User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2014/Q4

An award for you!

	Wiki Loves Monuments Pakistan
	Hello Tony, Thank you very much for being part of Wiki Loves Monuments Pakistan jury. Your help and assistance is very much appreciated. We're proud to have such a great Wikipedian and a talented photographer. With love from Pakistan. Thank you! Saqib (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City July 2014 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:38, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:48, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but still, see note Poco a poco 11:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC) It's a bird. I've cloned it out. --King of Hearts 19:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tioga Lake August 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tioga Pass August 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tioga Pass August 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very very good --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco City Hall September 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tioga Pass August 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side yet leaning in. --Cccefalon 21:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Could you clarify what you mean exactly? Distortion? Tilt? Keystoning? --King of Hearts 02:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC) Sure: The vertical structures on the right side are all leaning slightly to the left. A small perspective correction will do. --Cccefalon 07:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC) I don't quite follow. There are several vertical structures: power poles, trees, and people. The power poles are definitely straight. I trust them more than trees, which are sometimes tilted in order to face the sun. --King of Hearts 03:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC) No, no, I made up my mind upon the road sticks and the electrical poles. But ok, I won't pixelpeep and the overall quality is good, so let's be a QI, Cheers, --Cccefalon 20:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mono Lake Old Marina August 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redwood Shores February 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Code 06:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redwood Shores February 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 12:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in my eyes although I believe there may be other reviewers who would prefer it if you would remove the two planes (see my annotations). --Code 06:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco Ferry Building January 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francisco City Hall September 2013 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California Science Center January 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi, The whole set is promoted, but I am not sure what should be done... Congrats anyway. ;oD Regards, Yann (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oracle Redwood City February 2013 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very impressive image of good quality. However, some of the towers are leaning out and some perspective corrections to get them rectilinear are necessary. --Cccefalon 07:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC) I have checked and all the verticals are straight. I don't think any further correction is possible; a 180-degree panorama is guaranteed to be distorted in some way. --King of Hearts 07:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC) Sorry, I am not stupid: 1st building left side leaning left, right side leaning left, 2nd building left side leaning left right side almost straight; 3rd building almost straight, 4th and 5th building both sides leaning right, 6th building almost straight. --Cccefalon 07:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC) I have checked very, very closely, and I have reason to believe that not all the buildings are 100% straight. Don't take this lightly; I have tried restitching multiple times using different software and played around with the rotation/distortion settings on the source images as well as the final image. Go to Google Maps and point Street View to Marine Pkwy slightly right of the intersection with Twin Dolphin Dr. Now rotate the view so that the left side of the third building is straight up against the left border of the image. You should see that the fifth building is slightly tilted to the right, while the sixth building is somewhat tilted to the left. This would be impossible if all the buildings were straight, since the disparity between the fifth and sixth building would imply vertical distortion in the up direction, but if that were true the third building should be tilted to the right (even farther than the fifth). --King of Hearts 05:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Thank you for the comprehensive explanation. Sometimes architecture can be beyond the expectations. Different tilt angles can of course occur in a stitched image, but in dubio pro reo --Cccefalon 10:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barker Library MIT October 2014 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please rotate it a little bit to align the grid parallel to the image borders? --Cccefalon 08:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC) Done. --King of Hearts 07:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC) Well done --Cccefalon 14:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City November 2014 panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please have a look to my note. --XRay 09:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Auburn Cambridge October 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please have a look to my note. --XRay 09:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meyer Library Stanford April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but may be another crop would be better. --XRay 16:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tresidder Union Stanford April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Union Stanford April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Code 07:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roble Gym Stanford April 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The shoadow in the fron is disturbing. Please check the image.--XRay 16:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC) Fixed. It was my camera on a tripod. --King of Hearts 06:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Good quality now. --XRay 06:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varian Physics Stanford April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:09, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roble Gym Stanford April 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality but I suggest you remove the sensor spot, see my note. --Code 07:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC) Fixed. --King of Hearts 03:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Code 06:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)