User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive13

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 26 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 26 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 26 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dron DJI Phantom 3 Advanced.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electronic cigarettes, Volish Ego3, parts: clearomizer, accu and coil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Dańczów, bell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Jerzykowice Wielkie, bell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:38, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John of Nepomuk chapel in Lewin Kłodzki, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Case IH 6130, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, dormer window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, gatehouse, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 27 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 27 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Słoneczna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 25 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:31, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monuments and sculptures in Klodzko, monument to the fallen soldiers of the Red Army.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Armoured train ambush

Hi Jacek,

Following suggestions by El Grafo at Commons:Valued image candidates/ChurchillCapture Graves.JPG, I have reworded the scope of the article. The noteworthy part of the image is that Winston Churchill was captured during that skirmish. Martinvl (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 28 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I know there is no rule against that, but I think that four nominations of various details of the flat facade of the same building, even historical, is a bit too much--Jebulon 08:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 28 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. @Jebulon: The images are quite different; we should be relaxed about that. --Cccefalon 09:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 28 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 28 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gościnna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 27 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electronic cigarettes, accu Heatvape Defender and vaporizer Kangertech Subtank Mini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electronic cigarettes, Volish Ego3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Michael the Archangel in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Michael the Archangel in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, tented roof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Case IH 6130, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Best in scope, but per criterion 3: Main harvesting unit obscured by foreground vegetation. --El Grafo (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support No problem with criterion 3 for me. This image is useful and used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Archaeodontosaurus. --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 29 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 29 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 29 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 29 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Korytowska.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa park in Polanica-Zdrój, main fountain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa park in Polanica-Zdrój, fountain with stone balls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Przyjaciół dzieci 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bielice, kościół 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 5 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 5 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 5 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom nr 68 w Starej Bystrzycy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa park in Polanica-Zdrój,main avenue, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good very illustrative image, pity it is not included in an article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa park in Polanica-Zdrój, fountain in chess park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good very illustrative image, pity it is not included in an article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wielka Pieniawa Hotel in Polanica-Zdrój, covered passage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good very illustrative image, pity it is not included in an article. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wielka Pieniawa Hotel in Polanica-Zdrój, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and good -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Stacja kolejowa w Polanicy-Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Stacja kolejowa w Polanicy-Zdroju 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Połabska Street in Kłodzko, exposure from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Połabska Street in Kłodzko, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Połabska Street in Kłodzko, stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polanica-Zdrój train station, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sebastian church in Poręba, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, exposure from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sebastian church in Poręba, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, monument at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sebastian church in Poręba, cemetery chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Could you please add "cemetery chapel" or something like that in the description page? --Llez (talk) 18:30, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sebastian church in Poręba, old gravestones at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Could you please add "old gravestones at the church" or something like that in the description page? --Llez (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

   Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jagodna Hostel, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jagodna Hostel, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Poręba, kościół św. Sebastiana 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom w Starkówku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, exposure from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mortuary chapel in Nowa Bystrzyca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom nr 9 w Starej Łomnicy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Already QI but the bird in the upper right corner should be retouched to make it better --Berthold Werner 08:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom nr 9 w Starej Łomnicy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom nr 9 w Starej Łomnicy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lower Manor in Stara Łomnica, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lower Manor in Stara Łomnica, buttresses.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Upper Manor in Stara Łomnica, status in 2015.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful --Llez (talk) 18:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Starków, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Middle Manor in Stara Łomnica, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 18:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Górny w Starej Łomnicy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Middle Manor in Stara Łomnica, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Middle Manor in Stara Łomnica, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zalesie, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu, ogrodzenie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Stacja kolejowa w Polanicy-Zdroju 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 20:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Stacja kolejowa w Polanicy-Zdroju 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 20:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lower Manor in Stara Łomnica, balcony and portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zalesie, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zalesie, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Wyszki, exposure from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Wyszki, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ponikwa, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support it would be useful that this image is used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

On polish wikipedia there is no side with this church, how I will create them then then I will add this photograph.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu, oficyna 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu, ogrodzenie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu, spichrz zachodni.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Środkowy w Starej Łomnicy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ponikwa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ponikwa, cemetery chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Środkowy w Starej Łomnicy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Środkowy w Starej Łomnicy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Środkowy w Starej Łomnicy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Anny w Zalesiu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult light, but QI imo --DXR 09:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Anny w Zalesiu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ponikwa, exposure from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

I don't think it is different enough from WSW exposure, please chose one, we don't need the two as VI.--Jebulon (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

• @Jebulon  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Starków, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

