User talk:Myrabella/Archive/Archive 2013

Archive of 2013 discussions and messages

Happy New Year 2013

Happy New Year 2013 to all visitors of this page!
Bonne année 2013 à vous qui visitez cette page !
--Myrabella (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Vesinet villa Berthe La Hublotiere Hector Guimard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 01:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Image en VI

Cette image sera-t-elle la nouvelle VI ?

Tous mes Voeux pour toi et ta famille en 2013. La tour: Aerial view of Television Tower St. Chrischona qui est en changement de label est inaccessible au vote. Je me lancerai bien pour reclasser un coquillage, penses-tu que ce soit possible? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Pour cette nouvelle année, mes vœux très chaleureux pour toi et ceux qui te sont chers. Je m'étais permis d'intervenir sur la page de Taxiarchos au sujet de cette MVR sur Aerial view of Television Tower St. Chrischona. J'avais un peu retouché la re-nomimation, et je n'ai pas eu de problème pour voter (je viens d'essayer) ; quel est le bug que tu rencontres ? Plus largement, je te confirme qu'il est tout à fait possible de remettre en jeu une VI existante, via une MVR : "Si l'un des candidats est déjà une image de valeur pour un domaine similaire, la sous-page de candidature d'origine est ré-ouverte pour évaluation en changeant son statut à status=discussed, et les nouvelles évaluations sont ajoutées à la sous-page originale." ; c'est expliqué ici. Je suis bien sûr à ta disposition si tu souhaites un coup de main. --Myrabella (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Si je clique sur edit pour voter je tombe sur : #REDIRECT [[Commons:Valued image candidates/Aerial view - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona5.jpg]]. En fait tu es la seule à pouvoir voter . Cet après midi je me lancerai dans cette aventure... Si çà ne marche pas je ne manquerai pas de te solliciter. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Mystère... mais l'important est qu'au final nous arrivions à remplacer cette VI. Bonne expérience cet am ! --Myrabella (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Archaeo, clique sur "Review page" au lieu de "edit", et là, ça marche.--Jebulon (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Je crois que l'homme s'est beaucoup amusé à bord d'un ULM avec son appareil photo récemment, et il veut que ça se sache, probablement. Cela semble bien être une "aerial view of...". Mais tu ne devrais pas te retenir de faire ta remarque, qui est juste.--Jebulon (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Nope, je n'ai plus envie d'être la surgé des scopes ;) --Myrabella (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Avec moi, quand j'étais jeune, tu acceptais pourtant assez bien de te faire engueuler....--Jebulon (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Je dirais plutôt que c'était du temps où il t'arrivait de bouder très fort ;) Plus sérieusement, je ne crains pas la bagarre, mais à la réflexion, tous ces kilo-octets de discussion sur les scopes des VICs n'ont guère fait avancer le projet. Aujourd'hui, le projet VI est plus foutraque (à mon avis) mais au moins les contributeurs s'y sentent en général encouragés et sans doute répond-il mieux à la vision de Slaunger de beaucoup, beaucoup de VI très variées. Bon, il faudrait juste que VICbot fonctionne à nouveau en 2013 ! --Myrabella (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Vesinet villa Berthe La Hublotiere Guimard porche porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Vesinet villa Berthe La Hublotiere Guimard hublots.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Triple pomotion!

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aqueduc de Luynes.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deesis mosaic Hagia Sophia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comnenus mosaics Hagia Sophia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Berthe, Le Vésinet, France (main facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Meets all criteria. Underlying work (architecture) appears to be PD in France as of 1/1/2013. cmadler (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deesis mosaic (Hagia Sophia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Empress Zoe mosaic Hagia Sophia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --PierreSelim 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ Pantocrator Deesis mosaic Hagia Sophia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagia Sophia Southwestern entrance mosaics 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Page VI : problèmes

Hi, Myrabella et merci pour tes interventions récentes. Décidément, je n'arrive pas à me faire au fonctionnement de la page VI... Hier, j'ai labellisé deux photos d'Archaeo et, malgré tous mes efforts, les cadres sont restés bleus. Ils ont enfin pris la couleur désirée aujourd'hui, après ton passage. D'autre part, depuis huit jours, le set "Facade of the Dome of the Rock", se comporte de la même façon. Il a pourtant été traité le même jour et dans les mêmes conditions que deux autres, lesquels ont réagi normalement (si je puis m'exprimer ainsi). Comme j'ai déjà fait pas mal d'erreurs sur cette page, j'essaie de comprendre avant d'agir... et je ne comprends rien. De plus, lorsque j'échoue dans une entreprise, je commence par me mettre en question. En vain ici. Peux-tu jeter un coup d'œil au set en question -- même si pour l'instant, les sets sonts en sommeil -- et me signaler, éventuellement, quelle erreur j'ai faite ? -- Merci d'avance. Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 13:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Bonsoir JLPC, Tu n'es aucunement en cause, il s'agit d'une histoire de nom de page. Le nominateur a dû s'y reprendre à plusieurs fois, je suppose, et a créé deux pages pour le même set : celle sur laquelle tu as voté Commons:Valued image candidates/Façade of the Dome of the Rock et celle qui s'affichait dans la page des VIC Commons:Valued image candidates/Dome of the Rock, Facade (2008). J'ai remplacé la seconde par la première dans la page des VIC et ton vote bordé de vert apparait bien à présent ! Bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ioannes II Komnenos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• I find File:Jan1Komnenos RaimundTripolis.jpg itself better, but the photograph is too small.  Support. At least, this is a case where geocoding for a portrait make ssense. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:04, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Empress Zoe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion Help

