User talk:Fred Hsu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Zebrasoma flavescens taxo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please use existing pages/categories. For example Zebrasoma flavescens.

EugeneZelenko 15:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am still trying to figure out how to add it under the right page/category. I was using the Zebrasoma_flavescens.JPG page template, but it's probably not quite right either. I see the right way now. More images uploaded/fixed. Fredhsu 16:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Disney_Grand_Floridian_Resort_3.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 04:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. I no longer know whether to use a 'License' section or add license information in the Information template. Perhaps both are required now. So that's what I'll do from now on. Fredhsu 23:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Disney_Animal_Kingdom_Rainforest_Cafe_2.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 00:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. I wish the Licensing field at the upload page were sticky. Fredhsu 00:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caneel Bay gulls[edit]

Hi Fred - your gulls are Laughing Gulls, can you put them in Category:Leucophaeus atricilla, please! - thanks, MPF (talk) 15:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's great. Will do. Thanks! Fredhsu (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm working on an ident for File:Caneel Bay Bird 1.jpg too - MPF (talk) 15:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Got it - a Pearly-eyed Thrasher. I've put it in Category:Margarops fuscatus - MPF (talk) 15:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! Thanks for moving it. Fredhsu (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tilt[edit]

Hello,

I corrected the tilt on both images: File:Caneel Bay Turtle Bay Beach 4 edit.jpg and File:Caneel Bay Sunset at Scott Beach 1 edit.jpg. In fact it was not important, only 0.5 and 0.6 degree respectively. Best regards, Yann (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for helping. I tried that myself on my computer myself already. But don't you think a 100%-correct horizon actually causes an visual illusion of tilting? I think this is caused by the diagonal shoreline. Perhaps it is just me, but to my eyes, a 100%-correct, textbook horizon lines looks crooked because of the illusion :( I am now really confused as to how I should proceed. Fredhsu (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected both images, in place, just like you did in the *_edit versions. For File:Caneel_Bay_Turtle_Bay_Beach_4.jpg, I uploaded a new version. For File:Caneel Bay Sunset at Scott Beach 1.jpg, I simply reverted it to a version I uploaded last night which was 100% straight. Thanks! Fredhsu (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caneel Bay Turtle Bay Beach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Thomas Marriott Iguana 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Romanceor 13:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Fred Hsu!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 13:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. It's done. Fredhsu (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:California Sea Lion Zalophus californianus at Bronx Zoo 2 cropped.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Resolved. Thanks. Fredhsu (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consolidating all accounts[edit]

Ongoing: [1]. All accounts: [2]. Next step: Unified Login


File:Taiwan_2009_Taipei_Billboard_Featuring_Zhang_ZiYi_Across_From_Pacific_Sogo_ZhongXiao_Store_FRD_9045.jpg[edit]

File:Taiwan_2009_Taipei_Billboard_Featuring_Zhang_ZiYi_Across_From_Pacific_Sogo_ZhongXiao_Store_FRD_9045.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

78.55.160.216 07:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 East Coast ShihTiPing Giant Stone Steps Fishing FRD 6627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good shot for me. Impressive.--Jebulon 22:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 East Coast ShihTiPing Giant Stone Steps Algae FRD 6581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Elekhh 23:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Taipei Fire Drill FRD 7249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments super work --Carschten 14:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Taipei National Theater at Chian Kai Shek Cultural Center FRD 7291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ikar.us 17:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Tainan City Organic Farm Watermelon FRD 7962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good work--Kuvaly 18:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Tainan City Organic Farm Bitter Gourd FRD 7956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It lacks only the fruit size in the image description. QI and useful for me -- Archaeodontosaurus 18:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)  Support--Kuvaly 14:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 HuaLien City JingSi Hall FRD 8410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 GuangFu Sugar Factory Historical Train Exhibition RD 6173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting photo --Pudelek 12:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Taipei Liberty Plaza Gateway at Chian Kai Shek Cultural Center FRD 7312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 22:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure you know but...:)[edit]

You can always upload a crop of teh bird under another name and leave the original intact. It is a nice image. Regards --Herby talk thyme 15:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do :) In fact, File:Caneel Bay Bird 1 B.jpg is already a cropped version of File:Caneel Bay Bird 1.jpg. Don't worry about it. Not every single image needs to be QI. Not all images I submit for consideration are my best images in terms of composition or value. I care very much about composition as you may already guess from my review comments on other's pictures. But I try not to impose the same level of scrutiny on other's images as I I apply to my own pictures, in terms of composition, since QI is not all about composition.
I will probably crop it further for use as thumbnail on Wikipedia articles though, as I've done with some of my Bronx Zoo images. Fred Hsu (talk) 03:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western Lowland Gorilla at Bronx Zoo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful picture, QI For me The only criticism I can make this images is that the background is either too blurry or not enough --Croucrou 08:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Taipei National Concert Hall at Chian Kai Shek Cultural Center FRD 7364 Pano Extracted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp & beautiful --Croucrou 18:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 Taipei National Theater at Chian Kai Shek Cultural Center FRD 7293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautful QI for me --Croucrou 18:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arabo-Spanish mosaics[edit]

