User talk:Jordi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jordi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision page[edit]

Please see also my twin's talk page at Commons.--Jordi (talk) 20:49, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Den of Vulpes vulpes[edit]

Echt ein Fuchsbau? An einem Weg? Oder besteht noch Unsicherheit? Ich habe gedacht, es ist ein Kaninchenbau. Ich ärgere mich auch, das man nun nicht die Tiefe erkennen kann. Primär wollte ich bei der kleinen Bilderserie auch den sandigen Boden der Bergischen Heideterrasse (= Hildener Heide) im Fokus nehmen. --Atamari (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leider keine Ahnung. Hab nur Vergleichsbilder geschaut und es sah so aus, aber Kaninchenbau klingt dann doch wahrscheinlicher. Hab die drei Bilder mal in Category:Rabbit warrens umgestellt, danke.--Jordi (talk) 10:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, aber mit der gleichen Unsicherheit? --Atamari (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Ich nehme an, irgendeiner wird es dann richtig zuordnen. Wenn man überhaupt keinen Tierbau angibt, findet es niemand und keiner kommt auf die Idee, die Tierart ggf. zu korrigieren. Eine Kategorie "unidentifizierter Tierbau" gibt es scheinbar nicht.--Jordi (talk) 10:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:DU Innenstadt (33).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Duisburg Kontor GmbH (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo User:Duisburg Kontor GmbH, was genau hast du vor? Möchtest du, wie ich vermute, das auf der deutschen Wikipediaseite de:Mercatorhalle eingebundene Bild durch ein anderes ersetzen?
In diesem Fall ist der Löschantrag auf diese Datei der falsche Weg. Richtig wäre, dein neues Bild unter irgendeinem anderen Dateinamen hier auf Commons hochzuladen und anschließend im Quelltext des Artikels in der deutschen Wikipedia den Namen der neuen Datei anstelle des Dateinamens des jetzigen Bildes ("DU Innenstadt (33).jpg") einzutragen. Das Bild wird dann in dem Artikel automatisch ausgetauscht. Die Löschung der alten Datei hier auf Commons ist nicht nötig.
Wenn das so ist, könntest du den Löschantrag zurückziehen, indem du das auf der Spezialseite mit der Löschdiskussion erklärst.
Ich hoffe, das Missverständnis ist damit zu beheben. Wenn ich mich mit meiner Vermutung irre und es andere Gründe für den Löschantrag gibt, wäre es hilfreich, wenn du den Grund deines Löschantrags genauer erläuterst. Danke und viel Erfolg! --Jordi (talk) 12:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Samuel Fritz (1654-1725).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Samuel Fritz (1654-1725).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Fut.Perf. 22:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not upload this file.--Jordi (talk) 22:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:CarlMosterts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

S. Vlasto[edit]

Hello dear Jordi,

Could you, please, let me know what your source is that Stephen Vlasto died in 1935?

I would very much appreicate it, as I have been trying to find his death date without sucess. See file Marie Bonaparte

Best wishes Actia Nicopolis (talk) 22:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Actia Nicopolis,
Thank you for your message. I really do not remember where I took this date from.
Here (p. 237) the birth and death dates are given as 1885–1960, I have corrected the date in the file Marie Bonapart. Thank you again.--Jordi (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bayeux Sc.36 William with Papal Banner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IronGargoyle (talk) 21:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not tag images kept at DR for speedy deletion[edit]

Re File:Jeanne Moreau 1958.jpg: Please do not tag images which have been kept previously at COM:DR for speedy deletion (e.g. {{Copyvio}}) or expedited deletion of any form (e.g. {{No permission since}}). Consensus has established that such images have a valid copyright status, and therefore consensus is required to overturn that previous determination, not the mere opinion of a single tagger and a single patrolling admin. If you disagree with the prior DR decision, you may open a new DR, presenting your arguments for why the original decision was incorrect. -- King of ♥ 00:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]