Hi Myrabella- I am attempting to learn how to promote a VISC. Not wanting to mess anyone else up, I practiced on my own supported (by someone else) nomination (Valued image set: Façade of the Dome of the Rock). I closed it and have been somewhat successful following the steps but there is some extraneous syntax showing on the VIS page and I am unable to tag the individual images with VIS labels without visible syntax errors. Could you please help me? I would like to learn from my mistakes so I can help close/promote other VIS in the future. Thanks- Godot13 (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Godot13, Thank you for helping. Your closure was nearly complete, but it missed the "titlescope=" parameter in each step (to be added in the Valued Image Set Candidate (VISC), in the valued image set gallery page, and in the VIS tag). The "titlescope" is the scope without any link or special formatting; it can be shortened if the scope is very verbose. I've fixed it and I let you add the VIS tag to the other images of the set. Kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 07:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Süleymaniye Mosque (courtyard) (Istanbul, Turkey).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Can't check location, because of toolserver failure. Trusting you.  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
• Best (global) view of the courtyard.  Support- Godot13 (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgin and Child mosaic (Apse of Hagia Sophia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enrico Dandolo gravestone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée Grévin in Paris (facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : right : VI. --JLPC (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support after very sceptical examination of geocoding. --Ikar.us (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Lately expressed: thank you. Trusting you. --Myrabella (talk) 07:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• • •  Comment Hello everybody. Are you sure this façade is in the Public Domain (FoP) ? Furthermore, please notice that only the inside part of the museum is protected as "Monument Historique", not the façade. The tag on the file page seems a bit confusing IMO. Anyway, nice picture !--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
      •  Comment Eugène-Émile Esnault-Pelterie, architect : 1842-1905, according to this link : [[1]]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Haydarpasa port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 21:56, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Globes by Coronelli for Louis XIV of France.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Globes by Coronelli for Louis XIV of France.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Set ?

Bonsoir Myrabella,

J'ai proposé un set en VIS, mais comme c'est la première fois depuis longtemps, j'ai dû faire une bêtise...

Je ne vois pas l'erreur, mais tu es la grande spécialiste, et je suis sûr que tu trouverais la solution.

Tu veux bien jeter un coup d'œil à l'occasion, s'il te plaît ?

Un grand merci, à l'avance.--Jebulon (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup ! Si je comprends bien, c'étaient les guillemets ? --Jebulon (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

De rien. Il était tard, j'ai réparé à la barbare en renommant ta page selon la forme attendue par le lien rouge sans rechercher la cause du bug. En regardant un peu mieux, il y avait une incohérence entre nom de la page de VIS et le paramètre "title=" de par cette modification. &#39 est un code informatique pour l'apostrophe. À part ça, les guillemets dans les noms des pages VIC posent effectivement des problèmes à VICbot, mais cela ne s'applique pas aux sets, puisqu'ils sont gérés entièrement à la main ! --Myrabella (talk) 19:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

J'aime bien quand tu répares à la barbare. J'ai tout compris. Je te dédie ce set, que j'aime beaucoup, en remerciement. Il semble avoir un avenir prometteur dans "Commons".--Jebulon (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent - Godot13 04:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
High altar of Notre-Dame de Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Scope too narrow. Yann (talk) 05:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• This scope is relevant and coherent IMO. In 1638, Louis XIII made the vow to put up a new high altar in Notre Dame, devoted to Virgin Mary, with at her feet a statue of himself offering his crown and sceptre. Louis XIII died before fulfilling his vow, and his son Louis XIV accomplished it for him some decades later. Cf. fr:Vœu de Louis XIII. --Myrabella (talk) 07:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Very interesting story. However, I think this picture is the best in scope without the precision regarding the statues... Thoughts ? Very good caption in the file page, btw (as usual...)--Jebulon (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• OK, let's make it simpler => scope changed. --Myrabella (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from High altar of Notre-Dame de Paris with kneeling statues of Louis XIII and Louis XIV to High altar of Notre-Dame de Paris --Myrabella (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• most prominent feature of the picture seem the textile strips. Are they a prominent and permanent feature of the installation? --Ikar.us (talk) 16:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support : best in scope(s) imho. --JLPC (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I agree too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks Myrabella. I agree too, even if the (new) scope is rich, this one is the best (IMO).--Jebulon (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedrale Notre-Dame de Paris nef nouvelles cloches.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

ça a été tangent un moment (et les opposants n'étaient pas forcément hors-sujet), mais le bon sens l'a finalement emporté. Félicitations ! Au moins, je ne vais pas me faire sonner les cloches pour t'avoir donné un mauvais conseil !!!--Jebulon (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci à toi de m'avoir encouragée et soutenue :) C'est dommage que tu n'aies pas pu venir ce soir-là. Par la suite, as-tu eu l'occasion d'aller les voir, ces cloches ? --Myrabella (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Même pas... Et je passe au coin de la rue tous les jours... J'ai honte...--Jebulon (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Idem que Jebulon, bravo \o/ --PierreSelim (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Bêtise en VI mais c'est pas entièrement de ma faute

Bonsoir Myrabella,

Puis-je me permettre de t'arracher aux délices de ton triomphe campanaire ci-dessus ?

J'ai "encore" fait une bêtise en VI, avec la nomination de la photo de fr:Alphonse Milne-Edwards. J'avais fait une boulette orthographique dans le nom original, j'ai fait un "rename", mais entre temps, avant le renommage, la photo avait été évaluée et soutenue par JLPC. Je ne sais pas si ça a un rapport, mais je crois qu'elle a été soutenue sous son ancien nom, et du coup, le "review it" est en rouge. Crois-tu pouvoir réparer ça ?

...même "à l'arrache" ?

Mille mercis, d'avance.--Jebulon (talk) 17:59, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

ps, ils sont en train de les installer, les cloches...

