User talk:High Contrast/Archive 9

Archives 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Current

Hidden user categories

Hi High Contrast. Thanks for the pointer to more info when you reverted my edit at [1]. I've had a look, but I'm not sure I understand. There seem to be two types of categories here - photos *by* wikimedians, and photos *of* wikimedians. I can see why the former would be hidden and added to Category:User categories (in this case, that would be Category:Uploads by Fæ) as they are maintenance categories, but I'm not sure why the latter (in this case, Category:Fæ) should be hidden, as they are content categories rather than maintenance categories (e.g. they're included in category trees such as Category:Wikimedia UK board members). I've had a look at Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy, but that doesn't seem to really cover this situation although it seems to agree with me ("All files must be accessible via regular categories"). What's your view here? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I do not understand your problem. View on what? --High Contrast (talk) 19:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

I think on whether a category of photographs of a person ought to be hidden or not. If we are consistent then the category probably should not be hidden, as is the case for many other "named" Wikimedians such as Category:Johnbod or Category:Jimmy Wales. Obviously my various maintenance categories meant to index media I have created or uploaded are a different beastie. --Fæ (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Do what you want. I won't waste my time on this ting. But please keep in mind that Jimmy Wales has several Wikipedia entries. Fae won't get any. Adieu! --High Contrast (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, I've unhidden it again to be consistent with the other categories. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Vidic Treasure.TIF

Dear Sir, This Image is only for educational purpose and it was done with more responsibility with considerable amount of detailed research. The reader/viewer will also discover much more than the many recent discoveries in virtually all fields of science now present are already dealt by the great seers and sages in Vedic lore and paves the way to new discoveries that benefit the entire humanity with right and proper nurturing on the nature of the virtues.

Hence require your re-consideration for publication for the benefit of all.

Kishen SSR

Well, lets see what comes out of the DR. --High Contrast (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Best wishes for 2014

:) Feliz año nuevo --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you very much! I wish you the same! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Just delete my whole uploads

Go ahead please just delete my whole uploads, wanted to assist but it seems it's not appreciated, spome i took from google ok, and i read that now that those even are not able to use, but all i wanted to do is assist, unfortunally you also deleted real own works, but never the less just delete them all. then we can focus on rreal life issues again. --Ricodol74 (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

You have uploaded tons of images which are not your own work although you claim to be the author of. Please stop uploading images randomly found from the internet. --High Contrast (talk) 14:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Nah your attempt did not persue me to help no more, only thing i can tell is that they told me in the beginning that when it was on google search, it was allowed as Google search is an open source, so yes some of the pics I took from there as I didn't saw the harm in that, but you personally starting to attack me is a shame... so just delete them, I allready took them of the pages where I placed them on, I also contacted those persons from who I took the pictures and made those articles for, that there pictures are not appreciated by you. so end off discussion. not even going to bother about it no more Ricodol74 (talk) 05:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

"I also contacted those persons from who I took the pictures and made those articles for, that there pictures are not appreciated by you" - this is simply idiotic and is very simple and silly bullying attempt by you. When will you learn what a copyright violation is. --High Contrast (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for fixing my sloppiness while getting the categories for File:Tkachev Putin.jpeg, and let me use this occasion to wish you a productive and !--Nabak (talk) 17:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome! Best wishes to you, too! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Sumerian pandura.png

I just nominated this for deletion. I note that you deleted one of this user's files recently, and if you agree this is a copyright violation, this is their 4th clear violation. There may of course be more. Dougweller (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done Thank you for helping in copyright issues! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lusen Blockmeer, 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heinkel He 112 V-3 c1936.jpg

Hallo, hast Du dazu vielleicht eine Meinung? Ich wäre Dir dankbar. Alles Gute noch für 2014! Gruß Cobatfor (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Schwierige Sache. Ich schaue mal die nächsten Tage vorbei. Bin arbeitstechnisch derzeit gut eingespannt. --High Contrast (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

DoD "foreign national" images

Hi, I've been pondering the DRs for the Department of Defense images which they class as taken by foreign nationals (they should all have "-O-" in the VIRIN). I think the best thing would be for me to add a filter so these are no longer uploaded as the majority will invariably have some doubt on copyright, depending on the non-US forces involved. I don't currently parse the VIRIN but I could add a breakdown of this identifier, it might take me a while to get around to it but probably before the end of the month.

Let me know if you are aware of particular exceptions to this type of filter, or classes of photograph that would not get trapped using this method.

Though I personally think there is mileage with regard to the legal rationale of how these are released, which includes a transfer of property to the DoD, I am aware that the Commons community consensus is that we would like to see some more demonstrable evidence than technical terms on the DoD image website; especially when we might doubt that the uploader is the original photographer. I'm quite happy to follow this precautionary approach on that basis. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

This seems easier than I expected. I have added a trap for these and they should now be skipped from this point on in my uploads. --Fæ (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your efforts! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiden Christi Seiteneingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Jardín de niños.jpg

Sorry for uploading an image that is not free. Please forgive me. Thanks, --Samaniego123 (talk) 23:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Please upload no copyvios again. Use your own camera in order to take some good images around you in your home town. Where are you from? --High Contrast (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I will not do. I am from Panama.--Samaniego123 (talk) 23:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

From Panama? Cool! I hope you will contribute some own-work-image from you! If you have any further questions how to do so, please contact me! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Location

Hi High Contrast,

Thanks for reviews. location added. --Rjcastillo (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Can you enhance the file description, too? --High Contrast (talk) 19:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenau - Bierhütte 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:SAS Charlotte Maxeke.jpg

File:SAS Charlotte Maxeke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Fish Meat and Raising Shrimp posters

These images are mine. Please remove your deletion request.

 Not done --High Contrast (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Überflurhydrant Fallmantel - München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 13:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mobile phone base station in Munich, 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) in Munich (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenpark „Arche Heinz Theuerjahr“ -20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenpark „Arche Heinz Theuerjahr“ -23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulpturenpark „Arche Heinz Theuerjahr“ -03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiller Fahrzeug- und Maschinenfabrik in München-Moosach -03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add the geo location.--XRay 10:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  Done --High Contrast 19:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 08:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenau Dorfplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add the geo location. And the panorama template would be useful.--XRay 10:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  Done --High Contrast 19:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 08:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright Infringement

hello! i just received your message regarding 5 images i uploaded to wikimedia commons being a violation of copyright. these are our own images from the company but until we can clear this issue up, i'd like to delete them. unfortunately i'm still new to wikipedia. how can i quickly and easily delete these 5 images? thank you!

