User talk:Ligabo~commonswiki

Image Tagging Image:Morini350bnWP.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Morini350bnWP.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 20:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same for:

--GeorgHH 20:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ferrari212InterVignale1951.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 18:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Fixed. What was requested was to put a valid licence template like {{Cc-by-2.0}}. Please note that this photo is not self-made, that's why I changed the "source" field. You can add some information stating that you did the cropping if you want. — Xavier, 15:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LamboMiuraS1969i.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LamboMiuraS1969r.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 12:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fiat127MorettiMidimaxi1980Luc106.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Ligabo~commonswiki!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 21:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alfa159Mercedes196.jpg is uncategorized since 25 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 21:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Citroën10Rosalie1933.jpg is uncategorized since 12 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Stivale garibaldi 1870.jpg is uncategorized since 23 July 2009.

Chi fa da sè...[edit]

Usa {{rename|New name.jpg|Misspelled}}, per favore.--Trixt (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basta che lo inserisci nella pagina di descrizione dell'immagine.--Trixt (talk) 13:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Weiler i.A. Gruber-Museum Yamaha 250 ccm TR2.JPG[edit]

Dear Ligabo, thank you very much for your contribution. I checked the situation today at the Gruber-Museum and I talked with the boss, the racing driver Toni Gruber. They all (including me, the photographer) apologize the error. The Gruber-team had taken away the Yamaha for an exposition and replaced by the AJS without changing the ticket. In the near future I will upload the right Yamaha image and create a new image for the AJS with your description. Thank you once again. --Fredou (talk) 17:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foto[edit]

Ciao. La regole dei 70 anni dopo la pubblicazione per opere anonime si applica solo ad opere veramente anonime, ovvero bisogna provare che l'autore è davvero sconosciuto, e non semplicemente "non lo so chi è l'autore". Quindi generalmente occorre fornire un link ad una pagina in cui viene indicato che l'opera è ufficialmente e sicuramente di autore anonimo.--Trixt (talk) 19:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non penso basti la mancanza di indicazioni sull'opera, occorre un qualche dato per poter applicare quel tipo di norma sul diritto d'autore. Siccome la norma si basa sull'articolo 27 LDA, credo che occorra dimostrare in qualche modo che certamente "l'autore non si è rivelato". Non ho altra esperienza in merito per essere più preciso, questo è quello che ho sempre letto qui su Commons. Ad esempio, ricordo questa procedura di cancellazione.--Trixt (talk) 15:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks unidentified to me[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Issaquah_-_Hailstone_Feed_Store_-_Bugatti_01.jpg&diff=25129363&oldid=24584895: why remove Category:Unidentified vehicles? There is question there, in the description, as to just what this is. - Jmabel ! talk 22:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg[edit]

File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L'immagine rimossa File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg era stata scaricata da flickr, [1] dove è inserita con licenza CC-sa-2.0. In ogni caso, se qualcuno ha verificato trattarsi di copyviol, nessun problema. Alla prossima.

Traduzione automatica: Image removed File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg had been discharged from Flickr [2] where it is incorporated under license CC-sa-2.0. In any case, if anyone has checked question of copyviol, no problem. Bye. --Ligabo (talk) 07:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ligabo, it was tagged as copyvio because it was also found here with a photographer credit and (C) and dated from 2005. And somehow, this page seemed to be the more real source than Flickr, which dated the image from 2009. However, if you can provide any evidence to the contrary, I'll be glad to undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nessuna prova del contrario. Anzi, hai fatto un ottimo intervento. Buon lavoro e ciao.

Automatic translation: No evidence to the contrary. In fact, you did a great speech. Good job and hello.

--Ligabo (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Raduno auto storiche di Medole[edit]

Il nome della categoria Raduno Auto Storiche di Medole è corretto al singolare perché ritengo sia la sua denominazione. Il plurale avrebbe senso se ritenessi di doverla suddividere poi in altre categorie ad esempio per anno (ma visto sono meno di 100 non ne vedo la necessità). In quel caso andrebbe creata con il nome in inglese e non in italiano (Historic auto shows of Medole o qualcosa di simile). --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizzarlo come evento è la cosa corretta, ma non sono riuscito a trovare la denominazione ufficiale. Se non esiste allora metterò il titolo come suggerisci. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 10:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fatto. Controlla se servono altre categorie. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ronchi lith. - Cacciatori delle Alpi a Lodrone (16 luglio 1866) - litografia - ca. 1870.jpg[edit]