Hello my friend ! Many thanks for your very interesting comments on my images ! You are very often completely right in your judgement. I've loaded a new version of my arabo-spanish mosaics... Do you think it's enough for you supporting now ? Happy to know you and to benefit of your nice pictures ! friendly from Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I'll take a look now. Fred Hsu (talk) 20:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm back ! Ô Grand-Master of the Noise Reduction Order ! I understood what you mean with my horse. And with my organ too. Not with my mosaïcs at all. Would you please have a look ? (Maybe could you comment here or on my talk page, because of the frame of the vote-columns in the QIC page...) Many thanks, my friend !--Jebulon (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The candidate page doesn't give one enough space for decent comment :) My friend, I mean that in almost all your images, you seem to consistently apply very strong sharpening (organ, landscape, etc). In some pictures, you seem to apply strong noise reduction as well, when you don't really need to (for instance, the horse).
The Mosaic, however, was an exception. You did not apply any thing at all, as far as I can see. I commented that you should apply a little bit of sharpening, because this picture is great and is amenable to sharpening, because there is no blur due to motion, etc. You only need to apply a little bit, not full strength. What program do you use to touch pictures? How do you select the "strength"?
By the way, I ask for your forgiveness before I say this. I think your picture-taking skills and the time you obviously devote to this craft far exceed the limits of your camera. You should get a better camera with good sensor. Then almost every one of your pictures will be QI. I cut my teeth long long time ago on a second-hand Category:Canon AE-1 Program. My first digital camera was Sony F505. It was great, but obviously sucked compared to SLR. I've subsequently used a few 'prosumer' cameras and pocket-size cameras for convenience. I managed to take some good pictures, based on knowledge learned from SLR. But none of these can ever make it to QI. Check out File:View from Corona Heights 1.jpg, File:Sutro Baths Sunset.jpg, File:Architecture at Atlantis 7.jpg, and File:San Francisco Cable Car Racing Lexus up Nob Hill.jpg.
It wasn't until last year that I decided to pick up a real camera again. I bought Category:Nikon D700 and rediscovered the joy of photography. The camera does (almost) what I want it to do without me having to wrestle with it. The majority of my pictures are still junk. But I do manage to find a few presentable for QI consideration now. Fred Hsu (talk) 01:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Send me the original files for the horse and the mosaic. Let me take a look to see if I can suggest changes. Fred Hsu (talk) 01:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mushroom Säppi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ithink is good enough -Avenue 10:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LadyofHats said that,[3] not me (although I agree). JavaScript issue? --Avenue 11:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Support--Kuvaly 13:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 JinGuaShi Historic Gold Mine Abandoned Trail Giant Taro Elephant Ear Taro FRD 8760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments beautiful composition, very sharp on the first leaf --Croucrou 18:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Support--Kuvaly 13:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 CingShui Cliffs on SuHua Highway FRD 6762 Pano Extracted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, high quality, useful. --Avenue 08:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taiwan 2009 HuaLien City CiSingTan Bay First Light FRD 8235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:St_Thomas_Marriott_Iguana_9.jpg[edit]

File:St_Thomas_Marriott_Iguana_9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

109.93.252.243 15:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date format[edit]

Hi Fred, I noticed that you add the dates of your images in the yyyy-m-d format (e.g. 2011-7-1). The standard date format here is the ISO format yyyy-mm-dd (e.g. 2011-07-01), which is understood by the Mediawiki software, which will then display it in the date format according to the user's preferences (e.g. 1. Juli 2011 for German users). Maybe you can consider these in future uploads. Thanks! -- H005 09:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! That explains why my image pages do not show linkable dates. I will find a wiki gadget somewhere to change all images in one shot. Thanks! Fred Hsu (talk) 13:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohonk Mountain House 2011 Fishing Gazebo FRD 3056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition --Mbdortmund 03:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohonk Mountain House 2011 Boat Dock Against Guest Rooms FRD 3041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 00:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohonk Mountain House 2011 Boat Dock Against Reflection of Cliff FRD 3029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 00:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US Virgin Islands National Park Photos[edit]

Hi Fred,

I'm working on a guidebook to the national parks and I'd like to use your photos available at Wikimedia? If that's alright with you, how would you like to be attributed?