VI 4 me --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, matroneum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of church of the Assumption in Nowa Bystrzyca, pipe organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Goliniec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK.--ArildV 07:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Garb Golińca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Chmielnik, Wzgórza Włodzickie, Sudety.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza, cegielnia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza, cegielnia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Anny w Zalesiu 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower house in Stara Łomnica, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Stary Wielisław, manor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Stary Wielisław, outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Stary Wielisław, western granary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Stary Wielisław, eastern granary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Stary Wielisław, fence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Anny w Zalesiu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Wyszkach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Wyszkach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Wyszkach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Wyszkach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Włodzickie Hills, Chmielnik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bardzkie Mountans, Goliniec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Forester's lodge in Bożków, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support In use ? Anyway, best in scope. So-so quality though...--Jebulon (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Gołogłowy, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Hubertl 23:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Hubertl 23:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarny Palace complex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Ścinawka Średnia, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Ścinawka Średnia, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Ścinawka Średnia, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful --Llez (talk) 15:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Ścinawka Średnia, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful --Llez (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 16:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Anny w Zalesiu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a severe processing error. Can you please have a look at the branches? --Cccefalon 09:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Not perfectly resolved, but good enough for QI imo. --Cccefalon 15:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ścinawka Średnia, methodist church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ścinawka Średnia, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, nice! DeFacto (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Ścinawce Średniej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--Motiur Rahman Oni (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, relief over main entrace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--Motiur Rahman Oni (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, complies and certainly best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 14:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, matroneum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met, useful! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Starkowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu, oficyna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me, despite losing sharpness towards the left. --C messier 18:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, pipe organs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene Church in Ścinawka Średnia, Saint Francis of Assisi on stained glass window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarny summer palace, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Starkowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Masyw Śnieżnika.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Wójtowicach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now. --Berthold Werner 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
General Electric, factory in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Granary in Sarny palace complex, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarny Palace, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarny Palace, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Sklep abc, Kłodzko, ul. Korytowska.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I presume, that the roof of the house in the background is in real not flat but sloping toward the rear side--Hubertl 06:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Hipermarket Leroy Merlin w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Rodzinna, dom dla powodzian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, Steinhoff KPM Meble Kłodzko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, Steinhoff KPM Meble Kłodzko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Inveraray Castle

Hi Jacek,

I found four other images of Invareray Castle that I believe are candidates for VI alongside the image that you supported. I have moved the original into the MVR section along with the four others. Martinvl (talk) 10:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżnik Mountains, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jesuit parsonage palace complex in Ścinawka Średnia, palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ścinawka Średnia Castle, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ścinawka Średnia Castle, gables.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garland July 2015 24 (Garland Landmark Museum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza, stacja benzynowa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dekanat Kłodzko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dekanat Kłodzko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dekanat Kłodzko 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarny summer palace, exposure from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question No votes, comments or annotation? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used now... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steinhoff International Holdings, plant in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bardzkie Mountains, Goliniec Ridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP, kaplica pogrzebowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James the Greater church in Wolibórz, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James the Greater church in Wolibórz, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James the Greater church in Wolibórz, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pomnik - samolot MiG-21M w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP, kaplica pogrzebowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steinhoff International Holdings, office building in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leroy Merlin (Poland), hypermarket in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
E.Leclerc in Poland, hypermarket in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzko Deanery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Państwowa Szkoła Muzyczna w Kłodzku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 13:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Jacek Halicki 14:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)*  Support Ok now! --Hubertl 17:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżnik Hostel, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżnik Hostel, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nowa Ruda, monument - aircraft MiG-21M.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piast Mine, tower shaft "Nowy".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, stark shot. DeFacto (talk) 21:28, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża szybu Nowy w KWK Piast w Nowej Rudzie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 08:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Really, this is a "church" ? I thought it was a baptismal font...--Jebulon 08:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Really, this is a "church" ? I thought it was a pipe organ...--Jebulon 08:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Polanica-Zdrój, ul. Kościuszki 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Heinrich Bender.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schools in Kłodzko, music school.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, looks good to me. DeFacto (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Question I do not understand why this image has been submitted as a VI candidate The building itself does not appear to be sufficently notable to warrant being submitted as a VI candidate (it does not appear to be classified as a national monument). When I looked the school up on Google (I coud not link to it via the image description), it did not appear to me to be a sufficiently prestigious establishment to warrant interest from outside the region where it is situated. Martinvl (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, I had no problem finding it when I checked prior to supporting the image. Try this search, and particularly this result. DeFacto (talk) 06:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose I visited this site and translated the text into English. The two clauses that were of interest to me are:

§ 43.1 For schools admit children who are at least 6 years and not exceeding 16 years.

§ 43.6 The school may ask the parents or legal guardians candidate to provide a certificate stating the child's readiness to take additional learning.

