User talk:Fale/1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Benvenuto/a su Wikimedia Commons, Fale/1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Guida ai primi passi

La Guida ai primi passi e le FAQ ti aiuteranno molto dopo la registrazione. Spiegano come personalizzare l'interfaccia (per esempio la lingua), come caricare file e le norme sulle licenze. Qui non c'è bisogno di abilità tecniche per contribuire. Sii intraprendente nel contribuire e presumi la buonafede nelle azioni altrui. Questo è wiki — è molto semplice.

Ricevere aiuto

Maggiori informazioni sono disponibili nel Portale Comunità. Puoi rivolgere domande al Bar italiano o sul canale IRC #wikimedia-commons. Inoltre puoi contattare un amministratore sulla loro pagina di discussione. Se hai una domanda specifica sul copyright, chiedi (in inglese) qui.

Consigli e suggerimenti
  • Inserisci la tabella Babel nella tua pagina utente così che gli altri possano sapere in quali lingue possono comunicare con te e indica le tue capacità grafiche.
  • Tutti i file che hai caricato sono conservati nella tua galleria personale
  • Per favore firma gli interventi nelle pagine di discussione inserendo ~~~~
  • Usa il CommonSense tool per cercare categorie adatte per i tuoi file.
  • Per creare un link a una pagina di immagine, scrivi questo: [[:Image:Ponte_vecchio.jpg]], che darà come risultato: Image:Ponte_vecchio.jpg
  • Se stai copiando dei file da altri progetti, usa il CommonsHelper
Hai commesso un errore?
  • Vuoi rinominare o spostare un file? Carica nuovamente il file e nel vecchio inserisci questo: {{bad name|Nome corretto}}
  • Per maggiori informazioni leggi i criteri per la cancellazione.
(P.S. vuoi discutere di questo template?)

--Kimse (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Putting abstract symbols in a category "Sex drawings" is not very useful, since these are not drawings of sex in any very meaningful sense... AnonMoos 07:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you think that the images in Category:BDSM symbols should be further categorized, the accepted way to do this is to add the new superordinate classification to the Category:BDSM symbols page itself -- not to each individual image in the Category:BDSM symbols category... AnonMoos 07:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 87a75095ca77d9442d42de20569b5fc1[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Problemi con l'immagine: Image:Martinoni.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

messaggio d'avviso
Questo file potrebbe venire cancellato.

Grazie per aver caricato Image:Martinoni.jpg. Questa immagine non ha le informazioni sui permessi. E' stata fornita una fonte, ma non c'è una prova valida che indichi che l'autore o il detentore del copyright acconsente di rilasciare il file sotto la licenza che hai scelto. Per favore, fornisci un link ad una pagina con le informazioni sulla licenza o manda un'email con una copia del permesso scritto a OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Se le informazioni sul permesso non sono fornite, l'immagine potrebbe essere cancellata dopo sette giorni. Grazie. Kimse (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fabio Valenti.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Kimse (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:014prsp-.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:014prsp-.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Kimse (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problemi con l'immagine: Image:021pzastaziocr-.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

messaggio d'avviso
Questo file potrebbe venire cancellato.

Grazie per aver caricato Image:021pzastaziocr-.jpg. Questa immagine non ha le informazioni sui permessi. E' stata fornita una fonte, ma non c'è una prova valida che indichi che l'autore o il detentore del copyright acconsente di rilasciare il file sotto la licenza che hai scelto. Per favore, fornisci un link ad una pagina con le informazioni sulla licenza o manda un'email con una copia del permesso scritto a OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Se le informazioni sul permesso non sono fornite, l'immagine potrebbe essere cancellata dopo sette giorni. Grazie. Kimse (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Genoa 1893.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Genoa 1893.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:153334113 e86cbbd819.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 01:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:54mwx2s.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Cecil (talk) 05:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:BignardiDaria.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Cecil (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:BignardiD.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-Cecil (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning File:Fale_Lago_Garda_11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Erik Baas (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning File:Fale_Lago_Garda_12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Erik Baas (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning File:Fale_Lago_Garda_33.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Erik Baas (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image descriptions[edit]

Hi Fabio,
thanks for uploading images. But you should provide meaningful descriptions to every image you upload; for example, writing only "city of London" as description for File:Fale London 103.jpg is not really helpful.
In addition, it would be nice if you could upload your images already in the correct orientation (the freeware program IrfanView can rotate images without loss). Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't write your user name in each title. - Erik Baas (talk) 15:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning File:Fale Lago Maggiore 19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:20, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

per favore, un po' di attenzione[edit]

Per favore, un po' di attenzione, quando carichi le foto,. Non puoi caricare cento foto del lago maggiore senza indicare di che località si tratti. Dovresti per cortesia ripassare e indicare le località in cui le hai scattate, per lo meno quelle che non sono riuscito a riconoscere io. Tu sai dove eri, ma chi vede le foto, no..

