User talk:Martin Falbisoner/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Martin Falbisoner!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 13:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Louvre at dusk.JPG

File:Louvre at dusk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Remi Mathis (talk) 14:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Kategorien

Hallo Martin Falbisoner, bitte überkategorisiere Deine schönen Bilder nicht. Beispiel File:Jungloewe.JPG:

• Category:Panthera leo (juvenile) ist i.O.
• Category:Panthera leo zusätzlich ist überkategorisiert und daher falsch. Siehe hierzu Commons:Categories.

Was allerdings noch fehlt, ist die Kategorisierung des Ortes, z.B. des Zoos, in dem Du das Bild gemacht hast. Dann würde das Bild noch in eine der Unterkategorien von Category:Animals in zoos by zoo name gehören. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Wird gemacht. Danke! Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colosseum at night - wide angle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kölnpanorama bei Abenddämmerung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--JLPC 17:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegestor bei Nacht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

HDR oder nicht, das ist die Frage?

Kölner Dämmerungsbild

Hallo Martin, hast Du Dich schon mal an einem HDR Bild versucht? Genau solche Szenen sind dafür die idealen Objekte. Falls ich mal aushelfen darf, so melde Dich bitte einfach bei mir. Ich nutze Photomatix um HDR/Tonemapping-Bilder, genauer gesagt: Belichtungsfusionen zu erstellen. Dein Bild ist vom Motiv her gut in Szene gesetzt, Die Lichtverhältnisse sehr schön, aber zumindest mMn, technisch nicht ganz so gut umgesetzt. Und sorry für mein Contra bei diesem Bild. Ich denke aber Du wirst daraus lernen. Bei mir war es jedenfalls so: bei jedem Contra habe ich immer dazugelernt. Das wichtige bei HDR-Bildern sind mehrere unterschiedlich belichtete Bilder zu erstellen. Ein Stativ ist natürlich ein Muss. Bei diesem Bild hätte ich z.B. drei Bilder erstellt: eines mit -2ev, 0ev und +2eV, noch besser wären 5 oder gar 7 Bilder, dann mit +-3eV und die Zwischenstufen. Auf Seite 86 Deines Kamerahabbuches steht z.B. wie Du eine Belichtungsreihenautomatik erstellen kannst. Solltest Du das alles bereits wissen, dann vergiss meine Anmerkungen. Viele Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

• Hallo Heinrich, danke für Deine konstruktive Kritik! Du hast natürlich recht, mit einer Belichtungsreihe wäre ich hier besser gefahren. Ich habe im Nachhinein dann die Variante Pseudo-HDR ausprobiert, also basierend auf dem RAW eine unter- und eine überbelichtete Variante einrechnen zu lassen, das Ergebnis war aber nicht besser als die reine Rawentwicklung. Die eigentliche Schwierigkeit bei dem Bild - die zumindest für manche technischen Probleme teilverantwortlich ist - besteht aber darin, daß man auf der Aussichtsplattform durch eine zentimeterdicke, dreckige, gebogene Glasscheibe photographieren muss... und da diskutieren manche Foren Tag und Nacht über die Vor- und Nachteile von Schutzfiltern... ;-) Viele Grüße, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Ausgangslage

• Hi, hi, Du musst einfach eine Leiter und ein zeimlich hohes Stativ mitnehmen, dann kannst Du über die gebogene Glasscheibe hinweg photographieren ;-) Grüße, duck und wech ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

ein anderes Beispiel eines HDR-Bildes

• Noch eine Anmerkung zu RAW: klar, RAWs haben immer etwas mehr drin als reine JPG Dateien, aber nie so viel um Über und Unterbelichtungen gut genug ausgleichen zu können. Das geht eigenlich immer nur mit Belichtungsreihen. Versuche Dich einfach mal an einem HDR-Bild und Du wirst selbst staunen. Ein Beispiel eines anderen HDR-Bildes anbei. Das habe ich mal für Ralf R. verarbeitet, als er sich an einem HDR-Bild versucht hatte. An diesem Beispiel kannst Du sogar selbst mal üben. Die 5x Einzelbilder sind alle verlinkt. Viele Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