This tells me that the school is targeted at primary and secondary schoolchildren as an extra-mural qualification - locally prestigious, but not sufficiently so to even warrant a separate article in Polish - the best that I could find was here. In contrast, the article en:Guildhall School of Music and Drama has been translated into 15 other languages, en:Royal Northern College of Music into 7 other languages and en:Birmingham Conservatoire into two other languages (German and Swedish). Maybe DeFacto could direct me to the statements that demonstrate otherwise. Martinvl (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support No problem for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I tend to agree with Martinvl. It is not really apparent why either the building or the school would be of more than local interest. --El Grafo (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per DeFacto and Archaeodontosaurus --Llez (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per Archaeodontosaurus --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Schronisko PTTK „Jagodna” 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Schronisko PTTK „Jagodna” 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP, kaplica pogrzebowa 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality., QI for me --J. Lunau 13:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adršpašsko-teplické skály, chapel of mountain victims.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adršpašsko-teplické skály, bust of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gorzanów, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Jaszkowa Dolna, gargoyle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, very crisp. DeFacto (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Schronisko PTTK „Jagodna” 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Spalona 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Spalona 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Starej Łomnicy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowa Bystrzyca, kościół fil. pw. Wniebowzięcia NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zespół Dworski w Starym Wielisławiu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Grupa ukrzyżowania w Bierkowicach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna maryjna w Gorzuchowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Ścinawce Średniej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but the car ruins the compo. --Ermell 08:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Inveraray Castle

Hi Jacek,

When I moved this image from the VIC list to the MVR list, all existing votes were nullified. You might like to revisit the MVR list and reconsider your vote. Martinvl (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Bierkowicach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Bierkowicach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Ścinawce Średniej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Bierkowicach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Bierkowicach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Ścinawce Średniej 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Antoniego w Gołogłowach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Bożego Ciała w Ścinawce Średniej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Bierkowice, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question is there a Wikipedia article that could be linked into the image description? DeFacto (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

   Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, imposing. DeFacto (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Bierkowice, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Jaszkowa Dolna, sculpture of Saint John the Evangelist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dust on the air filter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, unusual but potentially useful. DeFacto (talk) 19:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ścibórz, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ścibórz, Otmuchowskie Lake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac letni w Sarnach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac letni w Sarnach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac letni w Sarnach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac letni w Sarnach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me, there is some noise left in the dark areas. Maybe, but not for sure fixable. Third opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 12:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, Chapel of the Annunciation, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The chapel at the Pass Puchaczówka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac letni w Sarnach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej, spichrz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zieleniec, wayside cross.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bardzkie Mountains, Kłodzka Top, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nysa Kłodzka in Kłodzko, waterfall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Ożary, John of Nepomuk scuplture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Tarnów, sculpture of Jesus Christ as the Good Shepherd.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Tarnów, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, bells at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, could be useful. DeFacto (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountains in Kłodzko, illuminated fountain at the Traugutta Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 11:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 11:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny I 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Bierkowicach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sienna (powiat kłodzki), exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Czarna Góra, observation tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Czarna Góra, upper station of the chairlift.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exhibition catalogues, Museum of the Kłodzko Land.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SanDisk SD cards, SDHC cards.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support good quality compared to other images in the category SSTflyer (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, pałac 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, dom mieszkalny III 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Bierkowicach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Ścinawce Średniej 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 17:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, western frontage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, useful. DeFacto (talk) 21:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, northern frontage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, eastern frontage, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, it's charming. DeFacto (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, eastern frontage, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, yep, the best in that scope. DeFacto (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Kapitanowo w Ścinawce Średniej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Kapitanowo w Ścinawce Średniej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Kapitanowo w Ścinawce Średniej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zapora w Chocieszowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Jacek Halicki 12:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Good quality for me now --Ermell 21:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MSI video cards, GTX 770 Lightning.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian statue in Nowa Ruda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Chorzelów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Polanica-Zdrój, altar with blood relic of John Paul II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in that scope. DeFacto (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zespół pałacowy Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zespół pałacowy Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Kapitanowo w Ścinawce Średniej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Kapitanowo w Ścinawce Średniej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, rurociąg ciepłowniczy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prague Castle Guard, checks of guard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vltava in Prague, view of Mánesův most from Charles Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of Madonna and Saint Bernard on Charles Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Provost Residence (Prague Castle), exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, rurociąg ciepłowniczy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, rurociąg ciepłowniczy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Piękna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South facade of St. Vitus Cathedral, south tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Różana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Różana 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Różana 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża widokowa na Górze Świętej Anny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Spółdzielcza 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Rodzinna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Bohaterów Getta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful architecture. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prison in Kłodzko, northern wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This one is representative enough for this prison, I can support, and the scope could be larger (no need of "northern wall" precision IMO)--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Provincial courts in Poland, court in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Wodna Street in Kłodzko, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Chełmońskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Moniuszki 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Szkolna 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 11:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wandy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 11:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, rurociąg ciepłowniczy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. I like it, though the DOF is a little bit too shallow. --Dirtsc 18:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower on St. Anna’s Mountain in Nowa Ruda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, exposure from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zakład Karny w Kłodzku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zakład Karny w Kłodzku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Krakusa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 10:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, can you link the image description to wikipedia articles please. DeFacto (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

