User talk:Llez/Archives/2017 (1)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephippiorhynchus senegalensis - Palmitos Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tursiops truncatus - Palmitos Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach - San Agustín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice detail level, excellent light and good composition. --Slaunger 22:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epinephelus marginatus - Palmitos Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euspira nitida (Common Necklace Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Pilares - Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail of cacti and high resolution. --WClarke 22:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almogarén - Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --WClarke 22:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomacea diffusa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuatro Puertas - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuatro Puertas - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomacea diffusa, unicoloured form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only Commons file in scope, useful, very high-resolution and good quality. Should be a QI, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euspira macilenta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Pilares - Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euspira macilenta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 00:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Pilares - Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Pilares - Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuatro Puertas, Gran Canaria, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuatro Puertas, Gran Canaria, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Almogarén, Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cueva de los Pilares, Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva de los Pilares - Archaeological area of Cuatro Puertas - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notocochlis dillwynii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for such a high resolution. -- Ikan Kekek 18:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notocochlis dillwynii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only photo in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachycereus weberi 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very bright sky gives a large contrast, but OK for QI, I think. --Slaunger 19:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena draco - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomacea diffusa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 21:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia candelabrum 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysostoma paradoxum (Orange-mouthed Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago de los Kois - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pancratium canariense 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysostoma paradoxum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bencomia sphaerocarpa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachycereus weberi, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 20:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Beach - San Agustín.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beach - San Agustín.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parolinia platypetala - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia bravoana - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia bravoana - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomacea diffusa (Spike-topped Apple Snail), banded form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bencomia sphaerocarpa, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiba speciosa - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiba speciosa - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendriopoterium pulidoi - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pancratium canariense (Canary Sea Daffodil), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helicacanthus tegulatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only file in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parolinia platypetala, habitus..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia bravoana, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope, wide usage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia bravoana, fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only photo in scope on Commons. Useful and widely used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Llez: I don't know if you have access to a better camera, but it is a shame to nominate pictures like this when the encyclopaedic value would be so much better with a sharper image and more careful composition and better lighting conditions. Charles (talk) 12:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus arnottianus - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some leaves on the right are slightly overexposed but IMO still within the limits. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus canariensis - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afrolittorina knysnaensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dendriopoterium pulidoi, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hibiscus arnottianus (White Rosemallow), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena ellenbeckiana - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tecoma capensis - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Echinolittorina malaccana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only photo in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena cinnabari - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It looks like perspective correction. IMO it's leaning out. --XRay 15:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC) I agree with you, it looks like. So I checked the picture again. The palms in the uppermost right corner (see annotation) and the nearby mast are exactly vertical. So I think, the perspective is correct despite you may get another imprsssion; BTW I removed some CAs I found while checking the picture --Llez 15:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC) Good quality. Please have a look to the background for perspektive. --XRay 17:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dracaena ellenbeckiana, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carpobrotus edulis (Hottentot-fig), fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Good quality, only photo in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena reflexa var. angustifolia - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena fragrans - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena reflexa - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclotus variegatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Littoraria pallescens 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sansevieria stuckyi - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Littoraria pallescens, spotted form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Of course this is by far the best photo of this shell. It's close to or at FP level, in my opinion. However, I think it's worth discussing this photo vs. File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - ZMA.MOLL.60053 - Littoraria pallescens (Philippi, 1846) - Littorinidae - Mollusc shell.jpeg, which while nowhere near as high-resolution, sharp or beautifully composed shows the diversity in the appearance of shells of this species, something your photo does not do. Would you like to narrow down your scope a little further, to encompass only the shells with this appearance? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
    •  Support - Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sand sculpture - Puerto de Mogan.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sand sculpture - Puerto de Mogan.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dracaena draco - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Contradusta walkeri ssp. surabajensis (Surbajan Walker’s Cowrie), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium arboreum - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Contradusta walkeri surabajensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium arboreum - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium arboreum - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Globularia ascanii, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Globularia ascanii, inflorescences.