User talk:Imz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction of the civil Russian alphabet by Peter I/History and note (ru)[edit]

Hi, I have put your page Introduction of the civil Russian alphabet by Peter I/History and note (ru) up for deletion as commons gallery pages are not meant for text. I have copied the text to the talkpage of Image:Peter 17.gif. Kind regards, Deadstar 12:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I din't know text is not allowed on gallery pages. Ok, the page can be deleted tranquilly now, since the text has been saved elsewhere.--Imz 13:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG categories[edit]

Hi. Just like to say good work on categorising the russian maps. However please note that the "SVG maps of Russia" category is not part of the same category tree as the "Maps of Russia". Therefore an image can be in both. /Lokal_Profil 22:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for attention and the information! I didn't know that but actually I wouldn't remove a "Maps of Russia" label from an image unless it were in a subcategory of the Category:Maps of Russia. And since I feel there is a need to sort out the non-SVG images that have been superseded by the SVG ones, I put those SVG images that are already in the tree of the Category:Maps of Russia to the Category:categorized SVG maps of Russia. (It's in order to keep track of those SVG images for which we should check if there any non-SVG duplicates. These will be left in the plain Category:SVG maps of Russia.)--Imz 22:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK then I understand. I created a 2008-03 category as well. I'll populate it with svg locator maps once Zabaykalsky Krai gets an ISO code (or if I suspect that ther will be no ISO code in time. /Lokal_Profil 23:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!--Imz 23:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Got a friend to create them automatically. See Category:Locator maps of federal subjects in Russia as of 2008-03 for the new maps. /Lokal_Profil 19:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to your friend and you for the work! I've just finally finished the transition to 2008-01 maps at the Russian Wikipedia.--Imz 04:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token a648edab6c45ed38e51d068014b485cb[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Imz (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

test[edit]

without a signature


Category:Empty pages has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Tony Wills (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Superseded maps incorporating flags has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Location maps of ethnic groups in Dagestan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Secretlondon (talk) 17:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Russian alphabet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


dcljr (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:RMS at CMC MSU, the small talk - 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Berber script has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Categorized_SVG_maps_of_Russia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]