User talk:KillOrDie

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi. Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. I have seen that you did upload Image:Venus-venera13-right.jpg. Please note that this is a nonfree image although coming from a NASA website. All russian spacecraft images after May 1973 are copyrighted -for details see Commons:Licensing. As this image has been already deleted in the past after a regular deletion request (at Commons:Deletion requests), I have now speey deleted it. So please don't upload russian space craft images past 1973 unless you got the permission of some russian officials. If you have further questions just have a look at Commons:First steps, Commons:Licensing or just ask me. Have fun, Arnomane 19:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mujereslibres.JPG[edit]

Eh-uh... ¿no estará en el DP a comienzos de 2007? Por aquello de los 70 años... (Además {{PD-Art}} es para obras de arte, no para portadas de revistas.) --Dodo 21:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

El caso es que, en ausencia de declaración sobre derechos de autor, el material se entiende protegido. Según la legislación aplicable, siendo una obra colectiva o anónima, sus derechos de autor expiran a los 70 años de la fecha de su primera publicación. O sea, queda poco pero aún no. --Dodo 16:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Para borrar, puedes marcar la imagen de acuerdo con Commons:Normas de borrado o bien pedírselo directamente a un administrador. User:Anna es española... Un saludo. --Dodo 09:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hola KillOrDie, ya están borradas las imágenes. Y tranquilo, puedes solicitarme lo que necesites, para eso estamos. :) Anna 23:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes borradas. Un saludo Anna 02:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No. La actual LPI preconiza un plazo de 80 y no 70 años para las fotos anteriores a 1986. --Dodo 18:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Junio 37 1.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Junio 37 1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yann 02:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Kill, te has adelantado tres meses, si la portada fue publicada en junio aún sigue protegida. Es mejor borrarla y en junio la subes con licencia {{PD-old}} y, si no encuentras la web de donde la sacaste, vuelve a poner la fecha de publicación en la infobox para que no sea marcada por falta de origen. En cuanto a Image:Kunst1843.png no se puede renombrar, si quieres puedo borrarla y la subes de nuevo con el nombre correcto. Un saludo. Anna 01:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bien, he comprobado el origen y licenciado la imagen, no creo que en el poco tiempo que resta para que expire el plazo haya problemas. Un saludo. Anna 22:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Imagen NASA[edit]

Hola KillOrDie, disculpa no haber respondido tu mensaje anterior, he estado ausente de wiki un par de meses. No estoy segura si esas imágenes son válidas, efectivamente algunas de las de los programas soviéticos no están en dominio público, por lo que he preguntado a otro admin, cuando me responda te aviso para que las subas o no. Un saludo. Anna 19:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Dresde-Venus[edit]

Las imágenes de libros tienen copyright, no importa cuan antigua sea la imagen fotografiada, lo que debes mirar es el año de la publicación del libro, porque salvo que tenga al menos 70 años no se puede utilizar. Si el libro del que has escaneado tiene esa antigüedad o superior, pon el título y el ISBN en la infobox, sino habrá que borrarla. Anna 23:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hecho. No sé si conoces esta web, http://www.famsi.org/mayawriting/codices/dresden.html es posible que encuentres algo útil. ;) Anna 23:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No todas. El codex de Dresden de Förstemann y la versión de Kingsborough con casi dos siglos sí, pero también hay imágenes con copyright en esa web.Anna 23:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:TMK-MAVR[edit]

Hola Kill, no es ninguna molestia que preguntes, para eso estamos los malvados admins, para informar, además de borrar sin misericordia todo lo que huela a ilegal ;). Pero la imagen es perfectamente legal, has utilizado una imagen libre, el resto es diseño original tuyo y te ha quedado bastante chula. Un saludo. Anna 00:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Catedral de Valencia (España)[edit]

Hola, la imagen es de un monumento público y está hecha por ti, por tanto no hay problema. Sobraría la segunda licencia PD-Old, ya que no es una foto que ha pasado a dominio público por edad.
En cuanto a los panfletos o posters, sean de grupos legales o ilegales, me temo que se consideran obras derivadas, ya que tienen un autor vivo y éste tiene los derechos. Lo mismo ocurre con las pintadas callejeras, sin embargo éstas no tienen un autor reconocido (salvo excepciones), por tanto si están en la vía pública y tú las fotografías no creo que el autor anónimo que las dibujó vaya a reclamar nada. Espero que estas "chuletas" te vayan sirviendo para ir cogiendo el truco a este rollo de las licencias ;). Un saludo. Anna 23:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Esa también es legal. Anna 00:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pintor Marco San Martin[edit]

Hola: El pintor me ha autorizado utilizar las imagenes que he colocado para ilustrar ese antículo. Saludos. --Alfredobi 23:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Refugios[edit]

Pienso que tienen perfecta cabida aquí, aunque nunca sean considerados edificios históricos y, como dices, terminen siendo derribados, son un testimonio histórico de algo horrible que nunca debió haber sido necesario y aquí se conservarán, aunque sólo sea virtualmente. Si tienes los originales en color y a mayor resolución súbelos también, recuerda que en Commons no hay restricciones de espacio y cuanta más calidad en las fotos mejor. Puedes enlazar las originales y las retocadas entre sí para dar la posibilidad de utilizar unas u otras. He encontrado esta Category:Spanish Civil War, además de incluirlas en Category:History of Valencia o Category:Buildings in Valencia o ambas, a tu gusto. Un saludo, reportero ;). Anna 22:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pues la verdad es que según lo cuentas los originales no quedarían nada ilustrativos para un artículo histórico, tienes razón. Puedes tirar mi consejo a la basura con toda tranquilidad. Lo que está claro es que eres un artista del retoque, le has dado una pátina antigua muy resultona, ni te cuento lo que harías con una buena cámara :D Anna 23:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sin duda quedaría más apropiada la retocada para un artículo, no has exagerado nada, sobre todo en lo del color teletubbie. jejeje. ¿En serio quieres que la borre? Anna 20:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
La dejamos, por si alguien quiere trastear con ella, pero mejor añade categoría, porque una imagen descategorizada es una imagen perdida, salvo que se busque en tu galería. Anna 01:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ya que has subido una sube el resto, por el mismo motivo. Anna 22:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holaaa[edit]

Gracias por meterte en la conversación. Me quedo perpleja, pero ahora veo que esa foto no es mía ¡¡puf, qué alivio!! ¿Cómo está el gran Kyle? Lourdes 23:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Cantones[edit]

Hola KillOrDie, gracias por tu comentario. El mapa incluye todas las sublevaciones que he podidio encontrar en la red, pero si tú sabes de algúna website que contenga más información, pásame la dirección y lo edito de nuevo. Saludos, Té y kriptonita 19:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Images from Soviet Marsnik missions have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Rotkraut (talk) 17:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edo script[edit]

Hi,

I've proposed the images in Category:Edo Script for deletion. The script appears to be a hoax. Kwamikagami (talk) 20:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, KillOrDie!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vega_lander.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 13:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mateo morral 1906.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mateo morral 1906.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mateo morral 1906.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sagecandor (talk) 00:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mateo morral 1906.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mateo morral 1906.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mateo morral 1906.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Triplecaña (talk) 14:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ki-ka-ku.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tcr25 (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]