User talk:IceWelder/Archive

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IceWelder!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mor. Utopiya.ogg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mor. Utopiya.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Niklas Akerblad photo.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Niklas Akerblad photo.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Niklas Akerblad photo.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruff tuff cream puff: Hey, I am not too common with Wikimedia Commons, so I need to ask: The image was sent to me by Akerblad himself in response to "an image for his Wikipedia article", wherefore I put "Attatched to email by author" as source description. I no longer have a copy of that email as my service's recycle bin empties automaticly after a short time, so what could I do? Would it be possible to move the image to en.Wikipedia file namespace? Lordtobi (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for replying. I am not sure how you could accomplish this, so I have posted a question at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Niklas_Akerblad_photo.JPG to see if someone could help you with it. It's a nice picture. It's just that the Commons is pretty strict about licensing. Sorry for the hassle. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Owning a copy of a photo (whether digital or film) does not equate to owning the photo's copyright, and neither does owning "publicity" rights. Subjects of photos are often unaware of this, and so in this case we will need either the photographer to confirm that they agree to a free license (as we define it), or for Akerblad to forward the contract confirming transfer of copyright. Either way, it needs to happen through the procedures outlined at COM:OTRS, both to protect the confidentiality of the participants and so that we have an archive. Storkk (talk) 15:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warhorse Studios logo.png[edit]

File:Warhorse Studios logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.221.159.67 21:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Broforce.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Broforce.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Broforce.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

80.221.159.67 21:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:247-logo-2.png[edit]

File:247-logo-2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.221.159.67 21:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions nominations[edit]

Hi, please use the 'nominate for deletion' link from the left menu to nominate a file for deletion. It will create the nomination for you, including the required notification of the uploader. Jcb (talk) 23:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove information like the original upload log, as you did here. Jcb (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Theft Auto V Logo.svg[edit]

File:Grand Theft Auto V Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Houser 2013.jpg[edit]

File:Dan Houser 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 13:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhain (talk • contribs) 13:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Houser 2013.jpg[edit]

File:Dan Houser 2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ponyo (talk) 17:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:StreetScooter.svg[edit]

File:StreetScooter.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:RedLynx logo.png[edit]

File:RedLynx logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: Hello, I think there is a little of a mix-up, and I don't think that this ban is justified. I was never really "warned" the way you put it in your block description, I did get some notifications implying that an image I uploaded did not fit the requirements for inclusion. Of the 60+ fies I uploaded, only a minority was deleted.

My first attempt at using Commons was by uploading an audio sample of a foreign game name, as I had seen multiply on Commons (I did the exact same TTS as others did, but apparently my version was bad...sure.) Following on that are two images I wanted to update: File:CDProjekt-logo.svg and the recent File:RedLynx logo.png, on the prior, my upload was actually justified as the bird displayed consisted just of simple lines and two colors and a proper documentation on that case COM:TOO#Poland does NOT exist, on the latter, COM:TOO#Finland did not really display how my upload would conflict with it (actually, it does not actually tell me anything, the page is really not maintained well.) Furthermore, the logo for the company Warhorse (in Czechia) was a simple "W" and "H" on a shield--yet, it was deleted for copyvio. Does that make sense? No, I don't think so. Next I uploaded the logo for Grand Theft Auto V, which includes the words "grand", "theft", and "auto", as well as a "V", the V has very little stylizatin (a few curves), but ultimately, it was deleted nonsensially. Another file that was deleted was a portait of Rockstar Games founder Dan Houser, in parallel to the picture of his brother, Sam Houser, which was present on Commons for almost two years alrady, and I took it from the same source, and when mine got deleted, the other stayed until I voted to have it deleted as well.

So in conclusion, in my history, only three files were more-or-less-justifiedly deleted (over a course of 2+ years!), while two were deleted against the background of my uploading parallel files only (where I could see that they are acceptable to have, but yet they weren't, just becuase). Your block makes it look like I only use Commons to purposefully uploaded fair-use media to mess with its users, but that is simply not true. I make mistakes--sure--Commons isn't my primary project, I even tend to always upload to English Wikipedia directly, only come here if the files are already present, or should be in parallel with other files, wherefore I consider this the proper place to put them, but to err is human, and I need to learn, and a block certainly does not help me learn. What should actually be done is a refurbishment of COM:TOO, which is crucial to the development of the platform. COM:TOO is a mess, and as you can tell from my behaviour, I certainly couldn't figure out the proper usage for some of my files, laying the fault on the maintainance of rules rather than my wrongdoing. Lordtobi (✉) 13:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1) You uploaded an image which looks very similar to this. There is no question this is a copyright violation. It's not an edge case.

