User talk:Ksarasola/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ikuska Dokumentalak digitalean.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Product photo. No permission.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

BriefEdits (talk) 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, @BriefEdits: , Ikuska is not exactly a commercial product. Its sales nowadays will be nothing. However, historically and culturally it is very interesting. That is why this photograph is important to illustrate in Wikipedia its cultural contribution. In the next 4 weeks I will try to get explicit permission from the authors. Ksarasola (talk) 08:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
If a permission is obtained, image can be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
@Ruthven Did you send a message to the user who uploaded the original picture? My work was just improving the original picture. Thanks. Ksarasola (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Oops, I expected the script to write directly to him. I'm moving the template; thanks! Ruthven (msg) 10:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
It wrote to both of you :) Ruthven (msg) 10:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
ː@Ruthven Thanks. Ksarasola (talk) 10:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Rose.Dieng Kuntz Femmes Savantes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nosferattus (talk) 23:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Intxaurrondo 20 orduz 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Intxaurrondo 20 orduz 2017.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 219.78.190.72.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@MiguelAlanCSː Eskatu dut baimena Euskal Telebistan. hitzeez eman didate. Idatziz egun gutxitan bidaliko didate. I have asked for permission at Basque Television. They've given me words. They are going to sentd me a witten version in a few days. I will tell you. Thanks. Ksarasola (talk) 14:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Deberás enviar el permiso a COM:VRT para que restauren la foto con la licencia cedida correctamente. Saludos! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
I give up. Basque Television is not going to sign a NC license. Sorry, I thought it would be reasonable.
Amore ematen dut, Euskal Telebistak ez du emango NC lizentzia. Parkatu, bideragarria izango zela uste nuen. Ksarasola (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Xgeorg (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Good afternoon, Xgeorg,
I got File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 02.jpg and File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 01.jpg from Argia journal, that publishes its contents in Basque and with CC-BY-SA license. You can verify it in the following URLː https://www.argia.eus/argia-astekaria/2624/valeri-kharlamov There you can see both pictures and (at the bottom of the page) the logotype of the CC-BY-SA License. Perhaps you could think that it is so odd finding those pictures in a journal in Basque language. The reason is that Valeri Kharlamov's mother was basque, and that the pictures came from her family in the Basque Country.
Therefore, I think there is no license problems with those images. I hope now you think so. Thanks for your interest. Ksarasola (talk) 19:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
If you search for picture of Valeri Kharlamnov, you will find that at least his portrait (in red CCCP jersey) is not owned by this basque website, so they are not allowed to release with CC-BY-SA. So I assume, also the other pictures are copy-fraud. Xgeorg (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, Xgeorg. Well, I am going to contact with the journal. I will ask about the source of the other pictures. Ksarasola (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Xgeorg (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Good afternoon, Xgeorg,
I got File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 02.jpg and File:Valeri Kharlamov eta bere ama Begoñita 01.jpg from Argia journal, that publishes its contents in Basque and with CC-BY-SA license. You can verify it in the following URLː https://www.argia.eus/argia-astekaria/2624/valeri-kharlamov There you can see both pictures and (at the bottom of the page) the logotype of the CC-BY-SA License. Perhaps you could think that it is so odd finding those pictures in a journal in Basque language. The reason is that Valeri Kharlamov's mother was basque, and that the pictures came from her family in the Basque Country.
Therefore, I think there is no license problems with those images. I hope now you think so. Thanks for your interest. Ksarasola (talk) 19:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Good afternoon, @Xgeorg
After one week I have no answer from Argia journal. I think they are in Summer Holidays. They don`t publish the journal in August. If you agree I can remove now the picture with Valeri in red. And I will try again in September with the journal. Do you agree? Ksarasola (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Hemeroteka-Egunkaria-Azkena 2003-02-20.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: File contains photograph taken by Associated Press, and this is not covered by the license (as provided by Google Translate).
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Senator2029 19:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Senator2029. The contents of the Euskaldunon Egunkaria newspaper (1990-2003) were published with CC-BY-SA license. For example all the images in the Commons category Category:Egunkaria. There is only one restriction related to images coming form agencies, But in this image the pictures come from Euskaldunon Egunkaria, so there is no copyright problems to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. Do you agree? Thanks Ksarasola (talk) 20:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, I see that one of the picture came from an agency. Ksarasola (talk) 22:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ksarasola,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 13:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, where on the source-site is the evidence for the claimed free license? --Túrelio (talk) 11:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I saw the cc-by-sa license in the book. I uploaded a picture with two pages in the book showing that. Please, see File:Twist - Harkaitz Cano novel.jpeg Ksarasola (talk) 11:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Super high resolution images

Kaixo. Super high resolution can be done in the old blurry images and it comes out very clear and sharp. I can send you the links of the tool I use. I studied in Zurriola and had the first teacher as a teacher myself. Kind regards. Idoia 98.116.122.81 05:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

ez dut ulertzen Ksarasola (talk) 11:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kaixo, Super high resolution argazkiak hobetzeko modu bat, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, delakoa erailtzen. Ni argazkian nago (aurpegia ez zait ikusten). Argazkia super high resolution filtroa pasa diot. New Yorken nago. Horregatik Ingelesez nabil. Idoia Lertxundi Begiratu hemen eta zu erabaki.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HBe1jyOZYkxaZ1lAhRonI5bm7znrxHax/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aft8xHK8_wK8AqSwQ4sbobZk42jaELEA/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18ve65QrkDvK87hCMhfDs03LVI8st6Fya/view?usp=share_link 98.116.122.81 22:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Azkenean ulertu dut mezua, Idoia,
Ederra da egin duzun lana (1. argazkia ezin izan dut ikusi baina). Mastodon sarearen bidez zabaldu dut gure lankidetzaren berri. ;-) Ze tresna erabiltzen duzu? Beste argazki batzuetan ere erabil ditzakegu.
Eskerrik asko, Kepa Sarasola Ksarasola (talk) 12:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Diccionario-basico-escolar 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, images coming from the IXA Taldea blog (Ixa Taldearen bloga),has licence CC-BY-SA, https://www.unibertsitatea.net/blogak/ixa/2010/03/31/xml-teknologiaren-erabilera-hiztegigintzan-diccionario-basico-escolar/
However I asked the author of the image (CLA center in Santiago de Cuba) to send the corresponding permission. They sent it and it was accepted via ticket:2023012910000034 for this file. 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I think this question is resolved now. Thanks. Ksarasola (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:ELGETAazal.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ELGETAazal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Trade (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

I had the permission of the authors. I am going to ask them to email permission. Thanks Ksarasola (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robotika-azala.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robotika-azala.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Trade (talk) 14:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi. The publisher of this book is Udako Euskal Unibertsitatea (UEU). It provides CC-BY-SA licence for all their contents, except some of its books published in the last 5 years. Besides, see a list of 23 book covers published in Commons (https://w.wiki/6H5w). This book was published in 2011 eleven years ago. Permissions use to be readable in the UEU's web page, but after some years, a new version of the web page was published last week; this version is not yet stable and it hasn´t yet include information about contents' licence. I hope it will be soon published, else I will email permission this week. Ksarasola (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, @Trade
As I promised, while the new version of the Publisher's web page (UEU, Basque Summer University, whose director is myself) is not updated with the cc-by-sa licence, I sent today an email providing the CC-BY-SA licence to permissions-es@wikimedia.org (8/2/23, [Ticket#2023020810014138] Confirmación de recepción (Re: File:Robotika-azala. [...]) Thanks Ksarasola (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)