User talk:Hajotthu

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hajotthu!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BibliothekKartauseValldemossa.JPG was uncategorized on 14 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Hofstaat zu Delhi am Geburtstag des Großmoguls02.jpg was uncategorized on 25 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

war bereits erledigt:Hajotthu (talk) 13:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergen Kriegerdenkmal.JPG[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Erledigt!Hajotthu (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Becklingen War Cemetery[edit]

Hi Hajotthu. Nice pic! --Bermicourt (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke de:Benutzer:Hajotthu Hajotthu (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lopau alte Schule.JPG[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, ist erledigt.Hajotthu (talk)

File:Lopau Haus Schilling.JPG[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, ist erledigt.Hajotthu (talk)

Category:Rudolf_Friedrich_Wasmann[edit]

A. Wagner (talk) 00:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fehlbestimmter Kreuzblütler[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, dein Bild File:Feld-Kresse Lepidium campestre 5 11.JPG zeigt in Wirklichkeit das Acker-Hellerkraut (Thlaspi arvense), nicht etwa die völlig anders aussehende, u. a. fast überall dicht kurz behaarte Feld-Kresse (Lepidium campestre). Ich habe die Bestimmung soeben korrigiert und zudem die Seite Flora of Südheide Nature Park, auf der das Bild verwendet wird, entsprechend geändert (auch bei dem dort zuvor noch falsch als Galeopsis tetrahit bezeichneten Bunten Hohlzahn (Galeopsis speciosa). Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Robert Flogaus-Faust ich nehme an du bist dir ganz sicher. Ich hatte die Angaben von einem studierten Biologen, Hajotthu (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hajotthu, in dem Fall bin ich mir sicher, auch wenn ich bin kein studierter Biologe bin. Schau dir doch mal Lepidium campestre ([1], [2]) sowie Thlaspi arvense ([3], [[4]) an. Falls du noch Bedenken hast, kannst du auch gerne die Leute bei de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Biologie/Bestimmung oder noch sicherer gleich bei [5] um ihre Meinung bitten. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Flogaus-Faust, meinen Experten kann ich leider nicht mehr befragen, ich bin mir sicher, dass du die Pflanze richtig bestimmt hast.. Mit freundlichem Gruß Hajotthu (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DKW F7 MstrKl Bj36 (b).jpg[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Erledigt--Hajotthu (talk) 16:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeHavreStJoseph innen.JPG[edit]

File:LeHavreStJoseph innen.JPG have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A beer for you![edit]

Danke für die tollen Bilder der Neustädter Markthalle. Und Prost. :) Derbrauni (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für das Bier. Freut mich wenn dir die Bilder gefallen. --Hajotthu (talk) 09:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kriegsgräberstätte Hehlentorfriedhof von Reitzenstein.jpg[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, habe ich berichtigt. --Hajotthu (talk) 09:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Bredebeck Wildschweinkopf.jpg[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, ist berichtigt. --Hajotthu (talk) 10:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rudolf Jordan Heiratsantrag a Helgoland.JPG[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, ist die oben verlinkte Datei ein Scan oder ein Originalphoto von Dir, gemacht in der Nationalgalerie Berlin. Ich frage das, weil im Bildarchiv Foto Marburg steht, das Gemälde währe eine Dauerleihgabe der Nationalgalerie an das Altonaer Museum in Hamburg. --Botaurus (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Botaurus, das ist ein Originalfoto von mir aus der Alten Nationalgalerie in Berlin, aufgenommen am 5. 10. 2011 mit meiner Nikon Coolpix P 100, was man auch an Hand der Metadaten beim Bild leicht erkennen kann.--Hajotthu (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info. Bei den Metedaten war ich mir nicht sicher, weil dort auch etwas von „Adobe Photoshop Elements 9.0 Windows“ steht. Grüße --Botaurus (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Botaurus, der Satz "Seit 1985 Dauerleihgabe im Altonaer Museum" Sollte am besten gestrichen werden, da er m.E. nicht zutreffen kann. Zumindest im Oktober 2011 hing dieses Bild eindeutig in der Alten Nationalgalerie - Sammlung Wagner - in Berlin. Der Konsul Wagner erwarb 1834 das Bild vom Künstler (auch gem. Bildarchiv Foto Marburg). Der Konsul Wagner vermachte 1859 per Testament seine Sammlung dem preußischen König unter der Auflage, die Werke ungetrennt in Berlin öffentlich auszustellen. Nach dem Tode Wagners 1861 wurde die "Wagnersche und National-Galerie" in Berlin eröffnet. Hiernach dürfte das Bild doch nicht seit 1985 an das Altonaer Museum ausgeliehen sein. Ich habe mir erlaubt den Satz raus zu nehmen. --Hajotthu (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Totenhaus Baven Modell 01b.jpg[edit]