2) You were previously warned for uploading an image from the Daily Mail. I don't care about the Warhorse logo, but this is an absolute no-no.

3) You cannot pretend TOO lies somewhere where you wish it lied instead of where it does. Nor is your wisdom greater than that of Commons editors; TOO does not need to be refined to include copyright violations.

4) With regards to the "mistakes", hopefully you will be more careful in the future.

You may appeal this block with the {{Unblock}} template. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battlecry Studios logo.png[edit]

File:Battlecry Studios logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.battlecrystudios.com/

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of information[edit]

Hi, in 2016 I told you not to remove things like the original upload log from a file description page. Now you did it again for the same file as in 2016 and for other files. Don't do that. Jcb (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jcb, I must apologize for this inconvenience. Back on the first case, I wasn't thinking straight, the second (today) I didn't quite notice that I did since I was adapting the gallery of other versions I had previously inserted on the Rockstar Games logo. I understand why you would want to restore those upload logs, but that does not quite explain why you reverting every single of my edits today. For example, you set thise file back to an uncategroized state, literally axing two years of progress with a single click. Might I ask you to restore my edits and then re-insert the upload log for the affected logos? The present versions, on all 11 files you reverted me on, does not feel better than a lacking OUL. I will try to look out for OULs more closely in the future. Lordtobi (✉) 22:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the mentioned file page you removed the original upload log and you left an empty source field. On the second and third file I click, you also removed information. That's the moment where an administrator will just rollback your edits. You cannot expect us to review all your edits one by one if such things happen. Jcb (talk) 22:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from one today, all of these removals happend back in 2016, when I was still new to the site. And I don't think that this reasons reverting all changes like I was some kind of vandal. In places where I changed the source, I did so because the new image had a new source (from which I sourced and cleaned the image some months back), so completely valid. The only istance where I actually removed such information was also the RAGE logo, but just because it only said "Rockstar Games". The company has never officially distributed that exact image, and it does not help to just add a company name there without further context. Nonetheless, would you be available to restoring my proper versions from earlier today and then merging the OULs into these versions? Lordtobi (✉ 22:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You now know that you cannot remove information, so don't do that. I am not going to examine and fix all your edits. If you don't understand what you are doing, make sure you understand before you start editting again. Jcb (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I restored my content in tandem with the OULs. Lordtobi (✉ 07:16, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/whttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_Grand_Theft_Auto_Vhhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_Grand_Theft_Auto_Vhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_Grand_Theft_Auto_Vhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_Grand_Theft_Auto_Vttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_Grand_Theft_Auto_Viki/List_of_accolades_received_by_Grand_Theft_Auto_V — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:18:4800:C8DD:2:1:1BD2:682F (talk) 22:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neptune's Trident[edit]

Hey, did you know that Neptune's Trident is "banned from making any edit or participating in any discussion relating to the gamergate controversy, broadly construed"? he probably shouldn't be editing videogame articles at all, especially not ones like this. Cheers! World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@World's Lamest Critic: Hey, in fact I was not aware of this, and it makes me wonder why they still engage in such, pardon my language, idiotic edits. I am currently in no position to change something about this, so since you already know about it, would you consider taking this to en:WP:ANI? Lordtobi (✉) 13:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm blocked on Wikipedia, so I can't. If Neptune's Trident continues to edit war with you, just remind them of their topic ban. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about that[edit]