Voilà, c'est réparé ! Il m'a suffi de renommer la page de revue elle-même [2]. Même pas brutalement :) --Myrabella (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

L'œuf de Colomb... Super merci !--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angouleme place du Palet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality ! --JLPC 17:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hi Myrabella- If you can tell me how to remove the VISC promoted previews I will be happy to clear them out. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 22:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campement mont Arafat ceramique Iznik Topkapi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:23, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Rocamadour AOC.jpg

File:Rocamadour AOC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

• • Bêêêê, y'en a qui ont du temps à perdre, ils prendraient n'importe qui comme bouc-émissaire...--Jebulon (talk) 15:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port-en-Bessin-Huppain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 16:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

ethnologie

Poids à peser la poudre d’or - Culture Akan

Bonjour, nous inaugurons un nouveau chapitre qui est l'ethnologie. Peux-tu jeter un oeil sur cet essai. Me corriger mon anglais défaillant (le français n'est pas meilleur) et donner ton avis sur... tout. Merci ici --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh, mais c'est formidable !! J'ai fait quelques retouches dans le texte en français, ajouté une catégorie, et comme tu m'invites à te donner mon avis sur tout, je me suis permis de noter une zone un peu bizarre de l'image.
J'ai vu qu'une partie du texte en anglais est repris de là, je signale juste que ce site diffuse ses textes sous licence Creative Commons d'après sa page Copyright, mais en CC BY-NC (interdisant l'usage commercial, ce qui n'est pas vraiment compatible avec Wikimedia Commons, et, euh, il faudrait attribuer l'emprunt normalement).
Voilà, c'est toujours un plaisir que d'être associée au projet Phoebus et j'espère pouvoir t'être utile. --Myrabella (talk) 00:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Pour la zone floue en fait s'est un plan entier qui manque.Je ne maîtrise pas encore ma machine, même si j'ai résolus ce point. Je ne vais garder que les moins mauvais et je reprendrais la série. Il y a presque 300 objets de ce type. Je suis aidé par Pierre et Léna dans cette aventure. Pour le texte j'attends le texte de notre conservatrice qui va donner son avis aujourd'hui. Mais le premier versement est important car il donne la voie à suivre pour les autres. Merci pour tes remarques toujours constructives. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quelques autres remarques sur la présentation de la fiche après réflexion. Il faudrait avoir plus haut dans la fiche les informations sur la culture et la région d'origine de l'objet (ici "culture Akan" et sans doute au moins "Afrique"). Ici, on apprend que c'est un objet de la culture Akan au fil du texte de la description détaillée, mais la mention elle-même n'apparaît que tout en bas, dans le champ "Notes" — or, n'est-ce pas une information essentielle pour des collections ethnologiques ? A remonter, il me semble. J'ai vu que cette information figure dans le nom du fichier, mais il me semble important de le mettre plus en lumière dans la description.
En revanche, le champ "Auteur" sera la plupart du temps "anonyme", n'est-ce pas ? Donc peut-être pas utile à garder ou afficher systématiquement en première information de la fiche.
A propos des noms de fichiers, prévoyez-vous simplement une convention "nom de culture" + "n° d'inventaire" (ce qui permet tout à fait de distinguer les objets) ou parfois des noms de fichiers un peu plus développés et explicites ?
Au passage, je trouve l'échelle utile, discrète et élégante. Tu ne la donnais pas toujours par le passé :) --Myrabella (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

VIC talk page

Hi Myrabella!

I have started two discussion topics at Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list. But it seems that this page is visited less frequently. Hence thought of notifying you as you are a regular editor at VIC. Please put your views, if any, on these topics. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 03 Pointe du Hoc bunker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --~Pyb 23:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 02 Pointe du Hoc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:54, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Pointe du Hoc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality.--ArildV 09:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaux-sur-Aure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Aubin Vaux-sur-Aure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI. --Selbymay 10:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port-en-Bessin-Huppain chenal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetiere americain Colleville-sur-Mer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 10:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port-en-Bessin-Huppain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Speedy  Support. --Ikar.us (talk) 19:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Sainte-Marie d'Oloron, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Question The detail called Avaleur d'homme in the image note is in de:Oloron-Sainte-Marie#Kirche_Sainte-Marie identified as fr:Tarasque. Is this correct? --Ikar.us (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

• Hmm, the Tarasque is more a fabulous creature from Provence. In Poitou-Charentes, “Grand'Goule” is a rather similar monster (poke JLPC ;). I don't know if there is a specific legend in Béarn with a local monster name... This kind of representation of a creature swallowing a man can be found elsewhere, for example here in Sweden. --Myrabella (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arromanches-les-Bains port artificiel Mulberry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good qual. --A.Savin 16:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arromanches plage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice athmosphere. --Coyau 16:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de la Ferriere Vaux-sur-Aure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau Sainte-Marie-du-Mont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Selbymay 10:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombiers-sur-Seulles tumulus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportQI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sharpness and DoF is borderline for QI (f/5). --NorbertNagel 18:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bayeux Tapestry 32-33 comet Halley Harold.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 01:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bayeux Tapestry scene43 banquet Odo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Neolithic tumulus in Colombiers-sur-Seulles .

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Neolithic tumulus in Colombiers-sur-Seulles .
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

The lion of Egyptian revolution

Sorry, feel free to fix whatever I have done wrong. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I've just added a link to the previous reviews in the renomination page. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 00:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Saint-François tower, Nice

Très belle image; je suis passé à Nice à midi, il tombait des cordes... Je n'arrive pas a "fermer" les votes pour les deux premiers images de VI. As tu une idée de la panne? Merci --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Merci d'avoir apprécié mon image de la tour Saint-François à Nice :-) J'ai chez moi une sorte de gravure qui me la rappelle tous les jours. Pour les revues fermées qui ne sont pas traitées par VICbot, je ne sais pas du tout quoi y faire. Peut-être le robot ne traite-t-il pas la première VIC parce que la page de nomination avait déjà été proposée et close sous un autre nom [3] ? À part ces quelques cas, VICbot fonctionne en ce moment : Special:Contributions/VICbot. --Myrabella (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-François tower, Nice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bayeux Cathedral (crypt).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support It is the most complete (and best) in scope. --Godot13 (talk) 06:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Reused pictured

check out [4] National Geographic! Rmhermen (talk) 18:41, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Nice! Thank you a lot for this information. --Myrabella (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

