User talk:Moroder/Archives 2017-3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of former Cooperative Bank in Ljubljana..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa e Campo di San Marcuola a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio di San Marcuola Ponte Storto dal Canal Grande Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Annotations comme il faut. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seis am Schlern Vulkanische Tuffe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Marcuola a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljubljana Robba fountain City Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seis am Schlern Vulkanische Tuffe und Kapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastelruth Wildeleiteloch ober Gschtatsch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Area ferroviaria sul Canal Grande Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiseralm Peterlunger Lock 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiseralm Peterlunger Lock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ljubljana house on Miklosiceva street 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljubljana house on Miklosiceva street 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.- could have more contrast though good to me --Joobo 14:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio di Noale Canal Grande Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plans de Cunfin funtana 1 Santa Cristina2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastelruth Wolken Schlernhex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ghost riders in the sky. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljubljana portal seminary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljubljana portal seminary sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of the Seminary (Ljubljana).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljubljana Central Pharmacy building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The outline of building against the sky could have been slightly sharper, but okay for me.--Famberhorst 17:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljubljana Grand Hotel Union on Miklosiceva street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave scuola Amerigo Vespucci a Venezia museo navale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sas dla Luesa Murfreit Pisciadu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium Martagon blanch sun Frea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Hotel Union, Ljubljana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central Pharmacy (Ljubljana).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz de Murfreit Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisciadu waterfall 2 Sella South Tyrol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val Setus Sella South Tyrol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisciadu waterfall Sella South Tyrol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 16:37, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Feldzutterhexlmoos St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum Tanirz Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen zwei Rotföhren unterhalb Rabans St. Peter Tafel Bildstock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen zwei Rotföhren unterhalb Rabans St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum Tafel Tanirz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Tanürzmoos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Tschöfas Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Tschöfas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Tanürzmoos 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cisles Forces de Siëles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leontopodium alpinum Stëila dla Elpes te Ncisles 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Alandmanson 09:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cisles Muntijela Forces de Siëles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum Tanirz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 08:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium Martagon blanch 2 sun Frea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! QI for me --Alandmanson 10:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Video Use on Facebook[edit]

Great video. I used it in a public post on facebook -- with attribution. Thanks!

https://www.facebook.com/7yr1nRo55/posts/490587391283944 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Straylight Focus Imaging (talk • contribs) 13:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen zwei Rotföhren unterhalb Rabans 2 St. Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststeig Gröden Kalte Löcher in Pontives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterfinser Hof Lajen Ried Rosskastanie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very beautiful image -- Spurzem 20:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterfinser Hof Lajen Rosskastanie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Val Mont dal Ega Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition. --ArildV 08:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech da Iman sun Mastle Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice panorama, little unsharp in places, but QI imo. --Lewis Hulbert 22:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cisles Muntijela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 12:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pastura de Ncisles Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 13:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech da Iman sun Mastle Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice panorama, little unsharp in places, but QI imo. --Lewis Hulbert 22:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using Your image[edit]

I'd like to kindly ask You for permission to use Your photograph https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dog_tags_(prisoners_identification)_of_Stalag?uselang=pl#/media/File:Permit_and_badge_Prisoner_of_war_Stalag_XVIII-A.jpg as a part of digital exhibition prepared by the Polish History Museum on the Google Cultural Institute platform.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dog_tags_(prisoners_identification)_of_Stalag?uselang=pl#/media/File:Permit_and_badge_Prisoner_of_war_Stalag_XVIII-A.jpg

think I owe You a few words about the intended use of the image. The exhibition I am preparing deals with the Polish military forces organized in USSR by general Anders, which were evacuated to Persia, moved through British Mandate of Palestine, and then participated in the battle of Monte Cassino in Italy. The image is very loosely related to the subject - it illustrates little-known fact that the army used reinforcements from the other side of the front line, including deserters from Wehrmacht and freed prisoners of the Stalag.