HI! You cannot delete them but I can. Please give me the links and I will do so. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Violetta Zironi.jpg

Hi.

I've noticed that the picture is undergoing a deletion request due to the fact that it's likely not the uploader's own work. I personally know the uploader (ms. Pamela Rovaris) since I've specifically asked her to upload the photo and she is a professional photographer. You can take a sneak at her work here: https://www.facebook.com/PamelaRovarisPh?fref=ts

Thank you for understanding.

--Mattia Mat (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Please use COM:OTRS to verify the permission. Thank you! --High Contrast (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vapiano Restaurant in München-Pasing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 22:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Before the Chinese New Year ... I hereby bestow upon thee, this bright star, to bring thee Peace and joy. Sincerely Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 08:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Best wishes! --High Contrast (talk) 16:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Ich hatte dich gewarnt....:)

...dass noch Neulingsfragen von mir auf dein Hilfsangebot hin kommen werden. :). Folgendes: Ich bin gerade am vorbereiten des Artikels zum MAZ-5335 auf WP. Dazu brauche ich u.a. ein vernünftiges Bild, mir hatte dieses: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%A3%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_03.jpg ganz gut gefallen. Nun ist da um den eigentlich wichtigen Gegenstand viel drumrum, das Bild im Original groß. Kann ich ausschneiden was ich brauche und als neue Version des Originals hochladen? Oder gibt es da einen Haken? Liebe Grüße und Danke für die Hilfe, --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC) (der sich jetzt erstmal durch die Hilfethemen wühlen wird....)

Hallo! Schön, dass du deine Arbeit fortsetzen willst. Hier ist das Bild, um welches du gebeten hast. Sollte irgendetwas nicht passen, dann einfach mir hier bescheidgeben. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Danke dir, jetzt weiß ich auch wies richtig gemacht wird. Beim nächsten Mal dann selbst. Artikel werde ich wohl nächsten Sonntag schreiben, da habe ich viel Zeit. Grüße zurück, --Druschba 4 (talk) 17:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Mit der Lizenzierung muss man ggf. aufpassen. Aber du kannst mich jederzeit natürlich fragen. Außerdem warte ich immer noch auf Fahrzeug-Bilder aus Russland ;-) Wenn es bzgl. des Uploads hier Probleme geben sollte, dann auch in diesem Falle: gerne Fragen. Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsgymnasium München-Pasing -02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

i don't understand why i can't use this pic

These are pictures info that i try to upload and use in Ann Mitchai , [[2]] Article Please,advice me.Thank you.

Hi! Just because images are available on the internet and can be watched without paying for them does not mean that they are published under a free license. The sources that you have given us showed that these files are not published under a free license. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm in Munich, 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Benutzerkonten

Hai, kann man eigentlich Benutzerkonten zusammenführen? Im deutschen Wikipedia sind sonst die Berechtigungen weg oder ich muss mich dauernd neu einloggen. Danke und Grüße Cobatfor (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpines Museum in München, 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haupthaus Aktionsforum Praterinsel (Praterinsel 3,4) - Vorderansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

fix the name

You can fix the name [[Category:Armored command post vehicles]] → Category:Armoured command post vehicles. [[Category:Interpolitex-2009]] → Category:Interpolitex 2009. — Octave Laval (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Use {{Move}}. A bot can do this. --High Contrast (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Moving from Category:Files by High Contrast to Category:Files by User:High Contrast

Hey there, just wanted to let you know that I've finished moving most of the files to your new personal category page as you requested on User:CommonsDelinker/commands. One of your pages is still in the former category, so I suggest renaming the category if you want to keep it consistent, but as it is placed in your userspace you are free to do with it as you wish. Cheers, TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Why did you this? --High Contrast (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I did this because per the instructions at User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands, "Currently (as of 08:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)), CommonsDelinker's cat move function is not working" so the rest of us have to take up the slack. Another thing, if you think the original categories were deleted improperly, feel free to recreate them at any time. Cheers, TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

This is no instruction on User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands or any demand for any user to process bot demands. Especially not if user related stuff is to be done. I do not appreciate your recent work on my user category. I had very good reasons why a bot should have done this thing and not a user. Now, you have ruined my watchlist for the next day! --High Contrast (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm really confused why this ruins your watchlist. The category pages are moved no matter who does it, so the end result should be the same. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

No, the end result is different - a bot can easily popped out whereas popping out registered user as you are is no good idea. --High Contrast (talk) 17:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Goggomobil grau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 09:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westseite des Maximilianeum - 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The crop at the left side is not the best. It is possible to show the whole flag?--XRay 13:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC) No, unfortunately not. This was lost due to the correction of converging lines. --High Contrast 19:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC) It's IMO still QI. --XRay 16:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified trams

Hallo! Irgendwie bin ich mir nicht wirklich sicher, wie sinnvoll das ist. Die Straßenbahntype ist ja (in der Beschreibung) identifiziert, diese konkrete Type hat nur noch keine Kategorie, so wie auch alle anderen historischen Linzer Straßenbahntypen. Sollten "unidentified"-Kategorien nicht eher für Fotos da sein, wo wir wirklich noch nicht genau wissen, was sie zeigen? darkweasel94 15:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Nein, Unidentified-Kategorien beziehen sich überlicherweise auf die Kategorisierung. --High Contrast (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Wo kann man das nachlesen? Diese Interpretation überrascht mich vor allem deshalb, weil sie meines Erachtens den Sinn dieser Kategorien ad absurdum führt: Dateien, von denen wir wirklich noch nicht wissen, was sie zeigen, werden dann mit Dateien durcheinander gewürfelt, von denen wir sehr genau wissen, was sie zeigen, aber wo jemand meint, dass der Kategorienbaum im jeweiligen Bereich noch nicht ausgereift genug für seinen Geschmack ist. darkweasel94 15:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Darkweasel94 wird in Kürze sicherlich fragen: Wie Irgendwie bin ich mir nicht wirklich sicher, wie sinnvoll das ist. Die Straßenbahntype ist ja (in der Beschreibung) identifiziert, diese konkrete Type hat nur noch keine Kategorie, so wie auch alle anderen historischen Linzer Straßenbahntypen. Sollten noch nicht existente Kategorien denn überhaupt eingebunden werden? Dann kommt vielleicht irgendwann: Wo kann man das nachlesen? Diese Interpretation überrascht mich vor allem deshalb, weil sie meines Erachtens den Sinn dieser Kategorien ad absurdum führt: Dateien, von denen wir wirklich genau wissen, was sie zeigen, aber wo jemand meint, dass der Kategorienbaum im jeweiligen Bereich noch nicht ausgereift genug für seinen Geschmack ist. Meines Erachtens, ... --High Contrast (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Hast du jetzt wirklich vor, Linzer Straßenbahnen nach einzelnen Wagennummern zu kategorisieren? Ich habe außerdem nicht die geringste Ahnung, was du mir mit deinem Kommentar zu sagen versuchst. darkweasel94 16:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Das beruht wohl auf Gegenseitigkeit. Dein Problemchen erschließt sich mir auch nicht. Ich hoffe für dich, dass du im "Real-Life" anders bist. Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your photos here!