Inoltre hai inserito la Rocchetta del castello sforzesco di Milano come se fosse la Corte ducale, e il Duomo di Milano con l'indicazione "Castello sforzesco". Qui ho già corretto io, ma se il lavoro fosse fatto bene fin dall'inizio, si risparmierebbe il doppio lavoro poi. Ciao.

PS non caricare dieci scatti identici della stessa immagine. Tanto verranno cancellati come "duplicati". Cerca di variare l'inquadratura, almeno un poco. Grazie. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Lapidedimebag.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lapidedimebag.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lapidedimebag.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Mappa_ursino_castle_catania.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mappa_ursino_castle_catania.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mappa_ursino_castle_catania.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:BignardiDaria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Denniss (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:File-Immagine_Alicia_Keys.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:File-Immagine_Alicia_Keys.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:File-Immagine_Alicia_Keys.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 06:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:Edizione straordinaria arresto di Del Turco.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Ferengi (talk) 08:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Corda Vibrante 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Corno - estensione.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Headbg blu.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Diagramma prevalenza diabete e obesità.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Esempio rasterizzazione poligono flood fill 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:M-theory2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:06, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


take care of image orientation[edit]

Hi Fale,
could you take care of the correct upright orientation of the images you upload? That's fairly easy with freeware programs such as IrfanView. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno why, but on my pc they result right oriented. - in many graphic programs you can set the View function so that the program automatically recognizes the correct orientation of an image and shows it correctly on screen without actually changing the real orientation of the image. You should switch-off that function in your graphic program when preparing files for upload to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

take care of description and categorisation[edit]

Hi Fale,
could you take care of the correct description and categorisation of your files? I noticed you uploaded tons of files, describing and categorizing them all merely by "Munich" whether it was the concentration cam in Dachau or the Castle Neuschwanstein. And please, select your images before uploading. Having 10 times the same motive seen from the same angle and the same zoom is not useful for the purposes of Commons. --Bjs (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Fale. Nella categoria Trentino-South Tyrol hai caricato molte foto interessanti, ma che non sono di alcuna utilità per nessuno poiché non le hai descritte né categorizzate correttamente. A tutte hai messo come descrizione "My trip in 2003 to Trentino Alto Adige, Italy / Viaggio fatto da me nel 2003 in Trentino Alto Adige, Italia". Questa è una descrizione talmente generica che non serve proprio a nessuno, perché non si sa CHE COSA rappresenta quell'immagine e DOVE si trovano quei posti. Sarebbe oltremodo opportuno che tu ti sforzassi a mettere in descrizione di che città o comune si tratta, e che monumento o località è rappresentata nell'immagine. Assegna poi la corrispondente categoria del Comune e della Provincia di appartenenza. Se dovessi avere problemi, fammelo sapere e sarò felice di aiutarti. Grazie, e buon lavoro! --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Cartoline_(5).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trixt (talk) 11:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Freeware software[edit]

Why you marked screenshots of freeware software with more than 10 years as copiright violation?

You have reason, it have copyright but what about [1]? is the same screenshot used in english wikipedia. I uploaded the images because I can't use the english wikipedia image in spanish wikipedia. --Kizar (talk) 14:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) --Kizar (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Guitarheroavatar.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Guitarheroavatar.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 17:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fale F1 Monza 2004 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good IMO. --Cayambe 19:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fale - Barcellona - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would indeed benefit from a crop, but already good enough as such IMO. --Cayambe 15:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of Arms of Milan (italy).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Deleting some of your photos[edit]