Help of lighting Minas123456 (talk) 23:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kingsoft Logo.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Kingsoft Logo.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kingsoft Logo.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 18:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: The logo fails the TOO (it's just text and trapeces) so it should be free media. Could you help me tag it properly? Lordtobi (✉) 18:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks OK now. Please do not forget to add a license to your files. Thanks, Yann (talk) 03:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kati Levoranta, Gamelab 2018 (43110732442).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Kati Levoranta, Gamelab 2018 (43110732442).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kati Levoranta, Gamelab 2018 (43110732442).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: The image was released by its photographer, Carolina Gaona (@Sonaratv), as a public donain image via the Flickr account of the event where the image was taken. The account in question is also operated by Gaona, as is said in the profile's description. I thought I had tagged it sufficiently and "public domain" would it mean it could be used anywhere, but your message has me believe that this is not the case. How would I tag this file correctly? Lordtobi (✉) 21:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr with it's license choices has been shown to be an issue, and subject of quite some discussion - hence the complicated template we have to put on the image page. The actual text used by Flickr is "Public Domain Work" and "Public Domain Dedication (CC0)" (and flcikr puts a "Public Domain Mark" or a CC-zero mark for these two choices). The former is for when the uploader believes it is the PD (old age, US Gov, etc.) and is not a irrevocable license. The latter is where the Flickr user wants to donate his work into the PD (and it has the CC-zero in brackets). Their Flickr page has a only a Twitter code - I linked that to twitter.com/search?q=%40Sonaratv&src=typd - suggest talk to them, explain what the choices mean, and ask if they will alter it (it only takes a few seconds to change it) Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand where you're coming from, though CC does not strictly classify the PD Mark as not suitable for original PD works. I feel like ambiguity is at play here, unfortunately. Nontheless, I'm trying to contact them, though obviously I cannot know when and whether they will respond. Regards. Lordtobi (✉) 21:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bethesda Game Studios logo.svg[edit]

File:Bethesda Game Studios logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 01:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Team17.png[edit]

File:Team17.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gamingforfun365 (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max Design Logo.png[edit]

File:Max Design Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 08:01, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic users notification[edit]

Thank you for helping with Commons maintenance! Please notify users about problems with their files. Help:Gadget-UserMessages is very helpful for this purpose. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @EugeneZelenko, thanks for your message. You're that I often (usually?) forget to notify the users of files I tag. I usually edit on enwiki and am a bit spoiled because I use Twinkle there for automated notifications. I will try to post notifications regularly in the future, and this tool is a good first step, but I wonder, is there a tool similar to Twinkle (i.e., automatically tag a file as copyvio and notify the uploader) for this project? Lordtobi (✉) 14:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I rarely edit English Wikipedia these days, so I'm not aware of best practices there :-( Is this tool JavaScript-based or bot monitoring recent changes? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: A JavaScript tool, similar to Gadget-UserMessages but with automatic tagging functions for files, articles, etc. with simultaneous user messages. You can check it out here. It's mostly a time saver, hence why I'm curious whether Commons has something alike. Lordtobi (✉) 14:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For mass tagging Commons has Help:VisualFileChange.js and this tool notifies user automatically. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: This tool certainly has good features, but it doesn't seem to support "tag this file". For single-file cases, I will probably stick to hand-adding copyvio tags and the notifying user via UserMessages, which realizes which file I just tagged. Thanks for the help! Lordtobi (✉) 15:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I completely forgot about Help:QuickDelete. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: This works beautifully, thanks alot! Lordtobi (✉) 17:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Grand theft — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.113.108.76 (talk) 07:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geoff Keighley, Gamelab 2018 (42442939804).png was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Geoff Keighley, Gamelab 2018 (42442939804).png was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:Explicit. Reason for deletion : No license since 12 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dino Patti, Gamelab 2017 (35611079335).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Dino Patti, Gamelab 2017 (35611079335).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:Explicit. Reason for deletion : No license since 12 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Debbie Bestwick, Gamelab 2018 (41307122860).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Debbie Bestwick, Gamelab 2018 (41307122860).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:Explicit. Reason for deletion : No license since 12 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Todd Howard, Gamelab 2018 (41230874350).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Todd Howard, Gamelab 2018 (41230874350).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:1989. Reason for deletion : Failed license review; Public Domain Mark is not a valid free license and file is not in public domain (F4) . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shawn Layden, Gamelab 2018 (42207336735).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Shawn Layden, Gamelab 2018 (42207336735).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:1989. Reason for deletion : Failed license review; Public Domain Mark is not a valid free license and file is not in public domain (F4) . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massimo Guarini, Gamelab 2017 (35459028892).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Massimo Guarini, Gamelab 2017 (35459028892).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:1989. Reason for deletion : Failed license review; Public Domain Mark is not a valid free license and file is not in public domain (F4) . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark Cerny, Gamelab 2018 (43111149312).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Mark Cerny, Gamelab 2018 (43111149312).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:1989. Reason for deletion : Failed license review; Public Domain Mark is not a valid free license and file is not in public domain (F4) . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raúl Rubio, Gamelab 2017 (35244714230).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

I would like to let you know that File:Raúl Rubio, Gamelab 2017 (35244714230).jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:JuTa. Reason for deletion : No license since 17 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second Life snapshots and copyright[edit]

Hi IceWelder, I noticed that you tagged a bunch of Second Life snapshots for speedy deletion. So here is a speedy reaction to that. Did you read and take notice of this page? Linden_Lab_Official:Snapshot_and_machinima_policy? As far as I know it is only Second Life landowners and portrayed avatars that can put up restrictions.

