cualquier caso, y como ya he dicho, magnífico mapa. Upvguri 15:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that...[edit]

You changed it as you said (very fast!), but then It seems to me that you accidentally restored the previous version and ended up creating a duplicate of "Spanish Empire and Empire of Charles V.svg".

Barjimoa (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In some browsers you may experience issues if you don't clear your cookies/historical record before uploading and checking new files in Wikimedia commons. Your version has a legend/reference about the HRE borders (check the upper right box) which needs to be deleted. I just did it. It wasn't a duplicate. Check it out. Nagihuin (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

can you please update File:European Ancestry Large.svg, thanks[edit]

can you please update this map, netherlands and switzerland are no longer over 90 procent white, thanks Gooduserdude (talk) 12:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be great if you could provide the data as machine readable file. The SVG doesn’t contain enough information to retrieve the data easily (e.g. many South American countries only exist as paths without IDs, not as groups with the country name and ID like other countries). Thank you! – Flying sheep (talk) 12:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iberian mare clausum claims.svg[edit]

@Nagihuin: The image file File:Iberian mare clausum claims.svg attaches a date of 1510 to the Strait of Magellan. Magellan first crossed the strait in 1520. What does the 1510 date represent? OvertAnalyzer (talk) 02:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a typo. I corrected it. Nagihuin (talk) 14:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What graphics program do you use?[edit]

Can you mention what graphics particular program you use to create your images? --Ismail (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly Inkscape. Nagihuin (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pueblos Grecolatinos.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Spanish Empire map[edit]

Your map of the Spanish Empire that is in the Spanish Wikipedia is extremely complete and is quite easy to see:

Spanish_Empire.svg

I would like to put that map in on the Spanish Empire article ([[1]]) in the English Wikipedia, because I think your map is better than the one that currently is posted. There is a discussion thread about which map we should use in the Spanish Empire article ([[2]]), I would support your map if you propose it.

Greetings and good work. Itagnol

Spanish Empire[edit]

Dear @Nagihuin,

First of all, congratulations for your work in Wikipedia, specialy for the outstanding maps. I contact you because I´m trying to change the maximum extension of the Spanish Empire In this entry it is stated that it was 13,700,000 km2 in 1780, which is completely inaccurate. The year should be 1784 and the extension around 20.000.000 km2.

Unfortunately they don´t accept my sources.

To justify their data they use the following source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Empire#cite_note-5

Which I studied and it only mentions the year and the expansion, without refering maps nor informing which territories were taken into consideration.

Could you help me with this matter? I´m sure you have great sources in order to having created such detailed maps.

Also that would be great to use this map from you for the head on the entry, instead of this other map.

Thanks, kind regards,

Christian Christian Ramírez Ferro (talk) 09:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagihuin
Sorry, for the head entry of the Spanish Empire, this map would be better since it doesn´t include the Portuguese territories. Christian Ramírez Ferro (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:United States - Territorial interests.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taichi (talk) 04:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

When you created this map, you said,

"Western Sahara has been colored light blue, due to the increased use of French there."

Do you have a ref for that? In our proportion-of-French-speakers maps, we leave Western Sahara uncolored, because we have no source for how much French is spoken there.

Thanks! Kwamikagami (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
This is a SVG redrawn from earlier PNG version. I just took the information from it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New-Map-Francophone_World.PNG Nagihuin (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. Kwamikagami (talk) 10:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]