Hello HC!

I would like to use this image

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scenic_Diamond,_Donau.JPG

in a magazine published in Munich.

I have sent you an Emaill!

Cheers, K.Mair

 Done --High Contrast (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst und HFF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwehrmuseum München - U-Bahn Typ A ausgebrannt (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perchta in Lower Bavaria -01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monopteros in Englischer Garten, Munich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 02:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

"Ungesichtete Version"

Hallo High Contrast, Wenn du mal Zeit hast habe ich ein kleines Rätsel, auf das ich noch keine rechte Lösung weiß. Folgendes: Ich habe schon einige Tage auf WP am Artikel "Jaroslawski Awtomobilny Sawod" rumgebastelt, und immer erscheint im blauen Balken am oberen Rand: "Vorlagen- und Dateiänderungen dieser Version sind noch nicht markiert." Es liegt nicht an meinen Bearbeitungen, die sind als gesichtet markiert und werden auch standardmäßig angezeigt. Aber: wie bekomme ich (oder jemand anderes) diese Meldung dort weg? Macht mich noch ganz nervös... (hat aber noch Zeit. Ich werde die Seite jetzt zumachen und warten, ob was passiert :)). Kannst du dir das bei Gelegenheit mal anschauen? Danke dir. Lieben Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Merkwürdig... Deine Bearbeitungen werden allerdings mit "[automatisch gesichtet]" angegeben, was so auch stimmt. Nervös machen braucht dich sowas wirklich nicht. Oftmals vertuen sich die Server und man kann dies evtl. manuell erneut sichten. Das habe ich nun gemacht - warum das von Nöten war ist mir schleierhaft. Naja... Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Das mich das nervös macht war mehr Spaß als Ernst ;). Liebe Grüße und vielen Dank für die Zeit. --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Nichts zu danken. Dass du aber an diesem Sichtungssystem verzagst habe ich dir auch nicht wirklich zugetraut. Übrigens: Das müsste ebenso ein MAZ-LKW sein. --High Contrast (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Das ist richtig. Ich hab emich mal ein wenig umgesehen und festgestellt, dass es ein MAZ-5432 ist, wenn auch die Scheinwerfer etwas geändert wurden. Steht jetzt auch in der entsprechenden Kategorie. Das eigentlich interessante ist, dass es ein Reimport aus Finnland sein könnte. KOFF ist finnisches Bier, die geänderten Blinker deuten darauf hin, dass er mal außerhalb Russlands fuhr. Leider lässt sich das wohl nie nachweisen. Heute jedenfalls wird er von einem Veranstalter als Transporter für Equipment genutzt. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Noch eine Anfrage an Sender Jerewan: Wie gehe ich im Moment am sinnvollsten vor, wenn eine Kategorie umzubenennen ist? Mit dem Bot dazu scheint es ja gewisse Problemchen zu geben. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Lege die neue Kategorie an, entleere die alte und, weil du es bist, sag mir wie die alte, zu löschende, Kategorie heißt und ich schließe das Ganze ab :-) Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich danke dir :). Alte Kategorie: Category:Drujba (chainsaw). War einfach falsch geschrieben. Ich sitze jetzt übrigens wieder in russischeen Landen und habe etwas weniger Internet als vorher. Nur, dass du vorgewarnt bist, falls ich mal ein paar Tage nicht da bin. Vielen Dank auch für deine Bearbeitungen bei BAZ. War schon sehr spät, als ich den Artikel erstellt habe. Gute Nacht und schönen Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Ist in Ordnung - die alte Kat ist gelöscht. Danke für die Info - du weißt ja, Fotos, die auf Commons noch fehlen sind immer höchst willkommen. Ich hoffe, du hast deine Kamera mit. Gruß nach RUS, High Contrast (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Sei beruhigt, die Kamera hatte ich gar nicht mit nach Deutschland genommen :). Vielen Dank und Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Einen schönen Nachmittag Dir,

Ich habe heute und gestern tatsächlich mal ein paar Fotos vom hiesigen Straßenverkehr zusammenbekommen :). Ein paar sind schon hochgeladen. Wenn du mal Lust und Zeit hast kannst du ja mal einen Blick drauf werfen. Der aktuelle MAZ-6312 könnte dich z.B. interessieren. Gegen den einen oder anderen Tip habe ich natürlich auch nichts. Aber wie gesagt, lass dich nicht stören, nur wenn du Zeit hast. Ich hätte noch ein paar GAZ-Modelle, die russische Post und noch ein bisschen anderen Kleinkram in Petto. Mal schauen, was das Modem noch hergibt. Lieben Gruß und ein angenehmes Wochenende, --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

1a! Besten Dank für deine Beiträge! Die ein oder andere passende Kategorie setzte ich bereits drauf. Viele Grüße nach Russland! --High Contrast (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Und noch eine Frage... Ich könnte folgendes Foto aus der russischen WP ganz gut hier bzw. später in der de.WP gebrauchen: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%81_%D0%97%D0%98%D0%A1_%D0%B2_%D0%93%D0%BB%D1%83%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5.jpg Ist da was zu machen oder ist das aussichtslos? Mir ist zwar klar, dass das lizenztechnisch wahrscheinlich geht, wie ich es aber am besten hierher bekomme ist mir noch etwas schleierhaft. Beste Grüße und danke für deine Geduld (die ich heute wohl schon recht strapaziert habe...), --Druschba 4 (talk) 19:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done Hier ist es. Lizenztechnisch ist es zwar unproblematisch, aber die Quellenangabe bedarf einiger goodwill-Interpretation (Frage in diesem Zusammenhang: ist ein Artikel in Planung). Und nein, strapaziert hast du nichts. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Morgen (nein, so wikipediasüchtig bin ich noch nicht, ich musste eh so früh raus :) ),

