User talk:KJG2007

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category:Levels[edit]

Hej! Din Category:Levels har inget bra namn. Det betyder främst "nivåer". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oj. Jag har ett förslag på kategorins diskussionssida. Johan G (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixat! Flyttat filer och kopierat diskussionssidan till Surveying levels Johan G (talk) 16:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map symbols[edit]

You have to ask uploader, i only made it in SVG for him. It's something about symbols on maps for scouts. Descriptions are indeed in Polish. Herr Kriss (talk) 22:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fullframe vertical photographs[edit]

Do you know this for example? There are a Lot of these pictures from Poland, Czech, Kaliningrad and north eastern Germany. Greetings --El. (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for responding so late. When I created that category my intention was to gather photographs from vertical cameras used in surveying, mainly for photogrammetry, like the Wild RC8. Those photographs show the features used in en:photogrammetry, such as time stamp, calibration marks, calibrated camera constant and other things that could come in handy in more detailed wikipedia articles about photogrammetry, and also of course wikibooks touching that subject. Johan G (talk) 07:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for answering and good luck for your activity! Greetings --El. (talk) 17:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your'e welcome and thank you. Johan G (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Survey_method_diagrams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cessna 172P over Lago di Guardia in FlightGear.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D-Kuru (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]