Best regards. Peli (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pelikana. I wasn't aware of this special case for Second Life. However, the individual characters would still be subject to copyright (and in some, the avatar is apparently modeled after Dr. Phil), right? Even if that did not apply, it would be out-of-scope as a screenshot for a personal project. Looking through the Second Life categories, a lot of images could be deleted with this reasoning. IceWelder [✉] 10:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this could lead to a lengthy discussion as to what is out of scope. And what is a non free video game. Installing the app, making an avatar and entering SL is free to everyone. It would be nice if you turned it into a normal deletion process at least so more users can express their opinion. Better to just remove the deletion request at all. To me Second Life is a part of the world. Regarding to size it can be compared to a small town of 40K inhabitants. Thats how many are actually in world at all times on average. The number of registered users is far larger. And this small town would deserve any categorisation that a small or middle sized town could have. I.e. streets in SL, vehicles, buildings, parcs, animals etc. in SL, actors in etc. Most of the avatars in SL can change appearance several times per day, and imho as long as their avatar names are not visible or mentioned in the description there is no harmful breaking of peronality rights. Some shop owners or creators might object to depiction of their products, but in my experience nobody cares if it is shown de minimis. I meant to say that most if not all avatars implicitely if not explicitely agreed to their snapshots being taken, especially the ones getting on stage to expose themselves as dancers to a SL audience. Taking snapshots at shows and publicing them outside of SL is in many cases encouraged by stage owners and event organisers. Jo Yardly is a landowner, a creator and contributor to commons herself. I see no valid reason to delete her files. Peli (talk) 10:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not adamant regarding the topic's scope in general. I only tagged a series of screenshots from the same user with possibly unattributable avatars/models. This is mostly a spillover from enwiki, where the corresponding article, presumably written by the project's author, is being deleted. An administrator will weigh in their opinion on the images soon. If there is ever a discussion for Second Life overall, feel free to ping me. IceWelder [✉] 11:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry, I have no idea how this works, but the page was not written by the project's author or anyone involved with managing/owning/creating the actual project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hab3045 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create the page, I did upload the pictures, only dr phil and I are in them (recognisably anyway). No idea who made the page but I think it's nice that a project that has been home to thousands of people and that has existed for over a decade in the oldest biggest user created virtual online world there is gets a mentioned. Second Life is 100% free. Joyardley (talk) 12:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the author of both the screenshot and the assets therein, the images should be fine. I retracted the copyvio notice from most images, but three images container avatars from third parties that still fall under their authors' copyright, per the licensing agreement for the game. I revised the copyvio tags for those. IceWelder [✉] 12:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Build a Rocket Boy logo.png[edit]

File:Build a Rocket Boy logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovision image violation[edit]

Hi Ice. This is the first time I've known about this image being uploaded. I've not edited or been active on Wikipedia since 2015. It would appear that someone has uploaded this fraudulently and without my knowledge. I've just had to reset my password, as the one I use to have wasn't recognised. Perhaps my account was hacked into? Wes Wolf ^Talk 09:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesley Wolf: In that case, you should review your most recent contributions. There are ~200 across 2016 and 2017. The image I tagged was uploaded in 2017 and I only discovered it just now as part of my routine sweeping. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 20:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Team17 (2018) Logo.png[edit]

File:Team17 (2018) Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— billinghurst sDrewth 15:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline TOO cases[edit]

