User talk:Kjetil r/arkiv7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arkiv av brukerdiskusjonen til user:kjetil r januar 2012 – februar 2014


License[edit]

== {{Autotranslate|1=File:Ski wax - 2013-02-03 at 15-46-19.jpg|base=Image license/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Ski wax - 2013-02-03 at 15-46-19.jpg|base=Image license}} [[User:Denniss|Denniss]] ([[User talk:Denniss|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 15:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

== {{Autotranslate|1=File:Ski wax - 2013-02-03 at 15-50-07.jpg|base=Image license/heading}} ==
{{Autotranslate|1=File:Ski wax - 2013-02-03 at 15-50-07.jpg|base=Image license}}

Denniss (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops… I forgot to add {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Regards, Kjetil_r 15:22, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De-admin message[edit]

Hi Kjetil r. I regret to inform you that soon you'll loose the admin bit as you failed to make 5 log actions since last run, see here. Trijnsteltalk 11:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Use it or lose it! Regards, Kjetil_r 22:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ser du akkurat mistet adminstatus her, men siden jeg er svært utdatert på commonsting spør jeg likevel her.

Lisensen på denne er nok tvilsom, ser heller ikke ut som noe er rapportert inn på OTRS. Har forsåvidt noen bilder selv fra åpningen, men kvaliteten er tvilsom. Røed (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, merket bildet med {{No permission since}}. Du har nok rett i at lisensen er tvilsom. Mvh. Kjetil_r 22:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pushwagner vsm-crop DSCN2687.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Vera (talk) 10:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Profero (talk · contribs) claims it to be his own work. I see no particular reason to distrust him, but if you do, please open a regular deletion request instead. Regards, Kjetil_r 23:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

«File:R Solem.jpg» hva er problemet?[edit]

Hei, Kjetil.

Jeg har en liten opprydningsrunde - og oppdaget skremmende, store, røde bokstaver på denne filens Commons-side: «File:R Solem.jpg»

Er det noe som mangler her? Jeg har tatt bildet; det opprinnelige portrettet er urgammelt - og anonymt. kj 17:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Heisann! Jeg ser at dette er veldig komplisert, men jeg tror den korrekte måten å merke slike "urgamle" bilder (og der du ikke hevder noen rettigheter til avfotograferingen) på er {{Licensed-PD-Art-two|1=PD-old-100|2=PD-1923|3=cc-zero}}
Mvh. Kjetil_r 19:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Takk for svar! Da avsluttes min kortvarige overvåking her, så hvis du vil nå meg om dette eller noe annet, treffes vi på min diskusjonsside! kj 08:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Svedjebruk[edit]

Hei. Har bltt anbefalt å kontakte deg. Har lovet å hjelpe Per Martin Tvengsberg å prøve å legge ut hans bok Svedjebruk på egnet sted på Wikikilden el. Han er en autoritet på skogfinner og svedjebruk. Tidl. fylkeskonservator i Hedemark og har publisert endel videnskapelige skrifter. Boken fantes ikke digitalt og jeg har derfor skrevet den av. Per Martin har oversatt den til engelsk og den engelske versonen blir fortiden bearbeidet av venner i USA til bedre engelsk. Ønsker å legge orginal ut i bånn og deretter på egnet sted lage en mer redigerbar versjon hvor uutgitt materiale og videre arbeider (av flere) kan legges ut i tillegg til en mengde ikke tidligere publisert billedmateriale. Har nå kommet så langt at jeg har lagt ut grovversjonen av avskriften på Norsk under svedjebruk i wikikilden og tilsvarende grovoversettelse under slash and burn på wikisource. Forstår og ser vi ikke oppfyller formatkravet og trenger gjøre nok en jobb der. Har scannet inn boken i pdf, men med 2 og 2 sider med teksten løpende ovenfra og ned. Har liten erfaring med data og har store problemer med sette meg inn i detaljene i fremgangsmåten jeg må følge for å få dette til. Finner også rådene jeg får er motsetningfylte. Finnes det mulighet for å få hjelp av noen som har erfaring med dette som kan ta på seg for eksempel med å få lagt ut det vi ønsker i bånn, med den norske og engelske utgaven? Eventuelt mot betaling? Mvh