VI

Bonjour, nous avons un petit problème en VI les deux premières images sont ignorées du Bot. Pour la première, çà ne m'étonne pas, je n'ai jamais pu l'ouvrir; Mais je n'ai aucune idée de la panne sur la seconde. Merci de tes lumières. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour, Pour celle qui reste bloquée, peu d'idées, j'essaie en standardisant le champ "nominator" (à suivre). --Myrabella (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• Meric doublement pour ton essai de déblocage et pour ton alerte sur la photo de Pierre Dalous j'ai immédiatement relayé sur le Muséum et la Mairie de Toulouse. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atmospheric diving suit by Alphonse and Théodore Carmagnolle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresnel lentille MnM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 09:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiffel tower from Cite Architecture Chaillot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin Stern JCN Forestier Saint-Cloud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some clouds overburnt, but QI from my point of view --Nino Verde 07:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin Stern JCN Forestier Saint-Cloud 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Sainte-Marie-du-Mont clocher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Arcalino 23:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin Stern JCN Forestier Saint-Cloud pergola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 10:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stern Garden in Saint-Cloud, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support As it's already QI and best in scope, I must admit it looks like a VI ! --JLPC (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduc Medicis regard 25 dit de Saux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Sainte-Marie-du-Mont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa dei Santi Giovanni e Reparata Lucca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 06:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Frediano Lucca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zita of Lucca (body).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Jebulon (talk) 12:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santi Giovanni e Reparata (exterior), Lucca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

French translation

Baie de Balaklava

Bonjour madame Myrabella, can i ask for a short French translation at this photo. Merci, Petar. --Mile (talk) 13:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Petar, I was offline yesterday pm and Jabulon has pinched the pleasure to answer your demand :) Congratulations for your FP! I inserted your image in the fr:WP article on Balaklava some days ago. Kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Frediano (Lucca), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct Nottolini Guamo Lucca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduc Medicis regard 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Big spot (see note)--Lmbuga 08:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Spot fixed, but thumbnail not updated yet. --Myrabella 12:27, 24 June 2013 (UTC) I've seen the new image. Much better, thanks, QI for me, good quality--Lmbuga 17:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduc Medicis regard 2 Rungis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MIN Rungis viandes de boucherie veau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bran, Braşov, Romania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Poco² 20:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cobblestone paving.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 05:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base clocher ancienne eglise Notre-Dame Rungis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meat hook on rail.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stonemason.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice, VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup !

Merci d'être passée sur la page incriminée. Je vais essayer de comprendre où j'avais pu faire une erreur. -- Je présume que votre journée d'hier s'est bien passée puisque j'ai aperçu, à la mi-journée, une bonne photo datée du 12 juillet et déjà QI ; je suppose qu'il y en a d'autres que nous découvrirons dans les jours qui viennent... -- Merci encore et à bientôt sur Commons. -- Amicalement. JLPC (talk) 14:00, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

De rien ! Avais-tu lancé ta demande en cliquant sur la lien "Proposer la suppression" du menu Boîte à outils ? Normalement, cela aide à préparer toute la demande de façon automatique. Pour la Villette, oui, la balade s'est très bien passée. Je tente l'image de la coupole en FP, ne serait-ce que pour donner envie à Moonik de charger des photos - merci de l'avoir soutenue ! --Myrabella (talk) 06:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fauteuil racine Chine Quianlong musee arts asiatiques Nice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotonde Villette interieur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --Jastrow 07:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassin de la Villette 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 06:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Regard de Saux.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Regard de Saux.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rotonde Villette interieur.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotonde Villette interieur.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris pont rue Ourcq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris passerelle des Ardennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 01:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stipa pennata (Feather Grass), habitat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:01 Gorges du Tarn Roc des Hourtous.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:01 Gorges du Tarn Roc des Hourtous.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lozere Montbrun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice--Lmbuga 19:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen de la Marque Mas-Saint-Chely.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the sharpest but still OK for QI I think. --NorbertNagel 09:35, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mas-Saint-Chely causse Mejean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition --Christian Ferrer 12:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champerboux causse Sauveterre Lozere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Rjcastillo 12:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Gorges du Tarn Roc des Hourtous.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very interesting weather resp. lighting situation. --Smial 22:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menhir Fraisse Mas-Saint-Chely causse Mejean 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not bad. --JLPC 16:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menhir Fraisse Mas-Saint-Chely causse Mejean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menhir Bac Sainte-Enimie causse Sauveterre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barre-des-Cevennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barre-des-Cévennes poids public.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Florac Vibron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bottom half needs sharpening. Mattbuck 06:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Bottom half sharpened--Myrabella 08:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC) I've tried my own version. Mattbuck 15:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Thank you. Bolder and better enhancement than mine, OK to me :). --Myrabella 06:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Agreed, good quality --Christian Ferrer 16:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Digue Georges Brassens, Sète 05.jpg

Bonjour Myrabella, je viens juste de me rendre compte que tu avais laissé des notes pour un crop de cette image, et bien c'est fait, mais je l'ai également élargit sur la gauche, alors si cela te pose un problème car ce n'est pas la version que tu as promus, dis le moi et je met en ligne la version que tu as suggérée. Amicalement. --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Christian, réponse tardive de retour de vacances. Ma note n'était qu'une suggestion. Tes choix de cadrage valorisent l'effet grand-angle, mais là, bien qu'appréciant le jeu graphique des ombres sur le sol, je trouvais l'avant-plan de ciment trop présent et peu attrayant. Dans ta nouvelle version, je ne suis pas fan de la voiture déformée par la perspective, mais j'aime bien l'effet d'opposition des couleurs, rouge contre bleu, même si je préfère le choix précédent d'une harmonie en bleu. Bref, pour moi QI de toute façon, y compris pour tes choix de cadrage qui donnent de la personnalité à tes images. Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecusson garde champetre territorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful. --JLPC 17:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Is this design free of rights ?--Jebulon 17:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stipa pennata Causse Mejean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Valuable, and quality image.--Jebulon 16:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Versailles - Hall of Mirrors

Hello Myrabella,

I have made an audio-visual production on Versailles using slides plus music, sound effects and narration.

