User talk:GFreihalter/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Category discussion warning

Agilolfingerplatz 2-3 (München) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


195.200.70.38 06:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Mamhofen

Hallo GFreihalter,

ich bin z. Zt. dabei, mir Material für einen geschichtlichen Ausbau der Seite "Mamhofen" zusammenzusuchen. Nun sah ich eben bei Commons, dass Du das Gut letzte Woche besucht hast. Kannst Du mir bitte mitteilen, ob Du einen Artikel über St. Jakob und Philipp planst? Dann würde ich mich bei der Kirche auf einige notwendige Eckdaten beschränken. Der Rest wäre in Deinen fachkundigen Händen sicher besser aufgehoben.

Danke und beste Grüsse --I. Berger (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Hallo I. Berger,

leider habe ich außer Dehio (Bayern IV) keine weitere Literatur. Die Kirche war nicht zu besichtigen und ich konnte keine Innenaufnahmen machen, deshalb habe ich zur Zeit keinen Artikel zu St. Jakob und Philipp in meiner Planung. Viele Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Nachricht. Das ist schade - aber ich weiß, das ist da etwas kompliziert. Man muß zuvor bei der Verwaltung anrufen. Falls Du es jemals planen solltest, bitte melden. Ich kann dann gerne aus der Starnberger Stadtgeschichte, Band 4, "Ein Stück vom Himmel" die entsprechenden Seiten einscannen. Schönes Wochenende --I. Berger (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:München-Moosach Dachauer Straße 275–287 910.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:München-Moosach Dachauer Straße 275–287 910.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo GFreihalter, bitte beachten, die nicht ganz kleine Kategorie ist bisher nach der angezeigten Zeit der jeweiligen Uhr ziemlich duchgängig geordnet/sortiert. Viele Grüße --DALIBRI (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo DALIBRI, diese Sortierung halte ich nicht für sinnvoll, wie sollen denn neue Fotos darin einsortiert werden? Üblicherweise erfolgt die Sortierung doch alphabetisch, d.h. nach dem Ort des fotografierten Objekts. Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 15:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo GFreihalter, im Normalfall kann man von den Uhrenbildern in dieser Kategorie die Tageszeit ablesen. Bisher habe ich die angezeigte Zeit zwecks Sortierung als Zahl von 0000 bis 1200 bei den Bilder hinterlegt. Ich würde das gerne beibehalten. Viele Grüße --DALIBRI (talk) 05:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
File:München-Schwabing Christian Hierneis 903.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sadads (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Köln St.Kunibert569.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Frauenberg(Euskirchen) St.Georg161.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus191.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Longpont-sur-Orge Affiche 509.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bopfingen St. Blasius 460.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Odenthal St.Pankratius 27Gf.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Odenthal St.Pankratius28.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Odenthal St.Pankratius29.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus650.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 14:59, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus649.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Bensberg(Bergisch-Gladbach)St.Nikolaus190.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019


Hallo GFreihalter,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

St. Silvester in Hausen

Hallo GFreihalter, ich habe in Deinem Foto von der Hausener Kirche die Perspektive korrigiert und nehme an, dass Du einverstanden bist. Wenn nicht, bitte auf die vorige Version zurücksetzen. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Pumpwerk Pasing

Sehr geehrter Herr Freihalter. "Fragerei" Sie zeigen einige Fotos des Areals an der Planegger Straße 150, das ehemalige Pumpwerk Pasing. Frage 1. Haben sie zur Begehung des Grundstücks einen extra Termin mit den Wasserwerken München vereinbart, oder konnten sie direkt vor Ort nach Rückfrage das Areal betreten? Frage 2. Sie zeigen in der Bildergalerie zum Pumpwerk auch einen Brunnen, haben sie zufällig auch die Plakette am unteren Rand des Brunnens ablesen können, und sich den Text irgendwie notiert? bzw. wissen sie um welchen Brunnen es sich hier handelt? Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Hallo User:Fentriss! Ich habe vor Ort um Erlaubnis gefragt, dort fotografieren zu dürfen. Zum Brunnen auf dem Gelände habe ich keine weiteren Informationen. Auf meinen Fotos kann ich entziffern: "Herrn Hermann ?????? zur Fertigstellung der Betriebsaußenstelle im Juni 1907 (?)". Mit freundlichen Grüßen--GFreihalter (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Danke für die schnelle Antwort und die enthaltenen Informationen. Der Brunnen ist von besonderem Interesse, da ich noch nach einem verschollenen Kustermann Brunnenständer suche, der einst nahe Maria Einsiedel, an/vor der Mühle stand, an der Benediktbeuerer Straße, bis 198x. Wenn aber an dem Schildchen das Jahr 1907 steht, kann es dieser gesuchte fast nicht sein. Zu dem "Pumpwerk Pasing", Max Megele nennt es Pumpwerk, er notiert im Jahr 1956 folgendes; Pumpwerk Pasing, Planegger Straße 42. Auf dem Gelände des Pumpwerks wurde 1920 ein Materialschuppen und die Trafostation errichtet. 1924 entstand das Gebäude des Pumpwerkes und 1928 die Garage, Entwurf, Josef Lang. Quelle; (110 C 7, in der Lokalbaukomission München, Baulinien- und Bebauungspläne, Hochbau- und Entwässerungsakten..)
Oh, und danke für die Fotos. Das Areal dort sah schon immer so interessant aus, hatte aber irgendwie nie die Möglichkeit direkt am Gebäude zu stehen. Wirklich prima!. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Auf der Denkmalliste steht Wasserwerk Pasing, D-1-62-000-5384 Planegger Straße 150. Wasserwerk Pasing, ein- und zweigeschossiger Dreiflügelbau mit Walmdach um runde Brunnenanlage, mit Stuckdekor, von Josef Lang, 1919-21 Grüße --GFreihalter (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC).