Bjørn Eggen— Preceding unsigned comment added by Svedjebruk (talk • contribs) 10:01, 2013 March 27 (UTC)

Hei. Det er sikkert noen som kan tenke seg å hjelpe deg med dette, og jeg forslår at du spør på Wikipedia:Torget. Mvh. Kjetil_r 21:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg tillater meg å blande meg inn, siden det var jeg som i utgangspunktet henviste deg videre til Commons fra Wikikilden (jeg er administrator der). Dersom du allerede har en pdf, er saken egentlig ganske grei. Du må først og fremst laste opp pdf-filen din til Commons. Dette gjør du ved å følge lenken "Last opp fil" i menyen til venstre. Deretter blir du bedt om å laste opp filen din, velge et passende filnavn og en passende lisens. Hvis du kommer så langt, kan jeg hjelpe deg videre på Wikikilden. Kåre-Olav (talk) 22:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Forresten: Bjørn har allerede lastet opp File:Boken på norsk Prosjekt 1.pdf, men noe ser ut til å være galt med formateringen. Mvh. Kjetil_r 22:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strålende. Jeg har laget en indeksside på Wikikilden som lenker til denne pdf'en, s:no:Indeks:Boken på norsk Prosjekt 1.pdf. For Wikikildens del er det ikke så farlig at formateringen er rar. Kåre-Olav (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ben Borgen 2009-06-03 (bilde 01).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 12:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} whenever you see picture that I obviously took myself and that have my personalized CC-BY-SA template. Regards, Kjetil_r 15:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dybbol Skanse.jpg[edit]

Hej Kjetil!

Du har scannet File:Dybbol Skanse.jpg, men hvorfra? Og hvor findes originalmaleriet? --Palnatoke (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hei. Den var scannet fra en gammel bok, jeg kan ikke huske hvilken. Originalen er på Frederiksborg Slot. Hilsen Kjetil_r 20:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Frogner Park in Oslo (edit).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 00:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jørgen Festervoll (bilde 01).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, feel free to add {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} whenever you see picture that I obviously took myself and that has my personalized template. Regards, Kjetil_r 16:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kjetil, if someone should be aware of this, it might be best adding this statement on top of your user page or talk page, however note that there are some more users who look through the new uploads and may use a script that automatically notifies the uploader so they possibly won't see this message at all. -- Rillke(q?) 21:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Спасибо за Ваши фотографии. К сожалению, фотографии мечети Кул-Шариф придётся удалить. Дело в том, что в России здания и памятники защищены авторскими правами до сметри автора (архитектора или скульптора) и ещё 70 лет. Так как мечеть Кул-Шариф была построена в 2000-е годы и архитекторы живы, она ещё долго будет охраняться, и её фотографии на Викисклад загружать нельзя. Если российское законодательство изменится, фотографии будут восстановлены.Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Ymblanter (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 06:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bykle kart.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bykle kart.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bykle kart.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spanias ambassade[edit]

Veldig flott at du har fått tatt så mange bilder av ambassadene, som jeg har hatt gleden av å bruke i artiklene jeg har opprettet. Nå mangler jeg imidlertid 2 ambassader, og har du mulighet til å ta bilder av de siste to, blir jeg veldig glad :-) Det er snakk om Spanias ambassade i Halvdan Svartes gate 13 og Iraks ambassade i Tidemands gate 9. --Alexanderjoahansen198 (talk) 01:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dette blir sånn ca. på vei hjem fra kontoret, så det koster meg lite. Jeg skal stikke bortom i dag (med mobilkamera) for å se om det duger. Hvis ikke kan jeg ta med skikkelig kamera en av dagene senere denne uken. Mvh. Kjetil_r 12:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tidemands gate 9 har vi forresten allerede to bilder av:

Trenger vi nye? Mvh. Kjetil_r 12:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La to bilder av Spanias ambassade i Category:Spanish Embassy, Oslo. Mvh. Kjetil_r 18:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kjempebra. Nei, trenger ikke nye, ser bra ut de du nevner og ser at listen er oppdatert på de to som manglet, så da er alt i boks med bilder til oversiktsartikkelen. --Alexanderjoahansen198 (talk) 00:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]