User talk:HCPUNXKID

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HCPUNXKID!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, HCPUNXKID!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrwashing[edit]

Regarding your question: The files from the flickr account Saharauiak appear to be gathered from various sources: Aminetu2005.jpg comes from www.arso.org/aminatoucamp.htm , http://farm1.static.flickr.com/39/88940167_7a4cb688b4.jpg also appears on other blogs (for example http://cotarelo.blogspot.com/2009/11/aminatu-haidar.html ). --DieBuche (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I agree that ones could be washed, but I dont think the same happens about the Bir Lehlou.jpg. I can't find that photo in any other site.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at DieBuche's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Lo que pasa es que en el origen tiene una licencia "noncommercial", que quiere decir que no se permite el uso comercial de la imagen. Belgrano (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The editions I made are according to the official positions. Some states are changing their opinion frequently or give separate announcements of support for both Morocco and Polisario Front/SADR.[edit]

Some states are changing their opinion frequently or give separate announcements of support for both Morocco and Polisario Front/SADR (Paraguay, Belgium, Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Chile, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Malawi, Peru, Russia, Sierra Leone, Swaziland). What is certain that the status of Western Sahara is not determined by the United Nations due to the support (veto powers) by UN Member states France and the USA for Morocco, but nor is Morocco's claim recognized by the United Nations as well, unlike the still non-independent "State of Palestine" which has a UN seat as a "non-voting" member.

The editions I made are according to the official (current) positions of countries on this issue and not on the frequently changing statements by them which either are for or against.

Personally I do not care about Western Sahara or Morocco and unlike you I am not a partisan on issues (E.g. Your support of secessionist claims even within internationally recognized borders such as Catalonia, Basque Country in Spain, Scotland in the UK, Kurdistan in various Middle Eastern Countries etc..)

Saguamundi

Embassy in Timor-Leste?[edit]

Hello HCPUNXKID! Can you give me a source, that SADR has an embassy in Timor-Leste? I know, that Timor-Leste is supporting interests of SADR, but couldn't find any informations about an SADR-embassy in Dili. There is maybe only an ambassador, who has his seat in Jakarta, like several other countries? Greetings, --Patrick (talk) 08:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Aminetou Mandela.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

VernoWhitney (talk) 17:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, It seems that the image was copied from [1]. Flickr is probably not the original source. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Laredocasapueblavieja.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:MercadoLaredo.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Columbrete Grande Columbretes.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Faro Columbrete Grande 2.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Faro Columbrete Grande.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:La Herrera island.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:La Horadada island.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Morcilla-burgos 1.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Morcilla-burgos 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Re:[edit]

¡Hola! Aquí está el escudo:
La bandera también la he hecho, pero no sé por qué la subida de imágenes a commons la tengo «caída» desde hace unas horas. La subiré cuando pueda. No soy lego en la materia precisamente pero espero que te guste. Detalles de ambos:

  • He puesto para el escudo como referencia principal el blasón aprobado. He anotado el problemilla del blasón oficial (si son 7 pendones es matemáticamente imposible que sean 3+1+2 y he puesto como corrección en faja de 4 (4+1+2) como indica la fuente web que me ofreces.
  • Con respecto a la bandera (que ya te avisaré cuando la suba), el orden de las barras externas que se señala (rojo-verde y verde-rojo), indica, al ser (entiendo) una enumeración de arriba hacia abajo, la simetría de colores respecto al eje de la recta horizontal que une el centro del asta con el del batiente (por lo que sería rojo-verde-blanco-rojo-blanco-verde-rojo en vez del rojo-verde-blanco-rojo-blanco-rojo-verde del diseño representado en vexilo-león).

¡Recibe un cordial saludo! Asqueladd (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Aquí tienes la bandera: . Saludos.-- Asqueladd (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


✓ Done ¿Escudos heráldicos? ¡El escudo de Carrizo es un escudo heráldico! ¿Te refieres a heráldica nobiliaria o de linajes? Hasta ahora sólo me ha motivado la heráldica cívica, pero dime qué tienes en mente. Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cascajares-de-Bureba-escudo.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

¡Hola HCPUNXKID! Por partes:

  • Si el logo no es libre no puede estar en commons. En cuanto a vectorizarlo para la wikipedia en inglés, pues mi interpretación es que tampoco. No creo que sea conveniente subir bajo el amparo del fair use un archivo vectorial (se suele considerarse fair use un archivo de baja resolución).
  • Respecto a los apellidos, un problema esencial es que no existe una relación biunívoca entre escudo y apellido. Sí entre linajes de un apellido y tal, tengo entendido.
  • Respecto al escudo de Laredo, le he realizado , pero ¿tienes una fuente mejor para el blasón?. Quicir, sería deseable que no fuera un blog aunque coincida con el escudo oficial.

Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola, HCPUNXKID! Muchas gracias. Ya conocía la web. Está muy bien para dar cobertura heráldica a la provincia, aunque en algunos casos echo en falta algunos blasones de los escudos. Recibe un atento saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, me pondré más tarde a la filigrana de las cruces. Te agradeceré sin embargo que no subas una versión que contradice claramente el blasón, y que además incumple gratuitamente las leyes de la heráldica (dice plata, y plata sobre ondas de azur va fetén). En la heráldica europea no existe el celeste, sino 5 esmaltes básicos (4 colores: gules, azur, sable y sinople, y 2 metales: oro y plata), y después ya casos especiales. No sé qué haré con casos como el de escudo de Aranda de Duero, que está por hacer y tiene dos tonos de azur, pero en este caso, Laredo, me parece altamente innecesario y gratuitamente antiheráldico cuando hay una solución óptima que se ha aplicado (además de por supuesto de no venir en el blasón). Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Como ya te dije en principio no existen dos esmaltes de azur en la heráldica europea. Sí existe sin embargo en Sudamérica el color cielo para el celeste. Ese dilema también está en el blasón de Aranda de Duero (que sin embargo, como podrías ver en la página de la diputación de Burgos dice que en cualquier caso es azul, no plata). Y por favor, no soy ningún experto en heráldica. Lo poco que sé lo he aprendido observando los armoriales del wikiproyecto de heráldica de es:wiki y siguiendo sus reglas. Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abbas al-Musawi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 04:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:La aguilera02.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La aguilera02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imam Ali Khamenei receives Hizbullah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 23:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hassan Nasrallah poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Leoboudv (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young Khadafi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 23:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pierre & Marie Curie graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 17:22, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mono 17:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim Jong Un graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Taichi (talk) 02:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bradley Manning graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sargentes de la lora05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

Hola, HCPUNXKID. No creo que realice la propuesta que me has realizado de la bandera de Aguas Cándidas por una mezcla de dos razones: que no sea una página web particularmente fiable (lo mejor es siempre la descripción en el BOE o en el BOCYL) unido a que la descripción ofrecida no parece coincidir siquiera con la fotografía que ellos mismos enseñan. Un saludo. Sobre lo de Laredo, ya veré, aunque no es una prioridad. Recibe un atento saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 12:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PD: He visto por notificación de la mención a User:Asqueladd que has dejado un mensaje al usuario SanchoPanzaXXI. Este usuario está inactivo en commons desde hace más de año y medio.

Antiguo escudo de Laredo[edit]

Perdona el retraso en la respuesta he estado muy liado y no he podido contestar antes. Tengo en mente hacer, como en Madrid, los escudos de las capitales de CC.AA y provincias y los de las grandes ciudades y poblaciones históricas, como es el caso de Laredo. He visto tu enlace y es muy interesante, voy a hacer seguro mi versión del escudo actual e intentaré hacer también lo que me has pedido aunque no puedo garantizarlo por falta de tiempo ya que los escudos provinciales y locales me van a llevar mucho tiempo, pero lo intentaré. Saludos--Heralder (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:André Malraux graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I'd like to be wrong, but... Yann (talk) 08:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Paul Bocuse graffiti.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aga (d) 13:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear HCPUNXKID,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re : BRN Flags[edit]

✓ Done. Here I have create the SVG version of all the flags except for the flags of the State of Greater Pattani and Pattani United Liberation Organisation which already available in the commons. Cheers! :) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ʜᴜʜ? 19:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Situation in East Ukraine[edit]

