User talk:Mdbeckwith

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mdbeckwith!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments

Thanks very much for taking part. Your photo of the inside of St John's in Lancaster is marvellous (I much prefer the second version you uploaded). Nev1 (talk) 12:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	I really liked your photo of the lady chapel. Hope you don't mind that I have slightly renamed it to File:Liverpool Anglican Cathedral, Lady Chapel.jpg thanks WereSpielChequers (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Mdbeckwith, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Natural History Museum HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Natural History Museum HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Mdbeckwith, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leeds Corn Exchange HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leeds Corn Exchange HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued images

Hi Mdbeckwith, I was wondering if you've considered nominating some of your photos as Valued images. The criteria are quite straightforward, and for example I think this image of yours would be the best image within the scope of St. Mary the Virgin (Bury) interior. Nev1 (talk) 21:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Mdbeckwith,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chester Cathedral - Interior England.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment need to correct perspective.--Pierre André (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

An update from Wiki Loves Monuments UK

Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK

More than 300 people have contributed a total of 4,000 photos to this year's competition and we wanted to say thank you for helping us get this far. The competition runs until the end of September, and you can upload as many images as you want - so feel free to document some more sites. Or why not go through your old images to see if you have any others that could be submitted? Since you've already submitted some pictures to the competition, you might be interested in the banner mini-contest; to take part you crop your images to a 7:1 and upload a new version. You can find out more about how to do that here. In the meantime, we hope you enjoy the competition and share it with others! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)} Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chester Town Hall Council Chamber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Capricorn4049 02:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ribblehead Viaduct 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 09:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glasgow City Chambers Staircase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 09:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rijks Museum Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 09:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruges City Hall Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 09:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beverley Guildhall Courtroom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Wilfrids Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I would pull down the shadows a bit, they look somewhat weird at 100%. Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Giles Cathedral Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Only a weak promotion. I don't know why. Your camera is really good, but there is visible noise. May be the photograph is taken with a short exposure time and brigthened later. --XRay 12:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Marys Cathedral Newcastle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbotsford House Library HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbotsford House Study Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glasgow City Chambers The Council Chamber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:49, 10 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harewood House The Yellow Drawing Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worcester Guildhall Assembly Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice --Poco a poco 08:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brougham Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harewood House The East Bedroom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion File:Turton Tower exterior.jpg Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turton Tower exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glasgow City Chambers Exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worcester Cathedral Choir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chester Town Hall Staircase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Cathedral Church Of St Nicholas Choir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The windows have a strange edge and there are some weird "bubbles" in a few corners (eg two top-left corners of the golden wall in the back). It would be nice if you fixed that but it's hardly visible at 200% of monitor, good quality. --Trougnouf 13:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York Minster Chapter House Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 09:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC) File:Ripon Cathedral Choir Interior.jpg   Your file(s) uploaded yesterday during database outage has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Jarekt (talk) 19:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion File:Burton Constable Hall The Great Hall.jpg Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burton Constable Hall The Great Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}} --QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC) good Zakaria gd (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC) Nomination FP I nominee this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canterbury_Cathedral_Tower_Ceiling.jpg, thanks :) --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC) ...and this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salford_Cathedral_Memorial_Chapel.jpg too :) thanks for your job --Σπάρτακος (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canterbury Cathedral Tower Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Canterbury Cathedral Tower Ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canterbury Cathedral Tower Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salford Cathedral Memorial Chapel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salford Cathedral Memorial Chapel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St Marys Cathedral Nave Edinburgh.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Marys Cathedral Nave Edinburgh.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Abbotsford House Study Room.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbotsford House Study Room.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:University Of Oxford The Bridge Of Sighs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:University Of Oxford The Bridge Of Sighs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Merchant Adventurers Hall Governors Parlour Room.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Merchant Adventurers Hall Governors Parlour Room.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lancaster Priory Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Beverley Guildhall Courtroom.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beverley Guildhall Courtroom.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halifax Town Hall Council Chambers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some CA at the top but small enough relative to the overall size of the image. --King of Hearts 01:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wells Cathedral Nave Photograph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Spectacular! --King of Hearts 01:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leadenhall Market black and white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winchester Cathedral Choir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexham Abbey Choir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wells Cathedral Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield Cathedral nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durham Town Hall The Great Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. Maybe even better with slightly less exposure and more contrast. QI --ArildV 19:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC) per User:ArildV. Might then be a FP. --Dktue 20:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durham Cathedral Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality considering the resolution. If I should pixelpeep, I'd point out that it's kind of hazy, maybe too warm and the window on the right has got some very visible CA or HDR artifacts --Podzemnik 00:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gawthorpe Hall exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astley Hall Drawing Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astley Hall Dining Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astley Hall Long Gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astley Hall Oak Bedroom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite high resolution. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Cathedral Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The ruins of Bolton Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 13:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC) September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again! Hi You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations. You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019. Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackburn Cathedral Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, well done --PantheraLeo1359531 16:36, 19 October 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds Cathedral Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Isiwal 19:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chester Cathedral Choir 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful, sharp, well exposed. --Bobulous 16:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chester Cathedral Choir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chester Cathedral Nave 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice, maybe FP? --Tournasol7 15:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Autopatrolled rights given Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln Cathedral nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, great work! --Steindy 20:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Athenaeum Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Athenaeum News Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Todmorden Town Hall Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a beautiful room. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Marys RC Church The Hidden Gem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, as always with your photos, but consider not raising the shadows so much for better contrast and photorealism. --King of Hearts 03:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Island Lindisfarne Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC) POTD Notification ⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Princes_Road_Synagogue_Nave.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. //EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bruges City Hall Interior.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bruges City Hall Interior.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC) FP Promotion ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Worcester Guildhall Assembly Room.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Worcester Guildhall Assembly Room.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. /FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Athenaeum Dining Room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, not sure if the perspective is a tiny bit off --Trougnouf 22:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Criminal Court of England and Wales (The Old Bailey) The Grand Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Criminal Court of England and Wales (The Old Bailey) Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere Panoramic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality. And before people object to a lack of sharpness, consider that it is caused by it being a gray day. However, the com:overcat has to be corrected before this can be promoted. -- Ikan Kekek 14:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC) I'll support, but now I think there are too few categories. I'll leave this to your discretion, though. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist Church Tuebrook - The Rood Screen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist Church Tuebrook The Chancel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC) --Pi bot (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist Church Tuebrook The Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}} --QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC) File:Chester Town Hall Committee Room (49788485582).jpg   File:Chester Town Hall Committee Room (49788485582).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)