Dear Fale, I have nominated some of your files for speedy deletion, but not as many as I should have done! Why do you upload so many almost identical pictures of each subject? I have noticed, for instance, in Category:Files by Fale, that you have 17 shots of one plant (File:Fale - Giardini Botanici Hanbury in Ventimiglia - 121.jpg plus files numbered 122–138) that are only very slightly different from each other – they are not even bracketed exposures or different compositions! And not one of them is properly in focus, or correctly exposed! Wikipedia is not here to store the complete contents of your camera's memory. You have some very nice pictures here, but there are also a lot of duplicates that are wasting enormous amounts of storage space. Please be more selective and only upload one file of each subject, unless there are important differences between the exposures! Many thanks. SiGarb (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where was the discussion? SiGarb (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a record of the discussion? What "some guys" suggested isn't necessarily always correct! Commons is meant to be a permanent repository for useful images that can be accessed by wiki users to put into the pages of wiki projects. Why would anyone need 17 almost identical out-of-focus pictures of an unidentified plant? If you can't identify it, and it's not in focus, and it's not remarkable in any other way, please leave it in the camera, or on your own hard drive. Trying to identify images on Commons is a time-consuming process. It takes long enough to identify one unidentified image, let alone 17! Please be more considerate. As I said, some of your photos are really good: please just upload one file of any image that you think is really worthwhile. Many thanks. SiGarb (talk) 16:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I expect they have probably been removed from Speedy because they are not exact duplicates of each other, and therefore should perhaps have been marked for deletion after discussion; but I think they are still surplus to any sensible requirements. Can you suggest why they should be kept? Are any of them used on Wikipedia pages, or elsewhere? SiGarb (talk) 19:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(This message also posted at Category:Files by Fale). Hello again Fale. Following advice from a few admins, I have nominated a whole raft of your images for deletion, as per our earlier discussions. The full list is available at: Commons:Deletion requests/Some images by Fale. Please believe me, there is nothing personal about this, it's not a vendetta. I will try to make sure that the best (so far as I can tell) of each set of images remains unmarked and therefore will remain available to be used in any wiki projects. Please keep uploading your great images (just not 5–10 versions of the same shot!). Best wishes, SiGarb (talk) 09:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if you agree that some of your images are surplus to requirements, you can nominate them yourself. They will then be deleted more quickly, more easily and without wasting anyone else's time. It would be best for you to go through your gallery yourself and decide which images are worth keeping (and you probably know which ones have already been used somewhere). Then you can just use {{speedy|author request}} – add that to the top of the file info, with your reason for deletion, and it should soon be dealt with. SiGarb (talk) 11:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carpobrotus edulis (Villa Hanbury, Italy) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Request Full ID of plant need (Binominal latina) --George Chernilevsky 10:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Carpobrotus edulis, now in the description too ;)Fale 10:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Support very good now ;) --George Chernilevsky 10:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Città di Milano.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 10:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Borgiallo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 18:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Avio.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 18:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Ailoche.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 18:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Città di Ferrara.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 14:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Città di Napoli.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 14:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fale - Barcellona - 282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It has a slight CW tilt, see the features of the building in the background.Andrei Stroe 08:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneNow should be fine :) Fale 21:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)  SupportLooks good to me.--Korall 14:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Conegliano.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 99of9 23:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Città di Bari.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 99of9 23:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fale - Barcellona - 194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now. --Cayambe 11:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images in the category Barcelona[edit]

Hi Fale, I’ve seen, that you added a lot of pictures to the Category:Barcelona, which is over-crowded now. It would great, if You could help to move them to more specific sub-categories. If You need any help on categorizing on Wikimedia Commons You can check the page Commons:Categories. PS: How is this wild west setting called and where is it located exactly? Thanks & greetings --Gepardenforellenfischer (talk) 16:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fale. Those images are very very similar: File:Fale - Barcellona - 343.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 344.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 345.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 346.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 347.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 348.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 349.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 350.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 351.jpg, File:Fale - Barcellona - 352.jpg and File:Fale - Barcellona - 352.jpg. There are some other groups ot photos very similar at Category:Barcelona (e.g. some showing a dove). Is there any reason why there must be retained all of them, if they are approximately identical? I was thinking of tagging the redundant ones for deletion... -Aleator (talk) 01:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fale - Capo Mimosa - 310709 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --Cayambe 10:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Angrogna.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Do we have to review any single variation over already promoted content? There is nothing significantly new in such a file from the other files you have submitted. Is it just a file count issue for you? I'd rather evaluate individual heraldic charges. --Eusebius 22:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The ones that are all variations on a theme are very easy to evaluate though. However, in this particular case it would be worth checking the font of the A - where is the original? 99of9 23:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I created it myself. --Fale 23:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The original one is cmr10 --Fale 23:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your answer. What I'm hoping to check is the font of the letter A. Is there a recognized image that we can check against? --99of9 03:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[Here] there is a png version (I think that is the only other one on the wiki world. Fale 08:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Thanks for linking that. There are significant differences (acorns, blue ribbon, narrow crown), are your choices based on an older original, or otherwise deliberate? --99of9 09:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC) Are deliberate based on the definition given by the municipality:"a green A on white field, insignia of municipality". I know that are a little bit different the two versions, this because the definition is not so strict. About the stuff out of the shield, they are the insignia of municipality. Fale 10:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then I'm worried that this might not match the insignia of the municipality? --99of9 03:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that you are worried about this, but this isn't true. I spoke even with other Italian people involved into municipal CoA and they told me that our is right, while sometimes the ones found the web are not exact. Fale 09:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll take your word on that, but it would still be nice to be able to cite an independent source for whether there should be olives on the olive branch, etc. --99of9 02:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Città di Caravaggio.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 07:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Offagna.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 07:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CoA Comune di Solofra.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 07:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

