User talk:MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2020-2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright
File:Перспективы Московского метрополитена до 2027 года.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not own work, grabbed from forum.nashtransport.ru
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 05:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Перапіс насельніцтва 2019.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Перапіс насельніцтва 2019.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2020-2022, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Пирамида населения 2005.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 11:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

File copyright status

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. --Sealle (talk) 11:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Хорошо, я понял вас. В будущем при загрузке файлов буду спрашивать разрешение у правообладателей. Timur Rossolov (talk) 20:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2020-2022, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Схема--трам1.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, - FitIndia Talk 09:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello MasterRus21thCentury/Archives/2020-2022, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Перапіс насельніцтва 2019.png

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, - FitIndia Talk 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Татарстан

Прошу исправить недоразумение, связанное с шаблоном {{Tatarstan.ru}}. Благодаря вашим правкам, а именно созданиям отдельных страниц (только вот на английском-то создали, а на русском и татарском нет), теперь некорректно показывается лицензия, заместо «CC-BY-4.0» выдаёт «Просмотр лицензии», поскольку не проставлен шаблон лицензии, равно как и не сделана атрибуция. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Я просто хотел сделать это по образцу {{Kremlin.ru}}. В ближайшее время создам шаблон на русском языке, на татарский язык перевести не смогу - здесь нужно обращаться к тем участникам, которые владеют данным языком. Timur Rossolov (talk) 21:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Палац Єдності в Душанбе.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Могила Левка Лук'яненка.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

ТВ

А вы можете загрузить изображение связанные с телевидением (история, логотипы, телепередачи, сцены и т.п.)? 2001:16B8:1E5A:AF00:C01F:9890:EC87:984E 20:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Пока не могу. Timur Rossolov (talk) 20:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Олег Бекмеметьев.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Олег Бекмеметьев.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bel Stud Sajuz.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bel Stud Sajuz.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bel Stud Sajuz.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

File:ТКМ Тер кр музей.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Белецкий и Романив.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Белецкий и Романив.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 21:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Иван Гушалевич.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 11:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Львов ратуша реконструкция.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

File:EuropeanSquare1932Kiev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 07:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Матрос и солдат Севастополь.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 09:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Добрый день. А зачем разрешение VRT перемещать на документацию из шаблона? Удобнее напрямую с описания изображения видеть, чем проваливаться в сам шаблон, и, насколько я помню, обычно шаблоны как раз так оформлялись rubin16 (talk) 07:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

На шаблоне {{Kremlin.ru}} была точно такая же вещь, на сайте Госдумы точно также перенёс разрешение VRTS на документацию. Если например от автора лично согласие, то здесь только разрешение VRTS, если на сайте есть конкретная лицензия Creative Commons, то можно убрать в документацию. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Согласен, но на vlc.ru я указания на лицензию не нашёл rubin16 (talk) 08:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Скорее всего, администрация сайта не приняла во внимание статью №1286 ч.1 ГК РФ, вводящая лицензии Creative Commons. А ведь-то ещё с 2017 года разрешение VRTS имеется в архиве Фонда Викимедиа. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 09:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Я к тому, что на сайте лицензии нет, поэтому я бы оставил VRT-тикет в шаблоне самой лицензии rubin16 (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Хорошо. Тогда всё возвращаю назад. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Спасибо. Ваше сообщение у себя видел, после выходных помогу: с телефона не очень удобно rubin16 (talk) 12:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Pamjatnuk T.G.Shevchenky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


File tagging File:Thunburg 4.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thunburg 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Thunburg 4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

C.Suthorn (talk) 14:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Moscow-tropar-nikulino-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 12:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Vasiliy Vavrik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 12:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Байгильдиев Шариф Камалутдинович.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Еврейская общинная больница во Львове.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Игры патриотов.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 11:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

добрый день. если переводите шаблон на autotranslate, то нужно и базовую языковую версию тоже создать, иначе там будет выдаваться ошибка, какую вы сейчас можете увидеть в верхней части экрана rubin16 (talk) 06:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Сейчас у сайта только перевод шаблона на русский язык, на английский перевода пока нету. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Кинотеатр Салют 20-01-2022 2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Olgerts V.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Касательно фотографий с российских государственных сайтов

Здравствуйте, MasterRus21thCentury. Лицензия Creative Commons уже сама по себе предполагает в том числе и последующее коммерческое использование. Если Вы видите на российском правительственном сайте какие-то запреты/ограничения на коммерческое использование материалов (право перепечатки со ссылкой на первоисточник, к сожалению, не делает материалы свободными), то материалы такого сайта уже не подходят для Викисклада. Лучше всего использовать материалы только тех российских правительственных сайтов, где ясно указана свободная лицензия Creative Commons.