  OK, werde ich tun. Danke Dir! Viele Grüße --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010-09 Ausschnitt Kölner Dom2 (MF).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loewe frontal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 18:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre at dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now --Poco a poco 21:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Industrial Zebra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit small, but ok --Poco a poco 09:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dus Hafen2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arcalino Arcalino 22:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via della Conciliazione at dawn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice.--ArildV 19:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glyptothek München Front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Rjcastillo 13:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment if you like it, feel free to promote it ;-) --Martin Falbisoner 14:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC) Comment Sorry --Rjcastillo 23:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good  Comment less sky, better imho --Rjcastillo 13:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amboise Hof.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo, i like the composition.--ArildV 19:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeche Zollv.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paviankopf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment noise --Rjcastillo 00:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)  Info somewhat denoised --Martin Falbisoner 19:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 03:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chinon from above.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps a bit oversharpened?. --Cayambe 22:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebesschlösser Köln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition, but next time try to hold in focus one entire object and build composition around it, like here. On your image there is no lock which is sharp entirely. --Ximeg 11:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giovanni in Laterano Front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colo sw.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very dramatic, but tilted. Mattbuck 04:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)  Info I tried to straighten the horizon. Is it better now? --Martin Falbisoner 05:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC) You haven't uploaded a new version. Mattbuck  Done, The new version is online now --Martin Falbisoner 16:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Not perfect but better. Mattbuck 20:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant’Andrea della Valle Front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexposed sky. --Mattbuck 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment it should be better now. --Martin Falbisoner 22:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Yes it is. Mattbuck 23:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria Maggiore Front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction and a crop at the top. Mattbuck 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)  Done --Martin Falbisoner 22:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 23:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Parc Munich at sunset.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'Amboise from below.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a crop at the top - too much sky. Mattbuck 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)  Done OK? --Martin Falbisoner 05:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC) yes. Mattbuck 08:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Saumur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwanenkopf Nymphenburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Saumur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I assume this is several centuries old, and so in public domain, but it would be helpful if the year (or even the century, assuming pre-19th century) were indicated. If more recent, we may also need to know the name and year of death of the architect. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 14:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment The castle was constructed in different stages and for different purposes between the 10th and the 16th century. Where do you want me to add this information? Thanks! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I'd suggest adding a short description, incorporating that information, at the top of Category:Château de Saumur. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
    •  Info The castle's already been tagged as an "historical monument" in the category. More detailed information can be found in the pertaining wikipedia articles. Besides, I'm not really familiar with doing editing of this kind... ;-) Sorry. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
      • I've made the edit. cmadler (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
        • Thanks cmadler! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. In addition to the chateau itself, this also helps to illustrate its historical value as a fortress on high ground overlooking the Loire. cmadler (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saumur, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info adjusted contrast and removed distortion --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:04, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nilboot.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barberinischer Faun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit noisy but ok. --Mattbuck 17:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neuer Zollhof at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentBest in scope, but needs geocoding. cmadler (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
    •  Support Meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfauenrad1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp, but due to high resolution still OK for QI. --A.Savin 10:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urban Surfer1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monopteros in February 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the composition. Nice light. --Tuxyso 18:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monopteros in February.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Poco a poco 15:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chinese Tower in February.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

HDR

Hallo Martin! Das Foto aus München ist wirklich sehr schön. Hast du die Original-Dateien, dann würde ich mal versuchen sie zu prozessieren. Oder hast du direkt die Kamera interne HDR-Funktion genutzt? Email: Replace-with-my-WP-Username@gmail.com --Tuxyso (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