If such use is OK to You, please contact me at pawel.koziol@muzhp.pl ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nescitus (talk • contribs) 10:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Used your pictures on Art.Nouveau.World[edit]

Hello, According to your license terms, I am happy to inform you that I have used a few of your wonderful pictures of Grand Hotel Europe in St.Petersbug in my Art.Nouveau.World project. If you have any more pictures of any thing Art Nouveau/Jugendstil/Secession - I will be delighted to have more of your contributions to my project. Thanks and regards, Andrei http://art.nouveau/world/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marassa (talk • contribs) 13:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Eiche Moar zu Tassis Freins Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 16:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststeig Gröden Pontives Kalte Löcher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststeig Gröden Pontives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Eiche Moar zu Tassis Freins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Pliegermoos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untertschutscher in Lajen Fresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe more contrast would have been more beautiful, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:36, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ncisles Val Mont dal Ega Gherdeina.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ncisles Val Mont dal Ega Gherdeina.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterfinser Hof Rosskastanie Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Unterbuchfelder Lajen Ried Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Unterbuchfelder Lajen Ried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eisacktal rechte Talseite in Klausen Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum im Bäcknangerle Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum im Bäcknangerle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Lusenegg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Lusenegg Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Backlighting is a downside. But the tree is impressive.--Famberhorst 16:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie beim Mair am Bach Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit too cut off at the top, but QI for me. Tournasol7 08:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum beim Tommele Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice scene, could be even better if you cropped out some of the cut things on the left and right side (see note) but it's not a deal-breaker. --W.carter 08:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Ahorn und Ansitz Fonteklaus Freins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Poststeig Gröden Pontives.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poststeig Gröden Pontives.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Oberbuchfelder Lajen Ried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GC --Ezarate 01:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using your image of Aspen Community Church[edit]

Dear Wolfgang, I'm using your lovely image for this slideshow: http://www.blouinartinfo.com/photo-galleries/travel-tips-for-art-aspen-visitors Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.48.101.80 (talk) 07:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using your image of St. Regis, Aspen[edit]

Hi using this at http://www.blouinartinfo.com/photo-galleries/travel-tips-for-art-aspen-visitors Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.48.101.80 (talk) 08:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using your image of John Denver Sanctuary[edit]

Also using your photo of John Denver Sanctuary in http://www.blouinartinfo.com/photo-galleries/travel-tips-for-art-aspen-visitors — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.48.101.80 (talk) 11:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Robinie beim Mantinghof Pardell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but please retouch the car at the right border. --Berthold Werner 11:53, 1 August 2017 (UTC)✓ Done Killed the beast. Thanks --Moroder 15:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Robinie beim Mantinghof Pardell Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  Support Pretty and homey. -- Johann Jaritz 12:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Edelkastanie beim Brunnerhof Naven Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Exemplary and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Edelkastanie beim Brunnerhof Naven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Esche beim Oberantinghof Pardell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Unterbuchfelder Lajen Ried Strasse Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tremendous. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Walnussbaum beim Tommele Tafel Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen Edelkastanie Oberbuchfelder Tafel Lajen Ried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Forces de Sieles Muntijela Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments FP quality --Uoaei1 13:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Cansles Stevia Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles papaver alpinum pavé da mont Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, BTW good quality for me. Tournasol7 14:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Esche beim Oberantinghof Pardell Geisler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leontondon montanus - Scorzoneroides montana fehlbestimmt[edit]

Das folgende Bild ist nicht der richtigen Art zugeordnet. Fotografiert wurde tatsächlich Leontodon crispus.

lg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orjen (talk • contribs) File:Leontodon_montanus_Resciesa_Gherdeina.jpg