Ja, ein Artikel zum ZIS-155 ist in Planung. Die Quellseiten sind schon alle zusammengesucht und geöffnet, ich muss nur noch anfangen. Mittelfristig will ich die Bus-Zeile in der ZIL-Navileiste blau bekommen, das ist quellentechnisch ganz gut zu schaffen. Auf meiner Benutzerseite in WP habe ich relativ tagesaktuell meine schon geschriebenen Artikel und meine Projekte. Dort kannst du auch nachschauen, wenn du Zeit und Lust hast. Morgendlichen Gruß und Dank für die Arbeit, --Druschba 4 (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Guten Abend.

Ich komme mal wieder mit einer dieser unangenehmen Anfragen :). Ich suche gerade Material zusammen für den Artikel zum ZIL-3250. Leider ist mal wieder nur in der russischen WP ein Foto aufzutreiben. Siehe dort https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:ZIL-3250AO.JPG . Grund meiner Anfrage ist folgender: Im Prinzip ist an dem Foto nichts auszusetzen. Vor mehr als 4 Jahren hochgeladen, anstandslos in Artikeln verwendet. Aber: Der Uploader Sah68 ist seinerzeit (2009) wegen diverser Lizenzprobleme recht negativ aufgefallen (siehe Diskussionsseite), viele Bilder wurden gelöscht. Dieses ist neben ein paar anderen stehengeblieben. Es findet sich auch noch an anderer Stelle im Netz, jedoch sehe ich bisher nur eine Seite, die erstens russisch (und sich um Bildlizenzen eh nicht schert) sowie jünger als 2009 ist (2010 entstanden). Bevor ich mir die Finger verbrenne an diesem Fall frage ich lieber. Zur Entschädigung für die Arbeit gibt es inzwischen von mir fertige Artikel für den ZIS-155, den ZIS-127, den ZIS-8, den ZIS-16, den ZIL-158 sowie eine Generalüberholung des ZIL-118. Beste Grüße.

PS: Wenn nicht, dann eben nicht. Dann lasse ich mir schon was Anderes einfallen. Probleme will ich dir auch keine machen. --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Vorsichtig hochschieb. Übersehen oder aktuell keine Zeit?. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC) *duck und wech*

Oh, sorry. Habe deinen Eintrag gänzlich übersehen. Das hätte nicht sollen sein. Zum Foto: Du hast Recht, dass der ru-wiki-Benutzer einiges hinsichtlich Foto-upload falsch gemacht hat. Aber da ich kein admin auf ru:wiki bin, ist es mir nicht möglich zu rekonstruieren, was damals schief lief. Nichtsdestotrotz sehe ich beim Bus-Bild kein Problem. Ich konnte keine URV nachweisen. Zumal die Dateigröße, Auflösung, Aufmachung und das Vorhandensein von EXIF-Daten glaubhaft wirken, sodass ich davon ausgehe, dass es sich um sein eigens Werk handelt - wie angegeben. Ich habe es nach Commons transferiert; es findet sich hier. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 17:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Macht nix. Der Bot hatte wahrscheinlich nach mir gepostet, sodass ich etwas untergegangen bin. Kommt alles noch zurecht und hilft mir sehr weiter. Ich habe es immer ungerne, Fahrzeugartikel ohne Bilder zu erstellen, deswegen kläre ich das gerne vorher. Da ich kürzlich einen MAZ-6430 vor die Linse bekommen habe wird das wohl eines der nächsten Projekte, die dich auch interessieren könnten :). Die ZIL/ZIS-Busse sind ja durch soweit nach dem -3520. Gruß und Dank, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Läuft. Wenns wieder etwas geben sollte, dann gerne wieder. Übrigens, eine eventuelle rechtliche Belange brauchst du nicht zu fürchten, wenn ein Bildchen auf einem anderen Wiki bereits vorhanden ist. Viele Grüße nach Russland und bis bald (mit neuen Bildern ;-) ) --High Contrast (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Deutz D40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unimog-based drilling machine (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochbunker am Lohnrößlerweg - Munich-Trudering.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beulas Aura Bus in Munich, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi High Contrast, I had nominated this file for deletion because it had already been published prior to being uploaded to Commons, but the uploader says he really was the creator of that photo and that it had been entered in that website as part of a photo competition. Could you undelete it? Cheers,--Underlying lk (talk) 13:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done --High Contrast (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 9⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 13:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Mercedes-benz Cabrio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It's my car;-) --Moroder 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geschäftshaus Dallmayr in München - Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofplatz 7 - München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Fendt Dieselross F18 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but QI now IMO. --P e z i 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Deutz 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but QI now IMO --P e z i 21:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:47, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westseite des Maximilianeum in 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum Lenbachhaus in München (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality image. --DAJF 02:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst - Gabelsbergerstraße 33–35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --Mattbuck 00:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maize field in Bavaria in Summer 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronzedenkmal König Maximilian I. Joseph (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lehrstuhl für Geodäsie - Arcisstraße 21 - München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Leuchtenberg - Odeonsplatz 4 - München (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Leuchtenberg - Odeonsplatz 4 - München (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Schlüter 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenkirche mit Geruest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --High Contrast 22:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Mattbuck 23:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap San Diego - Hamburger Hafen -01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Cccefalon 07:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HFF-Haupteingang in München (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but: please add the geo location. --XRay 07:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)  Done --High Contrast 20:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletion Appeal of File:FComite_-_Headshot.jpg and File:Doctor_Florence_Comite_.28Office.29.jpg

[see the appeal and needed permisison. Thank you] The photographer Nick Coleman sent the permission and release. Can you please help? Thanks Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)

Please contact the admin who deleted these images: User:INeverCry. Thanks. --High Contrast (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Special:Diff/115936426

In case you don't watch every page you edit: I've reverted your adding of {{LicenseReview}} because as far as I know files that have always been in the PD do not require a License Review, as this status does not depend on the license shown on the website.    FDMS  4    20:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

