User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2011 2

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Polyporus squamosus 2010 G4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polyporus squamosus 2010 G4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

File:TSV 1860 München (Wappen).png

Hi. Why did you here remove the warning about a deletion request, but not close the request itself? The request is still open. -- Cecil (talk) 07:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for notification and sorry for my mistake. All OK now. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:21, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viscum album section 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 20:55, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viscum album apple-tree 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. French caption added.--Jebulon 18:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S-3D cycle-car 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and very interesting too.--Jebulon 18:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VL80T-704 Locomotive 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice picture. I think, with crop in the top its better? --Ralf Roletschek 20:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC) It is composition with diagonal wire lines and some sky -- George Chernilevsky 21:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC) ok. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bernanke--500.jpg

I see that this image was deleted on grounds that the image is out of scope. (ref Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bernanke--500.jpg). I am an OTRS volunteer and we have received OTRS permission for this image. I do not have admin rights to see the image, so I was wondering whether it makes sense to restore the image. If the deletion reason is still valid, probably we need not restore the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I remember this deletion request.

The image has received strong manipulation. A modern photo (person face) has been placed instead of an original iconic portrait. After such updating this image has no EV and really far out of project scope.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. The OTRS ticket also covers File:Robert Mihaly.jpg. Can you check this image also for the scope and restore it if possible? --Sreejith K (talk) 13:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, restored. Please, add ORTS ticket and some info, category, etc. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:44, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
S-3D SMZ cycle-car.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Best representation of this model so far, imo. --MrPanyGoff 20:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:44, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viscum album (European Mistletoe), cross-section.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very useful and didactic. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Express train of Kiev 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ладно :-) --Carschten 20:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Ioann Vinnitsa 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Carschten 20:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Template:uk

Hello, and thanks for uploading all your fungi images. It seems though that the {{Uk}} language template is not yet working when used within another template like the information box. For some odd reason it does work as a standalone but erases a lot of unrelated content when used in the description field. I suggest you better not use it for a while. Regards, De728631 (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, Thank You for notification. With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mury fortress 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 00:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Voskresensky Vinn 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verry good --Böhringer 20:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Viscum album section 2011 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viscum album section 2011 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electric locomotive VL80.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

I like those two with stars on of which is this File:Электровоз ВЛ80К-172 с поездом.jpg. --Mile (talk) 22:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

 Comment noticed alternative show other locomotive modification (early K series), also not geocoded and watermarked -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I think narrowing scope to specific series makes scope far too narrow - 2 photos ? So i suggest normal scope "VL80", since that category exist. Otherwise your scope is not what you have stated (VL80T in VL80) so one must search all fotos where T is shown. --Mile (talk) 12:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

• It's quite funny, :)))) This one was me, yesterday I searched all the images for this T.--MrPanyGoff 14:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment For me scope is too narrow. Otherwise in scope VL80 there are some better candidates, should be panorama mode. --Mile (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Electric locomotive VL80T to Electric locomotive VL80

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Comment Very difficult. We have about 10 competitors of equal worth.--MrPanyGoff 17:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

• Show us. --Mile (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

• Only one can be geocoded.--MrPanyGoff 18:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

 Support - Finally I support this one as none of my top 5 choices can be geocoded.--MrPanyGoff 14:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mury fortress 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mury fortress 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 20:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2010 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Holleday 18:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerocomus chrysenteron 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Holleday 18:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

VIS Polyporus squamosus

Hallo, please have a look on your VIS. Shouldn't the scope be Polyporus squamosus (Dryad's saddle bracket fungi), i.e. additionally the scientific name? Greetings --Llez (talk) 22:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, fixed now. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Vinnitsa by night

Hello George !

Congratulations for your water tower, I like it very much !!--Jebulon (talk) 11:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Merci, mon ami! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Old Tower night winter 2011 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old Tower night winter 2011 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-200 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ED9M-0062 Train 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-044 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Despite the shadows at the right it's QI (and a valuable subject) -- MJJR 21:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mury fortress of Vinnytsya.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-042 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting--Jebulon 22:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Would like to see some kind of explanation

I saw your votes on FPC. Can you tell me why you think that the image is not featurable? --Niabot (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

St George's day

Hi George.

Today, 23 april, is the feast day of Saint George, in the french western calendar.

I would like to congratulate you for this !!