JuTa 18:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Linde oder Eiche?[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, dem Namen und der Beschreibung nach ist das eine Linde. Kategorisiert hast Du den Baum aber als Eiche. Was ist richtig? Ohne Laub kann ich es nicht erkennen. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 13:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies, danke für den Hinweis. Du hast natürlich recht. Es soll eine Linde sein. Ich habe die Categorie geändert, weiß aber leider nicht welche Art von Linde das ist. Hajotthu (talk) 16:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bildnutzung[edit]

Sehr geehrter Hajotthu,

dürfte ich das Bild "Dianthus deltoides (2)" für meine Zulassungsarbeit zum Staatsexamen an der Universität Würzburg verwenden? Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit soll ein Lehrpfad mit dem Titel "heimische Pflanzenwelt" für den Botanischen Garten Würzburg erstellt werden. Der botanische Garten ist allen Besuchern kostenfrei zugänglich. Die Verwendung wäre somit nicht kommerziell.

Selbstverständlich würde ich Sie als Urheber des Bildes am Bild kenntlich machen.

Mit freundlichem Gruß und in der Hoffnung auf eine positive Antwort Martin Bernhardt

(martin.bernhardt@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de)

Selbstverständlich gerne.(File:Heide-Nelke (Dianthus deltoides) (2).jpg) Hajotthu (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:TrpÜbPl Munster Nord Schießbahn 6 Westerhorner Schläge.JPG[edit]

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, habe ich übersehen und sofort erledigt. Hajotthu (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Altarraum Stadtkirche St. Marien Celle.JPG[edit]

JuTa 18:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Chor Stadtkirche St. Marien Celle 01.JPG[edit]

JuTa 19:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Orgel Stadtkirche Celle 02.JPG[edit]

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rembrandt's Son Titus in a Monk's Habit.jpg[edit]

File:Rembrandt's Son Titus in a Monk's Habit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Places_in_Ravenna[edit]

Category:Places_in_Ravenna has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

AlessioMela (talk) 09:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bildnutzung Neuntöter für Managementplanung[edit]

Hallo!

Dürfen wir Ihre Neuntöter-Bilder aus Wikimedia für die Erstellung von Managementplänen nach Vogelschutzrichtline verwenden?

Diese Pläne werden von Behörden (Forst und Naturschutz) erstellt auf Basis der FFH-RL und der Vogelschutz-Richtlinie, sie dienen der Dokumentation der Erfassung und Bewertung von bestimmten Vogelarten und ihren Habitaten sowie der Planung; Bilder (soweit vorhanden) dienen der Vorstellung/Wiedererkennung in einem Steckbrief genannten Abschnitt zu Biologie etc. je Art.