• Hab Dir eine Email geschickt --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenkirche and Neues Rathaus Munich March 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice view, good light, high quality. --Tuxyso 11:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hubertusbrunnen, Munich, in March.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenkirche Munich March 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and interesting light. Probably you can apply some (selective) NR to reduce noise in the sky. --Tuxyso 11:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Since this image is a (very slight) HDR, unfortunately there's no single raw file to denoise. Still, I gave it a shot applying NR to the existing jpg and it should be a bit better now --Martin Falbisoner 11:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Color noise is clearly visible. I know this noise problem well from my own HDR processing. Try the following: apply some NR to the original files (without any sharpening), then HDR process and afterwards masked (40-50) sharpening (30-50) with slight NR. The photo is very nice and deserves optimal processing :) Or did you use in-camera HDR? --Tuxyso 12:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC)  Info new version --Martin Falbisoner 22:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)  Abstain because I am now biased (due to minor help with HDR processing), but I think it is cleary QI, probably FP. --Tuxyso 07:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC) I agree.--Óðinn 18:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus Munich March 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The construction area at the bottom is unsightly and I feel there is a bit too much sky. Crop it out, maybe? Otherwise, very good.--Óðinn 18:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Fixed --Martin Falbisoner 18:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Great!--Óðinn 18:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Frauenkirche Munich March 2013.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenkirche Munich March 2013.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW March 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duck at Munich Zoo2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duck at Munich Zoo3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnadenkapelle und St. Magdalena.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptburg Burghausen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altoetting Tilly.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtsaal Burghausen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duck at Munich Zoo1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 20:27, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bearskin Guards.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Eye Thames.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I'd clone out this flying bird, as it looks like an error ;-) --Smial 08:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)  Done --Martin Falbisoner 19:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bridge at Night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bridge Lights.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naval College.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt at Dusk - 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could use more contrast, but good to go --Poco a poco 17:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks Poco a Poco - I've (slightly) increased the contrast --Martin Falbisoner 22:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt at Dusk - 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 13:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt at Dusk - 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 13:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of the Rhine in Cologne.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Martin, ich habe mal die hier bemängelten Kleinigkeiten versucht zu beheben. Wenn es dir nicht gefällt, dann einfach zurücksetzen. Ansonsten die Kandidatur weiterführen? Von mir hättest du ein Pro.--Hic et nunc (talk) 09:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Danke Dir! :-) Sieht jetzt doch deutlich besser aus. Ich lasse das Bild also in der Nominierung. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Palace in Brussels.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuscan Landscape 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - very nice --A.Savin 12:33, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria Nascente in Brescello.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio at dusk 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio at dusk 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:29, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:29, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bald Eagle Head sq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 07:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte alla Carraia at dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Beautiful shot. --Dirtsc 20:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allianz Arena illuminated in green for St. Patrick's Day.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It is advisable to attach the scope to a category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuscan Landscape 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image image:Ponte Vecchio at dusk 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/image:Ponte Vecchio at dusk 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bald Eagle Head sq.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bald Eagle Head sq.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tuscan Landscape 6.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tuscan Landscape 6.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Warum hast du deinen FPC-Kommentar wieder gelöscht?

Hallo Martin! Warum hast du deinen freundlichen FPC-Kommentar wieder gelöscht? Du hast zwar schon abgestimmt, aber du kannst ihn ja auch einfach als Kommentar unter die Bewertung von Colin setzen. Beste Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

• Ich hatte zunächst übersehen, daß ich schon meine Stimme abgegeben hab - zweimal geht ja nicht. Dies bemerkte ich erst nach meinem Post, und löschte diesen wieder. Aber Du hast recht, ich setze ihn als Kommentar erneut rein. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 14:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Vielen Dank. Ich freue mich über positiven Zuspruch, gerade weil die Stimmung gerade zu kippen scheint :) Drücke mir mal die Daumen, dass es noch gut geht... --Tuxyso (talk) 14:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Gerade aufgrund der kippenden Stimmung wollte ich ja was schreiben / voten. Ich drücke die Daumen! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuscan Landscape 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs geotagging --Kreuzschnabel 15:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)  Info I'd love to geotag the image. It's just that I honestly can't find this villa on a map again --Martin Falbisoner 05:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Bit lacking in fine detail, but ok. Mattbuck 11:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biergarten at Night 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice imo. --JLPC 17:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Showroom 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good quality. --Martin Kraft 20:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Showroom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Aleks G 22:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

From VI

Hi, Ok for the panorama, look at the change in the syntax of scope. Can you change the other 3. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Illumination of Hohenzollernbrücke Panorama of Cologne at sunset from LVR tower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is useful to connect the scope to a category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Look at the changes in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eisbach surfingin Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chinesischer Turm, Munich, in winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johann Tserclaes, Count of Tilly : Bronze statue in Altötting.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Biergarten at Night 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biergarten at Night 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hubertusbrunnen Munich: panoramic view in winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good with new syntax of scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte alla Carraia at sunset.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria Nascente (Brescello): interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:01, 13 August 2013

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

(UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Vecchio at Night: Fireworks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beer Gardens in Munich: Night scene.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful and beautiful imo. --JLPC (talk) 20:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Royal Palace in Brussels.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Palace in Brussels.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:30, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Parc at Dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark bits seem a bit too dark? Mattbuck 16:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Hmm, actually it was that dark --Martin Falbisoner 04:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment I like the prominent difference in light between the foreground and the sky, it reminds me The Empire of Light by Magritte. IMO we should promote it. --TintoMeches 13:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphenburger Schloss at sunset.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW-Welt at night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 10:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Loewe frontal.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loewe frontal.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace of Justice, Munich: At dusk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Back view of Nymphenburg Palace at sunset.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiastadion at dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contrast correction. (the file updated) --Aleks G 23:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks! --Martin Falbisoner 21:53, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biergarten at Night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure about this. The heads are a bit too wavey I feel. Mattbuck 16:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Yes, it's a bit extreme. But considering this effect is due to an exposure of 120s, it's - on the other side - pretty much what I was hoping to achieve. --Martin Falbisoner 04:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)  Support To me it’s a well-done shot of the beer-garden atmosphere. --Kreuzschnabel 20:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW-Welt at night 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nymphenburger Schloss at sunset.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nymphenburger Schloss at sunset.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plange Muehle Düsseldorf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! --VT98Fan 22:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Zollhof Düsseldorf at Golden Hour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 20:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Neuer Zollhof and Rheinturm at Blue Hour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 05:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Zollhof Düsseldorf at Blue Hour.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 20:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Justizpalast at dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Generally very good, except the wires show motion blur, presumably due to the passage of the tram. Can this be fixed? It's a bit distracting. Mattbuck 09:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Yes, you're right, it is distracting. But honestly I don't know how to fix this... I do have pictures without a tram - and therefore also without any motion blur. But the tram really makes the image much more dynamic and interesting. So I tend to accept the unavoidably blurred wires --Martin Falbisoner 20:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC) OK/ Mattbuck 21:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chinon from above.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chinon from above.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neuer Zollhof at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. And beautiful! --VT98Fan (talk) 13:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