I have used one of your pictures of the Hall of Mirrors and have given you a credit.

Do you want to email me with your full name so that I can use that or are you happy with Myrabella.

Please contact me by email so that I can send you a copy of my production.

Regards Chas

Hello Chas,
Thank you very much for informing me of this reuse! A credit to Myrabella will be perfectly fine to me, with the CC license (e.g. : "Photo by Myrabella, CC-BY-SA-3.0, via Wikimedia Commons"). I am looking forward to watching your production. Kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Digue Georges Brassens, Sète 05.jpg

Bonjour Myrabella, je viens juste de me rendre compte que tu avais laissé des notes pour un crop de cette image, et bien c'est fait, mais je l'ai également élargit sur la gauche, alors si cela te pose un problème car ce n'est pas la version que tu as promus, dis le moi et je met en ligne la version que tu as suggérée. Amicalement. --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Christian, réponse tardive de retour de vacances. Ma note n'était qu'une suggestion. Tes choix de cadrage valorisent l'effet grand-angle, mais là, bien qu'appréciant le jeu graphique des ombres sur le sol, je trouvais l'avant-plan de ciment trop présent et peu attrayant. Dans ta nouvelle version, je ne suis pas fan de la voiture déformée par la perspective, mais j'aime bien l'effet d'opposition des couleurs, rouge contre bleu, même si je préfère le choix précédent d'une harmonie en bleu. Bref, pour moi QI de toute façon, y compris pour tes choix de cadrage qui donnent de la personnalité à tes images. Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Versailles - Hall of Mirrors

Hello Myrabella,

I have made an audio-visual production on Versailles using slides plus music, sound effects and narration.

I have used one of your pictures of the Hall of Mirrors and have given you a credit.

Do you want to email me with your full name so that I can use that or are you happy with Myrabella.

Please contact me by email so that I can send you a copy of my production.

Regards Chas

Hello Chas,
Thank you very much for informing me of this reuse! A credit to Myrabella will be perfectly fine to me, with the CC license (e.g. : "Photo by Myrabella, CC-BY-SA-3.0, via Wikimedia Commons"). I am looking forward to watching your production. Kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Corse Ota Porto tour genoise.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! — TintoMeches, 22:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 en France, 1 September 2013

Votre photo File:Corse Ota Porto genoese tower sunset.jpg a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 1 September 2013. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

--PierreSelim (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Ota Porto genoese tower sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 12:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  FP! Good luck in the WLM 2013. --Iifar 13:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you for the support! I try it as FPC. --Myrabella 15:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Ota Porto tour genoise 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 07:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Ota Porto tour genoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Very good --Iifar 06:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Ota pont genois Pianella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio oratoire Saint-Roch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Porto tour genoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Jebulon 09:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Ota pont genois Pianella 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Heuschrecke 08:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio cathedrale facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 10:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio cathedrale barque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice enough to be QI --Nino Verde 14:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ajaccio cathedral, exterior, seen from south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ajaccio cathedral, interior, nave and choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio falaises Grain de Sable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio falaises escalier roi Aragon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 08:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio falaises escalier roi Aragon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 06:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio citadelle echauguette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Corse Ota Porto genoese tower sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Corse Ota Porto genoese tower sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour de Roccapina, Corsica, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jul (cartoonist).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champerboux croix fer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues chateau de Miral tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues chateau de Miral enceinte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues chateau de Miral facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 22:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues chateau de Miral 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues chateau de Miral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 07:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent Ursulines Ispagnac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 03:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancienne eglise Molezon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality-ArildV 10:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champerboux croix fer route.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont génois de Pianella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Better perspective and better light, base and underside of the bridge visible.  Support--Ikar.us (talk) 20:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --VT98Fan (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Most Valued Review Scores: 
1. Ota pont de Pianella-1.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 
2. Corse_Ota_pont_genois_Pianella.jpg: +3 <--
=>
File:Ota pont de Pianella-1.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. 
File:Corse_Ota_pont_genois_Pianella.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Myrabella (talk) 06:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lozere Sainte-Enimie monastere ruines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bonifacio falaises escalier roi Aragon.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bonifacio falaises escalier roi Aragon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

J'avais ça qui traînait chez moi.

N'ayant jamais mis les pieds en Corse, je pense que ça t'appartient...

Tu étais trop pessimiste, tu vois ! Félicitations, tu collectionnes les FP, en ce moment ! Je suis content de t'avoir fait cette surprise.

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 08:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

\o/ Joie ! Fierté ! Confiance ! Gratitude ! Merci en tout cas. Tu me permets d'accroître mon compte de FP, mais aussi ma confiance en ma capacité à produire de bonnes photos. Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 09:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Image du jour sur Wikipedia fr

Félicitation pour cette image du jour!