Zhdanivka --- army withdrew from the city --- also rebels and Russian army controled the village Sofiivka In area of the city Lugansk, the Ukrainian troops almost left the city and its surroundings, moving away from his main forces to the north. In fact today they hold only a small bridgehead on the right bank of the Seversky Donets (Vesela Hora - Shyshkove - Dovhe).
town Hlybokyi --- under control by rebels --- Also near Vesela Hora - Shchastia were intense battles, as well as near the Stanytsia Luhanska. Thus the rebels, with the support of the Russian army, acting in the direction of Krasnodon - Lugansk still managed to push the Ukrainian troops across the river Seversky Donets (except as noted above springboard). So that now both banks of the river are under control by Ukrainian troops only in area Katerinovka - Nyzhnie UA PressOdessa Daily
Talakivka, Shyrokyne, Sakhanka, Zemliane --- taken by rebels --- Mig NewsMig News112 UA--
Schastia --- The Russian military now are very close to the city of Schastia the front line between the Ukrainian army and the armed forces of Russia lies in area of ​​the bridge over the river of Seversky Donets --- Source
Krasnoarmiisk --- Ukrainian army left the city --- PodrobnostiIBRA UAMelitopol NewsDialog Inform--Hanibal911 (talk) 17:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
city Sartana and village Kominternove--- under control by pro Russian rebels --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 06:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Debaltseve --- The Russian troops or the rebels now start surround the Ukrainian troops in city Debaltseve now they are 300 meters away from position the Ukrainian army --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Zhdanivka source--Hanibal911 (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
VorovskeKrasnopilliaTelmanove --- taken by pro Russian rebels --- 112 UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ukraine's armed forces left the settlements Pryvitne, Pankovo​​, Stukalova Balka, Svitle, Obozne and Khrystove. Army also withdraw its troops from the liberated settlements Markivka, Novopskov, Belovodsk, Novojdar, Severodonetsk Starobilsk and Svatovo This is due to a truce, which was signed in Minsk between militants and Ukraine. source--Hanibal911 (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Debalcevo --- Half of the city Debalcevo controlled by insurgents --- Ukrainian military are now located under Debalcevo on a narrow strip of land on both sides surrounded by gunmen. Them all the time shell terrorists.Gordon UALB UAsource--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Army today left the several cities including Zhdanivka, Yunokomunarivsk, Rozivka, Vuhlehirsk.24TV UALB UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dokuchaevsk --- under control by pro Russian rebels --- Dialog UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
New data:
  • The area around the city Debalcevo under the control of militants and in this area Ukrainian troops in besiege with the four side inside the cities Debalcevo and Chornukhyne. So that we need left in orange color the city of Debalcevo and the city Chornukhyne but the other cities and villages in this area need put in red color.Dialog UA
  • Also pro-Russian rebels launched offensive in toward the city Mariupol. Violent clashes in the area of ​​the 13 and 14 checkpoints.InfoResist
  • Avdiivka --- under control by insurgents --- Ukrainian troops retreated from the city.
  • Marinka and Krasnogorovka --- Ukrainian military began to retreat from the cities --- source--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This pro government source confirmed that rebels inside Donetsk airport.here--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vuhlehirs'k and Chornukhyne under control the insurgents and of these settlements they shell the city Debaltseve.Gazeta UATSNFakty UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
According to pro government source the village Starohnativka now in besieged by pro-Russian fighters and they shelled her from heavy artillery.Also the city Debaltseve in besieged with three side and also under fire.112 UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
According these pro-Ukrainian maps herehere these settlements (Maloorlivka,Orlovo-Ivanivka, Ol'khovatka, Bulavyns'k, Olenivka and Oleksandrivs'ke) near on souths city Vuhlehirsk now under control by pro-Russian insurgents.--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kostyantynivka and Chornukhyne under control by pro-Russian rebels.Military maps Hanibal911 (talk) 06:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Map of East Ukraine conflict[edit]

You can fix this map East Ukraine conflict to according of this map.here--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola![edit]

Si lo prefieres, quando quieras, puedes conversar conmigo en español, que yo soy portugués, y lo hablo bien. Mondolkiri1 (talk) 17:53, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no corregi Smile antes, porque creí que no te iba gustar el "calderón".Mondolkiri1 (talk) 23:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Houthi control Map.png[edit]

Done :)

Escudo de Quemada[edit]

Buenas tardes.

En general, las llamas pueden ser de oro, gules o <al natural> (gules con detalles en oro), debiéndose especificarlo. Existe otra figura heráldica que se denomina “ardiente” y es un atributo del mueble que está ardiendo que, si no se especifica otra cosa, iría con las llamas al natural, simulando un fuego real.

En el caso del escudo de Quemada, efectivamente está descrito con llamas de gules. Sin embargo, debido a la cantidad de blasones con deficiencias o errores en la descripción, es conveniente apoyarse también en la imagen del escudo que realmente usa el ayto. Si hay pequeñas diferencias, mi opinión es la de respetar la imagen. Si la diferencia es tal que estamos ante dos escudos diferentes, pues realizar los dos.

El modelo que usa el ayuntamiento de Quemada de forma oficial trae un mueble ardiente con llamas de gules y oro (puedes verlo aquí) y es el que he tomado como base. No obstante, también es válida la versión con las llamas solo de gules que has elegido, puesto que se ajusta al blasón oficial.

Lo ideal sería respetar el modelo que efectivamente usa el ayto. y hacer un inciso en su descripción haciendo constar esa diferencia.

Si te puedo ayudar en algo más, no dudes en comunicármelo.

Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Safia Farkash on a plane.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Safia Farkash.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Vera (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo de Laredo[edit]

Le echaré un vistazo. Primero voy a ver si encuentro algún modelo más detallado. Si subo alguna versión, te lo haré saber. Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He subido una versión basada en el escudo que me mandaste.
A tener en cuenta: La ballena es manifiestamente mejorable, el problema es que las ballenas heráldicas suelen disponerse "adiestradas" y no "afrontadas" como en esta versión y no hay ningún modelo de referencia. Los esmaltes están deducidos del original pero cumple con la regla heráldica, es posible que difiera del original.