Image corruption detected in File:Heiligkreuztal Münster St. Anna Fresko 378.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:Heiligkreuztal Münster St. Anna Fresko 378.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-20T16:49:14Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 16:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Heiligkreuztal Münster St. Anna Kerker-Christi-Altar 377.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:Heiligkreuztal Münster St. Anna Kerker-Christi-Altar 377.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-20T19:00:56Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Heiligkreuztal Kloster Äbtissinnengebäude 361.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:Heiligkreuztal Kloster Äbtissinnengebäude 361.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-22T16:39:07Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 16:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Heiligkreuztal Kloster 496.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:Heiligkreuztal Kloster 496.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-22T17:23:30Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Heiligkreuztal Kloster 500.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:Heiligkreuztal Kloster 500.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-22T17:23:34Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 17:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:München-Pasing Planegger Straße 27 588.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:München-Pasing Planegger Straße 27 588.jpg which you uploaded 2020-01-27T22:44:35Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:München-Moosach SC Amicitia 920.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:München-Moosach SC Amicitia 920.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Bilder aus der Serie 'Plozévet Chapelle de la Trinité NNN.jpg' vom Mai 2019

Hallo GFreihalter, beim Abgleich einiger alter Bretagne-Urlaubsbilder von 2012 bin ich auf eine Diskrepanz bei den Bilden der Kategorie 'Chapelle_de_la_Trinité_de_Plozévet' gestossen. Unter den Bildern der Chapelle (mit kleinem Turm über der Vierung) fanden sich einige Bilder Deiner Serie 'Plozévet Chapelle de la Trinité NNN.jpg'. Es stellte sich heraus, das diese Bilder zur Kategorie 'Église_Saint-Demet_de_Plozévet' (mit hohem Westturm) gehören. Die Bilder der Aussenansichten habe ich neu kategorisiert, bei einigen Detailansichten konnte ich es mangels (eigener) Vergleichsbilder nicht sicher beurteilen - auch wenn der Serienname dafür spricht. Nebst der Kontrolle der weiteren Bilder der Serie wäre es natürlich auch sinnvoll, einen Antrag auf Namenskorrektur zu stellen. Dies möchte ich jedoch nicht über Deinen Kopf hinweg veranlassen. (Selber benötige ich jetzt nur mehr jemanden, der mir ein paar Bilder einer Kirche mit einer Galerie um den Turm in 24 Minuten Entfernung zur obigen Chapelle zuzuordnen weiss ;-)) Grüße, --PtrQs (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Danke, da ist mir offensichtlich ein Fehler unterlaufen. Die Fotos gehören zur Category:Église Saint-Demet de Plozévet, ich habe Kategorie und Filename korrigiert. Freundliche Grüße--GFreihalter (talk) 10:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Weißendorf (Oberdolling) St. Margareta Johannes Baptist 990.jpg

Deutsch | English | +/−


Information icon
Hello GFreihalter, it appears that the version of File:Weißendorf (Oberdolling) St. Margareta Johannes Baptist 990.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-04T22:44:52Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 11:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Pasing - Am Stadtpark 53 - niemand dort?

Hallo GFreihalter. Habe gesehen, daß sie das Gebäude so wunderbar eingefangen haben. Steht denn das Anwesen momentan leer? Es wirkt so verlassen. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Die Villa steht zur Zeit leer (siehe Süddeutsche Zeitung vom 27. Dezember 2019: Neue Büros in alter Villa). Grüße --GFreihalter (talk) 16:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Gut zu erfahren, so kann man noch ungestört fotografieren. Danke. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Hohenwart St. Georg Deckenmalerei 400.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Hohenwart St. Georg Deckenmalerei 401.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)