This is total nonsense. You may find out for yourself. And do not play on other people's work - ask instead before. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Well, I'm here because I think you could help me find out (and because I only noticed that it was you who requested License Review after I removed the tag; also in de if you prefer). CDC PD licenses aren't licenses that can change ...    FDMS  4    16:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, I thought you as a Sir Karl Popper student might come to the solution independently : LR is not useful for a photograph of the Mona Lisa or scan out of a 400-year-old monk book. But here we have a map. A map which can also come from a non-PD source, e.g. some scientific publication from Germany or from the UK (both are usually non "PD sources"). Because it is possible that this CDC-internet-source runs down in the future somebody might doubt its PD status in the future - a positive LR avoids that (very definately). Sorry, but I have no time left to speak to you about this kinky thing any longer. Focus on different activities. Have a nice life. Adieu. --High Contrast (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

You do not have to reply to this, but to "defend" myself as a student of the Sir-Karl-Popper-Schule: What about files from an offline source, such as a CDC leaflet? We can check whether files from that kind of source are really PD as much as whether files from 404 sources are. What do you mean saying I should focus on different activites? I am an elected license reviewer after all ...    FDMS  4    18:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Questions over questions in your last statement and I should not answer to them? --High Contrast (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Propyläen München - 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alstom LHB Coradia LINT - Fulda Bahnhof - 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 00:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasing "Renovierung" im Januar 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fulda - Kurfürstenstraße 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinderbibliothek im Schloss Blutenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehrsteg in Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anita Ehlers - Hamburg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenze zu Tschechien auf dem Dreisessel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geländewagen Puch G.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear High Contrast,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conrad Daniel von Blücher-Altona Denkmal, Hamburg-Altona.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the temple of Hercules in Amman, Jordan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkkreuz für die bayerisch-galizische Freundschaft -01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2014 (deux).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Städtische Realschule an der Blutenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your Flinfo recommendation

I love the tool, it's so very handy! Just wanted to say thanks once more! Palosirkka (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! You're welcome! Happy editing with the tool! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isar von der Maximiliansbrücke in München aus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 04:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beer truck - Braucommune Freistadt - Linz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned former restaurant in Freyung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtpfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt - Linz -06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt 714 Vario with a Claas-baler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 11:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CANCOM Zentrale Deutschland - Erika-Mann-Straße 69, München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fendt-Traktor beim Transport von Heuballen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilskraftwerk Vilshofen - Unterlauf, 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Rupert - Schwanthalerhöhe -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 08:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche in München-Schwanthalerhöhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 08:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benefiziatenhaus - Sindlhuberhaus in Aschach an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 09:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality images

Hello, and thank you for your review. It seems that some of the images uploaded in this batch are lacking description, but I didn't see it. I've corrected it.

For your information, it seems that the use of => in the comment provokes a bug in the template. Better to avoid it in the future I think :)

Pleclown (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for your response! I really hope to see more of your very good images! Thanks for editing on your uploads! Greetings from Milan! --High Contrast (talk) 22:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenbahngasse 1 Linz-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiser Bier in Österreich -01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Bgag 14:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Michael, Ringelai.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal in Ringelai.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Mal wieder ich...

...ich habe nämlich Mist gebaut, weil ich mich auf andere verlassen habe. Folgendes: Der gesamte Inhalt der Kat. "MAZ-5433" ist kein MAZ-5433, sondern ein MAZ-5434. Das ist ein komplett anderer LKW mit anderer Historie. Eigentlich gut daran zu erkennen, dass der MAZ-5434 Allradantrieb hat, der MAZ-5433 aber nicht. Sonst sind sie optisch recht identisch, bis auf den Auspuff. Es wäre also zu korrigieren (nach meinen zwei Uploads leider mehr Arbeit als vorher....):

1. Alle Dateien nach MAZ-5434 verschieben (gibt es noch nicht).
2. "meine" 2 Dateien umbenennen, von -5433 nach -5434
3. die alte Kat. löschen, wir haben nichts zum MAZ-5433 soweit ich das überblicke
4. die Bildbeschreibungen ändern...das kann ich auch selbst machen

Lässt sich da was machen? Ich bin gerade dabei, einen Artikel zum MAZ-5433 zu schreiben und bin deshalb auf dieses Wirrwarr gestoßen. Ein paar Beweisfotos gibt es hier, wenn auch nicht tauglich für WP oder Commons: [3]

Trotzdem liebe Grüße, in Hoffung auf etwas Zeit und eine gute Idee, --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Gerne! Punkte 1, 2, 3 kann ich machen, aber gib mir bitte die/den exakten Link/s der Dateien/Kategorien. Die Beschreibung kann ich sicherlich nicht besser erstellen als du, deshalb: machst du das bitte? Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Das sollte kein Problem sein.

• Die bisherige, falsche Kategorie: MAZ-5433
• Meine zwei umzubenennenden Bilder: File:MAZ-5433 Sattelzug.jpg und File:MAZ-5433 Zugmaschine.jpg (je von -5433 nach -5434 zu ändern)

Eine neue Kat. "MAZ-5434" habe ich noch nicht angelegt, das wäre noch zu machen. Dort sollten sich (logischer Weise) am Ende alle drei Bilder finden, die jetzt in der falschen Kategorie sind. Die Beschreibungen ändere ich gerne selbst. Vielen Dank und Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

So, nun gibt es das hier: Category:MAZ-5434. Ich hoffe, dass alles passt. Die nun leere MAZ-5433-Kategorie ist entfernt. Schade, dass wir keine Bilder des 5433-Modells haben. Beste Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Alles bestens, danke.

Ja, ich weiß, schade. Das ist aber auch ein komisches Ding das. Eine leichte Nahverkehrssattelzugmaschine für 15-Tonnen-Auflieger mit lediglich russ. Motoren und einem Fünfganggetriebe. Wozu braucht man soetwas? Als Watte-Schüttgut-Transport? Ich weiß es nicht. Jedenfalls ist mir noch keine vor die Linse gekommen. Wobei das so eine Sache ist. Die Fahrerhäuser sehen alle ähnlich aus, und ich traue den hiesigen Verkehrsteilnehmern zu, dass sie einen 25-Tonnen-Standardauflieger dranhängen (wenn ich unsere Holztransporter manchmal so sehe....). Schwer zu unterscheiden also. Wie auch immer, dir eine gute Nacht, ich verschwinde jetzt. Gruß und nochmals danke, --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC), der die Beschreibungen noch schnell geändert hat...