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tritia casta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia streptacantha - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia streptacantha - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia casta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeonium arboreum (Tree Houseleek), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melanoides tuberculata 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium lindleyi - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium castello-paivae - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium valverdense - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium valverdense - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melanoides tuberculata (Red-rimmed Melania), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opuntia streptacantha, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opuntia streptacantha, fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very good, and best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius jacksonianus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nassarius jacksonianus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinus terebinthifolius - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left side is leaning in a bit, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 18:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 19:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium glutinosum - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeonium valverdense, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeonium valverdense, infrutescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe marlothii - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe ramosissima - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Babylonia spirata 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Babylonia spirata 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cominella maculosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support} quality image. Charlesjsharp 19:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe castanea - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe mutabilis - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius crenoliratus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crassula cultrata - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia echios - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cominella maculosa (Spotted Whelk), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aloe mutabilis, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aloe castanea (Cat's Tail Aloe), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yucca gigantea - Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento - Teror - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade - Teror - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade - Teror - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stenocereus griseus (Mexican Organ Pipe), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heleobia maltzani, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupola - Basílica de Nuestra Señora del Pino - Teror - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 20:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade - Teror - Gran Canaria - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cominella virgata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yucca gigantea (Spineless Yucca), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Townhall, Teror, Gran Canaria, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water steps - Calle de la Diputación - Teror - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water steps - Calle de la Diputación - Teror - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbonium elegans 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Balos - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water steps - Calle de la Diputación - Teror - Gran Canaria - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basílica de Nuestra Señora del Pino, Teror, Gran Canaria, cupola, view from east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Fortaleza - Barranco de Tirajana - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umbonium elegans, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope and very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 12:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calle de la Diputación, Teror, Gran Canaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality picture seems tilted slightly. See guardrail right.--Famberhorst 17:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Thanks, i corrected it --Llez 21:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diloma subrostrata subrostrata (Mudflat Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barranco de Balos, panoramic view, NW-N-E-SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 02:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks very fine. (Could have a square format.) -- Renardo la vulpo 18:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diloma subrostrata subrostrata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock formation - Barranco de Tirajana - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you remove that dust spot, please? --Basotxerri 16:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 19:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Altar of James the Greater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Sacramental altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Chancel ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valvata macrostoma, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kermia maculosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Nuestra Señora del Rosario.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Nuestra Señora del Rosario.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - San Isidro Labrador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Santa Verónica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - San José de Fataga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Sta. Agueda de Arguineguin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Santissima Trinidad del Tablero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria -Santiago Apóstol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - San Bartolomé de Tirajana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Nuestra Señora del Rosario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

White-throated Kingfisher

@Llez: Thanks for your help in figuring out the issue with WB in my images. Can you help me in fixing this issue in as many images as possible. It takes a lot of time for me as I have bandwidth issues for the next few days. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centaurea raphanina, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Could we please have an indication of the size of the plant. I suggest that in the text you state the diameter of the flower or of the extremities of the leaves. Martinvl (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in scope, and should be nominated for QI, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think we can ask for the size of the plant. Charles (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info The description text of this picture is linked to the description of the plant in wikipedia. There also the size is given: Height 3-5 cm, seldom to 20, the diameter of the inflorescence is 1,2 - 2 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Santa Lucia de Tirajana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Jesùs Salvador de Risco Blanco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - San Fernando de Maspalomas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oliva todosina (Pretty Olive), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope, useful and high quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Barranco de Balos - Gran Canaria.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barranco de Balos - Gran Canaria.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Nuestra Señora la Virgen del Rosario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some posterization on back wall, but not a dealbreaker --Daniel Case 06:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trochoidea pumilio, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwartziella floridana, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oliva oliva ssp. longispira, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Certainly best in scope, but I'd observe that this is only one shell, and there are shells of this creature that look markedly different. I don't think the scope needs to be changed to reflect that, but inserting that info in the file description would be helpful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Western facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Olivier LPB (talk) 23:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliva oliva longispira.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Windows.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana - Gran Canaria - Windows.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nannodiella acricula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino de Viento - Mogán - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me the image is already OK but I think there some slight CAs on the wing towards the upper right corner. Perhaps you can enhance it... --Basotxerri 17:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Tanks for the hint --Llez 19:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC) OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, ceiling of the chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and seems to be unique in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moka pot - Mogán - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclophorus philippinarum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