Bei Bedarf kann ich Ihnen gern weitere Infos geben (vgl., z. B. http://www.lwf.bayern.de/biodiversitaet/natura2000/059798/index.php)

Vielen Dank --Kai.pedia (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Kai.pedia, natürlich dürfen sie die Bilder für ihr Vorhaben verwenden. Ich freue mich immer wenn die Bilder ankommen. Hajotthu (talk) 16:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank! --Kai.pedia (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Celle Schlosstheater 01.JPG[edit]

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vergesse ich doch immer wieder. Sorry, ist erledigt. Hajotthu (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Faßberg Heideblüte10.JPG[edit]

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vergesse ich doch immer wieder. Sorry, ist erledigt.Hajotthu (talk) 08:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Costa Fascinosa in Venice b.jpg[edit]

File:Costa Fascinosa in Venice b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Didym (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Munch Edvard Weiblicher Halbakt Sprengel Museum 01.JPG[edit]

File:Munch Edvard Weiblicher Halbakt Sprengel Museum 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

4ing (talk) 12:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Munch Edward Elgersburg Sprengel Museum 01.JPG[edit]

File:Munch Edward Elgersburg Sprengel Museum 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

4ing (talk) 12:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caspar David Friedrich (7)Coast Scene.JPG[edit]

File:Caspar David Friedrich (7)Coast Scene.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 19:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flensburg St. Johannis 01.JPG[edit]

Scoopfinder^(d) 08:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Erledigt, ich hatte versehentlich keine Lizenz angegeben.Hajotthu (talk) 09:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flensburg Museumsberg Zwergmaus (Micromys minutus).JPG[edit]

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vergesse ich doch immer wieder. Sorry, ist erledigt.Hajotthu (talk) 06:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Rex Motorcycle engines.JPG[edit]

base=Image license Ju Ta 09:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, ist erledigt.Hajotthu (talk) 11:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank[edit]

für diese Bearbeitung. Da ich möchte, dass die ursprüngliche Version erhalten bleibt, bitte ich Dich, die Bearbeitung unter einem anderen Namen hochzuladen. Danke! --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo 4028mdk09, ich weiß zwar nicht welchen Zweck zu mit einem total unterbelichteten Bild verfolgst. Ich habe meine Bearbeitung rückgängig gemacht.Hajotthu (talk) 06:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Günther Grabstein@Weimar Jakobskirche Kirchhof.JPG[edit]

base=Image license Ju Ta 20:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, ist berichtigt. --Hajotthu (talk) 06:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Residenz Würzburg Plan.JPG[edit]

Es sieht so aus, als wäre das Bild aus einer Publikation der Bayerischen Schlösserverwaltung herauskopiert. Jedenfalls stimmt es überein mit dem aus der Internetseite der Schlösserverwaltung unter http://www.residenz-wuerzburg.de/deutsch/garten/plan.htm. Die Nutzungsbedingungen verbieten eine Verwendung im Internet: "Texte, Bilder, Grafiken sowie die Gestaltung dieser Internetseiten unterliegen dem Urheberrecht. Sie dürfen nur zum privaten und sonstigen eigenen Gebrauch im Rahmen des § 53 Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG) verwendet werden. Eine Vervielfältigung oder Verwendung dieser Seiten oder Teilen davon in anderen elektronischen oder gedruckten Publikationen und deren Veröffentlichung ist nur nach vorheriger Genehmigung gestattet. Diese erteilen auf Anfrage die für den Inhalt Verantwortlichen. Weiterhin können Texte, Bilder, Grafiken und sonstige Dateien ganz oder teilweise dem Urheberrecht Dritter unterliegen. Auch über das Bestehen möglicher Rechte Dritter geben Ihnen die für den Inhalt Verantwortlichen nähere Auskünfte." Ich hatte zum Zweck der Veröffentlichung in Commons bei der Schlösserverwaltung angerufen und mir wurde dort erklärt, daß man mit einer Veröffentlichung bei Wikipedia nicht einverstanden ist. Möglicherweise hat sich die Einstellung mittlerweile geändert. Dann muß aber die Bayerische Schlösserverwaltung als Inhaber der Rechte angegeben werden. Ich bitte um Mitteilung, wie sich die Situation darstellt. Ansonsten muß ich leider einen Löschungsantrag stellen.