---

MVR Scores: 
1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Dus Hafen2.JPG: 0
3. Commons:Valued image candidates/Neuer Zollhof Düsseldorf at Blue Hour.JPG: +2 <--
=>
File:Dus Hafen2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former
File:Neuer Zollhof Düsseldorf at Blue Hour.JPG: Promoted <--

--VT98Fan (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitol at Dusk 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 10:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitol at Dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --JLPC 15:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
rear view of Monticello.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
United States Capitol at dusk, east front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Nice & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Capitol at Dusk 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Capitol at Dusk 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Ave Davis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Robert E. Lee Richmond.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washington Monument Richmond.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 18:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Vernon Estate Upper Garden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, maybe even better with slightly more exposure?--ArildV 13:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC) <br\>  Done --Martin Falbisoner 05:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Vernon Estate Mansion 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Vernon Estate Mansion 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maryland State House from College Ave.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virginia State Capitol late morning.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US Capitol east side.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln Memorial east side.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White House north side.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US Capitol and Grant Memorial.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US Capitol west side.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US Capitol west side at dusk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 19:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ulysses S. Grant Memorial - western view, wide angle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest to add "SE view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page for monuments. Thanks. --JLPC (talk) 15:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)<br\> Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 Best in Scope now. --JLPC (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mansion at Mount Vernon: eastern facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
United States Capitol: panorama of the western facade in the afternoon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo too ! --JLPC (talk) 10:10, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurgood Marshall Memorial Annapolis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Tufta 21:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurgood Marshall statue Annapolis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Front face of the building is in shadow but QI imo. --Laitche 06:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maryland State House from Church Circle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annapolis Post Office.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 22:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Ave Stuart.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:13, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mount_Vernon_Estate_Mansion_2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount_Vernon_Estate_Mansion_2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC) (fpc-bot not working)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annapolis MD Acton Cove.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:US Capitol west side.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US Capitol west side.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 06:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lincoln Memorial east side.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lincoln Memorial east side.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 16:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lincoln Memorial as seen from the east side in the morning.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 08:03, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:US Capitol east side.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US Capitol east side.JPG/2 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Deer Poing.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Red Deer Poing.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Deer Poing.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

Dear Martin Falbisoner,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

—

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

Herzlichen Glückwunsch

Ha, ein Bayer und ein Niedersachse belegen die ersten beiden Plätze :-) Herzlichen Glückwunsch. Dein Foto war mein persönlicher Favorit. Ich freue mich, dass die Jury das ähnlich sah. Auf ein nächstes Mal in 2014! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Olympiastadion at dusk.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olympiastadion at dusk.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
United States Capitol: eastern facade in the morning.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views from Olympiaturm at the Olympiastadion at dusk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met (and very nice imo). --JLPC (talk) 09:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Close-Up of young male lion licking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : very nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 Support per JLPC.-Godot13 (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Martin Falbisoner, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Commons Photo Challenge December 2013

Commons:Photo challenge has been created and needs you! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project. December 2013 has two themes: Coloured light and Silhouette. I hope you are able to participate. -- Colin (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Eye at Night (long exposure).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 19:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:London Eye at Night (long exposure).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:London Eye at Night (long exposure).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
London Eye seen from the south-west at night: long exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice and best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Justizpalast at dusk 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --JLPC 19:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)  Info I've uploaded a new - and imo better - version --Martin Falbisoner 05:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Good too ! --JLPC 08:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Martin Falbisoner, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Justizpalast at dusk 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Justizpalast at dusk.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Martin, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tower Bridge Lights.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tower Bridge Lights.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich subway station Wettersteinplatz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 15:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)