-- DeFacto (talk). 20:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coffee grinder - Mogán - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mangelia diatula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Bartolomé de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, altar of James the Greater.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clothes iron - Mogán - Gran Canaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A category related to the iron like "Art ..." could be useful. Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher in Ludhiana disctrict, Punjab, India 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 16:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carinapex minutissima, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Draco volans 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mangelia albolabrata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House - Grötzingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just enough exposure --Daniel Case 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Draco volans (Common Flying Dragon), Museum specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Platyraphe substriata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kermia barnardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Draco volans 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Draco volans 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Microdaphne trichodes, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope, useful. Pretty shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthera uncia - Zoo Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the crop could be better but OK for me. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthera uncia - Zoo Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthera uncia - Zoo Karlsruhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please fix the categories --A.Savin 15:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Question What do you mean? The picture is assigned to 2 categories --Llez 15:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment Overcategorized, and "Animals in..." should be over the other category. --A.Savin 12:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 13:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Not done. --A.Savin 13:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Only one category and overcategorized? Please propose a category you think is appropriate --Llez 15:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment Wenn auf dem Bild Panthera uncia gezeuigt ist, warum hast du dann diese Kategorie entfernt? Muss ich wirklich jeden einzelnen Schritt erklären? Die Kagegorien müssen korrekt gefixt sein, befor nominiert wird und nicht danach. --A.Savin 19:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Picture now in the category Panthera uncia --Llez 20:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC) OK, also nicht in Karlsruhe. Somit falsche Beschreibung der Datei. Ich glaube, ich kapituliere. --A.Savin 20:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Ich glaube, ich weiß jetzt, worauf Du hinaus wolltest. Habe entsprechende Änderung vorgenommen und hoffe, es ist jetzt OK. --Llez 09:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 13:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lienardia vultuosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Another type of shell seems to exist for this species, with a more reddish color, but the shells are tiny and the other photos do not magnify them, so this is best in scope by a very wide margin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
   Info A whitish form is depicted here --Llez (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gittenbergeria turriplana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:07, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricata suricatta - Zoo Karlsruhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gittenbergeria turriplana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 22:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fulguropsis spirata pahayokee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fulguropsis spirata pahayokee, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricata suricatta - Zoo Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 21:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabestana cutacea dolaria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 21:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cabestana cutacea dolaria (Ringed African Triton), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and very good quality (QI at least). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semicassis saburon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 22:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Semicassis saburon (Saburon Bonnet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Hervideros - Lanzarote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlicella barbara, slender form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbo intercostalis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo intercostalis (Ribbed Turban), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and beautiful. A slam-dunk for QI and could also be a solid FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tectus triserialis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tectus triserialis (Tall Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guildfordia aculeata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guildfordia aculeata (Aculeate Star Turban), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlicella barbara, stocky form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymatium doderleini 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Focus stacking?

Hallo Llez, danke für Dein positives Votum für die Spielzeuglokomotive aus meiner Kinderzeit. Da mein Englisch sehr begrenzt ist, bitte ich Dich mir aber noch zu sagen, was „Focus stacking“ ist. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calliostoma formosense 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma formosense (Formosa Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope and beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phalium flammiferum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Physeter macrocephalus - skeleton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agave americana 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phalium flammiferum (Striped Bonnet), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Excellent, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantoxerus getulus - Morro Jable 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantoxerus getulus - Morro Jable 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantoxerus getulus - Morro Jable 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 10:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantoxerus getulus - Morro Jable 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Physeter macrocephalus (Sperm Whale), Skeleton, Morro Jable, Fuerteventura.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cernuella cisalpina (Maritime Gardensnail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Some of the very small pictures show several varieties of shells, but this is of such obviously higher quality that it wins. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turris steinvorthi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 06:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saladar de Jandía - Morro Jable 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catamaran - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mmm, nice pic. I am however missing a cat for the boat itself, please add. --W.carter 14:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 15:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 15:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittina coromandeliana ( Coromandel Nerite), shell, form with straight bands.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope and an obvious QI, possibly more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina coromandeliana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Vinamar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach chairs - Playa del Matorral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia lamarckii 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia lamarckii 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barranco de Vinamar, Fuerteventura, upper part, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vittina coromandeliana 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vittina coromandeliana (Coromandel Nerite), shell, form with zigzag bands.