Hallo Thw1309 (leider hast du deinen Absender nicht hinterlassen), schau dir doch bitte mal die Exif-Daten an. Wie du erkennen kannst, ist es ein Foto und keine Kopie. Das Info-Schild ist an der Residenz an einem öffentlichen Weg aufgestellt und hier habe ich es fotografiert. Wie ich es sehe, fällt das unter "Panoramafreiheit", was ich in den Lizenzmarkierungen auch vermerkt habe. Siehst du das anders? --Hajotthu (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So eindeutig ist die Sache wohl nicht. Zumindest bei öffentlich angebrachten Schaukästen sagt die Rechtsprechung, daß die Inhalte nicht mehr von der Panoramafreiheit gedeckt sind. Eine Chance bestünde nur, wenn erkennbar wäre, daß es sich um ein Schild auf der Straße handelt. Ich darf ein Stück Straße, in der sich eben auch ein Schild befindet, photographieren aber wohl nicht mehr den Inhalt des Schildes ohne daß das Schild als solches noch erkennbar ist. Dieses Photo stellt eindeutig nicht mehr ein Schild auf der Straße dar, sondern nur noch seinen urheberrechtlich geschützten Inhalt, die Karte, die abgelichtet wurde, ohne daß erkennbar ist, von wo. Auch ist es problematisch zu beweisen, daß dieses Photo nicht aus einem Werk der Schlösserverwaltung stammt, da die Karte auch dort Verwendung findet. Zumindest würde ich dringendst empfehlen, in der Beschreibung ausdrücklich zu erwähnen, daß es sich um ein Straßenschild handelt und daß das Recht an der Karte selbst der Bayerischen Schlösserverwaltung zusteht. Vor dem Hintergrund der möglichen Legitimität der Aufnahme werde ich auf einen Löschungsantrag verzichten, warne aber vor möglichen Rechtsfolgen. --Thw1309 (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thw1309, du kannst gerne die Löschung beantragen, wenn du meinst, dass die Panoramafreiheit hier nicht (mehr) gegeben ist. Ich bin kein RA, da scheinst du dich besser aus zu kennen. --Hajotthu (talk) 11:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich will das doch noch mal aufgreifen. Auf einen Blick ist zu erkennen, dass die Datei auf der Internetseite nicht mit meinem Bild identisch ist. Auf meinem Bild ist sogar der Standort des Überssichtsplans im Gelände zu sehen, und dabei gleichzeitig zu erkennen, dass der Plan von einer öffentlichen Straße (aber auch der Platz davor dürfte öffentlich sein) fotografiert wurde. --Hajotthu (talk) 06:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canaletto Dresden unterh Augustusbruecke.JPG[edit]

File:Canaletto Dresden unterh Augustusbruecke.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 01:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tallinn Estonia-Memorial.JPG

Yours sincerely, MKFI (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Klaipéda Simon-Dach-Brunnen Ännchen von Tharau.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turku Denkmal Paavo Nurmi.JPG[edit]

File:Turku Denkmal Paavo Nurmi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Estormiz (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bild wohl falsch kategorisiert[edit]

check mal bitte mfg --Commander-pirx (talk) 10:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeHavre StJoseph.JPG[edit]

File:LeHavre StJoseph.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Culex (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:TransrapLeitstand.jpg[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, wo hast Du dieses Bild aufgenommen, also wo genau befand sich damals der Leitstand? War das im Versuchszentrum an der Hermann-Kemper-Straße in Lathen oder doch woanders? Ich frage, weil mir die Bedeutung diese Bauwerks noch nicht klar ist. Vielleicht kannst Du ja helfen. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 14:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies, genau dort im Versuchszentrum an der Hermann-Kemper-Straße in Lathen war es. --Hajotthu (talk)