  • Danke für den Tipp. Im Moment habe ich keine Unterlagen um das zu Prüfen. Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Nun, wie sieht's aus? --Leyo 15:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Leyo: Die Pflanze ist kaum 10 cm hoch und wurde auf 2200 m. Höhe fotografiert S. auch Karl Demetz, Josef Wanker. "Flora y fauna dla Dolomites-Flora und Fauna in den Dolomiten-Flora e fauna nelle Dolomiti." Athesia, Bozen 1997. S 129. ISBN 8882662837 Grüße aus Gröden --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Anpingen musst du Orjen, nicht mich? ;-) --Leyo 11:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Die abgebildete Pflanze ist definitive nicht Scorzoneroides montana. Das ist eine absolut unverkennbare Art der Schuttvegetation, die im Gletschrvorfeld oder auf Feinschuttablagerungen wenig beruhigter jung-Moränen vorkommt. Und ausschließlich da! Damit ist Scorzoneroides eine absolute Pionierpflanze die in der Sukzessionsfolge sofort ausfällt wenn der Schutt sich festigt und sich Rasengesellschaften einfinden. Die Art ist zwar verbreitet, jedoch nur zerstreut und überall selten. Sie kann wirklich nur auf Schutt fotografiert warden. Scorzoneroides montana hat zudem keine sternförmige Behaarung der Blätter sowie keine geraden Stängel, die sind gebogen und meist niederliegend. Die Hüllblätter sind bei Scoroneroides montana (im Foto nicht zu sehen) mit langen einfachen schwarzen Haaren bestanden (wichtiges Merkmal). Abgebildet ist hier eine Pflanze mit sternförmiger Behaarung aus einer alpinen Rasengesellschaft. Die Blätter von Leontodon crsipus sind grob buchtig zerteilt und überall dicht sternhaarig. Beides erkennt man auf dem Bild. Es kann sich im übrigen auch nicht um Leontodon hispidus handeln, der ist nie so dicht behaart und in der Regel viel größer.Orjen 13:58, 13. August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Flitzereisenquelle Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Weg zum Flitzewasserfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Kalter Keller innen St. Konstantin Schlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Kalter Keller Öffnungen St. Konstantin Schlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern St. Konstantin Schlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Kirschbaum St. Konstantin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry but the church is leaning in, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 16:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)✓ Done You are too fast ;-)) --Moroder 16:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rápido, rápido, zack-zack. Next picture, please... Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gufidaun im Eisacktal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK but I would crop a part of the sky, IMO there is too much. --Basotxerri 18:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Nussbaum Obervöls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Latin names are welcome to write in italics.--Famberhorst 15:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Schnaggenkreuzmoos St. Konstantin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 12:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern parasol St. Konstantin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 12:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sa la crëusc sun Resciesa Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The descent of sharpness towards the corners could be less, but the overall view is more than worth it: Wow! --PtrQs 22:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Sociautier Odles Val da Mesdi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gufidaun im Eisacktal Kuppelgelände Raffeil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Johanniskapelle mit Geisler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sa la crëusc sun Resciesa Gherdeina.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sa la crëusc sun Resciesa Gherdeina.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cisles Forces de Siëles furcela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Sas dla Porta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Odles Sas Rigais Cansles Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Waldidylle am Höfeweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eisacktal aus Prösels Brennerautobahn A22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villnöß Johanniskapelle mit Geisler 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 10:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

use the scala theater[edit]

Hello, My name is Aldo Villanueva, and I want you to notice that I'm going to use this photograph (giving you the copyright of course) for my tesis about concert halls, in order to get my degree as an architect, so I hope that there are no problem with use it, thanks an have a nice week, Aldo Villanueva — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 187.224.9.153 (talk) 05:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very happy to help you with your work.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:00, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gherdeina da Stevia Silvester.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gufidaun im Eisacktal Edelkastanien 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Latin names are welcome in italics.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 17:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gufidaun im Eisacktal Edelkastanien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Latin names are welcome in italics.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 17:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Stein am Ritten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image IMO is too hazy for a QI, I'm not sure if it can be fixed. Please fix the tilt, too. --Basotxerri 09:07, 19 August 2017 (UTC)✓ Done Fixed tilt, thanks --Moroder 17:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK but is there a way for you to reduce the haze, could you try? --Basotxerri 05:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done thanks --Moroder 18:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cisles da Pieralongia Gherdeina.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cisles da Pieralongia Gherdeina.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruf de Ncisles Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Roa blancia Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Stein am Ritten Siffian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ--Nikhilb239 02:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Völs am Schlern Kalter Keller Höfeweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selva luech de Tubla Gherdeina 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Beautiful composition. --MirandaAdramin 22:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen St Nikolaus Kirche Albions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Muntijela la Piza Stevia Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selva luech de Tubla porta de cësa Gherdeina 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You could add some door-related (or portal-related) category. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 15:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selva luech de Tubla Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. May be it is leaning in at the right, may be it is real. And the WB may be OK or to warm. --XRay 05:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. I like the warm hue. The wall is leaning, the windows are straight. Cheers --Moroder 14:34, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Villnöß Johanniskapelle mit Geisler.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villnöß Johanniskapelle mit Geisler.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cisles pastura y ruf Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juac y Mont de Sëuc Scilier Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit more contrast makes the picture probably less flat, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 18:53, 25 August 2017 (UTC) CommentThanks. I incremented contrast on the RAW file already to the maximum --Moroder 19:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Pieres Cisles Odles da Stevia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Pieres Cir Sela da Stevia Gherdeina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. But: There are halos around the bird. I would clone out the bird. --XRay 08:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedul Sëlva Mont de Sëuc Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La gran Piëra Stevia Gherdëina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Le Corbusier gave the following answer to the question, which was the most beautiful building on our planet earth: "The Dolomites." Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedul Mont de Sëura Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Sëura Chedul Cir Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cir Pass Val Gardena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frea pass Sella group Dolomites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a marvelous fairytale/Bosch-like landscape. If you can take a photo of this motif in less hazy light, please nominate it at FPC. I'd consider supporting this photo there, too, despite the haze. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)  Info But first Moroder should remove the little stitching problem, see note --Milseburg 13:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)✓ Done >contrast and removed se. Thanks @Poco a poco: ,@Ikan Kekek: and @Milseburg: .--Moroder 12:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedul Zirmëi Mont de Sëura Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice panorama - but a dust spot on your sensor shows the stitching and there's an artifact on one of the peaks - see annotations --PtrQs 18:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC)✓ Done Uploaded a new version and fxed DS. Thanks indeed for your accurate review --Moroder 11:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your cooperation. It's nice when people are not annoyed, if you want to help making things better --PtrQs 16:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use a picture[edit]