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and excellent, a potential FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Butihondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Vinamar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia lamarckii (Lamarck's Spurge), natural stand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia lamarckii (Lamarck's Spurge), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia lamarckii (Lamarck's Spurge), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphorbia lamarckii (Lamarck's Spurge), fruits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pico de la Zarza - Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trochoidea trochoides, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barranco de Butihondo, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barranco de Vinamar, Fuerteventura, lower part, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pico de la Zarza, Fuerteventura, gate to the summit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent except for the unsharp railing in the lower right corner, which I would suggest you crop out if you nominate this at FPC. I do think it's a possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek 07:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 08:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica stellata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope and very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Islote - View from Pico de la Zarza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica stellata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cofete, Fuerteventura, view from Pico de la Zarza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Winter, Cofete, Fuerteventura, view from Pico de la Zarza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guildfordia yoka delicata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 19:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guildfordia yoka ssp. delicata (Delicate Yoka Star Turban), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and what a great shell! A nomination at FPC wouldn't be out of line and might pass. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pico de la Zarza - summit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia lamarckii 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Pico de la Zarza 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbonium moniliferum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tablada de Vinamar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia lamarckii 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umbonium moniliferum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Obvious VI, and I think this should be an FP, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Jable - view from Talahijas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tablada de Vinamar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pico de la Zarza, Fuerteventura, summit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Archaeodontosaurus. By experience, I think that this photograph shows a nice picture of the landscape. Ivanhercaz | Discusión 13:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra troglodytes, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water steps - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --XRay 16:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Jable - Panorama from Talahijas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cabestana cutacea dolaria 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cabestana cutacea dolaria 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Information Board.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Caminos" by Lisbet Fernández, Fuerteventura, information board.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support if the scope is the information board, as in this case. Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra pumila, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Santamarcanda (talk) 02:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monilearia persimilis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra pumila forma minuscula, dark variety.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caltha palustris - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Llez, this reminds me of some of van Gogh's paintings. Do you think this could be a good FP candidate? -- Ikan Kekek 20:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lifeguard tower - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Jable - Roundabout FV2 - Calle el Quijote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia nigra - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra succinea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View from Pico de la Zarza 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Pico de la Zarza 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geronticus eremita - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia handiensis - Gran Valle - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Jable - Roundabout FV2 - Calle el Quijote - Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting motif. Well done! --Milseburg 13:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monilearia praeposita, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and used. Ivanhercaz (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea cinerea - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Valle - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia handiensis - Gran Valle - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead tree - Gran Valle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia stricta - Fuerteventura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafra hervieri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia handiensis - Gran Valle - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dipsochelys dussumieri - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks overprocessed.--Peulle 09:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)  Done New version from raw- file --Llez 13:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Comment Looks better. May I also suggest toning down the highlights a bit? It does seem a bit bright, don't you think?--Peulle 19:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)  Done --Llez 20:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality.--Peulle 10:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Unusual place for the nest. --Ermell 15:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Risco del Paso - Fuertevetura 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wind Toy - César Manrique - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zafrona striatula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea cinerea head - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhyticeros plicatus (Blyth's hornbill), male head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitrella pudica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de Cardón - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roundabout La Lajita - Fuerteventura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asphodelus tenuifolius, natural stand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lifeguard tower - Morro Jable.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lifeguard tower - Morro Jable.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomatias canariensis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 16:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de Cardón 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Numida meleagris - Heidelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arthrocnemum macrostachyum - Fuerteventura 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arthrocnemum macrostachyum - Fuerteventura 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomatias canariensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbo fluctuosus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 17:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asphodelus tenuifolius, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montaña de Cardón, Fuerteventura, view from east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo fluctuosus (Wavy Turban), shell, smooth form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Colorado - Fuerteventura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de Cardón 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Degollada de Cofete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this is already quite OK but the line between sea and beach and the mountains on the right seem a bit oversharpened. Could you try to get this better? --Basotxerri 17:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review, I made a completely new version from raw files --Llez 13:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC) OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turbo intercostalis 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turbo intercostalis 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbo articulatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 17:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña Hendida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barren area, well presented. --Milseburg 15:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de Cardón 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo articulatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de la Virgen del Tanquito, Fuerteventura, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ermita de la Virgen del Tanquito, Fuerteventura, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Every year in May there is a pilgrimage of the inhabitants of Cardón to the Ermita de la Virgen del Tanquito. The statue of Our Lady of Tanquito is carried to the chapel, where a festival with song and dance, grilling and typical Canarian food is celebrated.