Then, my dear friend, have a nice Saint-George feast day !!--Jebulon (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Merci, mon ami! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

I also join in this initiative from Jebulon. Bonne Fête Georges! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks too! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for [1]. For some reason --~~~~ gives a plain username link on the QI page but the normal signature on VI... don't know why. /Lokal_Profil 13:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

However the problem isn't solved. The help from the User:Eusebius is necessary. He will appear after May, 9th. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ganoderma applanatum 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vinca minor 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Blocking

Hi George. Please unblock the other account ASAP. I have the right to use more than one account. There is no abuse and there will never be, both accounts do not engage in each other's activities. so you do not have the right to block that account. Regards. Biopics 15:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

BTW, you also blocked the IP address for Biopics. Biopics 15:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

OK, IP addresses unlocked --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cypraea tigris (Tiger cowry).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best and very detailed photo of a living specimen --Llez (talk) 12:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
• Which covers the shell is also an extension of the animal or is it a parasite? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

This is a part of animal -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

• Wow... I'm glad I learned here, Thanks George! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Vinca minor 2011 G2.jpg

Hi George, I reviewed your nice picture in QIC and put an alternative version in the file history. Let me know what you think. Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 06:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Quartl, I accepted your edition. Good result, thanks.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vinca minor 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is ok, but the image looks tilted to the right by 3-4 degrees. It would also benefit by a tighter crop to the left. See alternative in history. --Quartl 09:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Accepted. --Quartl 08:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House turret Vinn 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 20:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House turret Vinn 2006 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please correct perspective on the left --Mbdortmund 20:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)  Done Fixed -- George Chernilevsky 20:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Good quality now. --Mbdortmund 22:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry tree blossom 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Mia Petitbois IMG 2141.JPG as FPC

Hello,

I mistakenly nominated File:Mia Petitbois IMG 2141.JPG while two other of my images were already running as FPCs, so it got automatically rejected. Is it possible to re-nominate it, now that I have only one candidate ? If yes, do you know how I should proceed ?

Cheers ! Rama (talk) 09:48, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

You can make new nomination with a diffirent page name and link to same photo.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Rama (talk) 14:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

memorial page

Hi George Chernilevsky, thanks for adding the interwiki to the Russian memorial page. Could you kindly check whether one of the users on that page had edits/uploads on Commons? I can't do it by myself because I don't read cyrillic. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. Both users have no contributions on Commons, however they were active in Russian Wiki.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Georgij -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Account

Hello George, today I obtained a mail from your personal mail account. It contains a recommendation for a well-known spam site. It is known that operators of such sites sometimes hijack mail accounts. - Feel free to delete this message after reading. Best regards, Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I already know about this problem. This attack on an email server. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Good that you are aware of it. Let me know if you need the full message header. The source is a Chinese IP. --Iotatau (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Image of the day

Bravo George, for the image of the day --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Merci, mon ami! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacerta agilis male 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Crab of the day

Congratulations --Llez (talk) 15:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks :) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
YuMZ-6 tractor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Анабазис на фоне Северной Анголы.jpg and User:Владимир Чекмарев

Hi, how did you verify that the uploader is author of that book? do we have any permission from them in OTRS? please also check this, thank you.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  17:31, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Uploads by User:Владимир Чекмарев is NOT copyvio. User:Владимир is probably other login of same person. Владимир Чекмарев is the author of books.

With best regards -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes you mentioned that on the DR, but how do you know that they are not impersonating the author? this is something that should be verified through OTRS system, please ask them to send an email to OTRS so we could verify that they are really the author of those books and images, thank you.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  15:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

This user has uploaded lots of rare self portraits photos in the company with some the well-known Russian actors and politicians. Verification is not needed IMO.

Article about this person: ru:Чекмарев, Владимир Альбертович. In article used photo with the the Ambassador of Angola in Russia.

I will ask the user to create self user page only. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Oops, some files deleted... Could be undeleted now. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacerta agilis male 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Raftsundet_panorama_3,_2010_09.jpg

I'll start by stating that I'm not sure this is the correct place to leave the following comment. But, why was this photo promoted? I understood that the promoted version is the one with the road on the right. Thanks, --Tomer T (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Fixed manually. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cowenby 00:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cowenby 00:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cowenby 00:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2011 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Structures on the white petals very good visible --Llez 11:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2011 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality --Llez 11:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Equation in circle proved by the method of indivisibles.gif

Подскажите пожалуйста почему моя анимашка отказывается проигрыватся при масштабировании. При вставке в статью без изменения размера анимация воспроизводится как положено, а стоит изменить размер — вместо мультипликации неподвижный первый кадр. Например в этой категории почти все ролики проигрываются с изменённым размером, но некоторые (в том числе и мой) — замирают. Заранее спасибо. --Kaidor (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Понятия не имею, в чем проблема. Я никогда не делал анимированных картинок.

С уважением, Георгий. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

А вы не в курсе, кто из русскоязычных админов может в этом разбираться? --Kaidor (talk) 20:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Не знаю. Попробуйте поискать ответ за пределами Вики-проетков, в Интернете вообще с помощью Гугла -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Поищу конечно. Только тут, скорее всего, дело в Вики-движке, так что, сдаётся мне, поиски приведут обратно. Но в любом случае спасибо. --Kaidor (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)