Cualquier duda me la comentas. Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Ukraine conflict map[edit]

Thank you so much for all your great work on File:East Ukraine conflict.svg! With your next update can you please add some more cities, especially the ones located close to the current border between Ukraine and Novorossiya. Also, can you fix the shape and position of some other cities such as Krasna Talivka, Triots'ke, Stanytsia Luhanska and a few others as they are not very accurately represented on the map. Thank you! --Leftcry (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Situation in East Ukraine on 21 November[edit]

Ukrainian government public the list of cities which controlled by DNR and LPR rebels. in the Donetsk region, Donetsk, Dokuchaevsk, Horlivka, Yenakiieve (except suburbs - Uglegorsk) Zhdanivka, Kirovsk, Makiivka, Snizhne, Torez, Khartsyzk, Shakhtars'k and Zuhres, Yasinovataya. Also under control the rebels (DNR) all settlements in Amvrosiivka Raion, Starobesheve Raion, Shakhtarsk Raion , and villages Pionerske, Prymorske, Kominternove, Vodiane, Zaichenko, Shyrokyne, Berdianske, Pavlopil, Pishevik, Chernenko, and Lebedinskoye, Sopyne in Novoazovskiy district. In Lugansk region in this list the city of Luhansk, Alchevsk, Anthracite, Bryanka, Kirovsk, Krasnyi Luch, Krasnodon, Pervomais'k, Rovenki, Sverdlovsk and Stakhanov, and all settlements in Antratsyt Raion, Krasnodon Raion, Lutuhyne Raion, Perevalsk Raion Sverdlovsk Raion and Slovianoserbsk Raion Korrespondent UADaily UATelegraf.by Hanibal911 (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

East Ukraine conflict map & Pervomaisk?[edit]

Dear HCPUNXKID ,

There is so much propaganda and I don't know who is right or wrong about who controls what area in the East Ukraine conflict. But according to this New York Times article, it shows 3 pictures where the Ukrainian Dnieper 1 brigade is stationed in Pervomaisk. But I thought Pervomaisk is shown to be under rebel control in your uploaded map--or is this information coming from militarymaps which some people say may be a pro-Russian website. These are 3 NYT photos in Pervomaisk and they suggest that this settlement is under Ukrainian control--unless there is another place called Pervomaisk in East Ukraine. If not, maybe your map needs to be corrected as I don't think the NYT would lie here since their story portrays the Ukrainian army...in a very poor light. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Perhaps I am wrong since http://liveuamap.com/ also shows Pervomaisk settlement under rebel control but I doubt the NYT would make such a mistake--unless there is another Pervomaisk also in East Ukraine. The NYT article seems to follow the Ukrainian state defense maps. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear HCPUNXKID,

You are absolutely right. That Pervomaisk you mentioned must be the one next to Pisky. I guess in a big country like Ukraine, there would be settlements with similar sounding names everywhere. I guess then that the information from http://liveuamap.com/ is right also that the big city of Pervomaisk is under rebel or pro-Russian control. Thanks for your help here. Best Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:41, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaddafi abstract portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buxtehude (talk) 14:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haidarpamphlet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 21:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

donbas war map[edit]

Hello. I am messaging you and a couple others. Maybe this [2] should be updated? (Lilic (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

HCPUNXKID, I also agree with updating the map as the conflict has seen many recent changes. Lilic has also asked me to update it, however I know that you would be able to do a much better job. --Leftcry (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done--HCPUNXKID (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hasakah[edit]

You can update map Battle of Hasakah! Here new source:here and village Al-Dhiyabah also under control by Syrian troops.here Hanibal911 (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Syria map[edit]

I was blocked in Wikipedia because was accused that I am sock a Deonis 2012 which was earlier blocked. And now I can't edit this map Syrian Civil War detailed map But I remember that you are also edited this map earlier so maybe you can help me and update some villages to east from city Hasakah and mark these villages from ISIS control to as under control of Syrian troops and YPG. Source:here I'll be grateful to you. --Hanibal911 (talk) 09:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some one from editors add black semicircle near Tiyas crossroads in Homs province without reliable source which can confirm such actions. Please remove this semicircle. Also ISIS attcker Qaratyan in Homs province from east side but not south so I ask you fix this mistake. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Sorry, but these images are too new to be out of copyright. Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:JeuxAfricains.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JeuxAfricains.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:JeuxAfricains.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali wanted dead or dead.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artifariti2010 PaulaAlvarez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:El Uali.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:El Uali.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:El Uali.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Uali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-badr flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaddafi poster Ghadames.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaddafi leaflets poster Tripoli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]