Danke! -- Ies (talk) 15:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2005 01 17 Wissower Klinken@vor dem Abbruch 01.jpg und File:2005 01 17 Wissower Klinken@vor dem Abbruch 02.jpg[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, ich habe gerade zu meinen Fotos File:Victoria-Sicht 1.jpg, File:Victoria-Sicht 2.jpg, File:Victoria-Sicht 3.jpg die Geo-Referenzen hinzugefügt bzw. korrigiert und bin in diesem Zusammenhang auf deine Fotos File:2005 01 17 Wissower Klinken@vor dem Abbruch 01.jpg und File:2005 01 17 Wissower Klinken@vor dem Abbruch 02.jpg gestoßen. Diese zeigen nicht die Wissower Klinken sondern ebenfalls (eindeutig!) einen Blick von der Viktoria-Sicht in der unmittelbaren Nähe des Königsstuhls. Insofern sind die Dateinamen deiner Fotos unglücklich gewählt und dadurch auch einer falschen Kategorie zugeordnet (besser wäre Category:Victoria-Sicht (Jasmund)). Vielleicht kannst du das bei Gelegenheit "reparieren". --Lapplaender (talk) 15:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lapplaender, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe das nochmal überprüft. Du hast wahrscheinlich recht. Ich habe die Änderung des Dateinamens und der Category in die Wege geleitet.--Hajotthu (talk)

Inzwischen erledigt, siehe: File:20050117Victoriasicht01.jpg und File:20050117Victoriasicht02.jpg. Ich hatte aber Fotos von den Wissower Klinken vor deren Abbruch in 2005 gemacht. Die kann ich leider nicht auftreiben. --Hajotthu (talk)

Category:Fontains_in_Lüneburg[edit]

Category:Fontains_in_Lüneburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Schofför (talk) 11:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Chor Schauroth Fenstser@Alte Nikolaikirche Frankfurt a.M. 20170817.jpg

And also:

File:Glasfenster Aufsteigender Christus@Alte Nikolaikirche Frankfurt a.M. 20170817.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Achterberg (Osterheide)Teehaus.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Achterberg (Osterheide)Teehaus.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Achterberg (Osterheide)Teehaus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Lizenz nachgetragen. ---Hajotthu (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, nur damit du dich nicht wunderst/ärgerst: ich habe bei den Reproduktionen von Albert-König-Gemälden, die in der Kategorie "Paintings by Albert König in the Albert-König-Museum" waren, die Kategorie "Paintings by Albert König" gemäß Commons:Categories#Over-categorization entfernt. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio, warum sollte ich mich ärgern? Das ist doch in Ordnung. Danke für deine Mithilfe.---Hajotthu (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernst Aug Schaumünzen 014.jpg[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, ich würde gern Deine Bilddatei c:File:Ernst Aug Schaumünzen 014.jpg umbenennen in c:File:Heinrich Julius Schaumünze 014.jpg o.ä., da sie das Bildnis von Heinrich Julius zeigt -- OK? --HReuter (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HReuter, ja klar. Das ist OK.--Hajotthu (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barlach The walker.JPG[edit]

Hi, hier hast du wohl den Lizenzbaustein vergessen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., danke, hatte ich bereits bemerkt, du bist aber schnell--Hajotthu (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valkenburg Interior of a Burgher House.JPG[edit]

Hallo, this file seems to me wrongly attributed to Valkenburg. The style is completely different (probably of older age also) and the signature is also not his. I removed it from Category:Hendrik Valkenburg, but that name is still in the filename – would you be able to retrieve the correct name and then rename the file? If not, I will later have the file renamed. Thanks, Eissink (talk) 23:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hallo Eissink, danke für deinen Hinweis. Ich habe die Information direkt vom Kulturhistorischen Museum. Schau mal hier die Infotafel. Da du anscheinend Experte bist, wäre es gut wenn du dich direkt an das Museum wenden könntest. Eventuell ist ja die Auszeichnung falsch.--Hajotthu (talk) 09:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Ich fand eine Beschreibung hier. Bin aber nicht uberzeugt dass es hier wirklich um Valkenburg geht, und werde vielleicht weiter informieren. Danke nochmal. Eissink (talk) 12:44, 6 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

File:Barbette Friedrich IV. - Miniaturen – Bomann Museum.JPG[edit]

The source comes from this file: File:König Frederik IV von Dänemark und Norwegen.png obtained from the museum's web page.