Nichts zu danken! Sorry wg. der Bildbeschreibungen der zugeschnittenen Bilder. Wenn es nur um das Ändern der Typennummern gegangen wäre, dann hätte ich es selber machen können/sollen. Ich dachte, dass du einen ausführlicheren Mehrzeiler zum Fahrzeuger möchtest - wie gesagt, da traue ich dir Besseres zu ;-) Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 09:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Ja, das wird noch. Ich hatte dafür nur nachts um kurz vor 3 Uhr keinen Geist mehr. Falsch stehen lassen wollte ich es aber auch nicht....wer weiß, wer dort durchschaut und dann sich die ganze Nacht den Kopf zerbricht, was denn nun richtig ist von beiden. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 10:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Dr. Zhivago American Author and Cartoonist.jpg

Hello I uploaded a photo for commons to be used on my wiki. It is a photo I took of myself for my Author page on wikipedia.

Why was it rejected. I am semi-new to this. Wikipedia has changed alot.

Hello! There is a copyright problem with this file. First two questions: Did you create it? Are you the copyright holder of it? --High Contrast (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Round hay bales in Bavaria -02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtplatz von Vilshofen an der Donau - 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Special:Diff/122435012

Sorry for only answering after you have archived that thread, but: You can answer them, and if you want to please do so, but you told me that you have no time left to speak to [me] about this kinky thing any longer so I thought you probably actually did not want to.    FDMS  4    15:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Authorisation of use on Wikipedia

The portrait of Christine Lauterburg made by Francesca Pfeffer was used in the article with the permission of the author Francesca Pfeffer herself!

A confirmation of this permission is needed. Please follow the steps on the file page. --High Contrast (talk) 17:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Air Mobility Rodeo 2000.jpg

Hi there High Contrast. I saw you tagged the file with License review. I sort of keep to myself I suppose, so I'm not sure if I can perform the license review myself since I don't have the license reviewer or admin permissions but I would like to let you know that the file is marked as an Air Force image on the source as indicated by "DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Jerry Morrison, U.S. Air Force. (Released)" so it's in the Public Domain. I hope this helps. Regards, Dainomite (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello! The licensing is clear and I am aware of its PF status. License review is a review process for verifying the copyright status of images uploaded from external sites. What if the source site goes offline? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh shoot, so should I be requesting licensing reviews for all the DOD pictures I upload incase the source site goes offline and/or removes the content in the future? Thanks, Dainomite (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

You can use this way in order to let this PD license confirm by another user. The reason is that some too much images get nominated years after upload because the source page is offline and nobody can image that this one once was created by a US governmental employee. By using {{licensereview}} another user (a so called trusted one) looked over it. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Christine lauterburg.jpg

I am confused to what I should do next to clear the deletion request of the uploaded picture. What is an OTRS? What does the author (Francesca Pfeffer) who gave me the permission to publish her image need to do? I don't want to bother her with too much administrational issues. Can I do anything for her? This all seems to be way too complicated. You may could contact me offline through my e-mail address. Thank you--Urs Lauterburg (talk) 15:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

COM:OTRS. You only have to send this permission to the emailadress which is published on COM:OTRS. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Frage betreffend Quellenangabe

Hallo High Contrast, Folgendes ist mir gerade aufgefallen: File:Gaz-3310 upper door.jpg hat der gute User aus einem meiner Fotos abgeleitet, nämlich File:Gaz-3310 dump-truck.jpg. Da hab eich ja nichts gegen, im Gegenteil. Aber Quelle ist dann ja wohl nicht eigenes Werk (von ihm), oder irre ich mich? Sollte ich das einfach korrigieren oder übergehe ich da das Protokoll? Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Ich habe es entsprechend abgeändert. Das darfst du natürlich auch - es trifft ja voll zu, dass es ein simpler Zuschnitt deines Fotos ist. Bitte weise den Falschquellenangeber darauf hin, dass sowas versehentlich schon mal passieren kann, aber in Zukunft bitte soll er besser aufpassen. --High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Noch etwas, was mir gerade aufgefallen ist. Es dürfte hier: File:Автокран Клинцы.jpg ein Copyrightproblem geben. Siehe dazu auch hier: http://vk.com/autocrane (Randspalte...anklicken zum vergrößern...). Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Ist entsprechend getagged. Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Merci, wieder etwas gelernt. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 00:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Kategorie Militärmuseum

Hallo, die vorgeschlagene neue Kategorie "Firearms..." ist untauglich. Es gibt dort nur "Firearms" (ein Artilleriegeschütz ist auch "firearm") und die Waffen rotieren zwischen zwei Museen in Full und in Reuenthal. --Bunkerfunker (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Die derzeitige Kategoriebezeichnung kann nicht bleiben, da auf Deutsch. Es muss auf englisch sein. Und nein, en:Firearm definiert anders. Also bleibt es beim "Firearms". Ansonsten sollte noch der Museumsname angepasst werden. Vorschläge bzgl. dieser Rotation? --High Contrast (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Natürlilch kann es auf deutsch sein. Die Unterkategorien mit Full-Reuenthal betreffen jeweils beide Museen. Das eine ist in Full, das andere in Reuenthal. Firearms=Feuerwaffen ist nicht dasselbe wie Infanteriewaffen. Panzer-, Flugzeug- und Artilleriekanonen sind Feuerwaffen, und es gibt Infanteriewaffen, die nicht Feuerwaffen sind. --Bunkerfunker (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Natürlich kann es nicht auf Deutsch sein. Kategoriebezeichnungen dieser Art müssen auf Commons auf Englisch sein. Außerdem: lies dir en:Firearm durch - bereits in der Einleitung wird eindeutig eine "Firearm" als portable weapon definiert. Dieser Definition wird Glauben zuerkannt als deiner persönlichen Definition.
Wann bist du fertig mit deinen Bilder-uploads dieses Full-Museums? --High Contrast (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Wikipedia commons picture of Christine Lauterburg

Now for some reason which is not transparent to me the picture, which is authorized to be published on Wikipedia by the Swiss Photographer Francesca Pfeffer got deleted. How can I restore it to be shown again? How can I make sure it does not get deleted again? I am not a very frequent publisher of Wikipedia contributions but I did some work which I believe to be of fairly good quality about topics I think I know well enough. Is there a comprehensive description of the procedure that will let a published photograph that has the proper permission by the author undeleted. Is a verbal agreement by the autor not enough? Does the author herself has to take action? I really have no clue to where to go from now. Any kind of assistance by an more experienced volunteer is greatly appreciated.