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco Valle de la Fuente - Fuerteventura - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de Cardón 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morro Colorado, Fuerteventura, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis diversicolor squamata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barranco de Machín 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de la Fuente 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asphodelus tenuifolius, inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montaña de la Fuente, Fuerteventura, view from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and a terrific photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis diversicolor ssp. squamata, (Scaly Australian Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - This picture is surely useful, as all your shell pictures are, but given the name, "diversicolor", why are the beautiful iridescences seen in File:Haliotis diversicolor squamata 002.jpg absent from your file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
  
  • The picture shows the subspecies squamata, my picture of Haliotis diversicolor diversicolor - photographed under the same light conditions - has much more reflections. This depends partly on the individual variation of natural objects. On the other hand we must consider that mother of pearl has structure colours, not pigment colours (like e.g. some feathers of birds). So the colour (or no colour) depends only from light conditions. Therefore the appearance of the reflections can be highly variable. In addition, the reflection depends also, besides the lightning, from the individual surface of the mother of pearl. Smooth surfaces have more reflections than rough. If you take a living shell, kill the animal and remove the shell, you have a smooth, heavier reflecting mother of pearl as in a "beached" shell (that is a shell, you find at the beach, and which was exposed to the weather for some time). As further information: The name diversicolor does not refer to the mother of pearl, but to the outside of the shell. --Llez (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for explaining, and  Support as useful, as always. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montaña Hendida, Fuerteventura, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and impressive as always. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Napaeus interpunctatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morro Mungla - Fuerteventura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place-name sign Pájara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Furcraea foetida (Giant Cabuya), Plant with bulbils.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barranco de Machín, Fuerteventura, lower part, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Obviously useful, but Llez, please explain in your file description what Barranco de Machín is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Barranco is the Spanish term for a ravine or canyon. Barranco de Machín is therefore the ravine (or canyon or valley) of Machín. (See for example also here, here or here) --Llez (talk) 21:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus interpunctatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains Jandía 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia handiensis - Jandía - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindaconus spurius 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Punta Jandía - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road to Faro de Punta Jandía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Village of Pájara, Fuerteventura, Place-name sign.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus spurius (Alphabet Cone), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and very good, but please identify it as a fossil in your file description. True, you use the word Pliocene, but adding the word "fossil" or "fossilized" would increase clarity. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done --Llez (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Punta Jandía - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --Palauenc05 16:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de Jandía 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbo petholatus (Tapestry Turban), green form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, really pretty shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Faro Punta de Jandía, Fuerteventura, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Punta Pesebre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast Punta Pesebre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis gigantea f. sieboldii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast Punta Pesebre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and refreshing! Could you add some water or wave-related category, please? --Basotxerri 15:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Added to the Category Breaking ocean waves --Llez 18:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you, good quality. --Basotxerri 19:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned airfield - Fuerteventura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A picture of nothing! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis gigantea var. sieboldii (Siebold's Giant Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, very pretty and high quality. I think this is likely to pass at FPC if nominated there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ardea cinerea - Heidelberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea cinerea - Heidelberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Cofete - Fuerteventura - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Lacking detail especially on sand and water, sorry --A.Savin 15:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment I made a new version from raw file --Llez 16:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Significant improvement,  Support --A.Savin 19:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street lamp - Roundabout - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dalechampia aristolochiifolia, inflorescence and bracts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus exilis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis kamtschatkana ssp. assimilis (Threaded Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - What a fantastic shell and great photography. Slam-dunk FP. I'll put it on my list to nominate and will post it at FPC within a few weeks if you don't do it first. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis kamtschatkana assimilis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cofete Cemetery - Fuerteventura - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Cofete - Fuerteventura - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucha Constante - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucha Constante - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis discus discus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sueños Rotos - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cofete Cemetery - Fuerteventura - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traganum moquinii (Moqin's Traganum), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traganum moquinii (Moqin's Traganum), leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Most useful at illustrating the leaves. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis discus ssp. discus (Ezo Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Another great shell picture and probably FP whenever nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabeza de Mujer - Antonina Fathullina - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sueños Rotos - Juan Miguel Cubas - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 18:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis laevigata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playing with the wind - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabeza de Mujer - Antonina Fathullina - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis laevigata (Green Lip Abalone), green form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Another great, featurable shell picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxychilus draparnaudi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conexión - Desconexión - Petre Petrov - Morro Jable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playing with the wind - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playing with the wind - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit oversharpened. --XRay 08:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast north of Punta de Capdepera - Majorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxychilus draparnaudi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis ovina ssp. ovina (Sheep's Ear Abalone), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis ovina ovina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 17:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luz en el Horizonte - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luz en el Horizonte - Amancio Gonzáles - Morro Jable - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pico de la Zarza - summit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pico de la Zarza - summit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turritella leucostoma (Tiger Turret), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turritella attenuata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turritella attenuata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rabax63 19:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Salvador d’Artà 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tablada de Vinamar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lighthouse Punta de Capdepera - Mallorca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 13:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxychilus alliarius (Garlic Glass-snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very good and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucibulum spinosum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblat Talaiòtic de Ses Païsses 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coves d’Artà - Rock structure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crucibulum spinosum (Spiny Cup-and-saucer Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and looks like another likely FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calyptraea helicoidea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais memorial Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Happy Birthday to the bike! -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl von Drais memorial Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)