This banner came to my talk page since I nominated your picture for the Most Valued Review. I think it belongs to your talk page instead. Congratulations!

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pit stop in Formula One.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MattiPaavola (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what happened here, but it would seem the bot didn't handle this use case very gracefully. Something to look into, perhaps. I've tidied up the mess on the file description page. LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does this contain?? It seems damaged. Delete? -Aleator (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorie[edit]

Innanzitutto complimenti per i trasferimenti da it.wiki (se prosegui allo stesso ritmo anche per le immagini "normali", e non solo per quelle dei raduni, avremo da brindare). Attenzione alle categorie, questa era sbagliata. Di là ti ho lasciato anche un suggerimento per Flickr. --Nemo 11:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All your images have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


File:Fale - Spain - Nature - 36.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I have nominated File:Fale - Spain - Nature - 37.jpg too. They are both of quite bad quality. Hope its fine with you! --Amada44 (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizzare correttamente COA[edit]

Ciao Fale. Grazie per i bei stemmi di comuni italiani che hai caricato. Vorrei però invitarti ad essere più preciso in futuro nel categorizzarli correttamente. La categoria che hai dato a tutti i tuoi stemmi, formulata nel modo "Category:Coats of arms of Torino" è scorretta sotto tutti i punti di vista e semplicemente non esiste (e difatti le categorie, quando non esistono, ti compaiono in colore rosso e non blu o viola). Prima di tutto gli stemmi di comuni debbono essere categorizzati nella loro provincia di appartenenza, dunque "Coats of arms of the province of NomeCapoluogoDiProvincia". Se tu metti solo il nome del capoluogo di provincia (p.es. Torino), allora tu attribuisci a quel comune altri comuni che fanno sì parte della stessa provincia, ma non certo della stessa municipalità. Saprai certamente che in Italia una cosa sono i comuni, un'altra cosa sono le province; e sono entità ben diverse. Poi: le grandi città e i capoluoghi di provincia italiani in Commons sono (purtroppo) dati e categorizzati nel loro rispettivo nome in inglese. Quindi non Torino ma Turin, non Milano ma Milan, e così via Venice, Padua, Genoa, Florence, Rome, Naples, Syracuse. Quindi questi li devi dare in inglese. Infine, uno stemma deve anche essere categorizzato nella categoria che lo riguarda, insomma nel suo comune, altrimenti che lo carichi a fare? Insomma, la categoria provinciale era errata, il nome era in italiano, il comune era assente, insomma i tuoi bei stemmi non risultavano proprio da nessuna parte! Ora li ho tutti aggiustati. Ma in futuro, quando carichi degli stemmi, vatti a vedere un attimo quale è la categoria giusta da dare! Non è difficile e ti richiede solo un paio di secondi di tempo, basta che vai in Category:Coats of arms of Italy e poi te la cerchi nella sottocategoria delle municipalities. Ciao e buon lavoro! --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:David_sedaris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Captain-tucker (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Davidfosterwallace.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Davidfosterwallace.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lapidedimebag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Perhaps you could inform uploader on it-wiki? --MGA73 (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Faiyum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abbazia_Di_S.Eustachio_Nel_1900.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abbazia_Di_S.Eustachio_Nel_1900.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Trixt (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Lots of your images have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


File:1_scristina_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amada44 (talk) 07:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Fale_-_Giardini_Botanici_Hanbury_in_Ventimiglia_-_546.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amada44 (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an electric water heater?--1-1111 (talk) 11:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

da categorizzare[edit]

Ciao, vedo che hai caricato moltissime immagini, ma non sono utili se non vendono categorizzate, e spiegato cosa rappresentano. In particolare mi riferisco a queste foto. Vedi se si puo fare qualcosa. Tu solo puoi sapere a cosa si riferiscono... Ciao e buon lavoro --Llorenzi (talk) 19:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Fale - Spain - Cordoba - 75.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Fale - Spain - Granada - 163.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Corrupt file with unknown content format. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]