Thank you

Urs Lauterburg

Hi! We need a written (valid and trustworthy) permission by the author which must be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Then, this permission gets checked there. --High Contrast (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Tucano (4892097633).jpg

File:Tucano (4892097633).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OAlexander (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Aircraft at Nuremberg Airport (9629420549).jpg

File:Aircraft at Nuremberg Airport (9629420549).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnolia677 (talk) 00:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Andoni Ferreño.jpg

(I've rearranged the thread to ease the reading)

Hi, They aren't the owners of the image, just publishers. Regards, Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).

Hi! Ok, User:Steinsplitter deleted this image already because of this. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

No, I'm talking about "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andoni_Ferre%C3%B1o.jpg" because you marked as suspicious. But, moreover, What's now with the first one?? --> "Ramon Landa.jpg" Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).

You need to provide clear source information for the used free CC license. I think you've ment this? --High Contrast (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

What more clearness do you need? I put the link of the source page and there you can read that you can resend to anyone the image freely! Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).

Again, if you talk about image you should not worry about it. Another editor - not you and not me - will look over it. And if there is everything OK with its licensing it will gratefully stay here on Commons. All right? ,High Contrast (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

OK about image. But, just another question, What's the way to can add an image of somebody that is popular and who logically you can't photograph? Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).

Hmm, that's a difficult question. Mostly, such images are strictly copyrighted so that they cannot be uploaded to Commons because they are not freely available. Commons is an ultimatively free media repository. have you tried flickr yet? For who do you look for? --High Contrast (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi again! OK, understood. Pitifully there are no images of a lot of famous people of my country so the Wiki´s archives will stay empty by now. However, thank you very much for all your help and information. :) Regards, Chanchus (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC).

Note

Hi, I note a discussion has been raised at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Possible_sockpuppet earlier today, that I believe you ought to have been notified about. --Fæ (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Using your photo

Hey! I'm doing a schoolproject and I want to use one of your photos (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dead_trees_in_the_Bavarian_Forest_-_Dreisesselberg_-01.JPG). You said that you wanted us to let you know, also, I'm wondering what I can use when crediting you in the end credits? Your name? Wikimedia page? Webpage? Wikimedias homepage?

Thanks in advance!

- Pauliina

Deleting SANY's pictures

Dear High Contrast. As I can notice, you deleted all the pictures I uploaded (I had the permissions for those pictures, as I explained it very clearly). You even left me a message warning me about the suspension of my account, namely "If I do not stop uploading files that are not free, my account will be blocked". Now it seems that we even need to send an email and explain why the pictures are legal. My message (and I wish everyone in your talk page can read it) is that thanks to people like you lots of potential editors loose interest in Wikipedia, I already found several guys like you that make the effort and satisfaction of working on this project (which was very interesting at the beginning) worthless and unsavory. Congratulations, you got one editor less. By the way, please proceed to block my account, I am not interested in working on it anymore. Jorge Rodríguez. San José, Costa Rica

--JorgeRodriguez (talk) 04:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:APB pistol

Why have you restored deleted empty ctgr? Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 04:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet thread at the administrators' noticeboard

As previously mentioned by Fæ, a discussion concering your actions is currently taking place at the administrators' noticeboard. Some users have hinted that further action should be taken in relation to your account, so I am leaving this message to let you respond to those comments and give you the opportunity to express your views about the situation that has taken place. This is a very serious situation, so please kindly respond as soon as possible. If we do not hear from you in the coming 48 hours, I intend to file a request with the community to remove your administrator privileges. Thank you! odder (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship request

This is just to inform you that in line with my previous message, I started a request to remove administrator privileges from your account. Your involvement in the discussion there is encouraged and would be welcomed. Thank you! odder (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Removal of admin rights

Dear High Contrast, I am posting a note here to inform you that following closure of the de-adminship proceedings you no longer have admin rights on Commons. I would like to thank you for the very substantial work you have done here as admin over many years. I am not sure whether you have retired or whether you are simply unable to edit at the moment, but in any event if at some future point you feel able to share your thoughts on what happened we would be more than happy to hear from you. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Neue Pinakothek

Hallo

Wir würden gerne dass Foto der Neuen Pinakothek, für unsere Seite

http://www.minihostelmunich.com

nutzen. Ich hoffe, daß das in Ordnung ist. Wenn nicht, dann schicke mir bitte ein kurzes Email und ich werde das Foto umgehend löschen.

Viele Grüße aus Kiew (momentan)

Joachim

Gerne doch! Alles ok! Gute Gesundheit! Vielleicht sehen wir uns! Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Police_trucks_of_Austria

Category:Police_trucks_of_Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Alan Liefting (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hola.

Tengo una consulta sobre las imágenes que he subido y que han sido catalogadas de plagio. ¿Sus acusaciones son por haber usado las licencias Creative Commons reconocimiento 3.0 y Creative Commons reconocimiento compartir igual 3.0?Chang2002 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:ALDI_supermarkets_in_Austria

Category:ALDI_supermarkets_in_Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

darkweasel94 20:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:APB pistol

Category:APB pistol ist jetzt befüllt und kann wieder angelegt werden. --Slick (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

• Category:467th Guards District Training Center dito --Slick (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Frag bitte die Löscher der entsprechenden Kategorien. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Beach in Kolka, Latvia.jpg

File:Beach in Kolka, Latvia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Slovak International Air Fest 2012 - AFRC -11.jpg

File:Slovak International Air Fest 2012 - AFRC -11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Kubinka

Ich habe das und das rückgängig gemacht. Der Standort des 45-й ОРП СпН ВДВ (в/ч 28337) ist nicht auf dem Flugplatz, sondern südlich der Stadt Kubinka (55° 47' 6" N, 37° 41' 36" E). Der Flugplatz ist nordwestlich von Kubinka. --Kreteglobi (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo High Contrast,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Vorder/Hinterfirmiansreut

Hallo High Contrast, dieses Bild zeigt nicht Hinterfirmiansreut, sondern Vorderfirmiansreut, worauf mich hier jemand aufmerksam gemacht hat. Grüße! --Konrad Lackerbeck (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Grand Prix of Donetsk 2012 (6931620114).jpg

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Leerstand in der Donaupassage, Passau.JPG

File:Leerstand in der Donaupassage, Passau.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi!