JMJ + AMDG + BVMH September 4, 2017

Dear Dr. Moroder,

 Hello, I am the young author who contacted you last August about acquiring your kind permission to use the picture of Ludwig Moroder’s beautiful “Christus” sculpture at the end of my book retelling The Snow Queen.  Since that time I have continued writing wholesome, enjoyable stories for my sisters and self-publishing them using Amazon’s CreateSpace program.  The majority of my books are still in the slow editing stage; however, as an innocent form of entertainment for my family and a fun, free way to advertise via a link on my Amazon product pages, I’ve recently been putting together simple little “book trailers” for each separate story, using Windows’ Movie Maker, featuring the text of the different book descriptions set to public domain music and images and videos.  The finished video is generally about two to four minutes in length.  I mostly use scenic images (mountains, forests, flowers, rivers etcetera), but I do always incorporate strikingly beautiful religious images as well (such as crucifixes, crosses, old church buildings, and statues).  
 While working on a “book trailer” for a story retelling the Frog Prince, I have been searching for a special Marian image to reflect that this tale prominently features a pilgrimage site called Our Lady’s Island.  I came across this very beautiful and lifelike statue of Mary on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Virgo_det_Josef_Moroder.jpg.  Just looking at it inspires love and devotion to the Blessed Virgin!  
 May I please have your very kind permission to use this lovely image in my video which will, Deo volente, be uploaded someday on YouTube when my book is officially made available for sale (after the editing process)?  At the end of the videos, I include attributions for images in order of appearance, and I would credit you as the “Author.”  
 A reply on this page would be so greatly appreciated!  (But please let me know if you would like to contact me directly and I would then provide my e-mail address.)
 God bless you and Mary keep you!  
             To Jesus through Mary, 
           Miss Angela Marie Michaels — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.53.33.103 (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It's a great pleasure to help you with my photos. Please send me the exact Title, editor and ISBN of your publications containing my pictures. You can write me a mail wolfgang.moroder at tin.it Best wishes Wolfgang

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Sëura Chedul Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lastëies Chedul Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odles pitla y gran Fermeda Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frea pass Sas dla Luesa Val Culea Schiefer Tod Gherdëina Dolomites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montes de Mezdi sëura Calfosch Dolomites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What a photo!Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mont de Sëura mountain, western face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Dein Fotos benutzen[edit]

Hallo, tolles Foto.

ich würde sehr gern dein Foto von der Alm Die Seiser Alm in Südtirol (Gemeinde Kastelruth), die Berge in der Langkofelgruppe im Hintergrund

auf Dekostoff drucken und als Fotohintergrund nutzen.

Wäre das für dich OK und wenn ja wie sind die Bedingungen.

Danke für deine Antwort.

MfG Christian Kolbe — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:DD:8BD9:E300:9927:6659:4FB:D2FA (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hallo Christian,

Welches Foto und zu welchem Zweck? MfG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedul Zirmëi Mont de Sëura Gherdëina 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

picture use - File:Sankt Katharina in Breien Völs am Schlern Erzengel Michael.jpg[edit]

Dear Mister Moroder

I’m an editorial staff member in the state museum of archaeology in Chemnitz (Germany). Right now, I’m working on the catalogue for our upcoming special exhibition about “Death and Rites”. We found your very nice picture "Sankt Katharina in Breien Völs am Schlern Erzengel Michael" on wikipedia and would like to use it in our exhibition grafic (not bigger than A3) as well as in our exhibition catalogue (not bigger than half a side). Of course we would mention your name. Would that be ok?