Ecummenic (talk) 19:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ecummenic, Schau mal hier [:https://tansey-miniatures.com/en/collection/11105]--Hajotthu (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Westerland Sylt St. Christopherus Fenster@20151230.JPG[edit]

File:Westerland Sylt St. Christopherus Fenster@20151230.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Historie Blasiiekirche Quedlinburg Harz-20200824.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Historie Blasiiekirche Quedlinburg Harz-20200824.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Quedel (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:AdolfDressler b.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:AdolfDressler b.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:AdolfDressler b.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, O.K. erledigt.--Hajotthu (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kursmünzen Georg Wilhelm (1665–1705) – Residenzmuseum Celle (4).JPG[edit]

File:Kursmünzen Georg Wilhelm (1665–1705) – Residenzmuseum Celle (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

HReuter (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Money of Lower Saxony[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, danke für die Erstellung der Kategorie "Money of Lower Saxony". Ich habe die Kategorie "Notgeld of Braunschweig" als Unterkategorie eingebunden, deshalb kann "Money of Lower Saxony" wieder aus den Dateien entfernt werden. Gruß "Palauenc"

Ja das habe ich gerade eben auch gesehen. Danke für den Hinweis.--Hajotthu (talk) 11:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bildnis von Johann Wolfgang Textor d. J.[edit]

Hallo Hajotthu, ist unter den im Goethe-Haus Frankfurt aufgenommenen Fotos eines, auf dem Johann Wolfgang Textor in einer höheren Auflösung als hier zu sehen ist? --Zaunkoeniglich (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Zaunkoeniglich, das ist ja ein Ausschnitt aus meinem Foto im Goethehaus Frankfurt. Ein anderes Foto habe ich davon leider nicht gefunden. Man könnte vielleicht probieren das Bild etwas zu verbessern, was der Hochlader Tetraktys anscheindend aber auch schon probiert hat.--Hajotthu (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Civil rights association mural Londonderry Nordirland@20160529.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 10:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Che Guevara Lynch mural Londonderry Nordirland@20160529.jpg

And also:

File:Mural in Londonderry Nordirland@20160529 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Freiheit 3.jpg

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Johannes Vermeer - The Astronomer - 1668.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Multichill (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Multichill, ich habe kein neues Bild hochgeladen, sondern das sehr dunkle Bild etwas aufgehellt. Danach konnte man die feinen Einzelheiten von Vermeers Bild erst erkennen.--Hajotthu (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Overwriting_existing_files/de#NICHT_Überschreiben. Multichill (talk) 22:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Eastern and Chatham Railway.JPG[edit]

File:South Eastern and Chatham Railway.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 15:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Herrenhausen Die Grotte 01.jpg

And also:

File:Herrenhausen Die Grotte 07.jpg

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter I in Peter-u Paul-Festung.jpg[edit]

File:Peter I in Peter-u Paul-Festung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 19:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Übigau 08 2012.jpg[edit]

File:Schloss Übigau 08 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klaipéda Skulptur Meerjungfrau.JPG[edit]

File:Klaipéda Skulptur Meerjungfrau.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skulptur Kaminkretys (der Schornsteinfeger) 02.JPG[edit]

File:Skulptur Kaminkretys (der Schornsteinfeger) 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skulptur Stebuklingasis peliukas (das Wundermäuschen) 02.JPG[edit]

File:Skulptur Stebuklingasis peliukas (das Wundermäuschen) 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Mariendenkmal Madonna della Lettera Messina@20171018.jpg

Yours sincerely, Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Residenz Bamberg Chinese Kabinet (1).JPG[edit]

Hallo, ich war so frei und habe die Umbenennung der oben erwähnten Datei beantragt. Im November habe ich die Neue Residenz in Bamberg besucht und daher weiß ich, dass es sich um das Vorzimmer handelt. Nur zu Info. Nemracc (talk) 20:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hajotthu,

ich habe deine Version als File:Der Astronom Hajotthu version.jpg neu hochgeladen.