I have filed this file for an undeletion. I hope that somebody who understands this legal text in German language will help here. It would be great if you reupload it on regio wiki Passau or here if it is wanted!

Best wishes! PassauerW (talk) 17:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Section of the Peoples Friendship Arch (8601795832).jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2010 09 27 Hannover 154228 (8599657279).jpg

File:2010 09 27 Hannover 154228 (8599657279).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

69.24.31.130 13:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:120407-F-GX122-014 (Marrakech Aeroexpo 2012) (26).jpg

File:120407-F-GX122-014 (Marrakech Aeroexpo 2012) (26).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buxtehude (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Statue of Taras Shevchenko (8673806943).jpg

And also:

• File:Statue of Taras Shevchenko (8674932046).jpg
• File:Statue of Taras Shevchenko (8674954290).jpg

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:56, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Template Australian War Memorial

Hi, das AWM hat den Link für die Fotos geändert (von http://cas.awm.gov.au/photograph/XXSignaturXX zu http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/XXSignaturXX/). Ich habe keine Ahnung, wie man das Template AWM-image|XXSignaturXX ändert oder an wen man sich da wenden kann. Ich wäre für Hinweise dankbar. Cobatfor (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lindt bunny.jpg

File:Lindt bunny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smial (talk) 08:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Katy Perry 402 - Zenith Paris - 2011 (5512339877).jpg

File:Katy Perry 402 - Zenith Paris - 2011 (5512339877).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C.Jonel (talk) 11:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Tour de Pologne 2013 - Domenico Pozzovivo et Matteo Montaguti.jpg

File:Tour de Pologne 2013 - Domenico Pozzovivo et Matteo Montaguti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guiggz (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bliss Dancer.jpg

—RP88 (talk) 10:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:"Gold deposits and ancient mining" (8724484913).jpg

And also:

• File:Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki, Greece (8725602208).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev Passenger Railway Station (8600773185).jpg

Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Interacting learning at the Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki, Greece (8724464701).jpg

File:Interacting learning at the Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki, Greece (8724464701).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Mosquito magazine (8729785718).jpg

File:Mosquito magazine (8729785718).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

...by location? Deine Meinung?

Hi! Da Du an der Kategorie auch schon mal dran warst, eine Frage: diese Änderung erscheint mir nicht sinnvoll. Imho sollte Category:T-34 tanks in museums in der Hauptkategrie stehen, sonst hätte ich es nicht so eingeordnet. "by location" kann sich imo nur auf ein einzelnes Objekt bezeihen, nicht auf eine Überkategorie. D.h. ich würde Category:Chelyabinsk kolkhoznik tank monument in Category:T-34 tanks by location einordnen oder eben einzelne files, aber nicht so etwas unspezifisches. Mich würde aber interessieren, ob es dazu irgendwo eine Festlegung gibt. Kennst Du so eine? TIA, --Markscheider (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lindt bunny.jpg

File:Lindt bunny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Beach near Athens (4922183910).jpg

File:Beach near Athens (4922183910).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C messier (talk) 16:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

File:NH 107952.jpg

Hallo, ich habe das obige Foto hochgeladen, bevor ich den Titel geändert hatte. Könntest Du die Datei bitte in "USS Chevalier (DD-451) off Boston in October 1942" umbenennen? Danke und Grüße Cobatfor (talk) 11:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Bundeswehrfahrzeuge Sanitätsregiment 22.jpg

File:Bundeswehrfahrzeuge Sanitätsregiment 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sanandros (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jayden Jaymes, Exxxotica Miami 2010.jpg

Yours sincerely, FredWalsh (talk) 00:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Clinton Fall Festival Car Show 2012 (8036717947).jpg

File:Clinton Fall Festival Car Show 2012 (8036717947).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

OSX II (talk) 00:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Clinton Fall Festival Car Show 2012 (8036717947).jpg

File:Clinton Fall Festival Car Show 2012 (8036717947).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OSX II (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fontain Friendship of Nations.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Ukrainian Gen. Lt. Rauf R. Nurullin in Štrpce, Kosovo.jpg

File:Ukrainian Gen. Lt. Rauf R. Nurullin in Štrpce, Kosovo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zinnsoldat (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Mamayev Kurgan from the air.jpeg

File:Mamayev Kurgan from the air.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 11:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Saviem (7360932616).jpg

File:Saviem (7360932616).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjp24 (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

File:"Albert Einstein" - Start 1 (8966454791).jpg

File:"Albert Einstein" - Start 1 (8966454791).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uwe W. (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Endmontagegebäude mit ATV-4 "Albert Einstein" Ariane 5ES (8957643235).jpg

File:Endmontagegebäude mit ATV-4 "Albert Einstein" Ariane 5ES (8957643235).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uwe W. (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo High Contrast,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File:Conservatoire Citroen 139 Citroen CX (10157502444).jpg

File:Conservatoire Citroen 139 Citroen CX (10157502444).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Eusthenopteron, Exhibit Museum of Natural History, University of Michigan.jpg

File:Eusthenopteron, Exhibit Museum of Natural History, University of Michigan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bike Wash Sunday at a Ford truck.jpg

And also:

• File:Bike Wash Sunday at Twin Peaks (1).jpg
• File:Bike Wash Sunday at Twin Peaks - 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini car wash at Twin Peaks - 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash at Twin Peaks - 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini car wash at Twin Peaks in 2012.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash at Twin Peaks, 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini car wash at Twin Peaks, 2012.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash at Twin Peaks.jpg
• File:Bikini car wash at Twin Peaks.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash Twin Peaks TX.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash woman.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash, 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Wash, Twin Peaks 2011.jpg
• File:Bikini Car Washing.jpg
• File:Bikini shower.jpg
• File:Bikini water hose.jpg
• File:Turquoise bikini, 2012.jpg
• File:Twin Peaks - Bikini Car Wash.jpg

Yours sincerely, Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:DSCN3819 (3512652163).jpg

Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Sunbathing at the beach in France.JPG

File:Sunbathing at the beach in France.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.119.64.31 14:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Advance Mixer L&L Redi Mix Southhampton,New Jersey.jpg

File:Advance Mixer L&L Redi Mix Southhampton,New Jersey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

50.73.206.73 05:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Radisson Blu Sharjah.jpg

File:Radisson Blu Sharjah.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)