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup ! --Myrabella (talk) 07:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

WLM 2013

Toi qui est versée en Commonologie, tu peux me donner un conseil utile. J'ai commis cette image (Tour de défense de Villemur-sur-Tarn.jpg) puis-je la verser dans le concours des monuments en cours où fallait-il le faire avant de la verser dans Commons? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Tu dois avoir versé l'image dans "Commons" entre le 1er et le 30 septembre, c'est la règle de base (avec ses références "Mérimée"). Tu peux ensuite placer le bandeau WLM 2013 quand tu veux, mais avant le 30 septembre, fin du concours.--Jebulon (talk) 21:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Jebulon a tout bien expliqué. Je précise juste qu'il ne faut pas oublier la référence Mérimée avec le numéro de code du monument inscrit ou classé dans la page de description du fichier. Bonne participation à WLM 2013 pour vous deux ! --Myrabella (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrought iron wayside cross of Champerboux, Lozère, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursuline monastery in Ispagnac, Lozère, France. Entrance portal..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Martin de La Capelle chevet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Martin de La Capelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen Coste-Rouge Soumont 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen Coste-Rouge Soumont tumulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen Coste-Rouge Soumont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 02:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues Issenges manoir domaine rural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 17:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues Issenges manoir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 18:46, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de La Capelle, Lozère, France (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau Montsoreau Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nymphaeum of the Saint-Sulpice Seminary, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful. Les nymphées, jusqu'à ce jour, m'étaient totalement inconnu.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

On en apprend tous les jours. Bon, j'arrête, je vais écrire des bêtises.--Jebulon (talk) 13:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aire des Trois-Seigneurs dolmen tumulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cloister of Prieuré Saint-Michel de Grandmont, Hérault, France (inside view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Prieuré Saint-Michel de Grandmont, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

100

Félicitations !

tu vois: y'en a qui suivent !--Jebulon (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Merci merci, je suis très honorée ! Je n'oublie pas que le projet VI fut le début de nos conversations, parfois vives. Aujourd'hui, je trouve que ce projet VI est devenu plus foisonnant sous la houlette d'ArchaéoD., plus encourageant pour les nominateurs, plus facile pour les reviewers, plus incitatif pour apporter de nouvelles images intéressantes sur Commons et WP et je suis contente d'y contribuer. --Myrabella (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle expiatoire Paris interieur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Sainte-Blaise Lacommande oculus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition and good quality. Pymouss 22:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée de l'Éventail, Paris, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse cote tour Olmeto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse-du-Sud truie allaitant porcelets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light is relatively harsh, but quality nonetheless OK. --Tuxyso 15:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochon Corse-du-Sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Grouik. Canal historique ? --Jebulon 08:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Merci ! Canal habituel en trêve, je dirais plutôt...

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 02 Calanche Piana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments dust spot (see notice) --P e z i 09:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  CommentOK now --P e z i 11:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your eye! --Myrabella 11:34, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Calanche Piana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau La Couvertoirade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK I suppose. --Mattbuck 18:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 04 Calanche Piana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 03 Calanche Piana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 05:39, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Sainte-Blaise Lacommande chevet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment details of the walls would be better visible when enhancing dynamics --P e z i 10:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse tour genoise Olmeto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix monumentale Cusson cathedrale Lodeve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you for your look. It is intentionally, without a perspective correction; I tried it, but the result was weird and I finally chose to upload it as it was because this point of view accentuates the monumental effect of this cross. --Myrabella 14:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 09:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Le vol de la punaise!

Acrosternum heegeri

Je viens vers toi car j'ai commis un vol. Involontaire. Voici :Acrosternum MHNT.jpg qui était mal identifiée. Son nom est rectifié et tout a été fait dans les différents wikis pour actualiser. Mais elle est promue en VI sous son ancien nom. Peut-on effacer cette promotion pour la représenter avec son nouveau nom? Merci de tes lumières. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Zut, ou plutôt, punaise ! Mais ce n'est pas difficile à traiter. Le cas de VI mal identifiées s'est déjà présenté, ex : Commons_talk:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list/Archive_7#Presumable_wrong_ID_of_the_current_VI_for_Pieris_rapae. Je te propose donc la même chose : retrait du label VI sur la page du fichier, retraits de ce fichier dans la galerie VI associée, et ajout de quelques mots sur la page de nomination pour expliquer cette modification.Je vais m'en occuper. Tu pourras ensuite la renominer sous ses nouveaux nom et scope. --Myrabella (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done La voilà remise à neuf, à toi de jouer ! --Myrabella (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

...Je t'offre virtuellement, non pas la punaise, mais la rose qui la porte.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Je t'en remercie ! Je suis d'autant plus touchée que c'est une rose de ton jardin... --Myrabella (talk) 21:34, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:01 Calanche Piana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:01 Calanche Piana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aire des Trois-Seigneurs dolmen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This view allows you to see the floor, and particularity walls, with particular frames walls. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 Support per above --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Supportper others--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Most Valued REview Scores: 
1. Aire_des_Trois-Seigneurs_dolmen.jpg: 0
2. Aire_des_Trois-Seigneurs_dolmen_2.jpg: +3 <--
=>
File:Aire_des_Trois-Seigneurs_dolmen.jpg: Declined.
File:Aire_des_Trois-Seigneurs_dolmen_2.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Myrabella (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calanques of Piana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio phare Madonetta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio phare Madonetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stendhal tombe cimetiere Montmartre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 22:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio phare Madonetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Corsica Ferries Mega Express Four.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 22:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bonifacio phare Madonetta.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bonifacio phare Madonetta.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 16:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of Stendhal, Montmartre Cemetery, Paris, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 02 Corsica Ferries Mega Express Four.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 10:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Bagatelle Paris printemps cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 12:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio baliseur Iles Sanguinaires IMO 7804819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose clipped whites and lacking crispness, sry --A.Savin 09:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Myrabella 12:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC) It's a significant improvement for me, OK for QI imo --A.Savin 19:34, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ligne Petite Ceinture parc Montsouris Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 10:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Zonitis (Zonitis) flava Mounted Specimen.jpg

Bonjour, me revoilà ennuyé par une bestiole. Je me suis trompé dans la dénomination. (il n'y à que 4 segment au tarse arrière au lieu de 5, tu te rends compte). Peux-tu annuler le label VI? J'ai déjà modifié tous se que je pouvais. Elle repassera en VI dans quelque temps avec sont nouveau nom. Merci, bonne soirée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Didier,  Done, il n'y a plus de fausse VI de Rhagonycha fulva. --Myrabella (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Merci!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ligne Petite Ceinture parc Montsouris Paris.jpg, which was nominated by Paris 16 at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ligne Petite Ceinture parc Montsouris Paris.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 05:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Lion de Roccapina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIDAblu Ajaccio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 22:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lady Lau super-yacht IMO 1010674 Bonifacio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lady Lau (ship, 2010).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baie Ajaccio voilier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsica Classic 2013 Skylark of 1937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 07:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

