User talk:Genium/Archive

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Genium!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File tagging File:Laclotte-salon.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Laclotte-salon.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Laclotte-salon.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

_→AzaToth 22:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, I've difficult to believe you took the photo 65 years ago; but if that's true, then please forgive me :) _→AzaToth 23:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

I didn't took this photo myself, please, I need your help here, English is not my native language. This is a family photo given to me by my mother, given to her by her grandmother Marcelle Boé (born Salon), and given to her after realized by her first cousin George Salon (the man who took the pic, he is dead in the late sixies), and René Salon was her brother, and her husband Clovis Boé was one of civilian shot at Laclotte. I am the only owner of the picture!! Do I have to send an email as suggested above? Again, sorry for my bad English! Thanks. (Genium (talk) 23:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC))

I just sent an email to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org to explain I am the legal owner of this photo. (Genium (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC))

That sounds good, I believe they are able to resovle this issue better than I am. _→AzaToth 23:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Inauguration 17 6 44 monument St Pierre.jpg

Bonjour, je me permets de vous contacter pour aider l'utilisateur Michel33, ce contributeur que je connais personnellement m'a contacté par email au sujet d'une photo supprimée qu'il avait lui-même publié (File:Inauguration 17 6 44 monument St Pierre.jpg). Je souhaiterais savoir si le titulaire unique et exclusif d'une œuvre peut la publier sur Commons en l'absence du nom de l'auteur avec mention D.R. (Droits Réservés), sous licence libre bien entendu, j'ai lu ça quelque part sur le web... Cette question m'interresse tout particulièrement car une photo que j'ai recemment publié a été supprimé pour les mêmes raisons. Cordialement. (Genium (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC))

Mettre une image sous mention "Droits Réservés" est assez contradictoire avec l'idée de licence libre. Dans ce cas, ces images ne sont pas utilisables sur Wikimedia Commons.--Bapti ✉ 16:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour la réponse. Je me permets de reformuler ma question car suite à la suppression du fichier "File:Laclotte-salon.png", ma mère n'est plus certaine que son auteur soit bien Georges Salon, bienqu'il qu'il ait été le seul membre de la famille à posseder un appareil photo. Et Michel33 semble être dans le même cas que moi. dans le doute sur l'identité de l'auteur, le titulaire unique et exclusif d'une œuvre a t'il d'autres options que celle d'attendre que la durée du droit d'auteur se termine, ce qui est en soit contradictoire en raison du doute sur l'identité de l'auteur. La photo "Laclotte-salon.png" a été prise en 1945 et j'en suis le titulaire exclusif. Et si je comprends bien, Michel33 est dans le même cas que moi pour la photo "Inauguration 17 6 44 monument St Pierre.jpg". Merci d'avance. (Genium (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC))

Si vous n'êtes pas l'auteur d'une image mais que vous ne savez pas qui est l'auteur, il n'est a priori pas possible de l'utiliser sur Wikimedia Commons tant qu'elle n'est pas tombée dans le domaine public. C'est effectivement embêtant (on appelle ça des œuvres orphelines) mais il n'y a aucune solution à ce problème vu la complexité des législations sur les droits d'auteurs.--Bapti ✉ 16:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Francis Lalanne.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Francis Lalanne.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Martin H. (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour, cette image est ume modification de la couverture du livre Révoltons-nous publié aux éditions ILV sous licence Art libre. J'ai fait la modification sous Gimp. On peut lire la notice suivante dans le livre : ... En application de la Licence Art Libre ou la Creative Commons BY-SA, il est autorisé de reproduire intégralement ou partiellement le présent ouvrage, sur quelque support que ce soit, tant qu’il est fait mention des auteurs, de l’éditeur et des présentes licences... La couverture faisant partie intégrante du livre, il n'y a pas de problème ici. (Genium (talk) 22:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC))

On est ici dans le même cas que pour l'image Richard Matthew Stallman cropped.jpeg, une modification de l'image de la couverture du livre Free as in Freedom.jpeg. (Genium (talk) 23:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC))

J'ai laissé un message sur la page de discussion de Martin. J'ai mis à jour les descriptions, etc... J'ai donc reverté sa contribution pour supprimer le bandeau. (Genium (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC))

Is the license applicable to the cover? The license is printed adjacent to the pdf. The pdf not includes the cover. Maybe for a good reason? --Martin H. (talk) 09:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes it is, the following notice appears in the paper version, too : reproduire intégralement ou partiellement le présent ouvrage. The paper version is licenced under the Free Art Licence, the same as the PDF version. The same way as the Stallman book that I talked above. (Genium (talk) 10:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC))

Category:Pseudonyms

Category:Pseudonyms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rhadamante (talk) 19:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Margaret Maud Mitchell

Category:Margaret Maud Mitchell is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: Meets Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#C3. An unuseful empty category. Its contents have all been deleted for copyright and other issues. Is parallel Wikipedia article has been deleted for similar reasons. As with other/similar categories, this category (together with the associated Wikidata) was created prematurely. Ideally we wouldn't create these "automatically". At least until the various projects have had a chance to determine whether they are warranted/appropriate/in-scope. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Guliolopez (talk) 02:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Herbert Sean Mitchell

Category:Herbert Sean Mitchell is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: Meets COM:SPEEDY#C3 as an unuseful empty category. The corresponding WP article was deleted as a non-notable family-history piece. The contents of this cat were largely deleted as out-of-scope/copyvio content. And the user who uploaded them blocked for repeated copyvio issues. Category is empty. And (more than) unuseful. Except as a reminder of why we have project policies. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Guliolopez (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)