Hello. You asked for "File:Ronchi lith. - Cacciatori delle Alpi a Lodrone (16 luglio 1866) - litografia - ca. 1870.jpg" to be renamed to "File:Battaglia di Lodrone 1866.jpg". Can you explain to me why the original name is wrong? I did not understand your reason for your request. Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 17:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao. Hai chiesto di rinominare "File:. Lith Ronchi - Cacciatori delle Alpi Lodrone (luglio 16 1866) - litografia - 1870.jpg ca." in "File: Battaglia di Lodrone 1866.jpg. Può spiegarmi perché il nome originale è sbagliato? Io non capisco il motivo della tua richiesta. Grazie. - Cheers

	Hello, Ligabo~commonswiki. You have new messages at Jacklee's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Category:Ducati motorcycles[edit]

Hi! Sorry I don't speek Italian. As I understand you want me to delete these categories. I am not an admin here - only admins can delete categories or files. I marked them to speedy deletation. In near future an admin will delete them. Regards Electron ^<Talk?> 18:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Mi dispiace di non fare speek italiano. Mi pare di capire che vuoi che io eliminare questi categories. I non sono un admin qui - gli amministratori possono eliminare solo categoris o file. Li ho segnato a deletation veloce. In un prossimo futuro un amministratore li eliminerà. Saluti Electron ^<Talk?> 18:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Laverda_750_SF.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Laverda_750_SF.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

deerstop. 17:29, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lombardi Lucciola[edit]

Wow! I was confused by your recategorizing of the 4-door SEAT 850s, as I had never heard of the Lucciola before. Turns out that the photo I uploaded (top) is actually of a Fiat 850 Lucciola, while the other one is a standard 4-door SEAT (no Francis Lombardi involvement at all). This website has two pictures a bit down on the page where you can compare the rear doors, the differences of which becomes quite apparent if you study the two photos closer. Once I took the time to zoom in on the top photo, the "Lucciola" trim also becomes quite legible, as do the "Fiat" logos on the hubcaps. The Lucciola also seems to sit on a shorter wheelbase.

Thank you, if you hadn't known about the Lucciola, none would have ever been the wiser! I am requesting a name change for the incorrectly named Fiat. Mr.choppers (talk) 07:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[Wow! Sono stato confuso dal tuo recategorizing del 850S a 4 porte SEAT, come non avevo mai sentito parlare della Lucciola prima. Si scopre che la foto che ho caricato (in alto) è in realtà di una Fiat 850 Lucciola, mentre l'altra è un sedile standard a 4 porte (senza coinvolgimento Francis Lombardi a tutti). Questo sito ha due immagini un po 'giù nella pagina dove è possibile confrontare le porte posteriori, le differenze di cui diventa molto evidente se si studiano le due foto più vicini. Una volta ho avuto il tempo per ingrandire la foto in alto, la "Lucciola" trim diventa anche abbastanza leggibile, così come la "Fiat" logo sul coprimozzi. La Lucciola sembra anche a sedersi su un interasse più corto.]

[Grazie, se non avesse saputo della Lucciola, nessuno sarebbe mai stato il più saggio! Sto chiedendo un cambio di nome per il modo errato di nome Fiat.]

Scusami se non rispondo con esattezza, ma la traduzione automatica spesso non mi consente di comprendere perfettamente il mio interlocutore. La SEAT ha venduto due modelli di "850 4p": il primo identico alla "Lucciola" e realizzato dalla Francis Lombardi e il secondo con passo allungato prodotto da Carrocerías Costa. La paternità del modello "SEAT 85o 4p" è generalmente attribuita a Francis Lombardi. --Ligabo (talk) 09:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[Sorry if I do not answer exactly, but the machine translation often does not allow me to fully understand my partner. SEAT has sold two models of "850 4p": the first is identical to the "Lucciola" and produced by Francis Lombardi and the second with a longer wheelbase produced by Carrocerías Costa. The authorship of the model "SEAT 850 4p" is generally attributed to Francis Lombardi.]

Never mind. It's OK now ;) micki t 10:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC) [Non importa. É OK ora;)][reply]

Renaming of "File:LambrettaModelC123cc.jpg"[edit]

Hi. You need to fix the {{Rename}} tag you placed on "File:LambrettaModelC123cc.jpg" as it does not state what the new filename should be. Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 17:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:0405.Annabell_002-2.jpg[edit]

File:0405.Annabell_002-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.