		The Quality Image Barnstar
		Pour tes 300 QI ! tu vois, y'en a qui suivent !--Jebulon (talk) 19:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

• Merci beaucoup de ton attention, cher Jebulon ! --Myrabella (talk) 00:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse phare Senetosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:51, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skylark of 1937 (ship, 1937).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 08:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castagna tour genoise rivage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. The lower part could be croped slightly. --NorbertNagel 20:36, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Capu di Senetosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

"Very nice but tilted"

You reviewed my photo Tambunan_Sabah_Battlefield-Battle-of-Tambunan-01.jpg and added the comment "very nice but tilted". I am not sure, if you are aware, that "tilt lines" - a result of perspective aberration - do not occur when the camera is far away from the object. I have to oppose your opinion, that a small hut which is 2 kilometers far away from the camera can produce tilted vertical lines. Please consider, that we are talking about handmade erected huts on pilars which are sometimes out of orthogonal construction schemes. Moreover, the photo is showing a section of the "Tambunan Plain" which is rising from Tambunan to Sunsurong - eventually the rising horicontal line is giving a misleading view over the photo.

Of course I am always willing to apply whatever operation is needed to enhance a photo, but I cannot "untilt" a photo which is not tilted. Thank you, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

*Hello*, To me, pillars, trees, houses in the background tend to lean to the left. Very nice shoot otherwise. Let's discuss in DR, regards, --Myrabella (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Al right; I could enhance by rotating clockwise. Your re-assessing will be highly appreciated. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. But it seems that something went wrong with your edit, and the image has lost contrast and sharpness (and weight) more than expected I am afraid. Maybe is because you have imposed the same size (a rotation generally implies a crop)? Sorry to be bothersome, but your image is pretty, not boring, and my eyes were stopped by it. --Myrabella (talk) 21:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Gosh, you are right! I oversaw the edit protocoll in Lightroom ... I made a mistake and the export resultat is really poor!!! I am just uploading a new version. Thank you very much for your important hint! Cheers from Cologne, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Better than the 2nd version! However, colors and saturation have changed in your new version, and personally, I prefer the original version in this respect. Good enough to go thouh, thank you for sharing. Cheers from near Paris :)--Myrabella (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting! Saturation is - to a certain extend - for sure also about personal preference and I am a little bit shy to upload a 4th version with reduced saturation but just for my consideration: can I do that without breaking the QI status? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

WLM2013

Congratulations on an incredible photo in the WLM 2013 finals!-Godot13 (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I am very pleased and proud of it! I seize the opportunity to felicitate you too for your recent uploads about Israel and Czech Republic—some are poignant. --Myrabella (talk) 22:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 - Édition française

Bonjour, une des photos que vous avez versé dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments a été sélectionnée par le jury. Nous prendrons contact avec vous rapidement pour les modalités pratiques de remise de prix. Sachez d'ores et déjà que la soirée de remise des prix aura lieu le 29 novembre à Paris et que vous y êtes bien entendu convié. N'hésitez pas à revenir vers moi si vous avez des questions.

In short and in english : one of your picture has been selected by french jury, we'll contact you as soon as possible with more information Symac (talk) 19:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Phare d'Ajaccio

Ah non, pas du tout !

Si tu veux couper quelque chose, enlève peut-être un peu des cailloux devant, mais ce "crop" fait perdre beaucoup de magie à ton image.

le phare de complément est une étape dans la ligne de fuite, et l'horizon montagneux ajoute encore. Il ne faut pas toucher à ça, pas plus qu'aux bâtiments...

Bref, tu auras compris, je "préfère l'original à la copie", si j'ose dire. Je trouve la version alternative "éviscérée," ayant perdu de son charme at de son caractère. Garde le mer, va !

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 23:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Ah ben tiens, merci bien, tu me confortes. Ce n'est pas un crop mais une autre photo que je n'avais pas retenue, la trouvant plate (plus plate que la mer calme un jour d'été sans brise..) --Myrabella (talk) 23:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio phare citadelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très beau -- MJJR 10:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Appel de phare (canal historique)

Si je lis bien ce qui précède : a/ nous sommes trois du même avis au sujet de ce phare : ne change rien, la deuxième mouture me paraît moins intéressante. Il arrive parfois qu'on recueille, sur Commons, des conseils à ne pas suivre... b/ Tu as obtenu, cette année encore, un prix à WLM France : congrats ! J'aurais bien aimé te rencontrer, avec d'autres, à cette occasion. Pour cela, il eût fallu que j'obtinsse un prix (ce qui n'était pas évident) et, tout d'abord, que je participasse (ouf !). Or je n'ai fait ni l'un ni l'autre : je regarderai donc la cérémonie à la télé ! Plus sérieusement, j'espère que, cette fois tu atteindras le podium, voire sa première marche (je croise les doigts) et que l'atmosphère sera aussi cordiale qu'en 2012. Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 10:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Un peu, qu'elle est sur le podium ! Deuxième, même !--Jebulon (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Merci cher JLPC ! Pour la photo du phare ajaccien alea jacta est, je l'ai un peu recadrée en enlevant des cailloux du bas, selon une suggestion faite par Christian Ferrer et aussi Jebulon, mais je ne la retoucherai plus, elle me plait comme ça. Pour WLM, je suis très contente de cette distinction. Tu avais fait le choix de ne pas participer, que je respecte - pourtant, que de photos intéressantes documentant mieux encore les églises romanes de Charente ! Pour se rencontrer, c'est simple, tu nous fais signe quand tu viens à Paris. Pour ma part, j'irai sans doute à nouveau à Angoulême pour le prochain festival BD, cela peut faire une autre occasion. Bien amicalement à vous deux, --Myrabella (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I wish you a very very happy and prosperous Diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