Viele Grüße, Graf von Lichtbild (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Hajotthu

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Bergen Kriegerdenkmal.JPG[edit]

Becklingen War Cemetery[edit]

File:Lopau alte Schule.JPG[edit]

File:Lopau Haus Schilling.JPG[edit]

Category:Rudolf_Friedrich_Wasmann[edit]

fehlbestimmter Kreuzblütler[edit]

File:DKW F7 MstrKl Bj36 (b).jpg[edit]

File:LeHavreStJoseph innen.JPG[edit]

A beer for you![edit]

File:Kriegsgräberstätte Hehlentorfriedhof von Reitzenstein.jpg[edit]

File:Schloss Bredebeck Wildschweinkopf.jpg[edit]

File:Rudolf Jordan Heiratsantrag a Helgoland.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Totenhaus Baven Modell 01b.jpg[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Linde oder Eiche?[edit]

Bildnutzung[edit]

Copyright status: File:TrpÜbPl Munster Nord Schießbahn 6 Westerhorner Schläge.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Altarraum Stadtkirche St. Marien Celle.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Chor Stadtkirche St. Marien Celle 01.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Orgel Stadtkirche Celle 02.JPG[edit]

File:Rembrandt's Son Titus in a Monk's Habit.jpg[edit]

Category:Places_in_Ravenna[edit]

Bildnutzung Neuntöter für Managementplanung[edit]

Copyright status: File:Celle Schlosstheater 01.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Faßberg Heideblüte10.JPG[edit]

File:Costa Fascinosa in Venice b.jpg[edit]

File:Munch Edvard Weiblicher Halbakt Sprengel Museum 01.JPG[edit]

File:Munch Edward Elgersburg Sprengel Museum 01.JPG[edit]

File:Caspar David Friedrich (7)Coast Scene.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Flensburg St. Johannis 01.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Flensburg Museumsberg Zwergmaus (Micromys minutus).JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:Rex Motorcycle engines.JPG[edit]

Vielen Dank[edit]

Copyright status: File:Günther Grabstein@Weimar Jakobskirche Kirchhof.JPG[edit]

File:Residenz Würzburg Plan.JPG[edit]

File:Canaletto Dresden unterh Augustusbruecke.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

File:Turku Denkmal Paavo Nurmi.JPG[edit]

Bild wohl falsch kategorisiert[edit]

File:LeHavre StJoseph.JPG[edit]

File:TransrapLeitstand.jpg[edit]

File:2005 01 17 Wissower Klinken@vor dem Abbruch 01.jpg und File:2005 01 17 Wissower Klinken@vor dem Abbruch 02.jpg[edit]

Category:Fontains_in_Lüneburg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Copyright status: File:Achterberg (Osterheide)Teehaus.jpg[edit]

Kategorien[edit]

File:Ernst Aug Schaumünzen 014.jpg[edit]

File:Barlach The walker.JPG[edit]

File:Valkenburg Interior of a Burgher House.JPG[edit]

File:Barbette Friedrich IV. - Miniaturen – Bomann Museum.JPG[edit]

File:Westerland Sylt St. Christopherus Fenster@20151230.JPG[edit]

File tagging File:Historie Blasiiekirche Quedlinburg Harz-20200824.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:AdolfDressler b.jpg[edit]

File:Kursmünzen Georg Wilhelm (1665–1705) – Residenzmuseum Celle (4).JPG[edit]

Money of Lower Saxony[edit]

Bildnis von Johann Wolfgang Textor d. J.[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

File:South Eastern and Chatham Railway.JPG[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Peter I in Peter-u Paul-Festung.jpg[edit]

File:Schloss Übigau 08 2012.jpg[edit]

File:Klaipéda Skulptur Meerjungfrau.JPG[edit]

File:Skulptur Kaminkretys (der Schornsteinfeger) 02.JPG[edit]

File:Skulptur Stebuklingasis peliukas (das Wundermäuschen) 02.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Residenz Bamberg Chinese Kabinet (1).JPG[edit]

Navigation menu

Search