Список российских сайтов под свободными лицензиями вы можете посмотреть тут: wmru:Список сайтов со свободным использованием материалов (правда, некоторая информация там может быть уже устаревшей).

Надеюсь, я ответил на Ваш вопрос.--Russian Rocky (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Например, на Викискладе есть Category:Мвд.рффотографии с сайта МВД РФ, однако на сайте не указано соответствующее разрешение на использование материалов в коммерческих целях, при этом прямой запрет действует в условиях использования сайтов Министерств здравоохранения и иностранных дел. На сайтах Министерств спорта, культуры, строительства и ЖКХ, юстиции также указывается разрешение использования с ссылкой на источник, однако без запрета или разрешения на коммерческое использование. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Это лучше обсудить с администраторами Викисклада. На мой взгляд, фотографии из Category:Мвд.рф находятся в группе риска. Например, текст с сайта мвд.рф повторяет текст со старого сайта Госдумы РФ (см. ссылку на Архив Интернета: https://web.archive.org/web/20190327135948/http://old.duma.gov.ru/about-site/copyrights/).
Пока сайт Госдумы РФ официально не перешел на лицензию Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, фотографии со старого сайта Госдумы РФ просто-напросто удалялись администраторами Викисклада из-за того, что внизу страницы сайта был знак копирайта: "© Государственная Дума Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации, 2018". Такой же знак копирайта есть и внизу страниц сайта мвд.рф: "© 2022, МВД России".
Это значит, что какой-нибудь англоязычный или не очень администратор Викисклада может прийти и все из Category:Мвд.рф удалить из-за того, что лицензия CC BY-SA 4.0, указанная загружавшими фотографии в ту категорию, не соответствует условиям использования материалов на самом сайте (Commons:License laundering).
Если никак не оговорено коммерческое использование материалов сайта, то лучше вообще не загружать такие материалы на Викисклад. Лицензии Creative Commons хороши тем, что они НЕ подлежат отзыву. В нашем же случае с мвд.рф все очень неясно.--Russian Rocky (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
А вы в Минцифры не пробовали обращаться по поводу использования фотографий по Creative Commons, так как они убрали отметку CC BY 3.0 2,5 года назад? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Я как-то написал им через Обратную связь, но ответа не получил. Лучше решать все это через официальных представителей сообщества Русской Википедии, чтобы не получить в итоге отписки.--Russian Rocky (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
То есть грубо говоря, через членов НП "Викимедиа РУ" возможна связь с государственными органами власти РФ? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Да. Викимедиа РУ официально представляет интересы участников Русской Википедии и имеет давний опыт сотрудничества с властью. Если и продвигать переход российских государственных сайтов на свободные лицензии, то только через них.--Russian Rocky (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
А что по поводу белорусских госсайтов? Ведь же в Белоруссии нет собственного аналога Викимедии РУ, однако там проживают тысячи активных читателей русского раздела и десятки активных авторов. Я более того уже пытался убедить нескольких белорусских участников Викисклада, чтобы те направили письмо в пресс-службу белорусского президента с просьбой переноса материалов сайта на Creative Commons. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Извините, но я не в курсе ситуации в Белоруссии. Знаю только, что там ситуация со свободными лицензиями еще плачевнее. Вам лучше это обсудить не с белорусскими участниками Викисклада, а с активными участниками и администраторами Белорусской Википедии. Они больше всего выиграют от перехода государственных сайтов Белоруссии на свободные лицензии.--Russian Rocky (talk) 18:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Православный священнослужитель во Львове.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, вы можете определить местоположение, транспортные средства и людей в толпах и на расстоянии?

File:Телебашня Ташкента.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.126 13:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Николаевская академия Генерального штаба 01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Я там уже исправил автора, поэтому убрал с БУ. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Senato.it and dati.camera.it

Hi, there is no year parameter in those templates. As the edits you did triggered LUA errors, I reverted everything. Please double check your changes when you edit widely used templates (e.g. if you want to use autotranslate, at least add the English and local language translations, and not only Russian). Thanks Ruthven (msg) 12:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Don't split up source categories by year

The practice on Commons is to keep the (hidden) source categories flat and to not split them up by year. So please don't split them up. Multichill (talk) 20:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

You have no consensus at all at Commons:Village_pump#Distribution_of_files_from_categories_by_years so please stop doing this. Multichill (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Sl 5 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Чорновіл Вячеслав.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Чорновіл Вячеслав.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Прошу совета и помощи

Коллега, день добрый. Не так давно Вы удаляли с Викисклада фото с А.Ведяхиным с (из) Викисклада. Речь об вот этих файлах [1]

  • File:Александр Ведяхин на ПМЭФ-2022 - выступление.jpg
  • File:Александр Ведяхин на ПМЭФ-2022 - выступление.jpg (видимо - дубль? не очень понимаю, загружаю редко, мог случайно накосячить...)
  • File:Alexander Vedyakhin at SPIEF-2022 - panel.jpg

В качестве обоснования для удаления указано (в плашке прямо):Этот файл нарушает авторские права, поскольку No license, the source is All Rights Reserved.