Kind regards, Linda Gaiser — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.25.240.89 (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC) (you can also reply direkly to linda.gaiser@lfa.sachsen.de) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.25.240.89 (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedul Steviola y barantli te Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heiliger Ulrich[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder, ich benutze Ihr Bild des Hl. Ulrichs für einen kleinen Film über eine den Hl.Ulrich gewidmete Kirche in Luxemburg, die nicht mehr existiert. Den Film werde ich mit einer Stadführungsapp verlinken. Selbstverständlich werde ich Sie als Photograph erwähnen. Freundlicher Gruß Marie-Paule Jungblut — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.99.98.222 (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Frea pass Sella group Dolomites.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frea pass Sella group Dolomites.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

croix sommitale[edit]

Bonjour, votre photo de la croix sommitale est magnifique ! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.198.40.94 (talk) 12:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia parëi dla Gran Piera Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! I feel like I'm going to fall off the cliff. PumpkinSky 19:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia Col dala Pieres SE Gherdeina .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia Col dala Pieres Mont de Sëura Chedul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col Turond Sciblota Mont de Sëura Saslonch Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia San Silvester.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La gran Piëra crëusc sun Stevia Gherdëina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedul Steviola y barantli te Gherdëina2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D850[edit]

So Wolfgang, you have the honor of the first D850 photo in the new Taken with Nikon D850 category I created! Lucky guy to have gotten one so early. I ordered one on August 25, second day it was open for preorder, and I'm sure you know about the complete debacle Nikon has created with this: won't tell the dealers anything, no one has any idea when they'll get their order, etc etc. Nikon has done this before but clearly can't learn from its mistakes. I'm seriously considering cancelling my order and getting a D810. Otherwise, it'll probably be August 2018 before I get an 850. Nikon has filled less than 10% of the pre orders. Anyway congrats on the new camera! PumpkinSky talk 16:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just saw you have a typo in this filename: File:Nikon DRSL camera D850.jpg, it should be DSLR, I'd guess. I can rename it if you need me to. PumpkinSky talk 16:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, it's still wrong. You renamed it to "DSRL". PumpkinSky talk 23:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John Baptist woodcarved statuette from Groeden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon DSLR camera D850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Congrats to your acquisition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon DSLR camera D850 lateral rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ein cooles Teil...Poco a poco 16:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco altare affresco tentato rapimento delle spoglie die martiri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco altare con pala del Romanino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco pala del Romanino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco sogno di Giuseppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 18:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco educazione di Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia sot al Cason.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 07:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inform about publication of your photo[edit]

Hi, Mr. Wolfgang! My name is Denis, I am the editor of the website topvoyager.com According to your demand about using your photo we inform you that we used your photo under licence CC BY-SA 3.0 in the article about mount Marmolada (https://topvoyager.com/marmolada/). We posted info about author and licence type. Please, tell, if you are not agree with this publication, send us message to office@topvoyager.com In this case we will immediately erase your photo. Thanks a lot. Denis. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.193.98.137 (talk) 20:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco paliotto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco affresco abside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments In spite of the good composition in full resolution this image lacks sharpness, especially in the shadows. Is it possible to fix this? --PtrQs 18:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)✓ Done Needed resize due to partial crop. Thanks for the comment --Moroder 20:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, good qualitiy now! --PtrQs 21:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco la gloria dei martiri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco altare San Niccolò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia Val Udera da San Silvester Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco altare Sacramento.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Christ is really sharp and beautiful. If you can find out what the sculptor's name was, please add that to your file description. -- Ikan Kekek 18:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Comment In the otherwisw very accurate leaflet of the church with a detailed description of the altar unfortunately no mention is made of the artist of the Christ. --Moroder 21:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad. Whoever the sculptor was, he deserves credit for this touching work. -- Ikan Kekek 00:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia parëi dla Gran Piera troi dla Palota Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Sëura Chedul Pizes de Cir Pizes Cuecenes Sela Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the photo Rosary-Madonna-Atzwang.jpg[edit]

Hello, I’m Hyunju LEE, editor of Bible and Life Publications in South Korea. Our company is operated by 'Caritas Sisters of Jesus' and we publish Catholic books and monthly magazines to help Catholic with their religious life. I am writing to inquire about your photo Rosary-Madonna-Atzwang.jpg. (link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rosary-Madonna-Atzwang.jpg?uselang=ko) We are planning to publish a book written by Most Rev. Benedictus Son Hee-song, S.T.D., D.D. of Archdiocese of Seoul, and it's a book that commemorates his sixtieth birthday. We wish to put your photograph in the book, if you don't mind. Surely we'll caption your name 'Wolfgang Moroder' as the author.

Thank you for the beautiful photo, and let me know if you have any problem about the matter. (biblelifekorea@gmail.com)

Sincerely, Hyunju — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.51.47.108 (talk) 02:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trieste pontone Ursus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Garda isola Borghese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco abside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco la gloria dei martiri allegorie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Felice del Benaco Chiesa San Fermo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parrocchiale San Felice del Benaco San Pietro Calegari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]