•  CommentAs per Commons:Valued image scope#Links in the scope the links in the scope are in order. Martinvl (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, the scope category link is good, I totally agree. I was only wondering if we could get Wikipedia links into the image description as suggested for criterion 4.2. DeFacto (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Done Martinvl (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 Support - Meets all the criteria for a VI. Happy to support this nomination. Martinvl (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, can you link the image description to wikipedia articles please. DeFacto (talk) 19:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

  There is currently no article about this building. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, ok, perhaps a link to the town or locality for context? DeFacto (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 07:14, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża widokowa na Górze Świętej Anny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża widokowa na Górze Świętej Anny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 07:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża widokowa na Górze Świętej Anny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bardo Castle, remains of walls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope is a bit broad isn't it, with no location mentioned? Charles (talk) 23:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2015 (UTC). Thanks. Charles (talk) 11:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Wieża widokowa na Górze Świętej Anny 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Wieża widokowa na Górze Świętej Anny 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Nowej Rudzie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego w Kłodzku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwaldzka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Witosa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 6-8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zbiornik retencyjny w Chocieszowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Distorted. Please correct it, you have enough experience and must see it by yourself. --Hockei 18:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Hockei 12:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masarykova chata (Šerlich), exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bystrzyca Dusznicka River in Szalejów Dolny.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 8 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 8 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 8 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 10 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Sąd Rejonowy w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me --~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, baroque gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose - Given that we already have a candidate with the scope "8 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko", I do not think that the gable justifies its own scope, particularly when both images can be taken from the same spot with little difference in magnification. Martinvl (talk) 20:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl: "Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest". Besides, look here and see using the FastCCI gadget how many photos in this category received VI. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 Not done - See my comments here. Martinvl (talk) 06:42, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't get your weird ideas. For over a year I nominate photos in the VI and so far no one has reported any problems to the scope. I'm not going to change anything because you told me to do. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, best in this scope. DeFacto (talk) 21:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, baroque gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose - Given that we already have a candidate with the scope "10 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, facade", I do not think that the gable justifies its own scope, particularly when both images were taken from the same spot. Martinvl (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl: "Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest". Besides, look here and see using the FastCCI gadget how many photos in this category received VI. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

@Jacek Halicki: I still feel that the scope is too narrow (and is also too narrow in many of the cases that you have mentioned). I would be happy to support this nomination if the scope were "XXXX-style gable in Poland" (where "XXXX" is an architectural type - something like "Baraoque" or "Gothic"), but I think it excessive to show the gable of every listed building in Poland. You should remember that in the first instance VIs are filters.

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 Not done - if you read my comment, I suggested that the scope be "Baroque-style gable in Poland", not just one building. Martinvl (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't get your weird ideas. For over a year I nominate photos in the VI and so far no one has reported any problems to the scope. I'm not going to change anything because you told me to do. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, best in this scope. DeFacto (talk) 21:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Usefull --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica św. Krzyża w Boguszynie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 10 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 10 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 10:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 12 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:41, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Gierymskich 8 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 16:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica św. Krzyża w Boguszynie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dekoracja dożynkowa w Woliborzu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The dog is very cute but the peacock is quite creepy. Dllu 08:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Suboptimal light, but QI to me. --Cayambe 09:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sněžka, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose I find the yellow building on the left too dominant. When I first saw the nomination, my reaction was to try to identify the building. Also, in my view this image illustrates the mountain better. It was taken from a point 500 metres further away, ans as such showed the track up the mountain far better and also reduced the prominence of the building. Also, the commentary associated with the alternative image identified the yellow building as the "tourist shelter Śląski Dom". Martinvl (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

 Support, nice juxtaposition too. DeFacto (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Na Iglicznej Hostel, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 22:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Na Iglicznej Hostel, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 22:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bystrzyca Dusznicka River in Polanica-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --XRay ^talk 05:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Distinctive emblems for the Protection of Cultural Property in Poland, pattern of 1968.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --XRay ^talk 07:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bartosz Głowacki monument in Tarnobrzeg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monuments and memorials in Tarnobrzeg, Józef Piłsudski monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 22:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of the Blessed Virgin Mary on Bardzka Góra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, Alphonsus Liguori chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross chapel in Boguszyn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk) 20:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MC MTO-11CA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)