This is a one-man operation. I plan on self-publishing, print and electronic versions (DRM protected) for sale. More information is available at my website: www.stoneroadpress.com

Thank you,

Michael Oswald

File:Manhasset Bay Yacht Club 2010 FRD SNC16946.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Manhasset Bay Yacht Club 2010 FRD SNC16839.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Stereogram Tut Eye Convergence.png, etc.[edit]

Could we get File:Stereogram Tut Eye Convergence.png and similar files redone with the lines of sight slightly thicker? It is difficult to see them, especially if the image is displayed at a smaller width (at 220px I can barely see them). Hyacinth (talk) 10:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been away from Wiki lately. You are right about these lines being too feeble. I'll find the original image (it was not a jpg) and make corrections when I have a chance. I painted this one in 2005; no one had a smartphone on which they could read Wikipedia articles on 8 years ago :) Fred Hsu (talk) 16:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for permission to use image[edit]

Dear Fred, I'm a publisher from Namibia. I would like to use your image of a watermelon in our Natural Science and Health Education textbook for Grade 6 Learners. I kindly ask for your permission to use this image in our publication. I would be happy to attribute the image to yourself in the Acknowledgement section of the book. Please contact me via email: malimap@nph.com.na for more information. I look forward to hearing from you. Warm regards, Patrycja

File:2017 Sarasota Folks Enjoying Sunset at Siesta Beach on Siesta Key 02 FRD 9721.jpg[edit]

File:2017 Sarasota Folks Enjoying Sunset at Siesta Beach on Siesta Key 02 FRD 9721.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taiwan 2009 JinGuaShi Historic Gold Mine Abadoned Railway Tracks FRD 8753.jpg[edit]

File:Taiwan 2009 JinGuaShi Historic Gold Mine Abadoned Railway Tracks FRD 8753.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Kai3952 (talk) 15:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Photo Forbidden City[edit]

Hello, I just want to inform you that I have used your good photo in my video/ vlog. I make vlog as a hobby. You can watch in youtube mFRbH9breNk Thank you kindly for sharing your photo.

Best Regards, S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 10:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, that's cool :) I watched your video. It's great. Fred Hsu (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Imperial Chinese Architecture Style[edit]

I noticed you created a category called "Imperial Chinese Architecture Style", but I can't find it on wikipedia, and was wondering if the term has a specific definition? How is it different from "Chinese architecture"?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fred Hsu: Hello, are you there? If you don't respond, I'll bring the issue to COM:CFD.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I was on vacation. I don't immediately recall how or why. Let me dig a bit deeper before coming back. Fred Hsu (talk) 00:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, @Kai3952: . You don't need to dig too deep. Just look at my edit history on both Wikimedia and on Wikipedia on the same day (aka March 1st, 2010) to see where this came from. So go here on Wikimedia Commons and here on English Wikipedia. See this diff where a picture was added to Chinese architecture in the "Imperial" section. The commit comment indicated "Imperial" as well. I'll add a link from the category page to the Wikipedia page for now, before the community thinks of a better way to improve this. Thanks for prompting me. I've been away from Wikidom for a while :) Fred Hsu (talk) 00:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This answer is not good for me. I know its architectural features include glazed tiles, but not enough to distinguish the Imperial Chinese Architecture Style from Chinese architecture. If you know all its architectural elements, you can add a description to the category. Now, I have created "Category:Imperial Chinese architecture in Taiwan".--Kai3952 (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @Kai3952: . You are making the world better. Please continue to raise the bar and prod everyone to march forward. Much appreciated. Fred Hsu (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 04:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:NorCal2018 Artesa Vineyards Winery Napa Valley S0072009.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:NorCal2018 Artesa Vineyards Winery Napa Valley S0072009.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: That sculpture was created in 1999 by Gordon Heuther. It remains copyrighted.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 20:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missvain - thanks for deleting it. I am very sorry you had to do the detective work for licensing issues. Much appreciated. Fred Hsu (talk) 00:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taiwan 2009 JinGuaShi Historic Gold Mine Valley View Left Page FRD 8822 Giant Statue of GuanYu.jpg[edit]

File:Taiwan 2009 JinGuaShi Historic Gold Mine Valley View Left Page FRD 8822 Giant Statue of GuanYu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:1E1E:A9CD:AA26:9EB0:A512.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fred_Hsu&oldid=734251886"