While Diwali is popularly known as the "festival of lights", the most significant spiritual meaning behind it is "the awareness of the inner light". It is the belief that there is something beyond the physical body and mind which is pure, infinite, and eternal, called the Atman. The celebration of Diwali as the "victory of good over evil” refers to the light of higher knowledge dispelling all ignorance, the ignorance that masks one's true nature, not as the body, but as the unchanging, infinite, immanent and transcendent reality. With this awakening come compassion and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). This brings Satcitananda (joy or peace). Just as we celebrate the birth of our physical being, Diwali is the celebration of this Inner Light. While the story behind Diwali and the manner of celebration varies from region to, the essence is the same – to rejoice in the Inner Light! And this year Diwali and All Souls' Day come together to fully defeat the Evil! "Happy Diwali!" – JKadavoor Jee 09:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Roccapina tour genoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Somewhat soft at the top of the tower, and in the corners, but acceptable, not really disturbing. --Smial 10:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Félicitations pour la 2e place en WLM 2013!

Chère Myrabella! Je te félicité très chaleureusement pour ta 2e place très mérité dans le WLM du 2013! Tes photos de Corse sont magnifiques et cella particulièrement! --Moonik (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Merci pour tes gentils mots! Commons me manque aussi mais je ne pense pas pour l'instant d'y revenir tant que les choses ne changent radicalement! Par contre je viendrai avec plaisir pour te féliciter personnellement lors de la cérémonie de remise de prix WLM 2013. Ça pourra être une excellente occasion de revoir tout le monde. A très bientôt je l'espère! --Moonik (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio citadelle phare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 22:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Punta di Campomoro tour genoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Campomoro tour genoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse tour genoise Capu di Muru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Capu di Muru phare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ajaccio phare citadelle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ajaccio phare citadelle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse Capu di Muru phare hors-bord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse-du-Sud Ota.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could profit from additional sharpness / clarity. But still QI. --Tuxyso 11:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Slightly amended, thank you. --Myrabella 13:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aitone piscine naturelle Evisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bussaglia plage Serriera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corse-du-Sud Evisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aitone cascade Evisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 08:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Évisa, Corse-du-Sud, France. View from east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Myrabella/Archive, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 15e Place Balard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petite Ceinture in Paris XVe arrondissement Promenade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Place Balard (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 00:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15e Parc Georges Brassens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is one blurry bird (see annotation). Although they are reasonable sharp in full resolution, I suggest to remove the other two birds, because they look like small dust spots in lower resolution. --Cccefalon 18:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Yes, that was a speedy bird! Removed, as well as the two other ones. --Myrabella 19:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok! --Cccefalon 20:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petite Ceinture in Paris XVIe arrondissement Promenade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and bucolic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marché livre ancien Georges Brassens Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15e Parc Georges Brassens vigne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 17:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Caesio_caerulaurea_(Blue_and_Gold_Fusilier)_in_Fiji_by_Nick_Hobgood.jpg : ID ?

Bonjour Citron,
Es-tu sûr de l'espèce représentée dans File:Caesio_caerulaurea_(Blue_and_Gold_Fusilier)_in_Fiji_by_Nick_Hobgood.jpg, image que tu as nommée en FP ? Je me pose la question en voyant cette page de Fishbase, les images Google, cette planche, les autres images de la catégorie dont File:Caesio_caerulaurea.jpg, cette page aussi. Les poissons dans l'image nominée ressemblent plus à Caesio teres qu'à Caesio caerulaurea AMHA. --Myrabella (talk) 10:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Myrabella,

Bien vu, il doit certainement y avoir une erreur d'identification. D'habitude, Nick identifie justement ses différentes trouvailles, je n'ai donc pas eu le réflexe de vérifier. Je vais lui demander ce qu'il en pense, pour qu'on envisage de renommer le fichier. Amicalement--Citron (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rochefort-Martrou transporter bridge, seen from the south bank.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 00:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues collegiale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collegiate church of Bédouès, Lozère, France (exterior, seen from West).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I think it is the best in scope. (There are two other candidates, one a crop ob this one and the other with plants covering a door.) --XRay ^talk 10:16, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedoues village collegiale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brignais vue du pont vieux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 14:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

National Geographic Editor would like to use your image.

Dear Myrabella,

I'm a photo editor and would like to use one of your images on Wikipedia. It's necessary for us to contact you and get your full name for proper credit, so if you could please respond to this message at-

acoakley@ngs.org

I would really appreciate it. The image we're interested in use in from this submission.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hagia_Sophia_Southwestern_entrance_mosaics.jpg

Many thanks, Adrian Coakley

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fête des Lumières 2013, Lyon, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Myrabella/Archive, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brignais Garon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Demande d'aide

Bonjour, je te sollicite pour un problème sur VI. Concernant les images en concurrence directes, et particulièmenet sur « Manuela Schwesig » Je pense que je me suis peu être trompé en fermant le vote que je croyais clos. Regarde ma page de discussion, nous ne savons pas comment sortir de se problème. Merci de tes lumières. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour, Je suis heureuse de pouvoir vous apporter quelque lumière :) J'ai répondu sur ta page, je donnerai un coup de main ce soir si toujours besoin. --Myrabella (talk) 07:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Merci. Quand tout est perdu :tu es toujours là. Je ne m'aventurerai plus dans ce secteur de VI que je ne maîtrise pas. Bonnes Fêtes! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

La maîtrise peut s'acquérir, si elle en vaut la peine :) Heureuse d'avoir pu t'aider. Très bonnes fêtes à toi aussi ! --Myrabella (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Sainte-Enimie statue sainte Anne Vierge Enfant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame-du-Gourg, Sainte-Enimie, Lozère, France (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)