I notice that you've tagged several borderline image for speedy deletion, such as File:Wolfenstein New Colossus.jpg. Note that COM:CSD#F1 states: "This does not apply whenever there is ... a plausible argument that it is below the threshold of originality." What this means is that even if you personally believe it to be above TOO, if it's not an obvious case that everyone would believe to be above TOO, you should not nominate it for speedy deletion. Instead, the best approach is to open a DR, as I've done for you. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cases I report are fairly obvious - not in my opinion, but according to the relevant TOO guidelines. For example, you declined the copyvios for the two Doctor Who logos despite COM:TOO UK stating that "most logos" are "Not OK" to upload here. The UK has one of the lowest TOOs around, so the copyvio tag was not "borderline". Now, we have two separate DRs (and really, it should only be one as it is two variations of the same logo to be deleted for the same reasons), but I fail to see where there would be a "plausible argument that it is below the threshold of originality" with such a strict guideline. IceWelder [✉] 08:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any logo from anywhere in the world that would be below TOO in the US is considered borderline. Remember, DRs aren't just for inviting further discussion, but also for documentation (e.g. Category:Threshold of originality related deletion requests). If our understanding of the copyright law of a certain country changes as a result of new evidence, we want to be able to easily look up the images we deleted under our faulty assumption. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly obvious? It's not obvious for me, why white text on black background now copyrighted. Denis Golyakov (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The font is not copyrighted but the content and arrangement obviously are, especially if you look at Sweden's extremely low TOO. IceWelder [✉] 16:34, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call Sweden's TOO "extremely low"; I would call it peculiar. You have stuff like File:Upphovsrätt på teknisk ritning.png which may be above US TOO, and stuff like File:4xcolor mini maglite 20050614.jpg which would be considered totally utilitarian in any other country. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

هيهثتثقتقنث[edit]

يعثعثثغثعثثا رقم ه 37.238.67.18 12:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sjjsj[edit]

Jsksososidk 195.19.125.235 19:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Siyadat[edit]

Magomedova 195.19.125.235 19:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Theft Auto (1997) logo.png[edit]

File:Grand Theft Auto (1997) logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ixfd64 (talk) 23:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Garry's mod[edit]

garry's mod 94.140.151.74 05:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ii3oekuuuu[edit]

Kekej877 46.158.82.0 09:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

게리모드[edit]

ㄴㄷㄴㅈㄴㅈ ㄷㄹㄷㄴㅌㄴ 211.204.243.40 01:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rockstar Dundee (52816004257).png[edit]

File:Rockstar Dundee (52816004257).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diego Angel (49945916081).jpg[edit]

File:Diego Angel (49945916081).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:IceWelder/Archive

Copyright status: File:Mor. Utopiya.ogg[edit]

File tagging File:Niklas Akerblad photo.JPG[edit]

File:Warhorse Studios logo.png[edit]

File tagging File:Broforce.png[edit]

File:247-logo-2.png[edit]

Deletions nominations[edit]

File:Grand Theft Auto V Logo.svg[edit]

File:Dan Houser 2013.jpg[edit]

File:Dan Houser 2013.jpg[edit]

File:StreetScooter.svg[edit]

File:RedLynx logo.png[edit]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

File:Battlecry Studios logo.png[edit]

Removal of information[edit]

Neptune's Trident[edit]

What about that[edit]

Copyright status: File:Kingsoft Logo.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Kati Levoranta, Gamelab 2018 (43110732442).jpg[edit]

File:Bethesda Game Studios logo.svg[edit]

File:Team17.png[edit]

File:Max Design Logo.png[edit]

Problematic users notification[edit]

Untitled[edit]

File:Geoff Keighley, Gamelab 2018 (42442939804).png was recently deleted[edit]

File:Dino Patti, Gamelab 2017 (35611079335).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Debbie Bestwick, Gamelab 2018 (41307122860).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Todd Howard, Gamelab 2018 (41230874350).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Shawn Layden, Gamelab 2018 (42207336735).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Massimo Guarini, Gamelab 2017 (35459028892).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Mark Cerny, Gamelab 2018 (43111149312).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Raúl Rubio, Gamelab 2017 (35244714230).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

Second Life snapshots and copyright[edit]

File:Build a Rocket Boy logo.png[edit]

Eurovision image violation[edit]

File:Team17 (2018) Logo.png[edit]

Borderline TOO cases[edit]

هيهثتثقتقنث[edit]

Sjjsj[edit]

Siyadat[edit]

File:Grand Theft Auto (1997) logo.png[edit]

Garry's mod[edit]

Ii3oekuuuu[edit]

게리모드[edit]

File:Rockstar Dundee (52816004257).png[edit]

File:Diego Angel (49945916081).jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search