Вы мне в комментах поясняли: "Правила Викисклада не разрешают загружать фотографии с сайтов, защищённых авторских правом и запрещающих использование материалов в коммерческих целях." Но на сайте Росконгресса нет такого "злобного" дисклаймера (или как там заявление о защите прав называется), как, например, на сайте Интерфакса. На Интерфаксе написано русским по тёмно-тёмно синему: " Все права защищены. Вся информация, размещенная на данном веб-сайте, предназначена только для персонального пользования и не подлежит дальнейшему воспроизведению и/или распространению в какой-либо форме, иначе как с письменного разрешения Интерфакса." (Фотогалереи - Интерфакс (interfax.ru) - в подвале). Всё ясно и понятно. На сайте же Росконгресса про такие ужасы ничего не сказано - написано только, что требуется указывать авторство.

Соответственно, возникают вопросы:

  • Такие файлы тоже нельзя на Викисклад загружать? Их же вроде бы как в фотобанке выставили - приглашение к использованию, т.е....
  • Если всё равно нет - можно ли их загружать в РуВики и с какими обоснованиями?

Я вот вижу интересный пример (я про правило ru:ВП:ДРУГИЕ всё усвоил лет с 10 назад!!! 8-) Как на прецедент на это ссылаться НЕ СОБИРАЮСЬ!) - просто как иллюстрация к моим вопросам и как более-менее подходящий кейс для анализа. Можно на нём мои непонимания показать? Я вполне допускаю, что и с этими фотографиями всё совсем не благополучно - но именно прошу Вашей помощи, советов и комментариев. Статьи ru:Шувалов, Игорь Иванович и en:Igor Shuvalov, фото, соотв, File:Shuvalov 2022.jpg и File:First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov.jpg Первая фотография (которая в русской статье) была загружена с того самого сайта Интерфакса, на котором горит синим пламенем тот самый девиз про ограничение всех и вся. Но в разделе Лицензия ничтоже сумяшись автор загрузки указывает :

Licensing

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.


Ну - допустим. Автор погорячился и его ждёт неминуемая отмена его правки. Но вместо этой фотографии повиснет тогда другая - вот так самая File:First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov.jpg, про которую написано буквально следующее:

Summary

Description
English: First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, Government of the Russian Federation (official photo).
Date
Source http://premier.gov.ru/en/press
Author Press Service and Information Department of the Government of the Russian Federation.
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Premier.gov.ru

Licensing

This file comes from the website of the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. In short: you are free to distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute premier.gov.ru. Note: Works published on site before April 16, 2015 are also licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Attribution: premier.gov.ru
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Attribution: premier.gov.ru
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Category:Igor Shuvalov

Эта-то фотография на Викискладе легальная? Под ссылкой на сайт правительства (правда под другой - та уже "мёртвая") можно, конечно, найти вот такое заявление:"Любым материалом можно делиться в социальных сетях или же воспользоваться сервисами хранения заметок." Ну и всё... Или пригодность таких файлов вытекает из некоммерческого характера сайте правительства?

Ну а самый-то главный вопрос - повторюсь - можно ли загрузить эти фото Ведяхина в РуВики, например - и на каких условиях? Я его рано или поздно сам сфортографировать надеюсь (есть ходы... 8-)) - но тут уж очень фото классыные, у меня так не получится...

Большое спасибо и миллион извинений за столь лютый лонгид - короче изложить не сумел.

Хорошего дня!

Vesan99 (talk) 18:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Vesan99 (talk) 18:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Sportspeople from <country> by name by year

Hi, MasterRus. You might not have known, but all these categories you created are named incorrectly. For example, the only entry in Category:Sportspeople from Canada by name by year is Category:Bruno Spengler by year. Assuming other subcategories would have similar names (<sportsperson> by year), the correct name would be Category:Sportspeople from Canada by year by name. That's because the variable part (in this case, the name) goes last.

I started renaming them, but then I saw how many there are and I can't do that many right now. Please arrange for these to be renamed. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Lviv Dominical Church 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Анастасия Львоваru/en 09:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:The Walt Disney Company CIS.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted character on logo
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

(Oinkers42) (talk) 22:40, 31 December 2022 (UTC)